Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Follow-up of bowel endometriosis resections performed using the double circular stapler technique: A decade's experience

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To report individual early and long-term functional outcomes of 43 women who underwent double circular stapler technique (DCST) for colorectal deep endometriosis (DE).

METHODS

This multidisciplinary observational study was a retrospective case series report exploiting a long-established database of clinical information from a single private institution. The cohort consists of consecutive patients from January/2010 through July/2021 who underwent minimally invasive surgical treatment of DE. Inclusion criteria: all women whose bowel DE was managed by DCST. The assessment of bowel function was based on Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and Bowel Function in the Community Tool. Outcomes also included intra and postoperative complications, lower urinary tract symptoms, endometriosis-related menstrual and nonmenstrual pain (numeric rating scale), and conception. The analysis of the results was guided by a semi-qualitative reasoning based on individual changes.

RESULTS

The follow-up ranged from 1.4 to 123.8 months (median 38.2). All women presented with DE (mostly rASRM stage 4) and underwent large resections. No procedure was converted to open surgery nor required blood transfusion or ostomies. There was no anastomotic leakage. The risk of rectovaginal bowel fistula was 2.3% (CI 95%: <0.1-7.0) - one case. No patient had long-term urinary retention after surgery. At the most recent follow-up on dysuria, dyschezia, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and cyclic low back pain, 88 to 100% of women had favorable responses (improvements ≥ 3 points in symptomatic women or asymptomatic women who remained pain-free). One patient reported important worsening of her intestinal function, requiring continuous use of laxatives. Considering the 20 women with pregnancy intent, 14 (70%) conceived after surgery.

DISCUSSION / CONCLUSION

Preliminary results were encouraging in the past. The current assessment including long-term follow-up supports DCST for colorectal DE as a feasible, useful, and safe strategy for avoiding segmental colorectal resection when appropriately indicated and properly performed.

[Colorectal endometriosis surgery: Technical and technological innovations in service of a complex surgery]

INTRODUCTION

Digestive endometriosis represents the most common form of deep endometriosis, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. The optimization of its surgical management has been marked by major technological advances. This review explores the evolution of colorectal endometriosis surgery, highlighting the progress in laparoscopy, the contribution of robotics, the shift towards organ preservation, and the optimization of postoperative care.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases, focusing on clinical studies, meta-analyses, and international guidelines published between 1980 and 2025. Articles were selected based on their relevance to technical advancements and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Laparoscopy has replaced laparotomy, leading to a reduction in complications and an improvement in postoperative quality of life. Robotics, while not a groundbreaking revolution, provides advantages in precision and surgeon comfort. Conservative procedures have emerged as safe alternatives to systematic extensive segmental resection. Indication criteria have evolved to favor strategies tailored to the depth and extent of lesions while minimizing complication risks and preserving digestive function and quality of life. The standardization of procedures, the abandonment of systematic protective ileostomy, and enhanced recovery protocols have contributed to reducing surgical morbidity and improving patients' quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Technical and technological advancements have transformed colorectal endometriosis surgery. Surgical strategies are shifting towards personalized approaches, integrating minimally invasive surgery and optimized multidisciplinary management. The future lies in the continuous improvement of techniques and the better standardization of surgical indications.

Comparative pregnancy rate after colorectal resection versus other surgical procedures for deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The debate around colorectal surgery for endometriosis has been ongoing, but to date no meta-analysis has investigated the impact of the different surgical approaches on the pregnancy rate. The aim of this meta-analysis study was to determine in women with deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis, how does colorectal resection surgery compare to other surgical techniques (e.g., rectal shaving, disc excision) in terms of pregnancy rates. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Clinical Trials for relevant studies published from inception to December 2024. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all English language full-text articles addressing colorectal resection compared with other management of deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis and presenting pregnancy outcomes. We included a study when it (i) provided data on surgical management (shaving, disc excision, and/or colorectal resection) and (ii) detailed the pregnancy outcomes in each subgroup. Four authors independently performed the initial search to evaluate the eligibility criteria. Four authors extracted the data and a fifth author checked this extraction. Of the 113 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, we included 13 in the meta-analysis. These studies represented a total of 3,248 patients. Pregnancy information was available for 2,131 patients: 1073 colorectal resection, 502 shaving, 172 disc excisions, and 384 other practices (expectant management). Colorectal resection was associated with a lower pregnancy rate compared with the other techniques (N = 2,131, odds ratio [OR] = 0.64 [95% confidence interval 0.52-0.79], p < 0.001, I2 = 35%). There were similar results when comparing colorectal resection with rectal shaving (N = 952, OR = 0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.36-0.73], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%), but not when comparing colorectal resection with disc excision (N = 432, OR = 0.65 [95% confidence interval 0.37-1.13], p = 0.13). Conclusions Rectal resection for endometriosis is associated with a lower pregnancy rate compared with other type of surgery, such as shaving. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42024512328.

Advances in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis: A comprehensive review

Endometriosis is a prevalent gynecological condition characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, leading to chronic pelvic pain and infertility. This review aims to shed light on the latest advancements in diagnosing and managing endometriosis. It offers insight into the condition's pathogenesis, clinical symptoms, diagnostic techniques, and available treatment approaches. Furthermore, the article emphasizes innovative technologies and novel therapeutic strategies that promise to enhance patient outcomes significantly. This review aspires to empower clinicians to deliver the highest quality care to their patients affected by this challenging condition by consolidating the current understanding of endometriosis.

A Multimodal Approach to Symptomatic Endometriosis: A Proposed Algorithm for Clinical Management

Recent research has proven that peripheral (PS) and central sensitization (CS), mental health, and myofascial dysfunction all play a role, alongside nociception, in the genesis and in the perpetuation of endometriosis' symptoms. However, such components of pain are still largely ignored in clinical practice, although not considering such contributors may entail serious consequences on women's health, including the choice of unnecessary surgery and leaving the real causes of pain untreated. At the present time, we are facing a paradox by which 25-40% of women who undergo laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain do not have an obvious diagnosis, while the percentage of women with endometriosis who have signs of CS, of depressive or anxiety disorders, or who have an increased pelvic muscle tone ammounts to 41-55%, 15-88% and 28-73%, respectively. Moving from the widely-accepted stepwise approach suggested for endometriosis management, which consists in the initial prescription of low-dose combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or of a progestin monotherapy, followed by GnRH analogues and, ultimately, by surgery, when COCs and progestins have proven ineffective or are not tolerated or contraindicated, we propose an integration of such model which takes into account the identification and the simultaneous treatment of all pain contributors. Our objective is to encourage physicians' awareness of the need of a multidisciplinary, multimodal approach to endometriosis-related pain, and ultimately to promote a reduction in the number of unnecessary surgeries.

A quality-of-life meta-analysis comparing pre- and postoperative symptoms in women undergoing colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis

AIM

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) may involve the rectum or colon and is associated with pain, gastrointestinal dysfunction and reduced quality of life (QoL). While hormonal treatment may be effective, surgical intervention including colorectal resection can be required. Colorectal resection can result in functional changes and complications, which can also impair QoL. The aim of this study is to examine all available comparative pre- and postoperative data on QoL and symptom outcomes following colorectal resection for DIE.

METHOD

An electronic database search was conducted for studies reporting pre- and postoperative QoL and symptom outcomes following colorectal resection for DIE. The study was registered with PROSPERO and followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Data were combined using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 1142 patients were included. Colorectal resection was associated with improved outcomes for all items in the SF-36 QoL questionnaire as well as symptom outcomes including dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and deep dyspareunia. Importantly, the gastrointestinal QoL index was significantly improved (mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 15.93-33.08, p < 0.0001) as was dyschezia (mean difference -4.1, 95% CI -4.77 to -3.42, p < 0.0001). There was no change in low anterior resection syndrome scores (mean difference -5.28, 95% CI -11.65 to 1.10, p = 0.1046).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a significant postoperative improvement in patient-reported QoL, pain symptoms and gastrointestinal function following colorectal resection for endometriosis.

