AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification: An Anatomy-based Surgical Complexity Score

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement. Hum Reprod Open 2024;2024:hoae029. [PMID: 38812884 PMCID: PMC11134890 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence‐based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non‐invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Pregnancy with endometriosis: Assessment of national-level trends, characteristics, and maternal morbidity at delivery

OBJECTIVE

To examine pregnancy characteristics and maternal morbidity at delivery among pregnant patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. Study population was 17,796,365 hospital deliveries from 2016 to 2020, excluded adenomyosis and uterine myoma. The exposure was endometriosis diagnosis. Main outcome measures were clinical and pregnancy characteristics and severe maternal morbidity at delivery related to endometriosis, assessed with multivariable regression model.

RESULTS

Endometriosis was diagnosed in 17,590 patients. The prevalence of endometriosis increased by 24 % from one in 1,191 patients in 2016 to one in 853 patients in 2020 (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.30). Clinical and pregnancy characteristics that had greater than two-fold association to endometriosis included polycystic ovary syndrome, placenta previa, cesarean delivery, maternal age of ≥30 years, prior pregnancy loss, and anxiety disorder. Pregnant patients with endometriosis were more likely to have the diagnosis of measured severe maternal morbidity during the index hospitalization for delivery (47.8 vs 17.3 per 1,000 deliveries, aOR 1.91, 95%CI 1.78-2.06); these associations were more prominent following vaginal (aOR 2.82, 95%CI 2.41-3.30) compared to cesarean (aOR 1.85, 95%CI 1.71-2.00) deliveries. Among the individual morbidity indicators, endometriosis was most strongly associated with thromboembolism (aOR 5.05, 95%CI 3.70-6.91), followed by sepsis (aOR 2.39, 95%CI 1.85-3.09) and hysterectomy (aOR 2.18, 95%CI 1.85-2.56). When stratified for endometriosis anatomical site, odds of thromboembolism was increased in endometriosis at distant site (aOR 9.10, 95%CI 3.76-22.02) and adnexa (aOR 7.37, 95%CI 4.43-12.28); odds of sepsis was most increased in endometriosis at multi-classifier locations (aOR 7.33, 95%CI 2.93-18.31) followed by pelvic peritoneum (aOR 5.54, 95%CI 2.95-10.40); and odds of hysterectomy exceeded three-fold in endometriosis at adnexa (aOR 3.00, 95%CI 2.30-3.90), distant site (aOR 5.36, 95%CI 3.48-8.24), and multi-classifier location (aOR 4.46, 95%CI 2.11-9.41).

CONCLUSION

The results of this nationwide analysis suggest that pregnancy with endometriosis is uncommon but gradually increasing over time in the United States. The data also suggest that endometriosis during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery, especially for thromboembolism, sepsis, and hysterectomy. These morbidity risks differed by the anatomical location of endometriosis.

Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Pelvic Deep Endometriosis and Endometriosis Classification Systems: An International Consensus Statement

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Guideline No. 449: Diagnosis and Impact of Endometriosis - A Canadian Guideline

OBJECTIVE

To provide a contemporary approach to the understanding of the impact and methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis in Canada.

TARGET POPULATION

Individuals, families, communities, health care providers, and health care administrators who are affected by, care for patients with, or manage delivery of services for endometriosis.

OPTIONS

The diagnosis of endometriosis is facilitated by a detailed history, examination, and imaging tests with providers who are experienced in endometriosis care. Surgical evaluation with pathology confirms a diagnosis of endometriosis; however, it is not required for those whose diagnosis was confirmed with imaging.

OUTCOMES

There is a need to address earlier recognition of endometriosis to facilitate timely access to care and support. Education directed at the public, affected individuals and families, health care providers, and health care administrators are essential to reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Increased awareness and education about the impact and approach to diagnosis may support timely access to care for patients and families affected by endometriosis. Earlier and appropriate care may support a reduced health care system burden; however, improved clinical evaluation may require initial investments.

EVIDENCE

Each section was reviewed with a unique search strategy representative of the evidence available in the literature related to the area of focus. The literature searches for each section of this guideline are listed in Appendix A and include information from published systematic reviews described in the text.

