Health Literacy and Patient Preparation in Radiology

Health literacy in medical imaging: a scoping review of current evidence and future directions

OBJECTIVE

The importance of health literacy in medical imaging is well recognized, yet the current landscape remains inadequately understood. This study aims to explore the extent of health literacy studies contextualized to medical imaging.

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted using three online bibliographic databases namely, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and CINAHL. We have adopted the concept of health literacy, as a clinical risk and personal asset, to guide this review.

RESULTS

Of 311 unique articles, 39 met our selection criteria. Five themes (categories) were identified by the authors: appropriate communication with patients who receive medical imaging test results, appropriate usage of medical imaging, classes and characteristics of eHealth literacy, disease/deterioration prevention, and patient education. Additionally, 17 health literacy assessment tools were identified, including 11 original creations. Finally, 11 recommendations have emerged from this scoping review, offering valuable insights into methods, considerations, and strategies for promoting health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Health literacy studies in medical imaging cover both clinical and public health perspectives, benefiting diverse populations, regardless of underlying medical conditions. Notably, the majority of assessment tools used in these studies were author-generated, hindering cross-study comparisons. Given the innate capacity of medical images to convey intuitive information, those images do not solely benefit the patients who are given medical imaging examinations, but they also hold significant potential to enhance public health literacy. Health literacy and medical imaging are closely associated and mutually reinforce each other.

Patient experiences and anxiety related to medical imaging: challenges and potential solutions

Patients' experiences of medical imaging are varied. In referencing the work of Plunkett et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.725, relating to fetal MRI, this editorial explores potential methods for increased education and support to alleviate anxiety in patients undergoing medical imaging procedures.

Upper Extremity Surgeon Recommendations for Imaging Do Not Correspond with Imaging Appropriateness Guidelines

Background

Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) increases annually, raising concerns about overuse. Imaging appropriateness guidelines have the potential to standardize decisions regarding imaging based on best evidence, which might reduce unhelpful or potentially misleading imaging. We studied expert use of advanced imaging for musculoskeletal illness compared to published appropriateness recommendations.

Methods

First, 15 imaging guidelines with recommendations for advanced imaging of the upper extremity were collated. Next, members of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG) were invited to participate in a survey of 11 patient scenarios of common upper extremity illnesses and asked whether they would recommend MRI or CT. Guideline recommendations for imaging were compared with surgeon recommendations using Fisher's exact tests. We used Fleiss' kappa to measure the interobserver agreement among surgeons.

Results

For the 11 scenarios, most imaging appropriateness guidelines suggested that MRI or CT is useful, while most surgeons (n = 108) felt it was not. There was no correlation between surgeons and guidelines recommendations for imaging (ρ = 0.28; p = 0.40). There was slight agreement among surgeons regarding imaging recommendations (kappa: 0.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.023-0.32).

Conclusion

The available imaging appropriateness guidelines appear to be too permissive and therefore seem to have limited clinical utility for upper extremity surgeons. The notable surgeon-to-surgeon variation (unreliability) in recommendations for advanced imaging in this and other studies suggests a role for strategies to ensure that patient decisions about imaging are consistent with their values (what matters most to them) and not unduly influenced by patient misconceptions about imaging or by surgeon beliefs and habits.

Level Of Evidence

II, diagnostic.

Cross-sectional survey of health literacy among health science students in Singapore

Background

Health literacy proficiency is essential for health care professionals to provide quality patient care. There is limited research exploring health literacy proficiency among undergraduate health science students.

Objectives

To determine health literacy among health science students in Singapore using the electronic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).

Design

A cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling was conducted among undergraduate health science students.

Methodology

This study hypothesises that health literacy is influenced by gender, and it increases with the level of health science education, attributed to the increased exposure to the health care system and health care education as undergraduates progress through the years of study. Eligible students from the 4-year entry-level programmes of diagnostic radiography, dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, radiation therapy and speech and language therapy, aged from 21 to 50, were invited. Exclusion criteria were students who were no longer studying due to dropping out or having immediately graduated from these programmes and students in the accelerated programmes whose studies would be completed in less than 4 years.

