Faster and economical screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci by sequential use of chromogenic agar and real-time polymerase chain reaction

"Keeping us on our toes": a review of what clinicians need to know about vancomycin-variable Enterococcus

Enterococcus faecium is a difficult-to-treat gram positive organism with increasing rates of resistance to vancomycin which is commonly mediated through the vanA gene cluster. There have been international reports of E. faecium isolates that are genotypically positive for vanA but phenotypically vancomycin-susceptible. These isolates, commonly called vancomycin-variable enterococci (VVE), can convert to phenotypic vancomycin resistance upon exposure to vancomycin. Multiple mechanisms for this genotypic-phenotypic mismatch have been reported and most commonly involve the regulatory components of the vanA gene cluster. VVE are challenging to identify unless microbiology labs routinely implement both genotypic and phenotypic screening methods. VVE has been associated with outbreaks and has become a prevalent pathogen in several countries. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms, microbiology and epidemiology of VVE. Clinicians must remain vigilant for VVE as diagnosis can be challenging and treatment failure on vancomycin is possible.

How to verify and validate a clinical microbiology test before it can be used in routine diagnostics: a practical guide

BACKGROUND

Before a new test can be routinely used in your laboratory, its reliability must be established in the laboratory where it will be used. International standards demand validation and verification procedures for new tests. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 was recently updated, and the European Commission's In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) came into effect. These events will likely increase the need for validation and verification procedures.

OBJECTIVES

This paper aims to provide practical guidance in validating or verifying microbiology tests, including antimicrobial susceptibility tests in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

SOURCES

It summarizes and interprets certain parts of standards such as ISO 15189:2022, and regulations, such as IVDR 2017/746 regarding validation or verification of a new test in a routine clinical microbiology laboratory.

CONTENT

The reasons for choosing a new test and the outline of the validation and verification plan are discussed. Furthermore, the following topics are touched upon: the choice of reference standard, number of samples, testing procedures, how to solve the discrepancies between results from new test and reference standard, and acceptance criteria. Arguments for selecting certain parameters (such as reference standard and sample size) and examples are given.

IMPLICATIONS

With the expected increase in validation and verification procedures because of the implementation of IVDR, this paper may aid in planning and executing these procedures.

A Review of Detection Methods for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) Genes: From Conventional Approaches to Potentially Electrochemical DNA Biosensors

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) genes are bacteria strains generated from Gram-positive bacteria and resistant to one of the glycopeptides antibiotics, commonly, vancomycin. VRE genes have been identified worldwide and exhibit considerable phenotypic and genotypic variations. There are six identified phenotypes of vancomycin-resistant genes: VanA, VanB, VanC, VanD, VanE, and VanG. The VanA and VanB strains are often found in the clinical laboratory because they are very resistant to vancomycin. VanA bacteria can pose significant issues for hospitalized patients due to their ability to spread to other Gram-positive infections, which changes their genetic material to increase their resistance to the antibiotics used during treatment. This review summarizes the established methods for detecting VRE strains utilizing traditional, immunoassay, and molecular approaches and then focuses on potential electrochemical DNA biosensors to be developed. However, from the literature search, no information was reported on developing electrochemical biosensors for detecting VRE genes; only the electrochemical detection of vancomycin-susceptible bacteria was reported. Thus, strategies to create robust, selective, and miniaturized electrochemical DNA biosensor platforms to detect VRE genes are also discussed.

Evaluation of Quadruple Real-Time PCR Method to Detect Enterococci Carrying Vancomycin-Resistant Genes vanA, vanB, vanM in Rectal Swabs

Purpose: To evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of the quadruple real-time PCR method for the detection of enterococci carrying vancomycin-resistant genes vanA, vanB, and vanM in rectal swabs. Methods: Choosing PCR-sequenced DNA extracted directly from rectal swabs as the gold standard, the results of the quadruple real-time PCR method and the traditional method (screening culture combined PCR-sequencing method whose DNA extracted from single colony) were compared with the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the quadruple real-time PCR method and the traditional method were obtained. The time required for the three methods was calculated. Results: The results between gold standard and the quadruple real-time PCR method were similar. Compared to the traditional method, the quadruple real-time PCR method had a much higher sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and consistency. Our study found that the quadruple real-time PCR method is beneficial for detection of enterococci carrying vanM with vancomycin heteroresistance. The traditional method had high specificity and NPV, but its sensitivity and PPV were not ideal. The time needed for gold standard is a minimum of 28 h; the quadruple real-time PCR method takes 2-3 h while the traditional method consumes a minimum of 72 h. Conclusion: The quadruple real-time PCR method can provide a rapid and reliable result for the diagnosis of patients with colonized vancomycin-resistant enterococci. This new method is beneficial for the active screening, timely clinical treatment measures, epidemiological research, and hospital monitoring of the enterococci carrying vancomycin-resistant gene, especially for the enterococci with vancomycin heteroresistance carrying vanM.

