Racial/Ethnic Disparities/Differences in Hysterectomy Route in Women Likely Eligible for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Feasibility of pharmacogenetic-guided selection of postoperative analgesics in gynecologic surgery patients: a prospective, randomized, pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the feasibility of implementing a multigene pharmacogenetic (PGx) test and genotype-guided pharmacist recommendations into gynecologic perioperative workflows and fidelity to pharmacist genotype-guided postoperative analgesic recommendations.

METHODS

A randomized, prospective, open-label pilot study was conducted in gynecologic patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Participants received multigene PGx testing and were randomized to the PGx-guided group where results were returned to the electronic health record with pharmacist genotype-guided postoperative analgesic recommendations or usual care. Primary outcomes included the proportion of PGx results and pharmacist recommendations completed before surgery, the number of prescriptions in alignment with pharmacist recommendations, and the proportion of analgesics prescribed differing from usual care.

RESULTS

Of the 101 participants analyzed, all were female, 50 ± 14 years old, 49% were Black, 48% were White, 60% were treated by gynecologic oncology, and 76% underwent minimally invasive surgery. PGx results were returned to the genomics results portal a median of 7 (interquartile range: 6-9) business days after ordering the test. A majority (85%) of results were returned before the participant's surgery. Pharmacist genotype-guided analgesic recommendations were completed for 35 (73%) of the 48 participants in the PGx-guided group. And, 32 (91%) of the prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 23 (66%) of the prescribed opioids matched the pharmacist's recommendations. Barriers included missed pharmacist notes when surgery dates were moved and low use of study-specific order set.

CONCLUSION

PGx test results were available before most surgeries, but the pharmacist recommendations were not always followed. Enhanced implementation strategies will need to be developed in future genotype-guided protocols.

Rates of Minimally Invasive Surgery After Introduction of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Common General Surgery Operations

Importance

Many patients who would benefit from minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have open surgery; robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) addresses some of the limitations of laparoscopic surgery and could increase rates of MIS across different patient populations.

Objective

To determine whether the introduction of RAS increases MIS rates and whether increases are seen across different patient populations undergoing common general surgery procedures.

Design

A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare rates of MIS in the year before and after the index date for hospitals that did and did not introduce RAS. Generalized estimating equation regression models were used to compare rates in MIS over time.

Setting

PINC AI Healthcare Database, an all-payor discharge database of hospitals in the United States.

Participants

Hospitals that performed cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, ventral hernia repair, and colorectal resection from 2016 to 2022.

Exposure

RAS hospitals performing at least 1 common general surgery procedure using RAS.

Main Outcome and Measure

The primary analysis examined rates of MIS, defined as the rate of common general surgeries that were minimally invasive (laparoscopic or RAS) in a hospital. The secondary analysis examined MIS rates for common general surgeries, across age, sex, race, ethnicity, and payor.

Results

Of 408 hospitals included in the study, 153 (38%) introduced RAS for common general surgeries. The relative MIS rate for hospitals that introduced RAS compared with hospitals that did not went from 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14; P < 0.01) before the index date to 1.15 (95% CI, 1.09-1.22; P < 0.01) after the index date (P interaction < 0.01), indicating a larger increase in MIS rates among hospitals introducing RAS. MIS rates increased significantly more in hospitals that introduced RAS across patient age, sex, ethnicity, race, and payor compared with hospitals that did not introduce RAS.

Conclusions and Relevance

Hospitals that introduced RAS for common general surgery procedures were associated with an increase in MIS rates across different patient populations compared with hospitals that did not introduce RAS.

Language-Based Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between patient primary language and route of hysterectomy.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Database (SID) and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD).

SETTING

All inpatient and outpatient hysterectomies from the most recent year of available data (2020-2021) from the six states that record patient primary language in the SID and SASD (Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, and New Jersey) were queried.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 18 and over undergoing an inpatient or ambulatory hysterectomy for benign indication.

INTERVENTIONS

Minimally invasive hysterectomy compared to abdominal hysterectomy.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

The association between patient primary language (English vs. non-English) and route of hysterectomy (abdominal vs minimally invasive) was evaluated. The cohort included 52,226 patients who met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were non-Hispanic White (71%), with a median age of 46 years (IQR 40.0-53.0). 91.4% of patients spoke English as their primary language, 3.6% spoke Spanish, and 5.0% spoke another non-English language. Patients with a non-English primary language were significantly less likely to undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy compared to patients who spoke English (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.56-0.64, p <.001). This association remained significant following adjustments for age, race, insurance, median income, state, and fibroid, abnormal uterine bleeding, prolapse or endometriosis diagnosis (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84). In a sensitivity analysis of English vs Spanish vs other non-English language, the association remained significant for other non-English languages (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60-0.75) but not for Spanish (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83-1.09).

CONCLUSION

Patients who are non-English speaking are significantly less likely to receive a minimally invasive hysterectomy. Addressing language disparities may improve access to a minimally invasive route of surgery, a possible surrogate for improved surgical outcomes, for our gynecologic patients.

Hysterectomy and medical financial hardship among U.S. women

OBJECTIVE

Hysterectomy is one of the common surgical procedures for women in the United States. Studies show that hysterectomy is associated with elevated risk of developing chronic conditions, whichmay cause financial toxicity in patients. This study aimed to assess whether women who underwent hysterectomy had a higher risk of experiencing medical financial hardship compared to women who didn't.

METHODS

Using data on 32,823 adult women from the 2019 and 2021 waves of the National Health Interview Survey, we estimated binomial and multinomial logistic regressions to assess the relationship between hysterectomy and financial hardship, defined as problems paying or unable to pay any medical bills. Further, we performed a Karlson-Holm-Breen (KHB) decomposition to examine whether the association could be explained by chronic comorbidity.

RESULTS

While the prevalence of financial hardship was 13.6 % among all women, it was 16.2 % among women who underwent a hysterectomy. The adjusted odds of experiencing medical financial hardship among women with a hysterectomy were 1.36 (95 % CI: 1.22-1.52) times that of their counterparts who did not have a hysterectomy. The KHB decomposition suggested that 34.5 % of the size of the effect was attributable to chronic conditions. Women who had a hysterectomy were also 1.45 (95 % CI: 1.26-1.67) times more likely to have unpaid medical debts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that women, who underwent a hysterectomy in the US, were vulnerable to medical financial hardship. Policy makers and health professionals should be made aware of this issue to help women coping against this adversity.

High-Volume Surgeons and Reducing Racial Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine racial disparities in route of hysterectomy and perioperative outcomes before and after expansion of high-volume minimally invasive surgeons (>10 minimally invasive hysterectomies [MIHs]/year).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Multicenter academic teaching institution.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent a scheduled hysterectomy for benign indications during 2018 (preintervention) and 2022 (postintervention).

INTERVENTIONS

Recruitment of fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery-trained faculty and increased surgical training for academic specialists in obstetrics and gynecology occurred in 2020.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients in the preintervention cohort (n = 171) were older (median age, 45 years vs 43 years; p = .003) whereas patients in the postintervention cohort (n = 234) had a higher burden of comorbidities (26% American Society of Anesthesiologists class III vs 19%; p = .03). Uterine weight was not significantly different between cohorts (p = .328). Between the pre- and postintervention cohorts, high-volume minimally invasive surgeons increased from 27% (n = 4) to 44% (n = 7) of those performing hysterectomies within the division and percentage of hysterectomies performed via minimally invasive route increased (63% vs 82%; p <.001). In the preintervention cohort, Black patients had a lower percentage of hysterectomies performed via minimally invasive route than White patients (Black = 56% MIH vs White = 76% MIH; p = .014). In the postintervention cohort, differences by race were no longer significant (Black = 78% MIH vs White = 87% MIH; p = .127). There was a significant increase (22%) in MIH for Black patients between cohorts (p <.001). After adjusting for age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, previous surgery, and uterine weight, disparities by race were no longer present in the postintervention cohort. Perioperative outcomes including length of stay (p <.001), infection rates (p = .002), and blood loss (p = .01) improved after intervention.

CONCLUSION

Increasing fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery-trained gynecologic surgeons and providing more opportunities in robotic/laparoscopic training for academic specialists may improve access to MIH for Black patients and reduce disparities.