Results

In total, 111 respondents (72 females and 37 males) completed surveys (response rate, 7.7%) returned from physiotherapy (n = 69), occupational therapy (n = 25), diagnostic radiography (n = 12) and dietetics (n = 5), with nil from radiation therapy and speech and language therapy. All participants were English literate. Female participants demonstrated higher HLQ with a mean total score of 30.67 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.61) versus male participants 29.83 (SD = 0.53). Year 2, 3 and 4 students generally scored higher than Year 1 across all nine HLQ scales. Overall, dietetics students had the highest total score on the HLQ, while the diagnostic radiography students had the lowest scores for all the nine HLQ scales.

Conclusion

This study established the health literacy level of health science students in Singapore. Gender and years of study influenced health literacy levels, supporting the hypothesis.

Survey on the knowledge of Portuguese society about Nuclear Medicine: A snapshot of the reality in the beginning of the decade

BACKGROUND

Nuclear Medicine has grown exponentially over the years, since it is useful in the early diagnosis and treatment of several pathologies. However, this field appears to be not widely recognized at the public level.

METHODS

An exploratory/descriptive cross-sectional study using a national survey assessed the Portuguese population's knowledge of Nuclear Medicine. A total of 211 questionnaires were collected and analyzed. The study population is made up of Portuguese adult citizens.

RESULTS

The study revealed a lack of knowledge about Nuclear Medicine. Some respondents were aware of this field, however a significant number have low or no knowledge at all. Most individuals are not aware about the Nuclear Medicine Departments in their home districts.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This project found limited knowledge within the Portuguese population about ionizing radiation in medical procedures, and mainly in Nuclear Medicine. Data highlighted the need to implement awareness campaigns to disseminate knowledge on this field. Health professionals should be aware about the lack of knowledge on this field by patients and public.

Analysis of Literature Regarding Health Care Disparities in Radiology: Is Radiology Falling Behind?

PURPOSE

To quantify the gap between radiology and other specialties regarding the amount of literature on healthcare disparities (HCD).

METHODS

Four different searches were conducted to evaluate the amount of literature on HCD in radiology as compared to internal medicine and surgery. Initially, the Journal Citation Report was utilized to search for the five highest ranking journals in each field and a second search used impact factor. A combination of search terms "health" AND "disparities" was used. Two additional searches were performed with PubMed using the terms "health" AND "disparities AND "radiology" with the final term changed for each specialty. The second PubMed search added the term "medical education" for each specialty. Articles were limited to years 2017 to 2020.

RESULTS

The initial search found 1817 articles discussing "health" and "disparities". 14.6% of these were radiology, 65.7% internal medicine, and 19.7% surgery. The subsequent search controlling for impact factor found 2176 articles. 12.2% were for radiology, 66.1% were for internal medicine, and 21.7% for surgery. The initial PubMed search found 6543 articles. 9.9% were for radiology, 32.4% for internal medicine, and 57.7% were for surgery. The addition of "medical education" decreased the articles to 807. Radiology had 9.9%, internal medicine was 44.2%, and surgery was 45.9 %.

CONCLUSION

A gap in HCD literature exists for radiology as compared to surgery and internal medicine. However, radiology has demonstrated a recent significant push towards understanding HCD.  Radiology should continue to capitalize on its momentum and develop HCD curricula and research.

Breast Cancer Patients' Perceptions of a Virtual Learning Environment for Pretreatment Education

The process and technicalities of radiation therapy (RT) for cancer treatment can be challenging for patients to understand as RT involves complex procedures, highly specialised equipment, and radiation itself has limited sensory characteristics. Hence, it is imperative that education programs are specifically planned and developed to suit the needs of patients, address radiation as an entity and include salient visual aids. In this context, the Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) system, primarily created for RT practitioner simulation, may provide unique opportunities for patient education. This article reports on patient feedback of a newly developed breast cancer patient education program, which integrates the VERT system as the focal education tool. The education program content included RT immobilisation, simulation, planning and treatment components, along with an introduction to the VERT system. Nineteen breast cancer patients (n = 19) completed an evaluation questionnaire at the completion of their VERT education program. Open-ended questions were used to detect the least and most useful aspects of the education session. Patient feedback indicated a high regard for the comprehensiveness of the education program, with particular acknowledgement of the three dimensional visual features of the VERT system. It is proposed that VERT's high visual impact should be exploited in tailored patient education programs in order to obtain maximum patient engagement and make significant gains in effective knowledge transfer.