Ultrasensitive Detection of NOTCH1 c.7544_7545delCT Mutations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia by Droplet Digital PCR Reveals High Frequency of Subclonal Mutations and Predicts Clinical Outcome in Cases with Trisomy 12

Research Topic: Measurable Residual Disease in Hematologic Malignancies. Can digital droplet PCR improve measurable residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphoid malignancies?

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring is progressively changing the management of hematologic malignancies. The possibility of detecting the persistence/reappearance of disease in patients in apparent clinical remission offers a refined risk stratification and a treatment decision making tool. Several molecular techniques are employed to monitor MRD, from conventional real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) to next generation sequencing and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), in different tissues or compartments through the detection of fusion genes, immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements or disease-specific mutations. RQ-PCR is still the gold standard for MRD analysis despite some limitations. ddPCR, considered the third-generation PCR, yields a direct, absolute, and accurate detection and quantification of low-abundance nucleic acids. In the setting of MRD monitoring it carries the major advantage of not requiring a reference standard curve built with the diagnostic sample dilution and of allowing to reduce the number of samples below the quantitative range. At present, the broad use of ddPCR to monitor MRD in the clinical practice is limited by the lack of international guidelines. Its application within clinical trials is nonetheless progressively growing both in acute lymphoblastic leukemia as well as in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The aim of this review is to summarize the accumulating data on the use of ddPCR for MRD monitoring in chronic lymphoid malignancies and to highlight how this new technique is likely to enter into the clinical practice.

Multiple Mechanisms of NOTCH1 Activation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: NOTCH1 Mutations and Beyond

Simple Summary

Mutations of the NOTCH1 gene are a validated prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and a potential predictive marker for anti-CD20-based therapies. At present, the most frequent pathological alteration of the NOTCH1 gene is due to somatic genetic mutations, which have a multifaceted functional impact. However, beside NOTCH1 mutations, other factors may lead to activation of the NOTCH1 pathway, and these include mutations of FBXW7, MED12, SPEN, SF3B1 as well as other B-cell pathways. Understanding the preferential strategies though which CLL cells hijack NOTCH1 signaling may present important clues for designing targeted treatment strategies for the management of CLL.

Abstract

The Notch signaling pathway plays a fundamental role for the terminal differentiation of multiple cell types, including B and T lymphocytes. The Notch receptors are transmembrane proteins that, upon ligand engagement, undergo multiple processing steps that ultimately release their intracytoplasmic portion. The activated protein ultimately operates as a nuclear transcriptional co-factor, whose stability is finely regulated. The Notch pathway has gained growing attention in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) because of the high rate of somatic mutations of the NOTCH1 gene. In CLL, NOTCH1 mutations represent a validated prognostic marker and a potential predictive marker for anti-CD20-based therapies, as pathological alterations of the Notch pathway can provide significant growth and survival advantage to neoplastic clone. However, beside NOTCH1 mutation, other events have been demonstrated to perturb the Notch pathway, namely somatic mutations of upstream, or even apparently unrelated, proteins such as FBXW7, MED12, SPEN, SF3B1, as well as physiological signals from other pathways such as the B-cell receptor. Here we review these mechanisms of activation of the NOTCH1 pathway in the context of CLL; the resulting picture highlights how multiple different mechanisms, that might occur under specific genomic, phenotypic and microenvironmental contexts, ultimately result in the same search for proliferative and survival advantages (through activation of MYC), as well as immune escape and therapy evasion (from anti-CD20 biological therapies). Understanding the preferential strategies through which CLL cells hijack NOTCH1 signaling may present important clues for designing targeted treatment strategies for the management of CLL.

Digital Droplet PCR in Hematologic Malignancies: A New Useful Molecular Tool

Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) is a recent version of quantitative PCR (QT-PCR), useful for measuring gene expression, doing clonality assays and detecting hot spot mutations. In respect of QT-PCR, ddPCR is more sensitive, does not need any reference curve and can quantify one quarter of samples already defined as "positive but not quantifiable". In the IgH and TCR clonality assessment, ddPCR recapitulates the allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR (ASO-PCR), being not adapt for detecting clonal evolution, that, on the contrary, does not represent a pitfall for the next generation sequencing (NGS) technique. Differently from NGS, ddPCR is not able to sequence the whole gene, but it is useful, cheaper, and less time-consuming when hot spot mutations are the targets, such as occurs with IDH1, IDH2, NPM1 in acute leukemias or T315I mutation in Philadelphia-positive leukemias or JAK2 in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Further versions of ddPCR, that combine different primers/probes fluorescences and concentrations, allow measuring up to four targets in the same PCR reaction, sparing material, time, and money. ddPCR is also useful for quantitating BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, WT1 expression, donor chimerism, and minimal residual disease, so helping physicians to realize that "patient-tailored therapy" that is the aim of the modern hematology.