A National Database Study on Racial Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy With a Surrogate Control for Uterine Size: A Proposed Quality Metric for Benign Indications

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between race and route of hysterectomy among patients undergoing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in the absence of uterine myoma disease and excluding malignancy.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional cohort study utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Ambulatory Surgical databases to compare abdominal to minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy.

SETTING

Hospitals and hospital-affiliated ambulatory surgical centers participating in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project in 2019.

PATIENTS

A total of 75 838 patients who had undergone hysterectomy for AUB, excluding uterine myoma and malignancy.

INTERVENTIONS

n/a MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 75 838 hysterectomies performed for AUB in the absence of uterine myomas and malignancy, 10.1% were performed abdominally and 89.9% minimally invasively. After adjusting for confounders, Black patients were 38% more likely to undergo abdominal hysterectomy compared to White patients (OR 1.38, CI 1.12-1.70 p = .002). Black race, thus, is independently associated with open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Despite excluding uterine myomas as a risk factor for an abdominal route of hysterectomy, Black race remained an independent predictor for abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy, and Black patients were found to undergo a disproportionately higher rate of abdominal hysterectomy compared to White patients.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sacrocolpopexy Approach

IMPORTANCE

Racial inequity elevates risk for certain diagnoses and health disparities. Current data show disparities for Black women when comparing open versus minimally invasive hysterectomy. It is unknown if a similar disparity exists in surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether racial or ethnic disparities exist for open abdominal versus minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional data of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample and the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for the year 2019 was used. Bivariate analysis identified demographic and perioperative differences between abdominal versus minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, which were compared in a multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Forty-one thousand eight hundred thirty-seven patients underwent sacrocolpopexy: 35,820 (85.6%), minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, and 6,016, (14.4%) abdominal sacrocolpopexy. In an unadjusted analysis, Black patients were more likely to undergo an abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared to non-Hispanic White patients (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.16-3.92, P <0.01). Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared to non-Hispanic White patients (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.26-2.26, P <0.001). Other factors associated with abdominal sacrocolpopexy are zip code quartile, payer status, composite comorbidity score, hospital control, and hospital bed size. In the regression model, Black patients remained more likely to undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared to those who identified as White (aOR 2, 95% CI 1.26-3.16, P < 0.003). Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared to those who identified as White (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.31-2.28, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy was more likely to occur in patients who identified as Black or Hispanic.

Associations between race and ethnicity and perioperative outcomes among women undergoing hysterectomy for adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

To study racial and ethnic disparities among women undergoing hysterectomy performed for adenomyosis across the United States.

DESIGN

A cohort study.

SETTING

Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2012-2020.

PATIENTS

Patients with an adenomyosis diagnosis.

INTERVENTION

Hysterectomy for adenomyosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th editions codes 617.0 and N80.0 (endometriosis of the uterus). Hysterectomies were classified on the basis of the Current Procedural Terminology codes. We compared baseline and surgical characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications across the different racial and ethnic groups. Postoperative complications were classified into minor and major complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

RESULTS

A total of 12,599 women underwent hysterectomy for adenomyosis during the study period: 8,822 (70.0%) non-Hispanic White, 1,597 (12.7%) Hispanic, 1,378 (10.9%) non-Hispanic Black or African American, 614 (4.9%) Asian, 97 (0.8%) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and 91 (0.7%) American Indian or Alaska Native. Postoperative complications occurred in 8.8% of cases (n = 1,104), including major complications in 3.1% (n = 385). After adjusting for confounders, non-Hispanic Black race and ethnicity were independently associated with an increased risk of major complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] {1.16-2.04}). Laparotomy was performed in 13.7% (n = 1,725) of cases. Compared with non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity, the adjusted odd ratios for undergoing laparoscopy were 0.58 (95% CI 0.50-0.67) for Hispanic, 0.56 (95% CI 0.48-0.65) for non-Hispanic Black or African American, 0.33 (95% CI 0.27-0.40) for Asian, and 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.41) for Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander race and ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

Among women undergoing hysterectomy for postoperatively diagnosed adenomyosis, non-Hispanic Black or African American race and ethnicity were associated with an increased risk of major postoperative complications. Compared with non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity, Hispanic ethnicity, non-Hispanic Black or African American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander race and ethnicity were less likely to undergo minimally invasive surgery.

Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Following Hysterectomy in the Department of Defense

INTRODUCTION

Hysterectomy is the most common major gynecologic procedure performed in the USA. Surgical complications, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are known risks that can be mitigated by preoperative risk stratification and perioperative prophylaxis. Based on recent data, the current post-hysterectomy VTE rate is found to be 0.5%. Postoperative VTE significantly impacts health care costs and patients' quality of life. Additionally, for active duty personnel, it can negatively impact military readiness. We hypothesize that the incidence of post-hysterectomy VTE rates will be lower within the military beneficiary population because of the benefits of universal health care coverage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Military Health System (MHS) Data Repository and Management Analysis and Reporting Tool was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of postoperative VTE rates within 60 days of surgery among women who underwent a hysterectomy at a military treatment facility between October 1, 2013, and July 7, 2020. Patient demographics, Caprini risk assessment, preoperative VTE prophylaxis, and surgical details were obtained by chart review. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-squared test and Student t-test.

RESULTS

Among the 23,391 women who underwent a hysterectomy at a military treatment facility from October 2013 to July 2020, 79 (0.34%) women were diagnosed with VTE within 60 days of their surgery. This post-hysterectomy VTE incidence rate (0.34%) is significantly lower than the current national rate (0.5%, P < .0015). There were no significant differences in postoperative VTE rates with regard to race/ethnicity, active duty status, branch of service, or military rank. Most women with post-hysterectomy VTE had a moderate-to-high (4.29 ± 1.5) preoperative Caprini risk score; however, only 25% received preoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

MHS beneficiaries (active duty personnel, dependents, and retirees) have full medical coverage with little to no personal financial burden for their health care. We hypothesized a lower VTE rate in the Department of Defense because of universal access to care and a presumed younger and healthier population. The postoperative VTE incidence was significantly lower in the military beneficiary population (0.34%) compared to the reported national incidence (0.5%). Additionally, despite all VTE cases having moderate-to-high preoperative Caprini risk scores, the majority (75%) received only sequential compression devices for preoperative VTE prophylaxis. Although post-hysterectomy VTE rates are low within the Department of Defense, additional prospective studies are needed to determine if stricter adherence to preoperative chemoprophylaxis can further reduce post-hysterectomy VTE rates within the MHS.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Care in Latinx Communities

The Latinx community represents the largest racial minority population in the nation. There are significant barriers to care and treatment as it relates to obstetrics and gynecology. Understanding cultural considerations is essential to improving care in this community. Public health strategies as well as policies to address racial health disparities facing the Latinx community are explored in this article.

Survival differences by race and surgical approach in early-stage operable cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if the higher rate of open radical hysterectomy in Black patients, prior to the widespread return to open surgical techniques, mitigated survival disparities and to identify other actionable factors to target for systemic change.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study including patients from the National Cancer Database with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy from 2010 to 2018. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and survival were compared by race and surgical route. Kaplan-Meier plots were constructed. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust for covariates.

RESULTS

7201 patients were eligible for inclusion, 687 (9.5%) Black and 4870 (68%) White. We found that 51% of Black patients and 39% of White patients underwent open surgery. Black patients were 10% less likely to receive Guideline Concordant Care (GCC). Those with publicly-funded insurance had a 40% higher hazard of death compared to private insurance (CI 1.19-1.73 p < 0.001). Black patients who had open surgery had similar 5-year survival compared to White patients who had MIS surgery (0.90 vs 0.91, NS). After adjusting for potential confounders including age, insurance, nodal status, and lymphovascular space invasion, Black patients who had surgery had a 40% higher hazard for death (HR 1.40 95% CI 1.10-1.79, p = 0.007) compared to White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower 5 and 10-year survival was seen in Black patients, regardless of surgical approach. Adjustment for significant covariates did not resolve this disparity, confirming that these factors do not fully account racial disparities.