Reproductive Endocrine Disorders: A Comprehensive Guide to the Diagnosis and Management of Infertility, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Endometriosis

Reproductive endocrine disorders, including infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and endometriosis, significantly impact women's reproductive health and overall well-being. This comprehensive review explores the diagnosis and management strategies for these prevalent conditions. Infertility, affecting millions globally, is often linked to ovulatory dysfunction, PCOS, and endometriosis. PCOS is characterized by hyperandrogenism, menstrual irregularities, and insulin resistance, contributing to anovulation and infertility. The Rotterdam criteria are widely used for PCOS diagnosis, and management includes lifestyle modifications, pharmacological treatments like ovulation inducers, and, in some cases, surgical interventions. Endometriosis, caused by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, leads to chronic pain and infertility through inflammation, adhesions, and impaired ovarian function. Laparoscopy remains the gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis, and treatment focuses on pain relief, fertility preservation, and reducing recurrence. In cases of endometriosis-related infertility, assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) like in vitro fertilization (IVF) are often recommended. In addition, the role of diet and lifestyle changes in managing these conditions is gaining recognition. This review emphasizes the complexity of reproductive endocrine disorders and underscores the need for individualized treatment plans, combining medical, surgical, and lifestyle approaches to improve fertility outcomes and enhance the quality of life for affected women. The review also highlights the importance of early diagnosis and advances in therapeutic interventions to ensure optimal patient care in the management of infertility, PCOS, and endometriosis.

Management of endometriosis: a call to multidisciplinary approach

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial-like glands and stroma outside of the uterus. There are three types of endometriotic lesions: superficial or peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, and deep infiltrating disease. Endometriosis not only occurs in the pelvis but also can be found in extrapelvic sites such as the gastrointestinal tract, upper abdominal viscera, genitourinary tract, abdominal wall, diaphragm, and thoracic cavity. After thorough history and physical examination is performed, imaging, such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), should be obtained if there is high suspicion for deep-infiltrating endometriosis to better assess visceral involvement. Endometriosis can be suspected based on symptoms, physical examination findings, and imaging. However, a definitive diagnosis requires histopathologic confirmation. Treatment options include expectant, medical, and surgical management. Endometriosis is largely a quality-of-life issue, and treatment should be tailored accordingly with empiric medical therapy frequently utilized. Medical management focuses on symptom improvement. Surgical management with excision of endometriosis is preferred over ablation or fulguration of endometriotic lesions. In the case of deep or extrapelvic endometriosis, treatment with a multidisciplinary team with experience in the treatment of advanced-stage endometriosis is essential to minimizing morbidity and increasing long-term success.

Clash of the Titans: the first multi-center retrospective comparative study between da Vinci and Hugo™ RAS surgical systems for the treatment of deep endometriosis

BACKGROUND

The proliferation of several robotic platforms presents an opportunity to pinpoint the most suitable system for specific procedures and patient profiles. This study aims to explore differences in complications and functional outcomes among patients undergoing deep endometriosis excision with the da Vinci surgical system compared to the Hugo™ RAS system.

METHOD

This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Patients were categorized based on the surgical system used: the Da Vinci system and the Hugo™ RAS system. Perioperative complications, functional outcomes (via validated questionnaire: BFLUTS, KESS, GIQLI), and pain symptoms both before and after surgery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of six postoperative complications were reported: four in the Da Vinci system group (20%) and two in the Hugo™ RAS system group (12.5%). No difference in the mean operative time (p = 0.647), median estimated blood loss (p = 0.179), and hospital stay (p < 0.0001) was found between the two groups. A significant difference was reported in questionnaire score changes and dyspareunia severity in the da Vinci system arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Both robotic systems offer comparable performances in terms of intraoperative complications, although there was a higher incidence of postoperative complications in patients who underwent surgery with the Da Vinci system. Moreover, there was an improvement in dyspareunia, urinary, and gastrointestinal function in the same group.

Assessment of Education and Management of Endometriosis Among Colorectal Surgeons and Residents

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify the type of endometriosis education and surgical training colorectal surgery residents are exposed to during training. To determine the current surgical management of endometriosis among recently graduated colorectal surgeons and their level of comfort.

DESIGN

A qualitative cross-sectional study was performed. An anonymous questionnaire was emailed to colorectal surgery residents of 2023 and recent graduates for completion. Data was then extracted and analyzed from REDCap. A chi-square test was performed on the primary outcome variables.

SETTING

A REDCap electronic survey was administered through email to each participant.

PATIENTS

All colorectal surgery residents in 2023 and recent graduates from Colon and Rectal Surgery subspecialty from 2012 to 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

A 17-item anonymous questionnaire was sent via email through REDCap.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The survey was completed by 70 participants. Most respondents (58.5%) did not receive formal education on bowel endometriosis. Forty percent of participants (28/70) did not feel they received adequate training for surgical management of bowel endometriosis. In terms of surgical exposure, 3.8% (2) responded they had been involved in >15 bowel endometriosis cases and 18 (25.7%) had been exposed to 1-5 cases during colorectal training. Factors that predicted feeling adequately trained in managing endometriosis included formal endometriosis education (OR 4.70, 95% CI 1.37-16.12, p-value .027) and surgical exposure during training (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.18-16.26, p-value .014). Additionally, the number of cases exposed during training is highly correlated with feeling adequately trained.

CONCLUSION

More than half of colorectal surgeons did not receive formal education on bowel endometriosis and the majority had only been exposed to 1-5 cases during their colorectal training. An overwhelming majority were interested in further education. This study highlights opportunities for improvement in the exposure to education and surgical management of endometriosis among colorectal surgery trainees.

Bowel Endometriosis Excision: Approaches and Outcomes Including Hand Sewing of Discoid Excision

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine the outcomes of surgery performed for bowel endometriosis including shaving, discoid resections with hand-sewn closure, and segmental resection.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large academic hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients with bowel wall endometriosis who underwent surgical excision with the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery between 2009 and 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions administered.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

From 2009 to 2022, a total of 112 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of endometriosis involving the rectum. From this cohort, 82 underwent shaving, 23 underwent discoid excision, and 7 had segmental bowel resection. The discoid excisions were closed in multiple layers with hand sewing and were not closed with a staple device. Average lesion size on preoperative imaging was 20.9 mm in the shave group, 22.5 mm in the discoid group, and 38.5 mm in the segmental group. Complication requiring reoperation for anastomotic leak occurred in 3 cases (3.66%) of the shave group and 1 case (4.35%) of the discoid excision group, but did not occur in any of the segmental resections. The number of layers of closure and type of suture used did not appear to have an effect on complication rate, however, this study was not powered to detect a meaningful difference.

CONCLUSION

Our data shows a similar rate of anastomotic leak complication for each closure type as that reported in the literature (2.2%, 9.7%, and 9.9% reported for shave, discoid and segmental resection, respectively). While our study is underpowered, these findings support that hand sewing for discoid excision is a safe and reasonable alternative to circular stapler closures and can be considered with an experienced surgeon. Further study is warranted to confirm safety and explore potential cost savings associated with this technique as well as applications in areas with less resources available.

Intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound to standardize bowel endometriosis shaving

OBJECTIVE

To study the use of intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound after bowel endometriosis shaving.

DESIGN

Stepwise demonstration with a narrated video footage of preoperative and intraoperative ultrasound to evaluate the extent of an endometriotic rectal nodule.

SETTING

Lausanne University Hospital and Geneva University Hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Two women with symptomatic endometriosis rectal lesion.

INTERVENTION(S)

Preoperative transvaginal ultrasound was performed to measure the rectal nodule. After completing bowel shaving, the surgeon conducted both clinical and sonographic evaluations of the rectal wall. Clinically, this was performed using laparoscopic grasping forceps and sonographically with a transvaginal probe after filling the pelvis with saline solution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Assessment of the rectal wall for residual disease after bowel shaving and evaluation of the necessity for additional bowel resection.

RESULT(S)

After sonographic evaluation of the rectal wall, the surgeon decided in both patients to perform a discoid resection because of the presence of a residual rectal disease despite thorough bowel shaving.

CONCLUSION(S)

Intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound after bowel endometriosis shaving is a promising technique that is safe, reproducible, and efficient. It aids surgeons in accurately assessing the extent of excision of deep rectosigmoid infiltrating endometriosis and determining the necessity of additional bowel resection to reduce recurrence risk. Moreover, intraoperative ultrasound provides precise measurements of residual nodules, enabling differentiation between persistent, recurrent, or new lesions during follow-up.