VALIDATION METHODS

The recommendations were developed following two rounds of review by a national expert panel through an iterative 2-year consensus process. Further details on the process are shared in Appendix B. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix C (Table C1 for definitions and Table C2 for interpretations of strong and conditional recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

This guideline is intended to support health care providers and policymakers involved in the care of those impacted by endometriosis and the systems required to support them.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Endometriosis impact and diagnosis updated guidelines for Canadian health care providers and policymakers.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Association between Endometriosis and Surgical Complications among Benign Hysterectomies

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of endometriosis on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

PATIENTS

A total of 127 556 hysterectomies performed for benign gynecologic indications INTERVENTIONS: Differences in the primary outcomes were compared between patients with and without endometriosis after adjustment for group differences in covariates using inverse probability of treatment weighting approach.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 127 556 hysterectomies identified, 19 618 (15.4%) had a diagnosis of endometriosis. Patients with endometriosis were younger with a lower prevalence of chronic comorbidities but had higher rates of concurrent pelvic inflammatory disease and previous abdominal operations. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher in patients with endometriosis (9.9% vs 8.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.34). The incidence of 30-day mortality (0.1% vs 0.03%; OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.69-5.65) and reoperations (1.50% vs 1.36%; OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98-1.42) were not different in patients with and without endometriosis.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative complications are more likely in hysterectomies involving endometriosis than those without endometriosis, likely owing to anatomic distortion incurring increased surgical complexity. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of complications and plan for mitigating these increased risks before and during surgery for suspected endometriosis.

Endometriosis: Classification, pathophysiology, and treatment options

The human endometrium is a complex hormone-target tissue consisting of two layers: the lower basalis, and the upper functionalis. The latter of the two goes through a cycle of thickening and shedding without residual scarring or loss of function. This cycle, known as the menstrual cycle, occurs on a monthly basis in most of healthy reproductive-age women. It is, however, associated with a number of reproductive diseases, endometriosis being one of them. Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrium at ectopic sites within the peritoneum or, more rarely, other locations outside the abdominal area. It affects around 6-10% of reproductive-age women in the world and causes debilitating pain, heavy menstrual bleeding, pain during penetrative sex, and infertility. The etiology of the disease is not yet fully understood but the generally accepted theory is that the endometriotic lesions originate from viable eutopic endometrial cells that flow back into the peritoneum through the process of retrograde menstruation. Endometriosis is usually classified into four stages: minimal, mild, moderate, and severe, though it is important to note that the presentation of symptoms does not necessarily correspond to the disease progression. The immune system plays an important role in supporting the viability and growth of ectopic endometriotic tissue, all the while promoting chronic inflammation at the lesion sites, which causes prolonged pain. There is no definitive cure for endometriosis, but there are several options for symptom management, including laparoscopy, hormonal therapy, the use of NSAIDs, dietary changes, exercise, and, in cases when all conservative treatments fail, hysterectomy.

Endometriosis in the era of precision medicine and impact on sexual and reproductive health across the lifespan and in diverse populations

Endometriosis is a common estrogen-dependent disorder wherein uterine lining tissue (endometrium) is found mainly in the pelvis where it causes inflammation, chronic pelvic pain, pain with intercourse and menses, and infertility. Recent evidence also supports a systemic inflammatory component that underlies associated co-morbidities, e.g., migraines and cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases. Genetics and environment contribute significantly to disease risk, and with the explosion of omics technologies, underlying mechanisms of symptoms are increasingly being elucidated, although novel and effective therapeutics for pain and infertility have lagged behind these advances. Moreover, there are stark disparities in diagnosis, access to care, and treatment among persons of color and transgender/nonbinary identity, socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, and adolescents, and a disturbing low awareness among health care providers, policymakers, and the lay public about endometriosis, which, if left undiagnosed and under-treated can lead to significant fibrosis, infertility, depression, and markedly diminished quality of life. This review summarizes endometriosis epidemiology, compelling evidence for its pathogenesis, mechanisms underlying its pathophysiology in the age of precision medicine, recent biomarker discovery, novel therapeutic approaches, and issues around reproductive justice for marginalized populations with this disorder spanning the past 100 years. As we enter the next revolution in health care and biomedical research, with rich molecular and clinical datasets, single-cell omics, and population-level data, endometriosis is well positioned to benefit from data-driven research leveraging computational and artificial intelligence approaches integrating data and predicting disease risk, diagnosis, response to medical and surgical therapies, and prognosis for recurrence.