Health Care Disparities in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To explore how markers of health care disparity are associated with access to care and outcomes among patients seeking and undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through January 23, 2022.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The population of interest included patients in the United States who sought or underwent hysterectomy by any approach for benign indications. Health care disparity markers included race, ethnicity, geographic location, insurance status, and others. Outcomes included access to surgery, patient level outcomes, and surgical outcomes. Eligible studies reported multivariable regression analyses that described the independent association between at least one health care disparity risk marker and an outcome. We evaluated direction and strengths of association within studies and consistency across studies.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Of 6,499 abstracts screened, 39 studies with a total of 46 multivariable analyses were included. Having a Black racial identity was consistently associated with decreased access to minimally invasive, laparoscopic, robotic, and vaginal hysterectomy. Being of Hispanic ethnicity and having Asian or Pacific Islander racial identities were associated with decreased access to laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy. Black patients were the only racial or ethnic group with an increased association with hysterectomy complications. Medicare insurance was associated with decreased access to laparoscopic hysterectomy, and both Medicaid and Medicare insurance were associated with increased likelihood of hysterectomy complications. Living in the South or Midwest or having less than a college degree education was associated with likelihood of prior hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

Studies suggest that various health care disparity markers are associated with poorer access to less invasive hysterectomy procedures and with poorer outcomes for patients who are undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Further research is needed to understand and identify the causes of these disparities, and immediate changes to our health care system are needed to improve access and opportunities for patients facing health care disparities.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021234511.

Hysterectomy inequities between black and white patients in the US military health system: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate multicomponent aspects of hysterectomy-related care in the US Military Health System including the probability of open hysterectomy (versus vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy), probability of having a length of stay > 1 day, and discharge milligram morphine equivalent dose (MED). Analyses sought to identify the presence and strength of healthcare inequities between Black and white patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, records of patients (N = 11,067) ages 18-65 years enrolled in TRICARE who underwent a hysterectomy between January 2017 to January 2021 in US military treatment facilities (direct care) or civilian facilities (purchased care) were included. Graphic representations illustrated provider and facility variation. Generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) evaluated inequities across outcomes. Sensitivity analyses included only direct care receipt and added a random effect for the facility.

RESULTS

There was significant variation in provider use of open versus vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomies, as well as provider and facility discharge MED. The GAMMs indicated Black patients were more likely to receive an open hysterectomy [log(OR) -0.54, (95 %CI -0.65, -0.43), p < 0.001] and have a length of stay > 1 day [log(OR) 0.18, (95 %CI 0.07, 0.30), p = 0.002], but had similar discharge MED [-2 mg (95% CI -7 mg, 3 mg), p = 0.51], relative to white patients. Patients receiving care in purchased care, relative to direct care, were more likely to receive a vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy [log(OR) 0.28, (95 %CI 0.17, 0.38), p = 0.002] and received approximately 21 mg lower discharge MED (95 %CI 16-26 mg less, p < 0.001), but were more likely to have a hospital stay > 1 day [log(OR) 0.95, (95 %CI 0.83, 0.1.10), p < 0.001]. Additional gynecological conditions (e.g., uterine fibroids) and prescription receipt were associated with some, but not all outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Improving timely care receipt, especially for uterine fibroids, increasing access to vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies, and reducing unwarranted variation in discharge MED could improve care quality and equity in the US Military Health System.

Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Assess outcomes of interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with laparotomy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 2013 and 2018 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS were identified in the National Cancer Database. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were 5-year survival, 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality, extent of surgery, residual disease, hospitalization duration, surgical conversions, and unplanned readmissions. Propensity score matching was used to compare MIS and laparotomy for IDS. Association of treatment approach with overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for effect of unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 7897 patients met inclusion criteria; 2021 (25.6%) underwent MIS. Percentage undergoing MIS increased from 20.3%-29.0% over the study period. After propensity score matching, median overall survival was 46.7 months in the MIS group versus 41.0 months in the laparotomy group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (95%CI 0.79-0.94)]. Five-year survival probability was higher in MIS versus laparotomy (38.3% vs 34.8%, p < 0.01). There was lower 30- and 90-day mortality (0.3% vs 0.7% [p = 0.04] and 1.4% vs 2.5% [p = 0.01], respectively), shorter length of stay (median 3 vs 5 days, p < 0.01), lower residual disease (23.9% vs 26.7%, p < 0.01), and lower additional cytoreductive procedures (59.3% vs 70.8%, p < 0.01) in MIS compared to laparotomy, with similar rates of unplanned readmission (2.7% vs 3.1%, p = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo IDS by MIS have similar overall survival and decreased morbidity compared with laparotomy.

Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis: a systematic review and application of social, structural, and political context

IMPORTANCE

Uterine fibroids and endometriosis are 2 of the leading causes of morbidity among reproductive-aged women. There are significant racial disparities in disease prevalence, incidence, age of onset, and treatment profile in fibroids. The data on endometriosis are less clear.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of racial disparities in prevalence of uterine fibroids and endometriosis in the United States and summarize the literature on these 2 highly prevalent benign gynecologic conditions using a framework that explicitly incorporates and acknowledges the social, structural, and political contexts as a root cause of racial disparities between Black and White women.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A systematic review regarding racial disparities in prevalence of fibroids and endometriosis was conducted separately. Two separate searches were conducted in PubMed to identify relevant original research manuscripts and prior systematic reviews regarding racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis using standardized search terms. In addition, we conducted a structured literature search to provide social, structural, and political context of the disparities.

FINDINGS

A systematic review of the literature indicated that the prevalence of uterine fibroids was consistently higher in Black than in White women with the magnitude of the difference varying depending on population and case definition. Prevalence of endometriosis varied considerably depending on the base population and case definition, but was the same or lower among Black vs. White women. As a result of the social, structural, and political context in the United States, Black women disproportionately experience a range of exposures across the life course that may contribute to their increased uterine fibroid incidence, prevalence, and severity of uterine fibroids. However, data suggest no racial difference in the incidence of endometriosis. Nevertheless, Black women with fibroids or endometriosis experience worse clinical and surgical outcomes than their White counterparts.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis can be linked with differential exposures to suspected etiologic agents, lack of adequate access to health care, including highly skilled gynecologic surgeons, and bias and discrimination within the health care system. Eliminating these racial disparities will require solutions that address root causes of health disparities through policy, education and programs to ensure that all patients receive culturally- and structurally-competent care.

Disparities in Benign Gynecologic Surgical Care

A person's health is not only affected by their disease states, but also the quality of care and posttreatment sequelae. Research shows that disparities exist in benign gynecologic surgery access to care, techniques, and perioperative outcomes. Surgical education, pathways that emphasize minimally invasive approaches, and patient-centered care that recognizes historical influences on patient perspectives are critical to dampening these disparities.

Postoperative Complications of Appendectomy in Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Indications

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether concomitant appendectomy in patients who undergo laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic indications is associated with increased rates of complications in the 30-day postoperative period.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery by a gynecologist. Patients were excluded if they underwent open abdominal surgeries, bowel resections, urogynecologic surgeries, or if diagnoses of cancer or appendicitis were present. There were 246,987 patients included in the population cohort from 2010 to 2020. Demographic information and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent concomitant appendectomy were compared with patients who did not undergo appendectomy. A matched cohort was created by computing propensity scores, and outcomes were again compared between groups. All patients undergoing appendectomy were 1:1 matched to a unique patient who did not undergo appendectomy using a greedy matching based on the propensity score calculated from demographic and surgical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 1,760 patients (0.7%) underwent concomitant appendectomy. There was an 8.0% complication rate in the appendectomy group, compared with 5.5% in the group of those without appendectomy ( P <.001), and this was similar to the results in the propensity-matched sample. Patients who underwent appendectomy had significantly higher rates of readmission (4.3% vs 2.3%), which remained significant in the propensity-matched sample. There were no differences in the rates of postoperative thromboembolic events, blood transfusion, or reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Patients who are undergoing concomitant appendectomy have an increased risk of any complication and hospital readmission. Additional studies may be conducted to identify patients with optimal risk benefit profiles when considering performing concomitant appendectomy at time of gynecologic surgery.