Low rectal resection for low rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma: Are we discussing the same risks?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the rate and risk factors for anastomosis leakage in patients undergoing colorectal resection with low anastomosis for rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study evaluating prospectively collected data was conducted. Patients undergoing colorectal resection for rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma with low anastomosis (<7 cm from the anal verge [AV]) from September 2018 to January 2023 were included in the analysis. The main outcome was the rate of anastomosis leakage. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for anastomosis leakage in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients underwent colorectal resection with low anastomosis due to rectal endometriosis (n = 99) and rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 60). Patients with endometriosis were significantly younger than those with adenocarcinoma (35.7 ± 5.1 vs 63.7 ± 12.6; P = 0.001). The leakage rate was similar between the endometriosis (n = 12, 12.1%) and adenocarcinoma (n = 9, 15.0%) patients (P = 0.621). The anastomosis height less than 5 cm from the AV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24-23.54) was significantly associated with the anastomosis leakage. Protective stoma was associated with the decrease of the leakage risk (aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.72). The type of disease (rectal endometriosis or adenocarcinoma) was not associated with the anastomosis leakage (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 0.34-21.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the different pathogenesis, the risk of anastomotic leakage was found to be similar between patients with low rectal endometriosis and those with rectal adenocarcinoma. These results must be considered by the gynecologist and colorectal surgeon to deliver proper information before rectal surgery for endometriosis.

Gastrointestinal function and pain outcomes following segmental resection or discoid resection for low rectal endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to examine the effect of full thickness discoid resection (FTDR) and modified, limited nerve-vessel sparing segmental bowel resection (NVSSR) in symptomatic patients with low rectal deep endometriosis (DE) within 7 cm from the anal verge.  Presurgical and postsurgical evaluation of gastrointestinal (GI) function reflected by low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and gastrointestinal function-related quality of life index (GIQLI) scores, complication rates, pain scores/visual analog scale (VAS) and endometriosis health profile (EHP-30) was performed.

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter cohort study, 63 premenopausal patients with symptomatic low (within 7 cm from the anal verge) colorectal endometriosis, undergoing low modified limited nerve vessel sparing rectal segmental bowel resection (NVSSR) and full thickness discoid resection (FTDR) were evaluated. Presurgery and postsurgery lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores, gastrointestinal function-related quality of life index (GIQLI), pain symptoms, endometriosis health profile (EHP-30) parameters compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Out of 63 women, 49 (77.8%) underwent NVSSR while 14 (22.2%) underwent FTDR. LARS-like symptoms were observed presurgically in 24/63 (38.1%) patients. Postsurgical LARS was observed in 14/63 (22.2%) of the patients (10/49, 20.4% in NVSSR vs. 4/14, 28.5% in the FTDR group). The LARS-like symptoms significantly decreased following surgery in the FTDR group (p = 0.049) and showed a trend for decrease in the NVSSR group (p = 0.077). Postsurgical de novo LARS was only observed in 5/63 (8%) of the patients (NVSSR 4/49, 8.1%, FTDR 1/14, 7.1%). Postsurgical GIQLI scores improved in both groups (p < 0.001) with comparable changes in the NVSSR and FTDR cohorts (p = 0.490). Postoperative grade III complication rates between NVSSR and FTDR did not vary significantly (6/49, 12.2% vs. 3/14, 21.4% p = 0.26). Pain/VAS scores and EHP-30 scores significantly decreased after a mean follow-up of 29.6 ± 11 months and 30.6 ± 11 months in the NVSSR and FTDR groups, respectively (EHP-30; p < 0.001; dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia all p < 0.05 for both cohorts).

DISCUSSION

When comparing low colorectal surgery by either NVSSR or FTDR in a high-risk group for surgical complications, both techniques confer improvement of GI function reflected by LARS and GIQLI with non-significant differences in major complication rates, reduced pain and EHP-30 scores.

Intra-operative and post-operative complications of endometriosis excision using the SOSURE approach - A single- surgeon retrospective series of 1116 procedures over 8 years

Background

Endometriosis surgery outcomes have been widely studied, yet heterogeneity in terminology and techniques persist.

Objectives

This study focuses on the perioperative outcomes of a single surgeon using the same structured approach (SOSURE: Survey & Sigmoid mobilisation, Ovarian mobilisation, Suspension of uterus and ovaries, Ureterolysis, Rectovaginal and pararectal space development, Excision of all visible disease) and adheres to the recent standardised terminology proposed by international gynaecological and endometriosis societies.

Materials and Methods

A quality improvement study was conducted retrospectively from January 2015 to January 2023. Data collection involved two databases: the National British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) database and a more comprehensive locally kept database. The methodology also integrated four endometriosis staging systems.

Main outcome measures

Intra-operative and post-operative complication rates.

Results

Between 2015 and 2023, 1047 women underwent 1116 endometriosis procedures in various UK hospitals with S.K. as primary surgeon. Exclusions totalled 20 due to missing records and specific surgical criteria. The rate of major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3a and 3b) was 1.5% and minor post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2) were seen in 13.8%. No Clavien-Dindo grade 4 or 5 complications were noted.

Conclusion

Our study has shown a low complication rate in endometriosis surgery, despite increasing complexity of surgical cases. This is likely attributed to the surgeon's learning curve, high surgical volume and adherence to a structured approach.

What's new?

Our study demonstrates the learning curve of a surgeon over the course of 8 years. This series involved more than 1000 patients and to our knowledge, is the first to report the complexity of the casemix using four different endometriosis staging systems.

Nerve-sparing surgery in deep endometriosis: Has its time come?

Nerve-sparing (NS) surgery was first introduced for the treatment of deep endometriosis (DE) 20 years ago, drawing on established neuroanatomy and success from oncological applications. It aims to identify and preserve autonomic nerve fibres, reduce iatrogenic nerve injury, and minimize postoperative visceral dysfunction, without compromising the therapeutic effectiveness against endometriosis. The evolution of NS surgical techniques over the past two decades has been supported by an expanding body of literature on anatomical details, dissection techniques, and functional outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that NS surgery results in reduced postoperative voiding dysfunction (POVD). Transient POVD may be influenced by preoperative dysfunction, with parametrial infiltration being a strong predictive factor for POVD. While the benefits in bowel and sexual functions are less pronounced and consistent, NS surgery potentially prevents de novo dysfunctions in these areas. Furthermore, perioperative complication rates, effectiveness in pain relief, and fertility outcomes are reportedly on par with conventional surgery.

Evaluating the safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for rectal endometriosis: results from a French prospective multicentre study including 60 patients

STUDY QUESTION

Is increasing the intensity of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) by 30% in the treatment of rectal endometriosis a safe procedure?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This study demonstrates the safety of a 30% increase in the intensity of HIFU in the treatment of rectal endometriosis, with no Clavien-Dindo Grade III complications overall, and namely no rectovaginal fistulae.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A feasibility study including 20 patients with rectal endometriosis demonstrated, with no severe complications, a significant improvement in digestive disorders, dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and health status, although the volume of the endometriosis nodule did not appear to be reduced.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted between 2020 and 2022 with 60 patients with symptomatic rectal endometriosis. Following the failure of medical treatment, HIFU treatment was offered as an alternative to surgery.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

As the main objective of this study was to examine safety, all adverse events observed during the 6 months of follow-up were analysed and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and Clavien-Dindo classifications. Secondary objectives included evaluating the evolution of symptoms using validated questionnaires: gynaecological and digestive pain symptoms with a visual analogue scale, health status with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire, average post-operative daily pain level, and analgesic medication required in the 10 days following treatment. MRI was also performed at Day 1 to detect early complications. Finally, we performed a blinded MRI review of the evolution of the nodule at 6 months post-treatment.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The procedure was performed under spinal anaesthesia for 30% of the patients. The median duration of treatment was 32 min. Fifty-five patients left the hospital on Day 1. MRI scans performed on Day 1 did not highlight any early-onset post-operative complication. Using the Clavien-Dindo classification, we listed 56.7% Grade I events, 3.4% Grade II events, and no events Grade III or higher. At 1, 3, and 6 months, all gynaecologic, digestive and general symptoms, as well as health status, had significantly improved. The evolution of the nodule was also significant (P < 0.001) with a 28% decrease in volume.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main objective was safety and not effectiveness. The study was not randomized and there was no control group.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

HIFU treatment for rectal endometriosis results in an improvement of symptoms with low morbidity; as such, for selected patients, it could be a valuable alternative to surgical approaches following the failure of medical treatment.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was funded by the company EDAP TMS. Professors Dubernard and Rousset are consultants for EDAP TMS. Dubernard received travel support from EDAP-TMS. Dr F. Chavrier received industrial grants from EDAP-TMS. He has developed a device for generating focused ultrasonic waves with reduced treatment time. This device has been patented by EDAP-TMS. Dr Lafon received industrial grants from EDAP-TMS; he declares that EDAP-TMS provided funding directly to INSERM to support a young researcher chair in therapeutic ultrasound, which is unrelated to the current study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04494568.

Surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis: an updated review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize recent literature on the surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The last decade has seen a surge in the number of studies on bowel endometriosis, with a focus on preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, surgical approach, and surgical outcomes. Many of these studies have originated from large-volume referral centers with varying surgical approaches and philosophies. Colorectal surgery for endometriosis seems to have a positive impact on patient symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. However, these benefits must be weighed against a significant risk of postoperative complications and the potential for long-term bowel or bladder dysfunction, especially for more radical procedures involving the lower rectum. Importantly, most studies regarding surgical technique and outcomes have been limited by their observational design.

SUMMARY

The surgical management of bowel endometriosis is complex and should be approached by a multidisciplinary team. Methodical preoperative evaluation, including appropriate imaging, is vital for surgical planning and patient counseling. The decision to perform a more conservative or radical excision is nuanced and remains an area of controversy. High quality studies in the form of multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed before clear recommendations can be made.

Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: Modern Concepts of Their Clinical Outcomes, Treatment, and Management

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are complex gynecological conditions characterized by diverse clinical presentations, including superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE), ovarian endometrioma (OMA), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). The hallmark features of these pathologies involve the manifestation of pain symptoms and infertility, and approximately 30% of patients are asymptomatic. Despite ongoing research, definitive treatments for these conditions remain elusive, and clinical management primarily revolves around medical or surgical interventions. Recent advancements in our understanding of the efficacy of various treatment modalities, including medical therapy and surgical interventions, have provided clinicians with valuable insights into pain relief and fertility preservation. This review aims to provide an updated overview of the latest literature on clinical outcomes, treatment options, and management strategies for different types of endometriosis. By synthesizing the newest available data, this review seeks to inform clinicians and guide decision making based on factors such as patients' symptom severity, childbearing desire, and overall health.

INTESTINAL ENDOMETRIOSIS: OUTCOMES FROM A MULTIDISCIPLINARY SPECIALIZED REFERRAL CENTER

BACKGROUND

Deep penetrating endometriosis (DE) can affect abdominal and pelvic organs like the bowel and bladder, requiring treatment to alleviate symptoms.

AIMS

To study and investigate clinical and surgical outcomes in patients diagnosed with DE involving the intestines, aiming to analyze the effectiveness of surgical treatments.

METHODS

All cases treated from January 2021 to July 2023 were included, focusing on patients aged 18 years or older with the disease affecting the intestines. Patients without intestinal involvement and those with less than six months of post-surgery follow-up were excluded. Intestinal involvement was defined as direct invasion of the intestinal wall or requiring adhesion lysis for complete resection. Primary outcomes were adhesion lysis, rectal shaving, disc excision (no-colectomy group), and segmental resection (colectomy group) along with surgical complications like anastomotic leak and fistulas, monitored for up to 30 days.

RESULTS

Out of 169 patients with DE surgically treated, 76 met the inclusion criteria. No colectomy treatment was selected for 50 (65.7%) patients, while 26 (34.2%) underwent rectosigmoidectomy (RTS). Diarrhea during menstruation was the most prevalent symptom in the RTS group (19.2 vs. 6%, p<0.001). Surgical outcomes indicated longer operative times and hospital stays for the segmental resection group, respectively 186.5 vs. 104 min (p<0.001) and 4 vs. 2 days, (p<0.001). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) had an overall prevalence of 6 (7.9%) cases, without any difference between the groups. There was no mortality reported. Larger lesions and specific symptoms like dyschezia and rectal bleeding were associated with a higher likelihood of RTS. Bayesian regression highlighted diarrhea close to menstruation as a strong predictor of segmental resection.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DE involving the intestines, symptoms such as dyschezia, rectal bleeding, and menstrual period-related diarrhea predict RTS. However, severe complication rates did not differ significantly between the segmental resection group and no-colectomy group.

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction as a Promising Alternative for Minilaparotomy in Bowel Resection Due to Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness, safety and efficacy of 2 surgical tissue extraction methods for treating bowel endometriosis: natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) and minilaparotomy.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was conducted in MedLine, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in October 2023, without date restrictions.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

This study included studies that directly compared NOSE and minilaparotomy in colectomy patients due to endometriosis. Primary outcomes were defined as operation duration, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, and major postoperative complication rates. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to categorize complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager Software by Cochrane, with a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to account for anticipated high heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was conducted for patients undergoing full laparoscopic (L/S) resection.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS

Out of 1236 identified studies, 6 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 372 patients. One study was a randomized controlled trial, and 5 were observational. Operation duration did not significantly differ between NOSE and minilaparotomy (MD: -10.85 min; 95% CI: [-23.33, 1.63]; p = .09). NOSE was associated with a significantly reduced length of hospital stay (MD: -0.76 day; 95% CI: [-1.21, -0.31]; p = .008). The major postoperative complication rates were 3.77% for NOSE and 5.55% for minilaparotomy, with no significant difference (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: [0.27, 2.60]; p = .76). Subgroup analysis revealed that Full L/S had significantly shorter operation duration (MD: -26.06 min; 95% CI: [-45.85, -6.27]; p = .01), reduced length of stay (MD: -0.75 day; 95% CI: [-1.25, -0.25]; p = .003), and lower blood loss (MD: -15.01 mL; 95% CI: [-29.64, -0.37]; p = .04).

CONCLUSION

NOSE emerged as a potentially safer alternative to minilaparotomy for tissue extraction in colectomy for bowel endometriosis. However, standardization of the procedure and additional randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel involvement: a systematic review and application of the IDEAL framework

AIMS

This review aims to evaluate the feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) as an alternative to standard laparoscopic surgery (SLS) for the treatment of bowel deep-infiltrative endometriosis. Additionally, it aims to provide guidance for future study design, by gaining insight into the current state of research, in accordance with the IDEAL framework.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant studies on RALS for bowel deep infiltrating endometriosis in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and PubMed databases up to August 2023 and reported in keeping with PRISMA guidelines. The study was registered with PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022308611 RESULTS: Eleven primary studies were identified, encompassing 364 RALS patients and 83 SLS patients, from which surgical details, operative and postoperative outcomes were extracted. In the RALS group, mean operating time was longer (235 ± 112 min) than in the standard laparoscopy group (171 ± 76 min) (p < 0.01). Patients in the RALS group experienced a shorter hospital stay (5.3 ± 3.5 days vs. 7.3 ± 4.1 days) (p < 0.01), and appeared to have fewer postoperative complications compared to standard laparoscopy. Research evidence for RALS in bowel DE is at an IDEAL Stage 2B of development.

CONCLUSION

RALS is a safe and feasible alternative to standard laparoscopy for bowel endometriosis treatment, with a shorter overall length of stay despite longer operating times. Further robust randomized trials recommended to delineate other potential advantages of RALS.

To drain or not to drain: A propensity score analysis of abdominal drainage after colorectal surgery for endometriosis

AIM

To assess the benefit of prophylactic abdominal drainage (AD) after colorectal surgery for endometriosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 215 patients who underwent colorectal surgery for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach in our center from February 2019 to July 2023. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis (1:1 ratio) identified two groups of patients with similar characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were then compared.

RESULTS

In the unmatched cohort, 151 patients (70 %) had AD at the end of surgery and 64 (30 %) did not. Clinical characteristics and surgical procedures were comparable between the groups after PSM. After PSM, AD was associated with a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) and a greater number of postoperative complications (p = 0.03). There were no differences for readmission, repeat surgery, or severe postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort of patients undergoing colorectal resection for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach, prophylactic AD was not found to be beneficial.

Bowel endometriosis: Surgical customization is demanding

Bowel endometriosis is the most common form of severe deep endometriosis. Surgery is an option in case of infertility and/or chronic pain or in the presence of a stenotic lesion. Clinical examination and preoperative imaging must provide an identity card of the lesion so that customized surgery can be proposed. The primary objective of this tailor-made surgery will always be to preserve the organ. The surgeon then has three options: shaving, discoid resection and segmental resection. The more extensive the resection, the greater the risk of severe short- and long-term complications. Surgery must therefore be adapted to the patient's specific situation and needs. Moreover, personalized care must extend beyond surgery. It must begin before the operation, preparing the patient for the operation like an athlete before a race, and continue afterwards by adapting the follow-up to the surgery performed.

