1
|
Huepenbecker SP, Iniesta MD, Wang XS, Cain KE, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Shen SE, Basabe MS, Suki T, Garcia Lopez JE, Mena GE, Lasala JD, Williams LA, Ramirez PT, Meyer LA. Longitudinal perioperative patient-reported outcomes in open compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:241.e1-241.e18. [PMID: 37827271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few prospective studies in the gynecologic surgical literature that compared patient-reported outcomes between open and minimally invasive hysterectomies within enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare prospectively collected perioperative patient-reported symptom burden and interference measures in open compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy cohorts within enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. STUDY DESIGN We compared patient-reported symptom burden and functional interference in 646 patients who underwent a hysterectomy (254 underwent open surgery and 392 underwent minimally invasive surgery) for benign and malignant indications under enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Outcomes were prospectively measured using the validated MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, which was administered perioperatively up to 8 weeks after surgery. Cohorts were compared using Fisher exact and chi-squared tests, adjusted longitudinal generalized linear mixed modeling, and Kaplan Meier curves to model return to no or mild symptoms. RESULTS The open cohort had significantly worse preoperative physical functional interference (P=.001). At the time of hospital discharge postoperatively, the open cohort reported significantly higher mean symptom severity scores and more moderate or severe scores for overall (P<.001) and abdominal pain (P<.001), fatigue (P=.001), lack of appetite (P<.001), bloating (P=.041), and constipation (P<.001) when compared with the minimally invasive cohort. The open cohort also had significantly higher interference in physical functioning (score 5.0 vs 2.7; P<.001) than the minimally invasive cohort at the time of discharge with no differences in affective interference between the 2 groups. In mixed modeling analysis of the first 7 postoperative days, both cohorts reported improved symptom burden and functional interference over time with generally slower recovery in the open cohort. From 1 to 8 postoperative weeks, the open cohort had worse mean scores for all evaluated symptoms and interference measures except for pain with urination, although scores indicated mild symptomatic burden and interference in both cohorts. The time to return to no or mild symptoms was significantly longer in the open cohort for overall pain (14 vs 4 days; P<.001), fatigue (8 vs 4 days; P<.001), disturbed sleep (2 vs 2 days; P<.001), and appetite (1.5 vs 1 days; P<.001) but was significantly longer in the minimally invasive cohort for abdominal pain (42 vs 28 days; P<.001) and bloating (42 vs 8 days; P<.001). The median time to return to no or mild functional interference was longer in the open than in the minimally invasive hysterectomy cohort for physical functioning (36 vs 32 days; P<.001) with no difference in compositive affective functioning (5 vs 5 days; P=.07) between the groups. CONCLUSION Open hysterectomy was associated with increased symptom burden in the immediate postoperative period and longer time to return to no or mild symptom burden and interference with physical functioning. However, all patient-reported measures improved within days to weeks of both open and minimally invasive surgery and differences were not always clinically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah P Huepenbecker
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria D Iniesta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xin S Wang
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Katherine E Cain
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andres Zorrilla-Vaca
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shu-En Shen
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - M Sol Basabe
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tina Suki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Juan E Garcia Lopez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gabriel E Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Javier D Lasala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Loretta A Williams
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wodlin NB, Oliv E, Kjølhede P, Nilsson L. Influence of Regional Analgesia on Self-Reported Quality of Sleep After Gynecological Abdominal Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2024; 46:102228. [PMID: 37741618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether intrathecal morphine (ITM) analgesia in abdominal surgery for presumed gynecological malignancy was associated with better self-reported sleep quality postoperatively compared with epidural analgesia (EDA), and to evaluate risk factors for bad sleep quality. METHODS A secondary analysis of a randomized open controlled trial, comparing ITM and EDA as postoperative analgesia in 80 women undergoing laparotomy under general anaesthesia in an enhanced recovery after surgery framework. A total of 38 women allocated to ITM and 39 to EDA completed the study. The Swedish Postoperative Symptoms Questionnaire assessed symptoms and sleep quality during the first postoperative week. Multiple logistic regression models evaluated risk factors. The results are presented as adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs. RESULTS The sleep quality night-by-night did not differ significantly between the women who had ITM or EDA. Risk factors for bad sleep quality for night 1 were age (0.91; 0.84-0.99), operation time (1.02; 1.00-1.03), and opioid consumption (0.96; 0.91-0.99). For night 2, regular use of hypnotics preoperatively (15.81; 1.52-164.27) and opioid consumption (1.07; 1.00-1.14) were independent risk factors for bad sleep. After the second night, no risk factors were disclosed. CONCLUSIONS ITM and EDA did not appear to affect the sleep quality postoperatively differently in women undergoing laparotomy for presumed gynecological malignancy. Risk factors for self-reported bad sleep quality varied during the first 3 days after surgery. Younger age, longer operation time, and preoperative use of hypnotics were associated with bad sleep quality, whereas the effect of opioid consumption on sleep quality varied depending on the time since surgery. These findings merit further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ninnie Borendal Wodlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Emelie Oliv