Who Places High Value on the Uterus? A Cross-sectional Survey Study Evaluating Predictors for Uterine Preservation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine predictors for placing high value on the uterus in patients who no longer desire fertility. The secondary objective was to identify reasons for placing high value on the uterus.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey study.

SETTING

Three hospitals within a large healthcare system in the United States.

PATIENTS

New patients ≥45 years old seeking care for benign gynecologic conditions, including abnormal uterine bleeding, uterine myomas, pelvic organ prolapse, endometriosis, or pelvic pain.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the summative score of the validated Value of Uterus (VALUS) instrument for measuring value placed on the uterus and the validated visual analog scale with the question "how important is it to you to keep your uterus when you have a gynecologic condition?" A total of 163 surveys were returned for analysis (79.2%). Using the VALUS cutoff, 64 patients (45.7%) were considered to have low value for their uterus (VALUS score <14), whereas 76 patients (54.3%) were considered to have high value for their uterus (VALUS score ≥14). The adjusted odds of placing high value for the uterus was 5.06 times higher among those who wanted to be sexually active in the future than those who do not desire to be sexually active (95% confidence interval, 1.55-16.52, p = .01). Patients who are sexually active have 3.94 higher adjusted odds of placing high value on the uterus than those who are not sexually active and do not desire to be (95% confidence interval, 1.36-11.43; p = .01). Race, religion, and personal history of cancer were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients who highly value the uterus were highly motivated by the desire to be sexually active. Nonwhite race, religion, and personal history of cancer were not predictors for placing high value on uterine preservation.

Racial Differences in Urinary Catheter Use Among Female Nursing Home Residents

OBJECTIVE

To assess racial differences in prevalence of indwelling urinary catheterization and intermittent catheterization among female NH residents in the United States (US).

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis using the 2019 Minimum Data Set 3.0 and developed a multivariable logistic regression model to examine the association between catheter use and race. Moderation analyses were performed to clarify significant associations.

RESULTS

Our study cohort was composed of 597,966 women, who were predominantly of White race with a median age of 80 years. Eight percent (n=47,799) of female residents had indwelling catheters, and 0.5% (n=2,876) used intermittent catheterization. Black residents had a 7% lower odds of having an indwelling catheter (aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96), and a 38% lower odds of utilizing intermittent catheterization (aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.71) compared to White residents when controlling for common factors associated with catheter use. In moderation analyses, Black residents with age under 80 years and BMI of 35 kg/m2 or greater were less likely to have an indwelling catheter than age- and BMI-matched White residents.

CONCLUSION

Racial differences in both indwelling and intermittent catheterization prevalence exist in female NH residents. These disparities should be further clarified to reduce bias in NH care.

Uterine Weight as a Modifier of Black/White Racial Disparities in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Among Veterans with Fibroids in the Veterans Health Administration

Introduction

Uterine fibroids are the most common indication for hysterectomy. Minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) confers lower risk of complications and shorter recovery than open surgical procedures; however, it is more challenging to perform with larger fibroids. There are racialized differences in fibroid size and MIH rates. We examined the role of uterine size in black-white differences in MIH among Veterans in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Methods

Using VA clinical and administrative data, we conducted a cross-sectional study among black and white Veterans with fibroids who underwent hysterectomy between 2012 and 2014. We abstracted postoperative uterine weight from pathology reports as a proxy for uterine size. We used a generalized linear model to estimate the association between race and MIH and tested an interaction between race and postoperative uterine weight (≤250 g vs. >250 g). We estimated adjusted marginal effects for racial differences in MIH by postoperative uterine weight.

Results

The sample included 732 Veterans (60% black, 40% white). Postoperative uterine weight modified the association of race and MIH (p for interaction=0.05). Black Veterans with postoperative uterine weight ≤250 g had a nearly 12-percentage point decrease in MIH compared to white Veterans (95% CI -23.1 to -0.5), with no difference by race among those with postoperative uterine weight >250 g.

Discussion

The racial disparity among Veterans with small fibroids who should be candidates for MIH underscores the role of other determinants beyond uterine size. To eliminate disparities in MIH, research focused on experiences of black Veterans, including pathways to treatment and provider-patient interactions, is needed.

Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Perioperative Outcomes During Hysterectomy for Endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether complications incurred during hysterectomy for the treatment of endometriosis differ among racial-ethnic groups.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2019. This database is a robust, comprehensive, multi-institutional database with nearly 700 participating hospitals.

PATIENTS

Patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis or with an endometriosis-associated symptom as the primary indication for surgery and surgical intraoperative documentation of endometriosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Compare perioperative complications based on patient race and ethnicity.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 5639 patients underwent hysterectomy for endometriosis; of these, 4368 were White patients (77.5%), 528 Black patients (9.4%), 491 Hispanic patients (8.7%), 252 Asian patients (4.5%). There was no association between location of endometriosis and patient race and ethnicity. However, White patients had highest rate, and Asian patients had the lowest rate of laparoscopic hysterectomy, 85.3% vs 69.8%, respectively (p <.01). In addition, there were differences in concomitant procedures performed at time of hysterectomy based on race and ethnicity, with White patients having the highest rates of adnexal/peritoneal surgery at 12.5% (p <.01) compared with patients of the other racial and ethnic groups. Asian patients had the highest rate of ureteral surgery at 6.8% (p <.01) and highest rate of intestinal surgery at 16.3% (p <.01) compared with patients of other racial and ethnic groups. There was no association of rates of concomitant bladder surgery, appendectomy, or rectal surgery with patient race and ethnicity. Black patients had the highest rate of minor complications at 13.5% (p <.01) and the highest rate of major complications at 6.6% (p <.01) compared with patients of other racial and ethnic groups. After multivariable analysis, Black patients still had increased odds of having a major complication compared with patients of other racial and ethnic groups even after controlling for patient characteristics and perioperative factors such as endometriosis lesion location, surgical approach, and concomitant procedures (odds ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.45).

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis lesion location did not differ with patient race and ethnicity. However, patient race and ethnicity did have an impact on the surgical approach and the concomitant surgical procedures performed at time of hysterectomy. Black patients had the highest odds of major complications.

The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Myomas

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for uterine myomas is used differentially based on race and ethnicity.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Quaternary care academic hospital in the United States.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine myomas between March 15, 2015, and March 14, 2020 (N = 1311). Cases involving correction of pelvic organ prolapse, malignancy, peripartum hysterectomy, or combined procedures with nongynecologic specialties were excluded. Racial/ethnic composition of the study population was 40.0% non-Hispanic white (white), 27.9% non-Hispanic black (black), 14.0% Hispanic, 13.7% non-Hispanic Asian (Asian), and 4.3% non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native/Pacific Islander/Other.

INTERVENTIONS

Hysterectomy, myomectomy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 1311 cases, 35.9% were minimally invasive hysterectomy, 16.4% abdominal hysterectomy, 35.6% minimally invasive myomectomy, and 12.1% abdominal myomectomy. MIS rates were 94.7% among fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgery subspecialists, 44.2% among obstetrics and gynecology specialists, and 46.8% among gynecologic oncologists. There were disparities in surgeon type based on race/ethnicity, with 59.8% of white patients having undergone surgery with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery subspecialist vs 44.0% of black patients and 45.7% of Hispanic patients. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo MIS overall vs white patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.48 and aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.72, respectively). Black and Hispanic patients undergoing hysterectomy were less likely than white patients to undergo MIS (aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.51 and aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.60, respectively). There were no significant differences in rates of MIS based on race/ethnicity for myomectomies nor differences in major or minor complications by race/ethnicity overall.

CONCLUSION

At a quaternary care institution, black and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely than white patients to undergo MIS for uterine myomas, particularly for hysterectomy.

Predicting major complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open hysterectomy for benign indications

BACKGROUND

Hysterectomy, the most common gynecological operation, requires surgeons to counsel women about their operative risks. We aimed to develop and validate multivariable logistic regression models to predict major complications of laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions.