A simple and expedient PCR format for rapid molecular screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Amies gel swabs

Screening patients for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is commonly undertaken in hospital laboratories using phenotypic methods. This work is labour-intensive, costly and may take several days to complete. We report on the validation of a novel rapid screening approach for direct testing of Amies gel swabs for MRSA. The method is based on two quantitative real time-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays for the detection of the nuc and mecA genes of MRSA. Based on SYBR Green technology, the assays use significantly less reagents than conventional qRT-PCR methods and are applied to testing templates derived directly from aqueous suspensions of swabs. Notwithstanding the occurrence of false-positives due to non-specific fluorescence generated by the SYBR Green dye, the novel assays showed a high negative predictive value enabling earlier reporting of negative findings and selection of swabs for confirmatory phenotypic testing for MRSA. In a blinded trial of 461 swabs, of which 34 (7.4%) were previously shown to be culture-positive for MRSA, the novel assays selected 121 (26.2%) swabs (inclusive of the known MRSA-positive swabs) for phenotypic testing. This enabled early reporting of negative findings for 340 (73.8%) of the 461 swabs tested. Application of this method has implications for screening strategies for large laboratories whilst achieving cost benefits.

Development of high-resolution melting curve analysis in rapid detection of vanA gene, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium from clinical isolates

Background

High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) is a novel molecular technique based on the real-time PCR that can be used to detect vancomycin resistance Enterococcus (VRE). The purpose of this study was to identify VRE species with HRMA in clinical isolates.

Results

Out of 49 Enterococcus isolates, 11 (22.44%) E. faecium isolates and 19 (38.77%) E. faecalis isolates were detected. Average melting temperatures for divIVA in E.faecalis, alanine racemase in E.faecium, and vanA in VRE strains were obtained as 79.9 ± 0.5 °C, 85.4 ± 0.5 °C, and 82.99 ± 0.5 °C, respectively. Furthermore, the data showed that the HRMA method was sensitive to detect 10⁰ CFU/ml for the divIVA, alanine racemase, and vanA genes. Also, out of 49 Enterococcus spp., which were isolated by HRMA assay, 8 isolates (16.32%) of E. faecium and 18 isolates (36.73%) of E. faecalis were detected. The vanA gene was reported in 2 isolates (25%) of E. faecium and 9 isolates (50%) of E. faecalis.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that using the HRMA method, we can detect E. faecium, E. faecalis, and the vanA gene with high sensitivity and specificity.

Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis Colonization in Nursing Facilities

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis frequently colonize nursing facility (NF) residents, creating opportunities for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) transmission and dissemination of mobile genetic elements conferring antimicrobial resistance. Most VRE studies do not speciate; our study addresses this lack and compares the epidemiology of E faecium and E faecalis.

METHODS

We enrolled 651 newly admitted patients from 6 different NFs and collected swabs from several body sites at enrollment, 14 days, 30 days, and monthly thereafter for up to 6 months. The VRE were speciated using a duplex polymerase chain reaction. We used multinomial logistic regression models to compare risk factors associated with colonization of E faecium and E faecalis.

RESULTS

Overall, 40.7% were colonized with E faecium, E faecalis, or both. At enrollment, more participants were colonized with E faecium (17.8%) than E faecalis (8.4%); 3.2% carried both species. Enterococcus faecium was carried twice as long as E faecalis (69 days and 32 days, respectively), but incidence rates were similar (E faecium, 3.9/1000 person-days vs E faecalis, 4.1/1000 person-days). Length of stay did not differ by species among incident cases. Residents who used antibiotics within the past 30 days had a greater incidence of both E faecium (odds ratio [OR] = 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82-4.60) and E faecalis (OR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.80); device use was most strongly associated with the incidence of E faecium colonization (OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.15-3.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Recent increases in vancomycin-resistant E faecium prevalence may reflect increased device use and longer duration of carriage.

Comparison of biochemical and genotypic speciation methods for vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolated from urban wastewater treatment plants

Enterococci species in wastewater including Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum isolates (n = 308) with low or high level vancomycin resistance were determined and compared using a phenotypic method (RapID™ STR system), 16S rRNA sequencing, and multi-locus (atpA, groESL, and pheS) sequence analysis (MLSA). Error rates for the RapID™ STR system were E. faecalis (15.9%), E. faecium (21.5%), and E. casseliflavus/E. gallinarum (56.9%) when referenced to the consensus of all methods tested. Comparison of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distances and phylogenetic trees suggested that the groESL locus delineated species more effectively than other loci. The groESL locus was the most reliable loci for the correct identification of Enterococcus spp., including E. casseliflavus and E. gallinarum, with high congruence compared to the consensus (Adjusted Rand Index = 0.954; Adjusted Wallace Co-efficient = 0.941). All of the methods were compared to whole genome sequencing, which acted as a gold standard, for the isolates from this study and those downloaded from NCBI.