Research progress of indocyanine green fluorescence technology in gynecological applications

Indocyanine green is a near-infrared fluorescent dye which is widely used in various fields of surgery and gynecology. It is currently mainly used to detect various malignant tumors, sentinel lymph nodes, endometriosis lesions, ureter or intestinal occlusion, vaginal perfusion, uterine arterial blood perfusion, pelvic nerve, uterine niche, lymphatic edema, metastatic lesion shadow, and so on, providing new methods for decision-making during surgery. This article elaborates the application progress of indocyanine green fluorescence technology in gynecology.

Treatment of rectosigmoid endometriosis by laparoscopic reverse submucosal dissection (LRSD): The Sydney partial thickness discoid excision technique

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic reverse submucosal dissection (LRSD) is a standardised surgical technique for removal of rectosigmoid endometriosis which optimises the anatomical dissection plane for excision of endometriotic nodules.

AIM

This cohort study assesses the outcomes of the first cohort of women treated by LRSD, for deeply infiltrating rectosigmoid endometriosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Primary outcomes assessed were complication rate as defined by the Clavien-Dindo system, and completion of the planned LRSD. Secondary outcomes include mucosal breach, specimen margin involvement, length of hospital admission, and a comparison of pre-operative and post-operative pain, bowel function and quality of life surveys. These included the Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire (EHP-30), the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom Questionnaire (KESS) and the Wexner scale.

RESULTS

Of 19 patients treated, one required a segmental resection. The median length of hospital admission was two days (range 1-5) and no post-operative complications occurred. Median pain visual analogue scales (scale 0-10) were higher prior to surgery (dysmenorrhoea 9.0, dyspareunia 7.5, dyschezia 9.0, pelvic pain 6.0) compared to post-surgical median scores (dysmenorrhoea 5.0, dyspareunia 4.0, dyschezia 2.0, pelvic pain 4.0) at a median of six months (range 4-32). Quality of life studies suggested improvement following surgery with pre-operative median EHP-30 and KESS scores (EHP-30: 85 (5-106), KESS score 9 (0-20)) higher than post-operative scores (EHP-30: 48.5 (0-80), KESS score: 3 (0-19)).

CONCLUSION

This series highlights the feasibility of LRSD with low associated morbidity as a progression of partial thickness discoid excision (rectal shaving) for the treatment of rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Towards comprehensive management of symptomatic endometriosis: beyond the dichotomy of medical versus surgical treatment

Except when surgery is the only option because of organ damage, the presence of suspicious lesions, or the desire to conceive, women with endometriosis-associated pain often face a choice between medical and surgical treatment. In theory, the description of the potential benefits and potential harms of the two alternatives should be standardized, unbiased, and based on strong evidence, enabling the patient to make an informed decision. However, doctor's opinion, intellectual competing interests, local availability of specific services and (mis)information obtained from social media, and online support groups can influence the type of advice given and affect patients' choices. This is compounded by the paucity of robust data from randomized controlled trials, and the anxiety of distressed women who are eager to do anything to alleviate their disabling symptoms. Vulnerable patients are more likely to accept the suggestions of their healthcare provider, which can lead to unbalanced and physician-centred decisions, whether in favour of either medical or surgical treatment. In general, treatments should be symptom-orientated rather than lesion-orientated. Medical and surgical modalities appear to be similarly effective in reducing pain symptoms, with medications generally more successful for severe dysmenorrhoea and surgery more successful for severe deep dyspareunia caused by fibrotic lesions infiltrating the posterior compartment. Oestrogen-progestogen combinations and progestogen monotherapies are generally safe and well tolerated, provided there are no major contraindications. About three-quarters of patients with superficial peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis and two-thirds of those with infiltrating fibrotic lesions are ultimately satisfied with their medical treatment although the remainder may experience side effects, which may result in non-compliance. Surgery for superficial and ovarian endometriosis is usually safe. When fibrotic infiltrating lesions are present, morbidity varies greatly depending on the skill of the individual surgeon, the need for advanced procedures, such as bowel resection and ureteral reimplantation, and the availability of expert colorectal surgeons and urologists working together in a multidisciplinary approach. The generalizability of published results is adequate for medical treatment but very limited for surgery. Moreover, on the one hand, hormonal drugs induce disease remission but do not cure endometriosis, and symptom relapse is expected when the drugs are discontinued; on the other hand, the same drugs should be used after lesion excision, which also does not cure endometriosis, to prevent an overall cumulative symptom and lesion recurrence rate of 10% per postoperative year. Therefore, the real choice may not be between medical treatment and surgery, but between medical treatment alone and surgery plus postoperative medical treatment. The experience of pain in women with endometriosis is a complex phenomenon that is not exclusively based on nociception, although the role of peripheral and central sensitization is not fully understood. In addition, trauma, and especially sexual trauma, and pelvic floor disorders can cause or contribute to symptoms in many individuals with chronic pelvic pain, and healthcare providers should never take for granted that diagnosed or suspected endometriosis is always the real, or the sole, origin of the referred complaints. Alternative treatment modalities are available that can help address most of the additional causes contributing to symptoms. Pain management in women with endometriosis may be more than a choice between medical and surgical treatment and may require comprehensive care by a multidisciplinary team including psychologists, sexologists, physiotherapists, dieticians, and pain therapists. An often missing factor in successful treatment is empathy on the part of healthcare providers. Being heard and understood, receiving simple and clear explanations and honest communication about uncertainties, being invited to share medical decisions after receiving detailed and impartial information, and being reassured that a team member will be available should a major problem arise, can greatly increase trust in doctors and transform a lonely and frustrating experience into a guided and supported journey, during which coping with this chronic disease is gradually learned and eventually accepted. Within this broader scenario, patient-centred medicine is the priority, and whether or when to resort to surgery or choose the medical option remains the prerogative of each individual woman.

Outcomes of discoid excision and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis: robotic versus conventional laparoscopy

Surgery for deep endometriosis with colorectal involvement is an option after medical treatment failure. Over the past decade, robotic laparoscopy has emerged as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy. We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and segmental resection. From 2019 to 2023, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 152 consecutive patients with colorectal endometriosis who underwent robotic or conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and colorectal resection. Ninety of the patients 152 underwent robotic surgery and 62 conventional laparoscopy. The mean total surgical room occupancy and operating times were longer in the robotic group: 270 ± 81 min vs 240 ± 79 min, p = 0.010, and 216 ± 78 min vs 190 ± 76, p = 0.027, respectively. The mean intraoperative blood loss, and the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications (according to Clavien-Dindo classification) were similar in the two groups. The mean hospital stay was greater after conventional laparoscopy (8 ± 5 vs 7 ± 4 days; p = 0.03), and the rate of persistent voiding dysfunction was higher in the conventional group (9/11, 25% vs 2/11, 5%; p = 0.01). A higher incidence of persistent voiding dysfunction was also observed after segmental resection by conventional laparoscopy (25% vs 4.8%, p = 0.01). Our results support the use of robotic surgery as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis.

Robotic assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis

Deep infiltrative endometriosis is a condition affecting up to 15 % of women of childbearing age, defined by extra uterine location of endometrial like tissues. The symptoms of endometriosis range from severe dysmenorrhea to infertility, chronic pelvic pain, bowel dysfunction and urinary tract involvement to name the most common. Endometriosis has an impact on the quality of life of patients, with personal and social consequences. Although medical treatment is indicated in the first instance, surgery may be necessary. Standard laparoscopy has become the gold standard for this surgery. However, surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis is known to be highly complex, and the significant development of robotic assistance in recent years has had an impact on the evolution of surgical practice. This comprehensive review of the literature provides an overview of the contributions of robotic surgery in the field of endometriosis and gives an insight into the next steps in its development.

Robotic Surgery for Severe Endometriosis: A Preliminary Comparative Study of Cost Estimation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the postoperative outcomes and the overall expenses between conventional laparoscopy and robotic surgery, in a series of consecutive patients managed for only severe endometriosis in our institute.

DESIGN

A cohort comparative study.

SETTING

Center of Excellence in Multidisciplinary Endometriosis Care.