METHODS

We obtained routinely collected health administrative data from the English National Health Service (NHS) from 2011 to 2018. We defined major complications based on core outcomes for postoperative complications including ureteric, gastrointestinal and vascular injury, and wound complications. We specified 11 predictors a priori. We used internal-external cross-validation to evaluate discrimination and calibration across 7 NHS regions in the development cohort. We validated the final models using data from an additional NHS region.

RESULTS

We found that major complications occurred in 4.4% (3037/68 599) of laparoscopic and 4.9% (6201/125 971) of abdominal hysterectomies. Our models showed consistent discrimination in the development cohort (laparoscopic, C-statistic 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.62; abdominal, C-statistic 0.67, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.70) and similar or better discrimination in the validation cohort (laparoscopic, C-statistic 0.67, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.69; abdominal, C-statistic 0.67, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.69). Adhesions were most predictive of complications in both models (laparoscopic, odds ratio [OR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.13; abdominal, OR 2.46, 95% CI 2.27 to 2.66). Other factors predictive of complications included adenomyosis in the laparoscopic model, and Asian ethnicity and diabetes in the abdominal model. Protective factors included age and diagnoses of menstrual disorders or benign adnexal mass in both models and diagnosis of fibroids in the abdominal model.

INTERPRETATION

Personalized risk estimates from these models, which showed moderate discrimination, can inform clinical decision-making for people with benign conditions who may require hysterectomy.

Trends and predictors of hysterectomy prevalence among women in the United States

BACKGROUND

Hysterectomy is the most common nonobstetrical medical procedure performed in US women. Evaluating hysterectomy prevalence trends and determinants is important for estimating gynecologic cancer rates and management of uterine conditions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess hysterectomy prevalence trends and determinants using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2006-2016).

STUDY DESIGN

We estimated crude hysterectomy prevalences and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations of race or ethnicity, age group (5-year), body mass index (categorical), smoking status, education, insurance, income, and US region with hysterectomy. Missing data were imputed. The number of women in each survey year ranged from 220,302 in 2006 to 275,631 in 2016.

RESULTS

Although overall hysterectomy prevalence changed little between 2006 and 2016 (21.4% and 21.1%, respectively), hysterectomy prevalence was lower in 2016 than in 2006 among women aged ≥40 years, particularly among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women. Current smoking (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.41), increasing age (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.40), living in the South compared with the Midwest (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.39), higher body mass index (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.27), Black race compared with White (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.13), and having insurance compared with being uninsured (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.30) were most strongly associated with increased prevalence. Hispanic ethnicity and living in the Northeast were most strongly associated with decreased prevalence (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.76; odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.69).

CONCLUSION

Nationwide hysterectomy prevalence decreased among women aged ≥40 years from 2006 to 2016, particularly among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women. Age, non-Hispanic Black race, having insurance, current smoking, and living in the South were associated with increased odds of hysterectomy, even after accounting for possible explanatory factors. Further research is needed to better understand associations of race and ethnicity and region with hysterectomy prevalence.

Social Vulnerability Index and Surgical Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Reproductive-Age Women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether surgical management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is associated with Social Vulnerability Index (SVI).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Seven hospitals and four ambulatory surgery centers within large New York health system.

PATIENTS

All patients 15-45 years of age who underwent either a hysterectomy or myomectomy for AUB between January 2019 and October 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

None. Home addresses were linked to Census tracts and SVI scores. SVI is composed of 4 themes that potentially influence a community's vulnerability to health stressors: socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between SVI and surgical procedure/approach, adjusting for: age, race and ethnicity, marital status, insurance, language, body mass index, and prior abdominal surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 1,628 patients were included. On regression analysis between SVI quarters and type of surgery, the odds of laparotomy for the hysterectomy group were not impacted by SVI composite score both before and after adjusting for alternative factors (OR and aOR). Amongst those who had a myomectomy, individuals in SVI Q3 had 1.86 (95% CI: 1.27 to 2.72) higher odds of having a laparotomy versus those in SVI Q1. Individuals in SVI Q4 had 1.74 (95% CI: 1.15 to 2.62) higher odds of having a laparotomy versus those in SVI Q1. While some unadjusted odds ratios were statistically significant in the myomectomy group, when adjusted for social, demographic and economic factors the results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients living in more vulnerable communities are less likely to have minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for management of AUB. Neighborhood characteristics are independently associated with surgical procedure and approach.

Racial and ethnic disparities in surgical care for endometriosis across the United States

BACKGROUND

Despite an estimated 10% prevalence of endometriosis among reproductive-age women, surgical population-based data are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate racial and ethnic disparities in surgical interventions and complications among patients undergoing endometriosis surgery across the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2010 to 2018 identifying International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision codes for endometriosis We compared procedures, surgical routes (laparoscopy vs laparotomy), and 30-day postoperative complications by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

We identified 11,936 patients who underwent surgery for endometriosis (65% White, 8.2% Hispanic, 7.3% Black or African American, 6.2% Asian, 1.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 0.6% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 11.5% of unknown race). Perioperative complications occurred in 9.6% of cases. After adjusting for confounders, being Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.64), Black or African American (adjusted odds ratio, 1.71; confidence interval, 1.39-2.10), Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (adjusted odds ratio, 2.08; confidence interval, 1.28-3.37), or American Indian or Alaska Native (adjusted odds ratio, 2.34; confidence interval, 1.32-4.17) was associated with surgical complications. Hysterectomies among Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio, 1.68; confidence interval, 1.38-2.06), Black or African American (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; confidence interval, 1.43-2.18), Asian (adjusted odds ratio, 1.87; confidence interval, 1.43-2.46), Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (adjusted odds ratio, 4.16; confidence interval, 2.14-8.10), and patients of unknown race or ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio, 2.07; confidence interval, 1.75-2.47) were more likely to be open. Being Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; confidence interval, 1.16-2.30) or Black or African American (adjusted odds ratio, 2.64; confidence interval, 1.95-3.58) was also associated with receipt of laparotomy for nonhysterectomy procedures. The likelihood of undergoing oophorectomy was increased for Hispanic and Black women (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; confidence interval, 1.96-3.37 and adjusted odds ratio, 2.06; confidence interval, 1.51-2.80, respectively), especially at younger ages.

CONCLUSION

Race and ethnicity were independently associated with surgical care for endometriosis, with elevated complication rates experienced by Hispanic, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and American Indian or Alaska Native patients.

Avoidable bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at hysterectomy: a large retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the proportion of justified bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) at hysterectomy, based on pathologic diagnosis, and determine prevalence of avoidable BSO based on pre- and intraoperative considerations and pathologic diagnosis.

METHODS

Retrospective review of hysterectomies at seven Ontario, Canada hospitals from 2016 to 2019. Surgeries completed by oncologists or for invasive placentation were excluded. Patient, case, and surgeon characteristics were recorded along with pathologic diagnoses. Avoidable BSO criteria were: preoperative diagnosis of cervical dysplasia or benign diagnosis other than endometriosis, gender dysphoria, risk reduction or premenstrual dysphoric disorder; age < 51 years; absence of intraoperative endometriosis and adhesions; unjustified pathology (where "justified" pathology was endometriosis or (pre)malignant diagnosis except for cervical dysplasia). Patients with avoidable BSO were compared to those having at least one criterion for BSO. Binary logistic regression identified factors most strongly associated with avoidable BSO.

RESULTS

Four thousand one hundred ninety-one hysterectomies were completed with 1,422 (33.9%) patients having concomitant BSO. Pathologic diagnosis justified BSO in most patients (1,035/1,422, 72.8%) with endometrial cancer being most common (439/1,422, 30.9%). When preoperative characteristics, intraoperative findings, and pathologic diagnoses were considered, 79 of 1,422 (5.6%) BSOs were avoidable. Compared to cases with at least one criterion for BSO, avoidable BSOs were more frequently completed by generalists (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.10-2.99, P  = 0.021), for preoperative diagnoses of abnormal uterine bleeding/menorrhagia (OR 3.82, 95% CI 2.35-6.30, P  = 0.001) and fibroids (OR 4.25, 95% CI 2.63-6.92, P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pathologic diagnosis justified most BSOs at hysterectomy. BSO was avoidable in 5.6% of patients, underscoring the need to standardize practice of BSO.