Does Robot Assisted Laparoscopy (RAL) Have an Advantage in Preservation of Ovarian Reserve in Endometriosis Surgery? Comparison of Single-Port Access (SPA) RAL and SPA Laparoscopy

The purpose of this study was to compare single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy and SPA robot assisted laparoscopy (RAL) for endometriosis with respect to ovarian reserve preservation and surgical outcomes. Clinical factors affecting any reduction in ovarian function after surgery were also evaluated. Patients with endometriosis who underwent SPA laparoscopy (n = 87) or RAL (n = 78) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' baseline characteristics, including the severity of endometriosis and surgical outcomes including surgical complexity, were collected. To assess the preservation of ovarian reserve after surgery, serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels before surgery, at two weeks, and at three months after surgery were collected. Age, ovarian cyst size, location of cyst, complexity of surgery, and the severity of endometriosis were associated with the reduction in AMH levels after surgery. The severity of endometriosis was higher in the RAL group than in the SPA group. There were no significant differences in other clinical baseline characteristics, including preoperative AMH levels. For surgical outcomes, radical surgery was more frequently performed in the RAL group. In univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses, age, ovarian cyst size, location of cyst, complexity of surgery, and the severity of endometriosis were associated with the reduction in AMH levels after surgery. Incorporating surgical approaches and risk factors for postoperative ovarian function decrease, RAL was more beneficial than SPA laparoscopy for the preservation of ovarian reserve in patients with mild endometriosis (stage I/II) (postoperative 3 month AMH reduction rate (%), SPA laparoscopy vs. RAL, 33.51 ± 19.98 vs. 23.58 ± 14.98, p = 0.04) and in patients who underwent non-complex surgery (postoperative 3 month AMH reduction rate (%), SPA laparoscopy vs. RAL, 37.89 ± 22.37 vs. 22.37 ± 17.49, p = 0.022). SPA RAL may have advantages over SPA laparoscopy in ovarian function preservation, especially in patients with mild endometriosis and patients who have undergone a non-complex surgery.

Distinct subtypes of endometriosis identified based on stromal-immune microenvironment and gene expression: implications for hormone therapy

Background

Endometriosis (EMs) is a chronic inflammatory condition that is highly heterogeneous. Current clinical staging fails to accurately predict drug responses and prognosis. In this study, we aimed to reveal the heterogeneity of ectopic lesions and investigate the possible underlying mechanisms using transcriptomic data and clinical information.

Methods

The EMs microarray dataset GSE141549 was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed to identify EMs subtypes, which was followed by the functional enrichment analysis and estimation of immune infiltrates. Subtype-associated gene signatures were identified and further validated in other independent datasets, including GSE25628, E-MTAB-694, and GSE23339. Additionally, tissue microarrays (TMAs) were generated from premenopausal patients with EMs to investigate the potential clinical implications of the two identified subtypes.

Results

The unsupervised clustering analysis revealed that ectopic EMs lesions can be classified into two distinct subtypes: stroma-enriched (S1) and immune-enriched (S2). The functional analysis revealed that S1 correlated with fibroblast activation and extracellular matrix remodeling in the ectopic milieu, whereas S2 was characterized by the upregulation of immune pathways and a higher positive correlation with the immunotherapy response. Moreover, we identified a subtype signature composed of FHL1 and SORBS1, and constructed a subtype diagnostic model. Based on the cohort data from the TMAs, we found that S2 was strongly associated with the failure of/intolerance to hormone therapy.

Conclusions

This study identified two distinct subtypes that are varyingly associated with hormone resistance, stroma-immunity, and molecular features, thereby highlighting the importance of this stromal-immune heterogeneity in identifying EMs subtypes and providing novel insights into future personalized hormone-free therapy in EMs.