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in solid organ transplant recipients: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation address vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infections in SOT candidates and recipients. VRE are an important cause of infection and have been named by the CDC as a serious public threat. Typically, a commensal of the gastrointestinal tract, VRE may become pathogenic after abdominal organ manipulation like transplantation. This guideline reviews the microbiology, antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of VRE infection in the context of solid organ transplantation. Treatment regimens including combination therapies and novel investigational agents are also reviewed. Finally, an updated appraisal of infection control measures relevant to VRE infection and colonization is presented.

Predictors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci co-colonization among nursing facility patients

BACKGROUND

The emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) poses significant challenges for antibiotic therapy. We characterized the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) co-colonization that may facilitate resistance transfer and vancomycin-resistant S aureus emergence among nursing facility patients.

METHODS

We cultured newly admitted patient hands, nares, oropharynx, groin, and perianal region plus wounds and device insertion sites, if applicable, upon enrollment at day 14, day 30, and monthly follow-up up to 6 months. Demographic, comorbidity, and antimicrobial use data were collected. Functional status was assessed at each visit using the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to determine factors predictive of co-colonization.

RESULTS

Five hundred eight patients were enrolled, with an average follow-up time of 28.5days. Prevalence of MRSA/VRE co-colonization, MRSA alone, and VRE alone was 8.7%, 8.9%, and 23.4%, respectively. Independent predictors of co-colonization included indwelling device use (odds ratio [OR] = 5.5 [2.2-13.7]), recent antibiotic use (OR = 2.5 [1.4-4.2]), diabetes (OR = 1.9 [1.0-3.8]), and the presence of open wounds (OR = 1.9 [1.0-3.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of VRE are driving co-colonization with MRSA in nursing facilities. Indwelling device use, recent antibiotic use, diabetes, and open wounds predicted patient co-colonization.

The Enterococcus: a Model of Adaptability to Its Environment

The genus Enterococcus comprises a ubiquitous group of Gram-positive bacteria that are of great relevance to human health for their role as major causative agents of health care-associated infections. The enterococci are resilient and versatile species able to survive under harsh conditions, making them well adapted to the health care environment. Two species cause the majority of enterococcal infections: Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Both species demonstrate intrinsic resistance to common antibiotics, such as virtually all cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, clindamycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Additionally, a remarkably plastic genome allows these two species to readily acquire resistance to further antibiotics, such as high-level aminoglycoside resistance, high-level ampicillin resistance, and vancomycin resistance, either through mutation or by horizontal transfer of genetic elements conferring resistance determinants.

Automatic Digital Plate Reading for Surveillance Cultures

The automation of specimen processing and culture workup has rapidly emerged in clinical microbiology laboratories throughout the world and more recently in the United States. While many U.S. laboratories have implemented some form of automated specimen processing and some have begun performing digital plate reading, automated colony analysis is just beginning to be utilized clinically. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, M. L. Faron et al. (J Clin Microbiol 54:2470-2475, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01040-16) report the results of their evaluation of the performance of the WASPLab Chromogenic Detection Module (CDM) for categorizing chromogenic agar plates as negative or "nonnegative" for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Their major finding was 100% sensitivity for detection of "nonnegative" specimens using CDM compared to manual methods for specimens plated on two different types of VRE chromogenic agar plates. Additionally, utilization of digital plate reading in conjunction with automated colony analysis was predicted to result in significant savings based on greatly reduced labor costs.

Development of a Real-Time PCR Protocol Requiring Minimal Handling for Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci with the Fully Automated BD Max System

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are an important cause of health care-associated infections, resulting in significant mortality and a significant economic burden in hospitals. Active surveillance for at-risk populations contributes to the prevention of infections with VRE. The availability of a combination of automation and molecular detection procedures for rapid screening would be beneficial. Here, we report on the development of a laboratory-developed PCR for detection of VRE which runs on the fully automated Becton Dickinson (BD) Max platform, which combines DNA extraction, PCR setup, and real-time PCR amplification. We evaluated two protocols: one using a liquid master mix and the other employing commercially ordered dry-down reagents. The BD Max VRE PCR was evaluated in two rounds with 86 and 61 rectal elution swab (eSwab) samples, and the results were compared to the culture results. The sensitivities of the different PCR formats were 84 to 100% for vanA and 83.7 to 100% for vanB; specificities were 96.8 to 100% for vanA and 81.8 to 97% for vanB The use of dry-down reagents and the ExK DNA-2 kit for extraction showed that the samples were less inhibited (3.3%) than they were by the use of the liquid master mix (14.8%). Adoption of a cutoff threshold cycle of 35 for discrimination of vanB-positive samples allowed an increase of specificity to 87.9%. The performance of the BD Max VRE assay equaled that of the BD GeneOhm VanR assay, which was run in parallel. The use of dry-down reagents simplifies the assay and omits any need to handle liquid PCR reagents.