PATIENTS

A total of 175 symptomatic patients undergoing surgery for only severe endometriosis from March 2021 to August 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

We treated patients with endometriosis involving the digestive tract such as rectum, sigmoid colon, and ileocecal junction by rectal shaving, discoid resection, or segmental resection (141 surgeries) with or without bladder (23 surgeries), sacral plexus (19 surgeries), and diaphragm involvements (14 surgeries).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Postoperative outcomes were evaluated in terms of total surgical time (total surgical room occupancy time and total operating time), hospitalization period, postoperative complications, rehospitalization, and second surgical procedures. A statistically higher total surgical room occupancy (203 minutes vs 151 minutes) and operating time (150 minutes vs 105 minutes) were observed in the robotic group (p = .001). No differences in terms of mean hospital stay (p = .06), postoperative complications (p = .91), rehospitalization (p = .48), and secondary surgical treatment (p = .78) were identified. Concerning the cost analysis only for disposable supply, the cost of colorectal resection was totaled at 2604 euros for the laparoscopic conventional approach vs 2957 euros for the robotic approach (+352.6 euros, +14%). The cost of rectal disc excision was 1527 euros for the laparoscopic conventional approach vs 1905.85 euros (+378 euros, +25%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the feasibility of the robotic approach for the treatment of severe endometriosis, with however a higher cost of robotic approach. Next studies should identify specific indications for robotic surgery, where technical advantages provided by the technology are followed by objective improvement of patients' outcomes.

Minimally invasive surgery for deep endometriosis

Deep endometriosis (DE) is endometriotic tissue that invades the peritoneum by >5 mm. Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic DE, and laparoscopic surgery is preferred over laparotomy due to better vision and postoperative pain. In this review, we aimed to collect and summarize recent literature on DE surgery and share laparoscopic procedures for rectovaginal and bowel endometriosis.

Risk factors for major complications following colorectal resections for endometriosis in the USA

PURPOSE

We aimed to describe the incidence and identify risk factors for the occurrence of short-term major posto-perative complications following colorectal resection for endometriosis.

METHODS

A cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2012-2020. We included patients with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis who underwent colon or rectal resections for endometriosis.

RESULTS

Of 755 women who underwent colorectal resection, 495 (65.6%) had laparoscopic surgery and 260 (34.4%) had open surgery. The major complication rate was 13.5% (n = 102). Women who underwent open surgery had a higher proportion of major complications (n = 53, 20.4% vs. n = 49, 9.9%, p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis, Black race (aOR 95%CI 2.81 (1.60-4.92), p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 95%CI 3.02 (1.42-6.43), p = 0.004), hypertension (aOR 95%CI 1.89 (1.08-3.30), p = 0.025), laparotomy (aOR 95%CI 1.64 (1.03-3.30), p = 0.025), concomitant enterotomy (aOR 95%CI 3.02 (1.26-7.21), p = 0.013), and hysterectomy (aOR 95%CI 2.59 (1.62-4.15), p < 0.001) were independently associated with major post-operative complications. In a subanalysis of laparoscopies only, Hispanic ethnicity, chronic hypertension, lysis of bowel adhesions, and hysterectomy were independently associated with major complications. In a subanalysis of laparotomies only, Black race and hysterectomy were independently positively associated with the occurrence of major complications.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a current population-based estimate of short-term complications after surgery for colorectal endometriosis in the USA. The identified risk factors for complications can assist during preoperative shared decision-making and informed consent process.

Changes in hospital consumption of opioid and non-opioid analgesics after colorectal endometriosis surgery

The aim of this study was to analyze postoperative consumption of analgesics during hospitalization following colorectal surgery for endometriosis. We conducted a retrospective study at Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France from February 2019 to December 2021. One hundred sixty-two patients underwent colorectal surgery: eighty-nine (55%) by robotic and seventy-three (45%) by conventional laparoscopy. The type of procedure had an impact on acetaminophen and nefopam consumed per day: consumption for colorectal shaving, discoid resection, and segmental resection was, respectively, 2(0.5), 2.1(0.6), 2.4(0.6) g/day (p = 10-3), and 25(7), 30(14), 31(11) mg/day (p = 0.03). The total amount of tramadol consumed was greater following robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy (322(222) mg vs 242(292) mg, p = 0.04). We observed a switch in analgesic consumption over the years: tramadol was used by 70% of patients in 2019 but only by 7.1% in 2021 (p < 10-3); conversely, ketoprofen was not used in 2019, but was consumed by 57% of patients in 2021 (p < 10-3). A history of abdominal surgery (OR = 0.37 (0.16-0.78, p = 0.011) and having surgery in 2020 rather than in 2019 (OR = 0.10 (0.04-0.24, p < 10-3)) and in 2021 than in 2019 (OR = 0.08 (0.03-0.20, p < 10-3)) were the only variables independently associated with the risk of opioid use. We found that neither clinical characteristics nor intraoperative findings had an impact on opioid consumption in this setting, and that it was possible to rapidly modify in-hospital analgesic consumption modalities by significantly reducing opioid consumption in favor of NSAIDS or nefopam.

Association between Endometriosis and Surgical Complications among Benign Hysterectomies

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of endometriosis on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

PATIENTS

A total of 127 556 hysterectomies performed for benign gynecologic indications INTERVENTIONS: Differences in the primary outcomes were compared between patients with and without endometriosis after adjustment for group differences in covariates using inverse probability of treatment weighting approach.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 127 556 hysterectomies identified, 19 618 (15.4%) had a diagnosis of endometriosis. Patients with endometriosis were younger with a lower prevalence of chronic comorbidities but had higher rates of concurrent pelvic inflammatory disease and previous abdominal operations. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher in patients with endometriosis (9.9% vs 8.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.34). The incidence of 30-day mortality (0.1% vs 0.03%; OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.69-5.65) and reoperations (1.50% vs 1.36%; OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98-1.42) were not different in patients with and without endometriosis.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative complications are more likely in hysterectomies involving endometriosis than those without endometriosis, likely owing to anatomic distortion incurring increased surgical complexity. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of complications and plan for mitigating these increased risks before and during surgery for suspected endometriosis.

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic approach in patients with large rectal endometriotic nodule: the evaluation of safety and complications

AIM

The aim was to compare postoperative complications in patients undergoing the excision of a rectal endometriotic nodule over 3 cm by a robotic-assisted versus a conventional laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating prospectively collected data. The main interventions included rectal shaving, disc excision or colorectal resection. All the surgeries were performed in one endometriosis reference institute. To evaluate factors significantly associated with the risk of anastomosis leakage or fistula and bladder atony, we conducted a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 548 patients with rectal endometriotic nodule over 3 cm in diameter (#ENZIAN C3) were included in the final analysis. The demography and clinical characteristics of women managed by the robotic-assisted (n = 97) approach were similar to those of patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy (n = 451). The multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the surgical approach (robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic) was not associated with the rate of anastomosis leakage or fistula (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-4.0) and bladder dysfunction (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-1.8). A rectal nodule located lower than 6 cm from the anal verge was significantly associated with anastomosis leakage (aOR 4.1, 95% CI 1.4-10.8) and bladder atony (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 1.5-12.3). Anastomosis leakage was also associated with smoking (aOR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.4), significant vaginal infiltration (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.7) and excision of nodules involving sacral roots (aOR 5.6, 95% CI 1.7-15.5).

CONCLUSION

The robotic-assisted approach was not associated with increased risk of main postoperative complications compared to conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of large rectal endometriotic nodules.

Risk Factors for Major Complications Following Minimally Invasive Surgeries for Endometriosis in the United States

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To study the rate and risk factors for short-term postoperative complications of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometriosis in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020.

PATIENTS

Patients with endometriosis diagnosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared women with and without 30-day postoperative major complications, defined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. A total of 28 697 women underwent MIS during the study period, of which 2.6% had major postoperative complications. Organ space surgical site infection and reoperation were the most common complications (47.0% and 39.8%, respectively). In multivariable regression analysis, African American race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61 [1.29-2.01], p <.001), hypertension (aOR 95% CI 1.23 [1.01-1.50], p = .036), bleeding disorders (aOR 95% CI 1.96 [1.03-3.74], p = .041), bowel procedures (aOR 95% CI 1.93 [1.37-2.72], p <.001) and hysterectomy (aOR 95% CI 2.09 [1.67-2.63], p <.001) were independently associated with increased risk of major complications. In multivariable regression analysis of laparoscopies without bowel procedures, African American race, bleeding disorders, and hysterectomy were independently associated with increased major complication risk. Among cases with bowel procedures, African American race and colectomy were independently associated with increased major complication risk. In multivariable regression analysis of women who underwent hysterectomy, African American race, bleeding disorders, and lysis of adhesions were independently associated with increased major complications risk. Among women who underwent uterine-sparing surgery, African American race, hypertension, preoperative blood transfusion, and bowel procedures were independently associated with increased major complications risk.