Clinical significance of serum Th1/Th2 cytokines in patients with endometriosis

Endometriosis (EMS) is a challenging gynecological disorder prevalent in reproductive-aged women, and Th1/Th2 cytokines are implicated in EMS progression. This study probed the serum levels and clinical values of Th1/Th2 cytokines in EMS patients. Firstly, the clinic characteristics of EMS and control patients were recorded. The levels of interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, and IL-10 in the serum of EMS and control patients were identified, respectively. The correlations between Th1 and Th2 cytokines and the diagnostic values of these cytokines in EMS were analyzed. We observed that EMS patients had obvious differences from the controls in dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, nulliparous, and CA125 levels. Serum IFN-γ and IL-2 were lower while IL-4 and IL-10 were higher in EMS patients. Serum IFN-γ, IL-4 were negatively correlated with serum IL-2, and IL-10 in EMS patients. Th1/Th2 cytokines may help the diagnosis of EMS. Serum IFN-γ and IL-2 were independent protective factors for EMS while dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, nulliparous, and serum IL-4 and IL-10 were independent risk factors for EMS. Collectively, serum Th1/Th2 cytokine levels helped the diagnosis of EMS, with IFN-γ and IL-2 serving as independent protective factors whilst IL-4 and IL-10 serving as independent risk factors.

Excision of triple compartment deep infiltrating endometriosis with visceral involvement

Background:

Excision of multi-compartment deep infiltrating endometriosis with visceral involvement is challenging. We illustrate an interdisciplinary approach to complete minimally invasive excision in a single surgery.

Case:

We present a case of deep infiltrating endometriosis with visceral involvement in the anterior, middle, and posterior compartments. A collaborative surgical approach was taken with gynecologic, colorectal, and urologic surgeons to perform a robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, ovarian cystectomy, and unilateral oophorectomy with concurrent segmental resection of rectosigmoid and excision of transmural bladder and vaginal nodules.

Conclusion:

Thorough preoperative evaluation and an interdisciplinary approach to surgical planning involving radiology, gynecology, colorectal surgery, and urology allowed for complete simultaneous resection of bladder, rectosigmoid, and pelvic deep infiltrating endometriosis without complications via a minimally invasive route.

External Validation of the "2021 AAGL Endometriosis Classification": A Retrospective Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Externally validate the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) staging system against surgical complexity and compare diagnostic accuracy with revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) stage, as was done in original publication.

DESIGN

Retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study.

SETTING

Multicenter (Sydney, Australia).

PATIENTS

A total of 317 patients (January 2016-October 2021) were used in the final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

A database of patients with coded surgical data was analyzed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Three independent observers assigned an AAGL surgical stage (1-4) as the index test and surgical complexity level (A-D) as the reference standard. Results from the most accurate of the 3 observers were used in the final analysis. The weighted kappa score for the overall performance of AAGL stage and rASRM to predict AAGL level was 0.48 and 0.48, respectively (no difference). This represents weaker agreement with AAGL level than was observed in the reference paper, which reported a weighted kappa of 0.62. Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) for stage 1 to predict level A was 98.5%, 64.3%, 66.3%, and 98.3%; stage 2 to predict level B 31.2%, 90.5%, 27.0%, and 92.1 %; stage 3 to predict level C 12.3%, 94.1%, 59.3%, and 60.7%; stage 4 to predict level D 95.65%, 88.10%, 38.60%, and 99.62%. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for A vs B/C/D (cut point 9) was 0.87, A/B vs C/D (cut point 16) was 0.78, and A/B/C vs D (cut point 22) was 0.94.

CONCLUSION

There was weak to moderate agreement between AAGL stage and AAGL surgical complexity level. Across all key indicators, the AAGL system did not perform as well in this external validation, nor did it outperform rASRM as it did in the reference paper. Results suggest the system is not generalizable.

