Risk of Upper-body Adverse Events in Robot-assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Factors related to clearance of the small pelvic cavity during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery

AIM

To identify factors influencing the Trendelenburg angle required during laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery at a single university hospital between May 1, 2019, and March 31, 2021 were enrolled. Data were extracted from the medical records, while magnetic resonance imaging scans and all laparoscopic surgery videos were retrospectively reviewed to assess the presence of the small intestine in the pelvic cavity as well as the adhesions at each site. Groups with and without the small intestine in the pelvic cavity, and those requiring a Trendelenburg angle above or below 13° were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 219 patients were examined. The Trendelenburg angle was significantly higher (p = 0.004), while a significant increase in ovarian adhesions was observed (p = 0.033; odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-5.01) in the group without the presence of the small intestine in the pelvic cavity. Furthermore, the group requiring a Trendelenburg angle of ≥13° had significantly thicker subcutaneous fat (p = 0.044) and more ileal adhesions (p = 0.040, OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.03-3.23) than the group with an angle of <13°.

CONCLUSION

Cases of ileal adhesions or thick subcutaneous fat are more likely to require a Trendelenburg angle of ≥13°. Therefore, Trendelenburg complications should be considered in this group. In addition, ovarian adhesions make it more difficult to exclude the small intestine from the small pelvic cavity, and may be associated with endometriosis.

Temporal trends of failure-to-rescue following perioperative complications in vulvar cancer surgery in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Failure-to-rescue, defined as mortality following a perioperative complication, is a perioperative quality indicator studied in various surgeries, but not in vulvar cancer surgery. The objective of this study was to assess failure-to-rescue in patients undergoing surgical therapy for vulvar cancer.

METHODS

This cross-section study queried the National Inpatient Sample. The study population was 31,077 patients who had surgical therapy for vulvar cancer from 1/2001-9/2015. The main outcomes were (i) perioperative morbidity (29 indicators) and (ii) mortality following a perioperative complication during the index admission for vulvar surgery (failure-to-rescue), assessed with a multivariable binary logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The cohort-level median age was 69 years, and 14,337 (46.1%) had medical comorbidity. Perioperative complications were reported in 4736 (15.2%) patients during the hospital admission for vulvar surgery. In multivariable analysis, patient factors including older age, medical comorbidity, and morbid obesity, and treatment factors with prior radiotherapy and radical vulvectomy were associated with perioperative complications (P < 0.05). The number of patients with morbid obesity, higher comorbidity index, and prior radiotherapy increased over time (P-trends < 0.001). Among 4736 patients who developed perioperative complications, 55 patients died during the hospital admission for vulvar surgery (failure-to-rescue rate, 1.2%). In multivariable analysis, cardiac arrest (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] 27.25), sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (aOR 11.54), pneumonia (aOR 6.03), shock (aOR 4.37), and respiratory failure (aOR 3.10) were associated with failure-to-rescue (high-risk morbidities). There was an increasing trend of high-risk morbidities from 2.0% to 3.7% over time, but the failure-to-rescue from high-risk morbidities decreased from 9.1% to 2.8% (P-trend < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Vulvar cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment had increased comorbidity over time with an increase in high-risk complications. However, failure-to-rescue rate has decreased significantly.

Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

Objective

To compare the 3-year oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for cervical cancer.

Methods

Based on the clinical diagnosis and treatment for cervical cancer in the China database, patients with FIGO 2018 stage IA with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI)-IB2 cervical cancer disease who underwent RRH and ARH from 2004 to 2018 were included. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to compare the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rate between patients receiving RRH and those receiving ARH. The Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching were used to estimate the surgical approach-specific survival.

Results

A total of 1,137 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled in this study, including the RRH group (n = 468) and the ARH group (n = 669). The median follow-up time was 45 months (RRH group vs. ARH group: 24 vs. 60 months). Among the overall study population, there was no significant difference in 3-year OS and DFS between the RRH group and the ARH group (OS: 95.8% vs. 97.6% p = 0.244). The Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that RRH was not an independent risk factor for 3-year OS (HR: 1.394, 95% CI: 0.552–3.523, p = 0.482). However, RRH was an independent risk factor for 3-year DFS (HR: 1.985, 95% CI: 1.078–3.655 p = 0.028). After 1:1 propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in 3-year OS between the RRH group and the ARH group (96.6% vs. 98.0%, p = 0.470); however, the 3-year DFS of the RRH group was lower than that of the ARH group (91.0% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.025). The Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that RRH was not an independent risk factor for 3-year OS (HR: 1.622, 95% CI: 0.449–5.860 p = 0.461), but RRH was an independent risk factor for 3-year DFS (HR: 2.498, 95% CI: 1.123–5.557 p = 0.025).

Conclusion

Among patients with stage I A1 (LVSI +)-I B2 cervical cancer based on the FIGO 2018 staging system, RRH has a lower 3-year DFS than ARH, suggesting that RRH may not be suitable for early cervical cancer patients.

Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of the first level I evidence (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer [LACC] trial) on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complications for cervical cancer surgery.

METHODS

This was population-based retrospective observational study, querying National Inpatient Sample. Women with cervical cancer who underwent hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from 10/2015-12/2018 were examined. A quasi-experimental analysis with interrupted-time series was performed to assess the influence of the LACC trial report on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complication rates.

RESULTS

5120 women in the pre-LACC period and 1645 women in the post-LACC period were compared. Following the LACC trial report on 3/2018, the minimally invasive hysterectomy use dropped by 19.7 percent points in one month (55.2% in 3/2018 to 35.5% in 4/2018), followed by a continued decline of 8.0% (95% confidence interval 0.1-15.3) monthly. By 12/2018, minimally invasive hysterectomy was used in 17.9% of cases, which was 38.8 percent points lower than the expected rate per the pre-LACC period projection. In multivariable analysis, women in the post-LACC period were 63% less likely to undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy (adjusted-odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.42) but 23% more likely to have a perioperative complication (38.6% versus 29.1%, adjusted-odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.40) compared to those in the pre-LACC period. Women in the post-LACC group were more likely to have a longer hospital stay compared to those in the pre-LACC group (median, 3 versus 2 days, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Following the LACC trial results, U.S. surgeons rapidly shifted from minimally invasive to open hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive surgery was associated with an increase in perioperative complications and longer hospital admissions.