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Värnamo Hospital, Värnamo, Sweden
| | - Preben Kjølhede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Lena Nilsson
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sibley D, Sellers D, Randall I, Englesakis M, Culos-Reed SN, Singh M, Mina DS. Evaluating the effect of preoperative interventions on sleep health in the perioperative period: a systematic review. J Sleep Res 2023:e14124. [PMID: 38124447 DOI: 10.1111/jsr.14124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Surgery and general anaesthesia have deleterious effects on sleep and disrupted perioperative sleep health is a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to summarise preoperative interventions that report sleep outcomes. Studies that delivered an intervention initiated >24 h prior to surgery among an adult sample without a diagnosed sleep disorder were included. Studies were excluded if they were preclinical or were not published in English. MEDLINE, MEDLINE ePubs Ahead of Print and In-process Citations, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Web of Science were searched on February 2, 2023. This review was reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier: CRD42021260578). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of Bias 2 tool for randomised trials and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions for non-randomised trials. Certainty of findings were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The searching yielded 10,938 total citations, and after screening resulted in 28 randomised and 19 non-randomised trials (47 total) with 4937 participants. Sleep was a primary outcome in 16 trials; a sleep outcome was significantly improved relative to comparator in 23 trials. This review demonstrates that preoperative sleep is modifiable via a variety of interventions, including pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and nursing interventions delivered preoperatively or perioperatively. Our results should be considered with caution due to an overall intermediate to high risk of bias in the included trials, and low to very low certainty of evidence. This review supports the modifiability of sleep health among surgical patients and provides the groundwork for preoperative sleep optimisation research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sibley
- Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Sellers
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian Randall
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marina Englesakis
- Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mandeep Singh
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Santa Mina
- Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mills H, Acquah R, Tang N, Cheung L, Klenk S, Glassen R, Pirson M, Albert A, Hoang DT, Van TN. Commentary: Computational Analysis for ERAS and Other Surgical Processes: Commentary From Clinical Perspective. Front Surg 2022; 9:946963. [PMID: 35903264 PMCID: PMC9316441 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.946963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hilla Mills
- Department of Medical Science, University for Development, Accra, Ghana
| | - Ronald Acquah
- Department of Medical Science, University for Development, Accra, Ghana
| | - Nova Tang
- RD Lab, The Hospital Institute for Hebal Research, Toluca, Mexico
| | - Luke Cheung
- RD Lab, The Hospital Institute for Hebal Research, Toluca, Mexico
| | - Susanne Klenk
- Research Institution of Clinical Biomedicine, Hospital University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ronald Glassen
- Research Institution of Clinical Biomedicine, Hospital University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany
| | - Magali Pirson
- Industrial Research Group, International College of Science and Technology, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alain Albert
- Industrial Research Group, International College of Science and Technology, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Early Discharge within 12 Hours after Robotic Radical Hysterectomy. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11041122. [PMID: 35207395 PMCID: PMC8874658 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11041122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate safety of quick discharge after robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) in a tertiary hospital which has the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Among 94 consecutive cervical cancer patients who had undergone RRH, operative outcomes and the rate of unexpected visit after surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized as a surgery-to-discharge time of ≤12 h (early discharge [ED]) or >12 h (late discharge [LD]). About 77% (n = 72) of analyzed 94 patients discharged within 12 h after RRH. The ED group had significant correlation with shorter duration for urinary catheter required, less operative blood loss, and less voiding difficulty after long-term follow up compared to the LD group. There was no difference of perioperative complications and unexpected visit between the two groups. Performing nerve sparing (NS) RRH was only independent predictor for ED (p = 0.043, hazard ratio for LD = 0.22, confidence interval = 0.05–0.95). In conclusion, the ED within 12 h after RRH was safe in the setting of ERAS protocol. The NS-RRH could avoid the delay of genitourinary function recovery after surgery which caused LD. It can become the reasonable clinical pathway to discharge early patients who undergo NS-RRH with ERAS protocol.