Expert opinion on the use of transvaginal sonography for presurgical staging and classification of endometriosis

Gynecological ultrasonography plays a central role in the management of endometriosis. The rapid technical development as well as the currently increasing evidence for non-invasive diagnostic methods require an updated compilation of recommendations for the use of ultrasound in the management of endometriosis. The present work aims to highlight the accuracy of sonography for diagnosing and classifying endometriosis and will formulate the present list of key messages and recommendations. This paper aims to demonstrate the accuracy of TVS in the diagnosis and classification of endometriosis and to discuss the clinical applications and consequences of TVS findings for indication, surgical planning and assessment of associated risk factors. (1) Sophisticated ultrasound is the primary imaging modality recommended for suspected endometriosis. The examination procedure should be performed according to the IDEA Consensus. (2) Surgical intervention to confirm the diagnosis alone is not recommended. A preoperative imaging procedure with TVS and/or MRI is strongly recommended. (3) Ultrasound examination does not allow the definitive exclusion of endometriosis. (4) The examination is primarily transvaginal and should always be combined with a speculum and a bimanual examination. (5) Additional transabdominal ultrasonography may enhance the accuracy of the examination in case of extra pelvic disease, extensive findings or limited transvaginal access. (6) Sonographic assessment of both kidneys is mandatory when deep endometriosis (DE) and endometrioma are suspected. (7) Endometriomas are well defined by sonographic criteria. When evaluating the ovaries, the use of IOTA criteria is recommended. (8) The description of sonographic findings of deep endometriosis should be systematically recorded and performed using IDEA terminology. (9) Adenomyosis uteri has sonographically well-defined criteria (MUSA) that allow for detection with high sensitivity and specificity. MRI is not superior to differentiated skilled ultrasonography. (10) Classification of the extent of findings should be done according to the #Enzian classification. The current data situation proves the best possible prediction of the intraoperative situs of endometriosis (exclusive peritoneum) for the non-invasive application of the #Enzian classification. (11) Transvaginal sonographic examination by an experienced examiner is not inferior to MRI diagnostics regarding sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of the extent of deep endometriosis. (12) The major advantage of non-invasive imaging and classification of endometriosis is the differentiated planning or possible avoidance of surgical interventions. The recommendations represent the opinion of experts in the field of non-invasive and invasive diagnostics as well as therapy of endometriosis. They were developed with the participation of the following national and international societies: DEGUM, ÖGUM, SGUM, SEF, AGEM/DGGG, and EEL.

Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Perioperative Outcomes During Hysterectomy for Endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether complications incurred during hysterectomy for the treatment of endometriosis differ among racial-ethnic groups.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2019. This database is a robust, comprehensive, multi-institutional database with nearly 700 participating hospitals.

PATIENTS

Patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis or with an endometriosis-associated symptom as the primary indication for surgery and surgical intraoperative documentation of endometriosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Compare perioperative complications based on patient race and ethnicity.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 5639 patients underwent hysterectomy for endometriosis; of these, 4368 were White patients (77.5%), 528 Black patients (9.4%), 491 Hispanic patients (8.7%), 252 Asian patients (4.5%). There was no association between location of endometriosis and patient race and ethnicity. However, White patients had highest rate, and Asian patients had the lowest rate of laparoscopic hysterectomy, 85.3% vs 69.8%, respectively (p <.01). In addition, there were differences in concomitant procedures performed at time of hysterectomy based on race and ethnicity, with White patients having the highest rates of adnexal/peritoneal surgery at 12.5% (p <.01) compared with patients of the other racial and ethnic groups. Asian patients had the highest rate of ureteral surgery at 6.8% (p <.01) and highest rate of intestinal surgery at 16.3% (p <.01) compared with patients of other racial and ethnic groups. There was no association of rates of concomitant bladder surgery, appendectomy, or rectal surgery with patient race and ethnicity. Black patients had the highest rate of minor complications at 13.5% (p <.01) and the highest rate of major complications at 6.6% (p <.01) compared with patients of other racial and ethnic groups. After multivariable analysis, Black patients still had increased odds of having a major complication compared with patients of other racial and ethnic groups even after controlling for patient characteristics and perioperative factors such as endometriosis lesion location, surgical approach, and concomitant procedures (odds ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.45).

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis lesion location did not differ with patient race and ethnicity. However, patient race and ethnicity did have an impact on the surgical approach and the concomitant surgical procedures performed at time of hysterectomy. Black patients had the highest odds of major complications.

Preoperative application of the Enzian classification for endometriosis (The cEnzian Study): A prospective international multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic performance of preoperative application of the Enzian classification (cEnzian) using surgical findings as reference standard.