Racial and ethnic differences in the adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States

BACKGROUND

Clinicians in the United States have rapidly adopted opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. However, little is known about racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption. Surgical innovations in gynecology may be adopted differentially across racial and ethnic groups, exacerbating current disparities in quality of care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption across inpatient and outpatient settings and assess the effect of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use on these differences.

STUDY DESIGN

A sample of 650,905 women aged 18 to 50 years undergoing hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or surgical sterilization from 2011 to 2018 was identified using the Premier Healthcare Database, an all-payer hospital administrative database, including more than 700 hospitals across the United States. The association between race and ethnicity and opportunistic salpingectomy use was examined using multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects log-binomial regression models accounting for hospital-level clustering. Models included race and ethnicity by year of surgery (2011-2013 [before guideline] and 2014-2018 [after guideline]) interaction term to test whether racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption changed with the release of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2018, 82,792 women underwent hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy (non-Hispanic White, 60.3%; non-Hispanic Black, 18.8%; Hispanic, 12.2%; non-Hispanic other race, 8.7%) and 23,398 women underwent opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization (non-Hispanic White, 64.7%; non-Hispanic Black, 10.8%; Hispanic, 16.7%; non-Hispanic other race, 7.8%). The proportion of hysterectomy procedures involving an opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 6.3% in 2011 to 59.7% in 2018 (9.5-fold increase), and the proportion of sterilization procedures involving an opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 0.7% in 2011 to 19.4% in 2018 (27.7-fold increase). In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black (risk ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.97), Hispanic (risk ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.00), and non-Hispanic other race women (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.96) were less likely to undergo hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy than non-Hispanic White women. A significant interaction between race and ethnicity and year of surgery was noted in non-Hispanic Black compared with non-Hispanic White women (P<.001), with a reduction in differences in hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy use after national guideline release (risk ratio_2011-2013, 0.80 [95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.88]; risk ratio_2014-2018, 0.98 [95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.01]). Moreover, non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to undergo an opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization than non-Hispanic White women (risk ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.95), with no difference by year of surgery (P=.62). Stratified analyses by hysterectomy route and age at surgery revealed similar results.

CONCLUSION

Although opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention has been rapidly adopted in the United States, our findings suggested that its adoption has not been equitable across racial and ethnic groups. Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other race women were less likely to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy than non-Hispanic White women even after adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, procedural, hospital, and provider characteristics. These differences persisted after the release of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use. Future research should focus on understanding the reasons for these differences to inform interventions that promote equity in opportunistic salpingectomy use.

Health Care Disparities in Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Contemporary Nationwide Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to compare the rate of native tissue repair (NTR) versus sacrocolpopexy (SCP) and reconstructive (RECON) versus obliterative repair (OBR) for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), evaluating for health care disparities based on race, socioeconomic, and geographic factors.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients older than 18 years undergoing POP surgery from 2008 to 2018. Baseline demographics, comorbidity index, socioeconomic, and hospital variables were extracted. The weighted t test, Wilcoxon test, and χ2 test were used to compare the rate of (1) NTR versus SCP and (2) RECON vs OBR. Multivariate weighted logistic regression was used to compare while controlling for confounders. Reference groups were White race, Medicare patients, northeast region, small hospital size, and rural location.

RESULTS

Of 71,262 patients, 67,382 (94.6%) underwent RECON. Patients undergoing OBR were older and had a higher comorbidity score. Multivariate analysis showed the following: (1) Black, Hispanic, and other races; (2) Medicaid patients; (3) patients at urban teaching hospitals are less likely to receive RECON. Patients in the midwest were more likely to receive RECON. Among 68,401 patients, 23,808 (34.8%), and 44,593 (65.19%) underwent SCP and NTR, respectively. Hysterectomy was more common in the NTR group. Multivariate analysis showed the following:(1) Black, Hispanic, and "other" races; (2) uninsured and Medicaid patients; (3) patients in the midwest, south, and west were at higher odds of receiving NTR. Patients in large and urban hospitals were less likely to undergo NTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities exist in surgical management for POP warranting further study to seek to eliminate these disparities.

Comparison of urethral sling surgery and non-ablative vaginal Erbium:YAG laser treatment in 327 patients with stress urinary incontinence: a case-matching analysis

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurs when abdominal pressure, such as from coughing or sneezing, causes urine leakage. We retrospectively compared tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and non-ablative vaginal Erbium:YAG laser treatment (VEL) by propensity score (PS) analysis in women with SUI. No PS analysis studies have investigated urethral sling surgery using polypropylene TVT and VEL for SUI. Data from patients aged 35-50 years who were treated for SUI and registered at several institutions were selected. Patients with medical records covering 1 year for the 1-h pad test, who completed the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), were included. We analyzed 102, 113, and 112 patients in the TVT, VEL, and control groups, respectively. Compared with the control group, the TVT and VEL groups exhibited significant improvement in the 1-h pad test and ICIQ-SF. In the PS analysis, the TVT and VEL groups similarly improved in the 1-h pad test and ICIQ-SF. As for the OABSS, the VEL group showed significantly greater improvement than the TVT group. In the odds ratio analysis for the 1-h pad test, no differences in any of the parameters were observed between TVT and VEL. VEL may be considered an alternative to TVT for SUI treatment.

Racial Disparities in Surgery for Malignant Bowel Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Operative management of patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) may provide effective palliation, but is associated with substantial risks. This study aimed to analyze racial and ethnic differences in surgical outcomes for patients with MBO.

METHODS

This retrospective study, using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry data from 2010 to 2019, compared differences in outcomes by race and ethnicity for 2762 patients undergoing surgery for MBO. Multivariable logistic regression controlled for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

Black patients (n = 407) had higher rates of preoperative comorbidity and were more likely than White patients (n = 2081) to have major complications (28.5% vs 21.8%; p = 0.0031), overall complications (47.4% vs 40.4%; p = 0.0087), a longer median hospital stay (12 days; interquartile range [IQR, 8-19 days] vs 10 days [IQR, 7-17 days]; p = 0.0007), and unplanned readmission (17.1% vs 12.9%; p = 0.0266). Black patients had a similar mortality rate to that of White patients and were less frequently discharged to home (67.6% vs 73.0%; p = 0.0315). Differences in morbidity between Black patients and White patients persisted after controlling for potentially confounding variables. Hispanic patients had lower mortality than White patients (6.3% vs 13.1%; p = 0.0130) and a longer hospital stay (12 days [IQR, 8-18 days] vs 10 days [IQR, 7-17 days]; p = 0.0313). Outcomes did not differ between Asian patients and White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated significant disparities for Black patients undergoing surgery for MBO. Understanding and addressing what drives these differences, including systemic inequalities such as access to care and racial biases, is essential to the achievement of more equitable, higher-quality patient care.

Single Evaluation of Use of a Mixed Reality Headset for Intra-Procedural Image-Guidance during a Mock Laparoscopic Myomectomy on an Ex-Vivo Fibroid Model

Uterine fibroids represent the highest prevalence of benign tumors in women, with reports ranging from 4.5% to 68.6%, with a significant bias towards African American women. For uterine fibroids, a significant decision is determining whether fibroids can be successfully removed using minimally invasive (MI) techniques or their removal requires open surgery. Currently, the standard-of-care for intra-procedural visualization for myomectomies is ultrasound, which has low image quality and requires a specially trained assistant. Currently, the state-of-the-art is to obtain a pre-procedural MRI scan of the patient, which can be used for diagnosis and pre-procedural planning. Although proven incredibly useful pre-procedurally, MRI scans are not often used intra-procedurally due to the inconvenient visualization as 2D slices, which are seen on 2D monitors that do not intuitively convey the depth or orientation of the fibroids, as needed to effectively perform myomectomies. To address this limitation, herein, we present the use of a mixed reality headset (i.e., Microsoft HoloLens 2), as a tool for intra-procedural image-guidance during a mock myomectomy of an ex vivo animal uterus. In this work, we created a patient-specific holographic rendering by performing image segmentation of an MRI scan of a custom-made uterine fibroid animal model. A physician qualitatively assessed the usefulness of the renderings for fibroid localization, as compared to the same visualization on a 2D monitor. In conclusion, the use of mixed reality as an intra-procedural image guidance tool for myomectomies was perceived as a better visualization technique that could lead to improvements in MI approaches and make them accessible to patients from lower socioeconomic populations.