Collapse
|
6
|
Analgesia for Gynecologic Oncologic Surgeries: A Narrative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:1-13. [PMID: 35118596 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-00998-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gynecologic oncologic malignancies are amongst the most common cancers affecting women across the world. This narrative review focuses on the current state of evidence around optimal perioperative pain management of patients undergoing surgeries for gynecologic malignancies with a specific focus on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). RECENT FINDINGS Recent improvements in postoperative pain management following all types of gynecologic procedures, including minimally invasive, open-abdominal, or CRS + HIPEC, have been implemented through enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. These protocols encompass the use of preemptive analgesia, neuraxial and regional techniques, local anesthetic infiltration, and multimodal analgesia. The severity of postoperative pain varies for minimally invasive cancer surgery to open debulking procedures. Therefore, an individualized perioperative analgesic plan is critical depending on the surgical approach. For CRS + HIPEC, neuraxial techniques such as thoracic epidurals and opioid sparing multimodal analgesics have shown efficacy in the perioperative period. However, future research is needed as many of these patients develop chronic pain with very limited research done in this realm.
Collapse
|
7
|
Aquil A, El Kherchi O, El Azmaoui N, Mouallif M, Guerroumi M, Chokri A, Jayakumar AR, Benider A, Elgot A. Body image dissatisfaction and lower self-esteem as major predictors of poor sleep quality in gynecological cancer patients after surgery: cross-sectional study. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2021; 21:229. [PMID: 34082733 PMCID: PMC8173912 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01375-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Sleep quality is among the indicators associated with the quality of life of patients with cancer. A multitude of factors may affect patient sleep quality and are considered as associated predictive factors. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of poor sleep quality in Moroccan women with gynecological cancer after radical surgery. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out at the Oncology Department of the Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca (Morocco), on women who had undergone radical surgery for gynecological cancer (n = 100; mean age: 50.94 years). To assess sleep quality, symptoms of depression and anxiety, self-esteem and body image, the following translated and validated Arabic versions of the tools were used: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale and Body Image Scale. To determine predictors of sleep quality, multiple linear and hierarchical regressions were used. Results 78% of participants were considered poor sleepers, most of them exhibited very poor subjective quality (53%), longer sleep onset latency (55%), short period of sleep (42%) and low rate of usual sleep efficiency (47%). 79% of these patients did not use sleep medication and 28% were in poor shape during the day. Waking up in the middle of the night or early in the morning and getting up to use the bathroom were the main reasons for poor sleep quality. Higher PSQI scores were positively correlated with higher scores of anxiety, depression, body image dissatisfaction and with lower self-esteem (p < 0.001). The medical coverage system, body image dissatisfaction and low self-esteem predicted poor sleep quality. After controlling for the socio-demographic variables (age and medical coverage system), higher body image dissatisfaction and lower self-esteem significantly predicted lower sleep quality. Conclusion Body image dissatisfaction and lower self-esteem were positively linked to sleep disturbance in women with gynecological cancer after undergone radical surgery. These two predictors require systematic evaluation and adequate management to prevent sleep disorders and mental distress as well as improving the quality of life of these patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-021-01375-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amina Aquil
- Epidemiology and Biomedical Unit, Laboratory of Sciences and Health Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University of Settat, 26000, Settat, Morocco
| | - Ouassil El Kherchi
- Epidemiology and Biomedical Unit, Laboratory of Sciences and Health Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University of Settat, 26000, Settat, Morocco
| | - Naoual El Azmaoui
- Epidemiology and Biomedical Unit, Laboratory of Sciences and Health Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University of Settat, 26000, Settat, Morocco
| | - Mustapha Mouallif
- Epidemiology and Biomedical Unit, Laboratory of Sciences and Health Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University of Settat, 26000, Settat, Morocco
| | - Maroua Guerroumi
- Epidemiology and Biomedical Unit, Laboratory of Sciences and Health Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University of Settat, 26000, Settat, Morocco
| | - Aziz Chokri
- Institut des Sciences du Sport, Hassan First University of Settat, 26000, Settat, Morocco
| | - Arumugam R Jayakumar
- Neuropathology Research Unit, Miami VA Medical Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Abdellatif Benider
- Ibn Rochd University Hospital Center, Mohammed VI Center for the Treatment of Cancers, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Abdeljalil Elgot
- Epidemiology and Biomedical Unit, Laboratory of Sciences and Health Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University of Settat, 26000, Settat, Morocco. .,Institut supérieur des sciences de la santé, Complexe Universitaire, route de Casablanca, B.P 555, Settat, Morocco.
| |
Collapse
|