DESIGN

A prospective international non-interventional study.

SETTING

Twelve endometriosis centres in four European countries (Austria, Germany, Switzerland and Czech Republic).

POPULATION

1062 women with endometriosis surgery.

METHODS

Extent of endometriosis was preoperatively classified using the cEnzian classification based on gynaecological examination and/or transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After subsequent surgery, the surgeon classified the intraoperative findings using the Enzian classification.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR⁺ , LR^- and accuracy were calculated. Conditional frequencies of intraoperative Enzian codings and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were computed for each preoperative coding and visualised in plots.

RESULTS

Although overall consistency of cEnzian and Enzian was poor (35.14%, 95% confidence interval 32.26-38.03), high specificities and negative predictive values (NPVs) of the cEnzian compartments could be demonstrated. Looking at the individual parts of the Enzian classification, the poorest diagnostic performance was detected for compartment B and the highest PPVs were found for category 3 lesions (>3 cm), independent of the compartment.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Enzian classification in a non-invasive setting is a useful tool providing us with an 'at a glance' summary of the diagnostic workup regarding deep endometriosis with high specificities and NPVs. An attempt to merge the two new endometriosis classification systems (#Enzian and AAGL 2021) seems reasonable taking into consideration the respective advantages of each other.

Comparison of #Enzian classification and revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stages for the description of disease extent in women with deep endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

How is endometriosis extent described by the #Enzian classification compared to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) stages in women undergoing radical surgery for deep endometriosis (DE)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The prevalence and severity grade of endometriotic lesions and adhesions as well as the total number of #Enzian compartments affected by DE increase on average with increasing rASRM stage; however, DE lesions are also present in rASRM stages 1 and 2, leading to an underestimation of disease severity when using the rASRM classification.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriotic lesions can be accurately described regarding their localization and severity by sonography as well as during surgery using the recently updated #Enzian classification for endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a prospective multicenter study including a total of 735 women between January 2020 and May 2021.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Disease extent in women undergoing radical surgery for DE at tertiary referral centers for endometriosis was intraoperatively described using the #Enzian and the rASRM classification.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 735 women were included in the study. Out of 31 women with rASRM stage 1, which is defined as only minimal disease, 65% (i.e. 20 women) exhibited DE in #Enzian compartment B (uterosacral ligaments/parametria), 45% (14 women) exhibited DE in #Enzian compartment A (vagina/rectovaginal septum) and 26% (8 women) exhibited DE in #Enzian compartment C (rectum). On average, there was a progressive increase from rASRM stages 1-4 in the prevalence and severity grade of DE lesions (i.e. lesions in #Enzian compartments A, B, C, FB (urinary bladder), FU (ureters), FI (other intestinal locations), FO (other extragenital locations)), as well as of endometriotic lesions and adhesions in #Enzian compartments P (peritoneum), O (ovaries) and T (tubo-ovarian unit). In addition, the total number of #Enzian compartments affected by DE lesions on average progressively increased from rASRM stages 1-4, with a maximum of six affected compartments in rASRM stage 4 patients.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Interobserver variability may represent a possible limitation of this study.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The #Enzian classification includes the evaluation of DE in addition to the assessment of endometriotic lesions and adhesions of the ovaries and tubes and may therefore provide a comprehensive description of disease localization and extent in women with DE.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding was received for this study. All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

The role of minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons in the era of subspecialties: when to refer and consult

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) is a subspecialty focus of obstetrics and gynecology with focused expertise on complex benign gynecologic disorders. To date, no formal recommendations have been made in defining a referral system for MIGS. This article reviews the evidence regarding common disorders and procedures and their outcomes, and posits a basis for MIGS referral.

RECENT FINDINGS

In instances where intraoperative and perioperative features may pose clinical challenges to the surgeon and ultimately the patient, the literature suggests the following scenarios may have adverse outcomes, and therefore, benefit from the skills of MIGS subspecialists: fibroids - at least five myomas, myoma size at least 9 cm, and suspected myoma weight at least 500 g; endometriosis - presence of endometrioma(s), suspected stage III/IV endometriosis, and requirement for advanced adjunct procedures; hysterectomy - uteri at least 250 g or 12 weeks estimated size, at least three prior laparotomies, obesity, and complex surgical history with suspected adhesive disease.