CONCLUSION

Among women undergoing MIS for endometriosis, African American race, hypertension, bleeding disorders, and bowel surgery or hysterectomy are risk factors for major complications. African American race is a risk factor for major complications among women undergoing surgeries with and without bowel procedures or hysterectomy.

Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal ultrasound for the detection and measurement of endometriotic lesions of the bowel

INTRODUCTION

The number and invasion depth of endometriotic bowel lesions, total length of bowel affected by endometriosis, lesion-to-anal verge distance, and extent of pouch of Douglas obliteration are important factors in preoperatively determining risk and complexity of endometriosis surgery. The intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal ultrasound in the evaluation of many of these parameters has not yet been investigated. Our study aimed to assess the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal ultrasound between an experienced and less experienced examiner for all of these parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2019 and November 2020. Fifty consecutive premenopausal women who underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination in our clinic for the first time, were examined by the same two operators during the same attendance. Outcomes of interest were the inter-rater reproducibility of transvaginal ultrasound for detecting the presence, number, depth and size of bowel endometriotic nodules, lesion-to-anal-verge distance, total length of bowel affected, and pouch of Douglas obliteration. The intraobserver reproducibility was assessed for the continuous parameters. Cohen's kappa (κ) statistic, Cohen's weighted kappa (κ), proportions of agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement were used to assess the reproducibility of the parameters.

RESULTS

The inter-rater agreement and reliability were very good for identifying bowel endometriosis, the number and invasion depth of bowel nodules, determining whether the maximum nodule length was <3 cm, and lesion-to-anal-verge distance <8 cm (proportion of agreement 0.92, 0.94, 0.97, 0.94, 0.96; κ 0.92, 0.91, 0.92, 0.82, 0.89). The inter-rater agreement and reliability were good for assessing pouch of Douglas obliteration (proportion of agreement 0.86, κ 0.80). The intra-rater reliability for the mean nodule diameter (ICC 0.93 and 0.97) and total length of bowel affected (ICC 0.94 and 0.91) were excellent for operators A and B, respectively. The inter-rater reliability for the mean nodule diameter was good (ICC 0.80), and moderate for the total length of bowel affected (ICC 0.70). The Bland-Altman limits of agreement demonstrated clinically acceptable ranges for these two parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a high intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of bowel endometriosis and measurement of its various components.

Pain, gastrointestinal function and fertility outcomes of modified nerve-vessel sparing segmental and full thickness discoid resection for deep colorectal endometriosis - A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

There is an ongoing debate on surgical techniques for colorectal deep endometriosis (DE) and their effects on gastrointestinal (GI) function. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the differences in pre- and postsurgical GI function, health profiles and pain symptoms in women undergoing colorectal surgery for symptomatic DE either with a modified segmental resection technique, so-called nerve-vessel sparing segmental resection (NVSSR), or full thickness discoid resection (FTDR). Complication rates and fertility outcomes were also evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 162 consecutive patients, 125 (77.2%) of whom underwent NVSSR and 37 (22.8%) FTDR, were evaluated regarding complication rates. Furthermore a lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores, gastrointestinal function-related quality of life index (GIQLI), pain symptoms, endometriosis health profile (EHP-30) parameters were analyzed pre- and post-surgery in a final cohort of 121 patients.

RESULTS

There was no difference between postsurgical prevalence of LARS in either surgery group (14/98, 14.1% NVSSR; 2/23, 8.6% FTDR), with significantly decreased LARS scores and increased GIQLI values before vs after surgery in both groups (P < 0.001). The overall grade III complication rate was 7/162 (4.3%) with no significant differences between NVSSR and FTDR groups. Overall, EHP-30 and pain scores significantly decreased after a median follow-up of 41 (± 17.6) months (EHP-30 51.1, SD 21.5 vs 12.7, SD 19.3, P < 0.001; dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia all P < 0.001 both cohorts, respectively). The overall life birth rate and postsurgical pregnancy in infertile patients undergoing NVSSR and FTDR was respectively 58.1% in 25/43 patients; 55.6% in 5/9 patients; 56.0% in 14/25 patients and 100% in 5/5 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

NVSSR and FTDR for symptomatic colorectal DE confer a significant amelioration of GI function reflected by decreased LARS symptoms and increased GIQLI scores with no differences in postsurgical function in between the two techniques. Both techniques confer similar complication rates and effects on pain reduction and health profiles.

Gynecological Fistulae-Has Anything Changed in the Diagnosis and Treatment over the Last Decade? A Narrative Literature Review

Gynecological fistulae are a rare but severe complication of radiation therapy, pelvic surgery, prolonged labor, cesarean deliveries, or inflammatory bowel diseases. A gynecological fistula is an abnormal pathway formed between the urinary and gynecological tract, most commonly located between the urinary bladder and vagina. Vesico-uterine and vesicovaginal fistulae are an important health issue, common in women of reproductive age in developing countries with limited access to obstetrical care. Various surgical techniques have been described for VVF repair, depending on the location, severity, and cause of the fistula and the surgeon's experience. The purpose of our review was to evaluate the present state of knowledge about the prevalence and treatment of gynecological fistulae. The PubMed scientific database was searched for original articles on the subject of gynecological fistulae that had been published between 2013 and 2023.

"A Space Odyssey" on Laparoscopic Segmental Rectosigmoid Resection for Deep Endometriosis: A Seventeen-year Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes and Postoperative Complications among 3050 Patients Treated in a Referral Center

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection for bowel endometriosis (RSE), reporting surgical and short-term postoperative outcomes in a consecutive large series of patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Third-level national referral center for deep endometriosis (DE).

PATIENTS

3050 patients with symptomatic RSE requiring surgical treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Nerve-sparing laparoscopic resection for RSE perfomed by a multidisciplinary team. After collecting intraoperative surgical characteristics, postoperative complications were collected by evaluating the risk factors associated with their onset.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clavien-Dindo IIIb postoperative complications were noted in 13.1% of patients, with anastomotic leakage and rectovaginal fistula accounting for 3.0% and 1.9%, respectively. Postoperative bladder impairment was observed in 13.9% of patients during hospital discharge but spontaneously decreased to 4.5% at the first evaluation after 30 days, alongside a statistically significant change towards global symptom improvement. Multivariate analyses were done to identify the risk factors for segmental bowel resection in terms of occurrence of postoperative major complications. Ultralow (≤5 cm from the anal verge), low rectal anastomosis (<8 cm, >5 cm), parametrectomy, vaginal resection, and previous surgeries seemed more related to anastomotic leakage, rectovaginal fistula, and bladder retention.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection for RSE seems an effective and feasible procedure. The surgical complication rate is not negligible but could be reduced by implementing a multidisciplinary approach, an endless improvement in nerve-sparing techniques and surgical anatomy, as well as technological enhancements. Real future challenges will be to reduce the time for the first diagnosis of DE and the likelihood of surgical indications.

Case study of colorectal endometriosis treated with endoscopic submucosal excavation

Colorectal endometriosis (CEM) is a rare and complicated form of deep invasive endometriosis. Its treatment methods include drug therapy and surgery. However, it is often difficult to alleviate symptoms and address problems, such as infertility, using drug treatment alone. Surgical intervention provides a histologic diagnosis, allows assessment of pelvic cysts or masses with features concerning for malignancy, and reduces pain by destroying the endometriotic implants. We consider surgery in women with the following: Persistent pain despite medical therapy; Contraindications to or refusal of medical therapy; Need for a tissue diagnosis of endometriosis; Exclusion of malignancy in an adnexal mass; Obstruction of the bowel or urinary tract. But there is no consensus about the surgical methods. With the rapid development of gastroenteroscopy technology in recent years, many local gastrointestinal tumors that previously required surgical resection can now be removed by endoscopic surgery. Herein, we report one case of CEM treated by endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) to provide a new treatment option for the radical resection of single CEM.

Multicenter External Validation of the Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Index Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score

Importance

Preoperative mapping of deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE) is crucial as surgery can be complex and the quality of preoperative information is key.

Objective

To evaluate the Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Index (dPEI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score in a multicenter cohort.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, the surgical databases of 7 French referral centers were retrospectively queried for women who underwent surgery and preoperative MRI for DPE between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed in October 2022.

Intervention

Magnetic resonance imaging scans were reviewed using a dedicated lexicon and classified according to the dPEI score.

Main outcomes and measures

Operating time, hospital stay, Clavien-Dindo-graded postoperative complications, and presence of de novo voiding dysfunction.