Variation in Vaginal Hysterectomy Rates in an Integrated Healthcare System

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe trends in minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) and assess patient, surgical, and provider characteristics associated with differences in vaginal versus laparoscopic rates within an integrated healthcare system.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2008 to 2018.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent MIH for benign conditions excluding uterine prolapse and incontinence surgeries.

INTERVENTIONS

Hysterectomies.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 27518 hysterectomies were performed for benign indications. Of these, the proportion of MIH increased from 29.1% (2008) to 96.7% (2018) (p <.001). The proportion of vaginal hysterectomies (VHs) of all hysterectomies did not change significantly over the study period (p = .07); however, the proportion of VH among MIH cases decreased from a high of 50.6% in 2008 to 13.2% in 2018 (p <.001). VH rates were lower in obese and morbidly obese patients (p <.001 and p = .02, respectively) and in women with uterine weights >250 g (p <.001). The differences persisted after controlling for patient demographic, clinical, and surgery characteristics. Low surgical volume was inversely associated with VH (adjusted relative risk, 7.19; 95% confidence interval, 6.62-7.81; p <.001). VH rates ranged from 11.5% to 27.8% across service areas (hospitals). Service area remained a significant predictor of VH after controlling for patient (including body mass index and uterine weight) and surgery-related characteristics. Postoperative hospital stay decreased from 33.8 ± 16.4 hours (2008) to 6.1 ± 12.2 (2018) for VH. Operative time was shorter for VH than laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) (1.7 vs 2.5 hours; p <.001). Overall operative/perioperative complications were low and not significantly different (VH vs LH).

CONCLUSION

As the proportion of MIH increased, LH became the preferred route despite similar rates of postoperative stay and intraoperative complications and shorter operative time for VH compared with LH. Service area and provider volume were independent predictors of MIH route, suggesting that training and evidence-based guidelines for route selection may help preserve VH rates.

Disparities in Complications After Prolapse Repair and Sling Procedures: Trends From 2010-2018

OBJECTIVE

To compare 30-day complication rates after prolapse repair and sling procedures across racial/ethnic groups, and evaluate trends over time.

METHODS

We identified female patients in a national outcomes-based database who underwent prolapse repair and/or sling procedures between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018, stratified by race and ethnicity, and compared 30-day postoperative complication rates. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounders. Trends in complication rates over time were evaluated using a test for trend (p-trend).

RESULTS

We identified 70,540 prolapse repairs and 23,968 sling procedures. Following prolapse repairs, Black women had the highest complication rates (11%, vs 8% for Hispanic and 9% for both White and Other race/ethnicity women, P <0.01). Following sling procedures, there were few differences in complication rates between groups. After adjustments, Black women still experienced higher odds of any complication (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.29), particularly a vascular complication (venous thromboembolism or transfusion) (aOR 2.50, 95% CI 2.05-3.04) following prolapse repair procedures. Hispanic women had higher odds of vascular complications after prolapse repair (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.76) and slings (aOR 2.40, 95% CI 1.53-3.76). Trends from 2010-2018 showed a decrease in vascular complication rates among non-Black women after prolapse repairs, but rates among Black women did not decrease.

CONCLUSION

Black women have higher odds of experiencing postoperative complications after prolapse repair procedures, particularly vascular complications. Vascular complication rates after prolapse repair decreased over time for all racial/ethnic groups except Black women. Hispanic women have higher odds of vascular complications after prolapse repair and slings than other racial/ethnic groups.

Racial and ethnic representation in primary research contributing to pelvic organ prolapse treatment guidelines

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate whether the studies contributing to the national treatment guidelines on pelvic organ prolapse adequately represent the racial and/or ethnic makeup of the American population.

METHODS

This analysis examines the racial and ethnic makeup of all primary study cohorts contributing to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/American Urogynecologic Society Practice Bulletin No. 214 on pelvic organ prolapse. References were excluded if they lacked a primary patient population or were from outside the US. Mean proportional representation of racial/ethnic groups was compared to the 2018 United States Census data on race/ethnicity. The representation quotient was also calculated to evaluate for relative representation of each group. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

Of the 110 references, 53 primary studies were included in the final analysis with 30 studies reporting on race/ethnicity. On average, 82% (SD = 15%) of study populations were White, while Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians represented 67% (SD = 7%), 4% (SD = 8%), and < 1% (SD = 1%), respectively, differing significantly from the 2018 US Census (p < 0.01.) The representation quotients for White women was 1.36, demonstrating a 36% overrepresentation, while Black, Hispanic, and Asian women were underrepresented among studies of all evidence levels, with representative quotients of 0.50, 0.23, and 0.09, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates a significant underrepresentation of non-White populations in primary cohorts of studies contributing to the ACOG/AUGS Practice Bulletin No. 214 on POP. This analysis reinforces that more efforts are required to include and report on racial and ethnically diverse cohorts to better serve all patients.

Each Uterus Counts: A narrative review of health disparities in benign gynaecology and minimal access surgery

INTRODUCTION

Health disparities exposed by the Covid-19 pandemic have prompted healthcare professionals to investigate disparities within their own specialty. Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetrics are well documented but inequities in gynaecology are less well known. Our aim is to review the literature on two commonly performed procedures, hysterectomy and myomectomy, and one condition, ectopic pregnancy, to evaluate the prevalence of racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in benign gynaecology and minimal access surgery.

METHODS

A narrative review of 33 articles identified from a Pubmed using the following search criteria; "race"; "ethnicity"; "socioeconomic status"; "disparity"; "inequity"; and "inequality". Case reports and papers assessing gynaecological malignancy were excluded.

RESULTS

Despite minimal access surgery having fewer complications and faster recovery than open surgery, US studies have shown that black and ethnic minority women are less likely than white women to have minimally invasive hysterectomies and myomectomies. Uninsured women and patients on Medicaid are also less likely to receive minimally invasive procedures. Contributing factors include fibroid size, geographic location and access to hospitals performing minimal access surgery, and the discontinuation of power morcellation. Ethnic minority women who receive minimally invasive myomectomy have been shown to have a higher risk of complications and prolonged recovery. Black and ethnic minority women also have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality from ectopic pregnancy and are more likely to receive surgical than medical management.

CONCLUSION

Extensive study from the US has demonstrated disparities in access to minimally invasive gynaecological surgery, whereas in the UK the data is infrequent, inconsistent and incomplete. Little is known about the influence of patient preference and counselling as well as institutional bias on health equity in gynaecology. Further research is necessary to identify interventions that mitigate these disparities in access and outcomes.

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current US literature and describe the extent, source, and impact of disparities that exist among Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) in surgical route and outcomes for hysterectomy, myomectomy, and endometriosis surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the nationwide trend toward minimally invasive surgery (MIS), BIPOC women are disproportionally less likely to undergo MIS hysterectomy and myomectomy and have higher rates of perioperative complications. African American women, in particular, receive significantly disparate care. Contemporary literature on the prevalence of endometriosis in BIPOC women is lacking. Further, there is little data on the racial and ethnic differences in endometriosis surgery access and outcomes.

SUMMARY

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology exist and these differences are not fully accounted for by patient, socioeconomic, or healthcare infrastructure factors. Initiatives that incentivize hiring surgeons trained to perform complex gynecologic surgery, standardized pathways for route of surgery, quality improvement focused on increased hospital MIS volume, and hospital-based public reporting of MIS volume data may be of benefit for minimizing disparities. Further, initiatives to reduce disparities need to address racism, implicit bias, and healthcare structural issues that perpetuate disparities.

Rethinking Disparities in Minimally Invasive Myomectomy: Identifying Drivers of Disparate Surgical Approach to Myomectomy Between African American and White Women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify drivers of disparities among patients undergoing surgical management of fibroids when stratified by self-identified patient race.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective IRB-approved chart review of all patients who underwent a myomectomy at a large academic center. Surgical approach to myomectomy was classified as abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic. Fibroid burden was quantified preoperatively using uterine volume, intra-operatively by number of fibroids listed on operative report, and postoperatively by fibroid weight from pathology reports.