SUMMARY

A referral system for MIGS subspecialists has proven benefits for both the gynecologic surgical community as well as the patients and their outcomes. This article provides evidence for collaboration with MIGS especially as it relates to leiomyomatous uteri, endometriosis, and complex hysterectomies.

Accuracy of sonography for non-invasive detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis using #Enzian classification: prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the preoperative detection of endometriosis using transvaginal sonography (TVS) supplemented by transabdominal sonography (TAS) with surgical assessment of disease, using the #Enzian classification for endometriosis.

METHODS

This was a prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of women undergoing TVS/TAS and radical surgery for deep endometriosis (DE) at different tertiary referral centers. The localization and grade of severity of the endometriotic lesions and adhesions were described according to the criteria of the #Enzian classification, both at preoperative ultrasound examination and during surgery. According to the #Enzian classification, the small pelvis is divided into three compartments for DE: A (rectovaginal septum and vagina); B (uterosacral and cardinal ligaments, parametrium and pelvic sidewalls); and C (rectum). In addition, further locations (F) are classified as adenomyosis (FA), urinary bladder involvement (FB) and ureteric involvement with signs of obstruction (FU). Other intestinal locations (FI) and other extragenital locations (FO) are also included. Ovarian endometriosis and adhesions at the level of the tubo-ovarian unit are listed as O and T, respectively. The #Enzian grade of severity (Grade 1-3) was determined for #Enzian compartments O, T, A, B and C based on the size of the lesion or the severity of the adhesions. Concordance between preoperative assessment using TVS/TAS and evaluation at surgery was assessed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of TVS/TAS in the detection of endometriotic lesions/adhesions in the different #Enzian compartments were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 745 women were included in the analysis. Preoperative TVS/TAS and surgical findings showed a concordance rate ranging between 86% and 99% for the presence or absence of endometriotic lesions/adhesions, depending on the evaluated #Enzian compartment. The concordance rate between TVS and surgery ranged between 71% and 92% for different severity grades, in #Enzian compartments O, T, A, B and C. Determining the presence or absence of adhesions at the level of the tubo-ovarian unit and classifying them accurately as Grade 1, 2 or 3 on TVS was more difficult than determining the presence and severity of endometriotic lesions in #Enzian compartments O, A, B and C. The sensitivity of TVS/TAS for the detection of endometriotic lesions ranged from 50% (#Enzian compartment FI) to 95% (#Enzian compartment A), specificity from 86% (#Enzian compartment T_left ) to 99% (#Enzian compartment FI) and 100% (#Enzian compartments FB, FU and FO), positive predictive value from 90% (#Enzian compartment T_right ) to 100% (#Enzian compartment FO), negative predictive value from 74% (#Enzian compartment B_left ) to 99% (#Enzian compartments FB and FU) and accuracy from 88% (#Enzian compartment B_right ) to 99% (#Enzian compartment FB).

CONCLUSIONS

The localization and severity of endometriotic lesions/adhesions, as described and classified according to the #Enzian classification, can be diagnosed accurately and non-invasively using TVS/TAS. The #Enzian classification provides a uniform classification system for describing endometriotic lesions, which can be used both at TVS/TAS and during surgical evaluation. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

A 10-Year Journey to Diagnosis With Endometriosis: An Autobiographical Case Report

Endometriosis is a multifocal, chronic disease defined by extrauterine endometrial glands and stroma. This case report describes the author’s experience of living with stage IV endometriosis, including a 10-year diagnostic delay, the impact on daily life, management, and treatment. The diagnostic delay for endometriosis averages between seven to nine years globally, which imparts significant physical, psychological, and financial effects on the lives of patients.

Author's reply regarding AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification: An Anatomy-Based Surgical Complexity Score

Many classifications proposed for this disease over the last decades. While most classification systems have been tailored to measure particular outcomes, all have limitations. In this study, we validated this new system's ability to predict pain and infertility symptoms using a prospective, multi-center study involving over 1,200 cases and compared it to the ASRM classification for endometriosis. Future improvements are necessary to the proposed classification and the development of a preoperative classification by imaging are the next steps.