Results

The final cohort consisted of 605 women (mean age, 33.3; 95% CI, 32.7-33.8 years). A mild dPEI score was reported in 61.2% (370) of the women, moderate in 25.8% (156), and severe in 13.1% (79). Central endometriosis was described in 93.2% (564) of the women and lateral endometriosis in 31.2% (189). Lateral endometriosis was more frequent in severe (98.7%) vs moderate (48.7%) disease and in moderate vs mild (6.7%) disease according to the dPEI (P < .001). Median operating time (211 minutes) and hospital stay (6 days) were longer in severe DPE than in moderate DPE (operating time, 150 minutes; hospital stay 4 days; P < .001), and in moderate than in mild DPE (operating time; 110 minutes; hospital stay, 3 days; P < .001). Patients with severe disease were 3.6 times more likely to experience severe complications than patients with mild or moderate disease (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.4-8.9; P = .004). They were also more likely to experience postoperative voiding dysfunction (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.6; P = .001). Interobserver agreement between senior and junior readers was good (κ = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest the ability of the dPEI to predict operating time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and de novo postoperative voiding dysfunction in a multicenter cohort. The dPEI may help clinicians to better anticipate the extent of DPE and improve clinical management and patient counseling.

Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for endometriosis with rectal involvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and long-term outcomes

PURPOSE

The optimal surgical approach for removal of colorectal endometrial deposits is unclear. Shaving and discoid excision of colorectal deposits allow organ preservation but risk recurrence with associated functional issues and re-operation. Formal resection risks potential higher complications but may be associated with lower recurrence rates. This meta-analysis compares peri-operative and long-term outcomes between conservative surgery (shaving and disc excision) versus formal colorectal resection.

METHODS

The study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search was performed on PubMed and EMBASE databases. All comparative studies examining surgical outcomes in patients that underwent conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for rectal endometrial deposits were included. The two main groups (conservative versus resection) were compared in three main blocks of variables including group comparability, operative outcomes and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies including 2861 patients were analysed with patients subdivided by procedure: colorectal resection (n = 1389), shaving (n = 703) and discoid excision (n = 742). When formal colorectal resection was compared to conservative surgery there was lower risk of recurrence (p = 0.002), comparable functional outcomes (minor LARS, p = 0.30, major LARS, p = 0.54), similar rates of postoperative leaks (p = 0.22), pelvic abscesses (p = 0.18) and rectovaginal fistula (p = 0.92). On subgroup analysis, shaving had the highest recurrence rate (p = 0.0007), however a lower rate of stoma formation (p < 0.00001) and rectal stenosis (p = 0.01). Discoid excision and formal resection were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Colorectal resection has a significantly lower recurrence rate compared to shaving. There is no difference in complications or functional outcomes between discoid excision and formal resection and both have similar recurrence rates.

Disk Excision Using End-to-End Anastomosis Circular Stapler for Deep Endometriosis of the Rectum: A 492-Patient Continuous Prospective Series

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To report a large series including women managed by disk excision using end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) circular transanal stapler to assess the feasibility of the technique, the features of nodules suitable for removal by disk excision, and the rate of major early complications.

DESIGN

Retrospective study on data prospectively recorded in 2 databases.

SETTING

Two tertiary referral centers.

PATIENTS

A total of 492 patients undergoing surgery for rectal endometriosis from May 2011 to June 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Rectal disk excision using the EEA stapler.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Disk excision using EEA was performed in 492 patients (24.2%) of 2,029 women receiving surgery for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum during the 11-year study period. Deep endometriosis involved low rectum in 11% and mid rectum in 55.3%. The diameter of rectal nodules exceeded 3 cm in 65.9%. Mean operative time was 2 hours, mean diameter of rectal patches removed was 41 ± 11 mm, and the mean rectal suture height was 9.2 ± 5.5 cm. The presence of microscopic foci on the edges of rectal patches was identified in 30.2% of cases. Rectal fistula was recorded in 20 patients (4%). The distance from the anal verge was significantly lower in patients with fistula than women with no fistula (5.9 ± 2 cm vs 9.2 ± 5.6 cm, p = .027). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 120 months, with a median value of 36 months. Magnetic resonance imaging in 3 patients during follow-up revealed a recurrent nodule infiltrating the previous stapled line (0.6%) after a postoperative delay of, respectively, 36, 48, and 84 months.

CONCLUSION

Disk excision using the EEA stapler is suitable in nodules >3 cm if surgeons ensure deep shaving of the rectum, to allow complete inclusion of the shaved area into the stapler jaws. Postoperative rectal recurrences seem incidental, whereas bowel leakage rate is comparable with that after colorectal resection. This technique is suitable in almost a quarter of patients managed for rectal endometriosis nodules and is therefore a valuable technique that warrants more widespread use.

Laparoscopic Discoid Excision of Bowel Endometriosis Using Sutures for Closure

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the technique of discoid excision of bowel endometriosis followed by closure of the bowel defect using sutures, without the application of the transanal stapler device.

DESIGN

Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage.

SETTING

Bowel endometriosis is a common pattern of deep endometriosis [1]. Discoid excision is 1 of the 3 surgical interventions applied to manage this pathologic entity, with shaving and segmental resection being the other 2 [2]. When discoid excision is performed, a transanal stapler device is used for bowel closure in most cases [3,4]. Only a few studies so far have reported the application of sutures for this purpose [5]. This video highlights the technique of bowel suturing after discoid excision.

INTERVENTIONS

This video presents the technique of bowel discoid excision with the application of sutures to close the bowel defect (Supplemental Video 1). The key surgical steps are as follows: 1. Dissection of both ureters and development of pararectal spaces. 2. Recognition and preservation of the inferior hypogastric plexus and the hypogastric nerve. 3. Detachment of the nodule from the cervix. 4. Detachment of the nodule from the bowel, beginning with deep shaving and followed by discoid excision. 5. Thorough description of the bowel closure using 2 layers of Vicryl 3-0 sutures, the first being interrupted and the second continuous.

CONCLUSION

The described technique of bowel closure using sutures may be a safe and effective alternative to the transanal stapler. Its advantage is that it can be performed when the pathology is located higher than 15 cm from the anal verge or the diameter of the nodule is more than 30 mm.

Surgical Treatment of Deep Endometriosis

In deep endometriosis (DE), clusters of endometrium-like cells penetrate more than 5 mm below the peritoneum: The affected organs and tissue structures can eventuate in an alteration of the anatomy with eliminated organ boundaries, which in some cases can pose a real surgical challenge, even for experienced surgeons. A comprehensive description of the different manifestations of the disease can be found in the #Enzian classification. Since the operation is usually the foundation for the successful treatment of DE, what is important are conclusive indications, appropriate preoperative preparation and, above all, appropriate experience on the part of the surgical team. This article aims to provide a review of the surgical options that are currently available.

Study of postoperative complications after the implementation of a multidisciplinary care pathway for patients with digestive endometriosis

PURPOSE

To assess the quality of care following the establishment of a multidisciplinary care pathway for patient operated on for deep pelvic endometriosis with digestive impairment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric study of patients suffering from deep infiltrating endometriosis, treated in Gynaecological Department at Toulouse University Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020. We compared our results to those of our previous study, Gornes et al. which showed a postoperative complication occurred in 37.8% of the cases and a postoperative severe complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (grades 3b) rate of 18.3%.

RESULTS

98 patients were included. Our study shows a clear decrease in postoperative complications with an overall complication rate of 19.4% and severe complications (grades 3b) of 4.1%. The rate of complication appeared to be significantly less frequent in the case of shaving in relation to other digestive procedures (p = 0.008) and in the case of a lesion of < 20 mm by MRI (p = 0.01). The use of multidisciplinary surgical care was more frequent in the case of multiple locations (66.7% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.07) and was more frequent in the case of transmural damage with echo endoscopy (and to a lesser degree in the case of damage of the muscularis or mucous membrane) (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary care of endometriosis with digestive damage appears to be indispensable. The intraoperative intervention of a skilled digestive surgeon of bowel endometriosis helps create the best balance between effectiveness-complications-functional prognosis, with a reduction of severe postoperative complications.

Colorectal infiltrating deep endometriosis: Laparoscopic treatment. A case report

Endometriosis is a disease affecting approximately 10% of women of fertile age. A particular presentation is deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid colon with symptoms that can mimic an intestinal obstruction or neoplasm. We report the case of a 39-year-old woman with pelvic pain during the menstrual cycle and significant anemia who presented an ectopic endometrial tissue in correspondence of the rectum. Because of the thickness of the lesion the patient underwent a segmental laparoscopic colorectal resection with end-to-end anastomosis.