SETTING

A large tertiary care hospital containing a comprehensive fibroid treatment center.

PATIENTS

265 white patients and 121 African American patients who underwent a myomectomy between January 2012 and October 2018 were included in the study population.

INTERVENTIONS

Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomy. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted myomectomy were classified as minimally invasive myomectomy. Multivariable logistic regression models and a propensity score matching algorithm were used to match African American women and white women for fibroid burden.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 386 women were included in the study. African American (AA) (31%; n=121) women had higher fibroid burden (p<0.01) by preoperative imaging (36% with 3 or more) as compared to white women (19% with 3 or more) and operative report (>8 AA: 31% vs. white 13%, p<.01). Despite this, African American women underwent minimally invasive myomectomy at similar rates as compared to white women when adjusted for fibroid burden, BMI, preoperative hematocrit, HTN, and surgical indication (adjusted OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.8 to 2.2, p<.01).. Sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching found similar results.

CONCLUSION

In this population, African American women had a higher fibroid burden as compared to white women. When matched for fibroid burden, however, there was no statistically significant difference between rates of minimally invasive myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy. This finding was consistent when controlling for fibroid burden measured by preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative methods of measurement. Further studies are needed to better characterize this disparity at other hospitals, and to investigate ways to increase access and equity among patients undergoing minimally invasive myomectomy.

Racial disparities in complications and costs after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The study objective was to examine the impact of race on inpatient complications and costs after inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified women who underwent surgery for POP between 2012 and 2014. Patient demographics, outcomes, hospital characteristics, and hospital costs were extracted. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared by race using Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were used to identify variables associated with increased complications and costs respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 29,347 women with a median age of 62 years underwent inpatient surgery for POP between 2012 and 2014. There were 4,419 women (15%) who had at least one in-hospital postoperative complication. Rates of any postoperative complication were significantly higher among Black women (20%) than among white, Hispanic, and women of other races (16%, 11%, and 13% respectively, p < 0.01). The median total cost associated with surgeries for POP was $8,267 (IQR $6,008-$11,734). After multivariate analyses controlled for potential confounders, postoperative complications remained independently associated with Black race (aOR 1.21) whereas Hispanic and other races were associated with decreased odds of complications (aOR 0.62, and aOR 0.77) relative to white race. After controlling for confounders, Hispanic women had lower associated hospital costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Black women undergoing inpatient surgery for POP had a 21% increase in the odds of complications, but no difference in costs compared with white women, whereas Hispanic women had the lowest odds of complications and lowest costs.

Postoperative Risks for Hispanic Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications

BACKGROUND

Hispanic patients have previously been shown to have relatively lower odds of complication following hysterectomy compared with non-Hispanic white patients, but little is known about specific risks for this group. Our primary objective was to identify differences in proportions of specific complications experienced by Hispanic patients following hysterectomy for benign indications as compared with non-Hispanic white patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study examining differences in complication rates following benign hysterectomy between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients in NSQIP-participating hospitals from 2012 to 2016.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 102,051 women were included. A total of 15.0% were Hispanic and 85.0% were non-Hispanic white. Hispanic patients were more likely to have class 1 or 2 obesity (59.7 vs 49.8%), diabetes (10.9 vs 6.7%), and anemia (hematocrit < 33: 14.1 vs 6.5%); p < 0.01 for all. Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo abdominal hysterectomy (30.0 vs 19.1%, p < 0.01) and to remain inpatient for 2-6 days (38.8 vs 24.0%, p < 0.01). After adjustment for possible confounders including anemia, an increased odds of requiring blood transfusion persisted only in the laparoscopic and vaginal groups. Hispanic patients had a decreased or equal odds for all other examined complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-Hispanic white patients, Hispanic women had a higher odds of requiring blood transfusion even when undergoing minimally invasive laparoscopic and vaginal approaches to hysterectomy. Despite a higher proportion of open surgery, Hispanic patients had a decreased or equal odds of postoperative complications.

Discovering and Reflecting on Bias: A Discussion about Challenges and Benefits of Culturally Centered Patient Care with Women Physicians of the East Bay

Implicit or unconscious bias is a lens through which we see our world based on our past experiences and learned stereotypes. Within health care, this lens of bias has typically had a negative impact on patient care, particularly for marginalized populations. We sat down with 3 physicians within Kaiser Permanente East Bay to learn about their personal experiences of bias in patient care. We also discuss the importance of acknowledging bias and practicing cultural humility in order to best ally with our patients. We are hopeful our conversation with these physicians will inspire more of the same, leading to improved health care for those that have suffered from bias in the past.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Surgical Complications and Posthysterectomy Hospitalization among Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Evaluate whether 30- and 90-day surgical complication and postoperative hospitalization rates after hysterectomy for benign conditions differ by race/ethnicity and whether the differences remain after controlling for patient, hospital, and surgical characteristics.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using administrative data. The exposure was race/ethnicity. The outcomes included 5 different surgical complications/categories and posthysterectomy inpatient hospitalization, all identified through 30 and 90 days after hysterectomy hospital discharge, with the exception of hemorrhage/hematoma, which was only identified through 30 days. To examine the association between race/ethnicity and each outcome, we used logistic regression with clustering of procedures within hospitals, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics and surgical approach.

SETTING

Multistate, including Florida and New York.

PATIENTS

Women aged ≥18 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions using State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases.

INTERVENTIONS

Hysterectomy for benign conditions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We included 183 697 women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions from January 2011 to September 2014. In analysis, adjusting for surgery route and other factors, black race was associated with increased risk of 30-day digestive system complications (multivariable adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-2.21), surgical-site infection (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18-1.53), posthysterectomy hospitalization (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.40), and urologic complications (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34) compared with white race. Asian/Pacific Islander race was associated with increased risk of 30-day urologic complications (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.03), intraoperative injury to abdominal/pelvic organs (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.23-1.75), and hemorrhage/hematoma (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67) compared with white race. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with increased risk of 30-day posthysterectomy hospitalization (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20) compared with white race. All findings were similar at 90 days.

CONCLUSION

Black and Asian/Pacific Islander women had higher risk of some 30- and 90-day surgical complications after hysterectomy than white women. Black and Hispanic women had higher risk of posthysterectomy hospitalization. Intervention strategies aimed at identifying and better managing disparities in pre-existing conditions/comorbidities could reduce racial/ethnic differences in outcomes.

Association of Patient Race With Type of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Performed and Adverse Events

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine if there are differences in (1) surgical procedures performed for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and (2) rates of adverse events between racial groups.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women 18 years and older who underwent POP surgery using the 2005-2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Race was categorized as Black, White, Hispanic, and other minority. Pelvic organ prolapse procedures were organized into 4 groups: (1) hysterectomy without concurrent POP procedures, (2) vaginal wall repair(s) only without apical suspension, (3) apical suspension with or without vaginal wall repair(s), and (4) obliterative procedures. Patient characteristics and rates of adverse events were noted. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the association between patient race and surgical procedures performed for POP.

RESULTS

We identified 48,005 women who met the inclusion criteria. Most women who underwent POP surgery were White (79.6% [n = 38,191]). Although only contributing to 4.7% (2,299) of the cohort, Black women experienced higher complication rates compared with White women (10.7% [246] for Black vs 8.9% [3,417] for White women, P < 0.01). Hispanic and other minority women were less likely to undergo an apical suspension than White women (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 0.79 [0.75-0.84] for Hispanic women and 0.78 [0.71-0.86] for other minority women; P < 0.001 for both). Obliterative procedures were more likely to be performed in Black, in Hispanic, and especially in other minority women (aORs, 1.53 [1.20-1.92] for Black, 1.33 [1.12-1.58] for Hispanic, and 3.67 [3.04-4.42] for other minority women; P < 0.001 forall).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial differences exist among women who undergo POP surgery.

Racial Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications Within an Integrated Health Care System

This cross-sectional study examines racial disparities in the route of hysterectomy for benign indications within an integrated health care system in the United States.