Consistent B Cell Receptor Immunoglobulin Features Between Siblings in Familial Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Key processes in the onset and evolution of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are thought to include chronic (antigenic) activation of mature B cells through the B cell receptor (BcR), signals from the microenvironment, and acquisition of genetic alterations. Here we describe three families in which two or more siblings were affected by CLL. We investigated whether there are immunogenetic similarities in the leukemia-specific immunoglobulin heavy (IGH) and light (IGL/IGK) chain gene rearrangements of the siblings in each family. Furthermore, we performed array analysis to study if similarities in CLL-associated chromosomal aberrations are present within each family and screened for somatic mutations using paired tumor/normal whole-genome sequencing (WGS). In two families a consistent IGHV gene mutational status (one IGHV-unmutated, one IGHV-mutated) was observed. Intriguingly, the third family with four affected siblings was characterized by usage of the lambda IGLV3-21 gene, with the hallmark R110 mutation of the recently described clinically aggressive IGLV3-21^R110 subset. In this family, the CLL-specific rearrangements in two siblings could be assigned to either stereotyped subset #2 or the immunogenetically related subset #169, both of which belong to the broader IGLV3-21^R110 subgroup. Consistent patterns of cytogenetic aberrations were encountered in all three families. Furthermore, the CLL clones carried somatic mutations previously associated with IGHV mutational status, cytogenetic aberrations and stereotyped subsets, respectively. From these findings, we conclude that similarities in immunogenetic characteristics in familial CLL, in combination with genetic aberrations acquired, point towards shared underlying mechanisms behind CLL development within each family.

The Predominant Prognostic Significance of NOTCH1 Mutation Defined by Emulsion PCR in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Purpose

NOTCH1^mut represents a new prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). The low sensitivity of the current methods may increase the risk of false-negative results, particularly in patients with low NOTCH1^mut allelic burden. This study compared two methods of the NOTCH1^mut assessment including droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and amplification-refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR) untreated CLL patients.

Patients and Methods

This study included 319 untreated CLL patients. Two PCR-based methods; ddPCR and ARMS-PCR were performed to assess the mutational status of NOTCH1. The Mann–Whitney, Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal–Wallis, Kaplan–Meier, Log rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to analyze collected data.

Results

We proved that ddPCR increased the detectability of the NOTCH1^mut compared to ARMS-PCR in CLL (18.55% vs 6%). We showed a shorter time to first treatment (TTFT) in the NOTCH1^mut group of patients compared to the NOTCH1^wt defined by ddPCR (1.5 vs 33 months, p=0.01). The TTFT survival curves analysis in subgroups divided according to the mutational status of IGHV and NOTCH1 assessed by ddPCR discriminated group with the best prognosis: IGHV^mutNOTCH1^wt. Multivariate analysis revealed that the mutational status of IGHV represented an independent prognostic factor for TTFT, while NOTCH1^mut determined by ddPCR constituted as a dependent prognostic factor for TTFT.

Conclusion

The selection of the precise method of NOTCH1^mut detection as ddPCR might significantly improve prognostic stratification of CLL patient. Assessment of IGHV might be relevant to more accurate discrimination of prognostic groups of CLL patients, especially in harboring NOTCH1^mut irrespective of the quantity of allelic burden.

Spatial Distribution Patterns of Clinically Relevant TERT Promoter Mutations in Follicular Thyroid Tumors of Uncertain Malignant Potential: Advantages of the Digital Droplet PCR Technique

In thyroid carcinomas, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations C228T and C250T predict an unfavorable clinical outcome. The analysis is particularly valuable when assessing histologically equivocal follicular thyroid tumors of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMPs). Given recent findings of TERT promoter mutational heterogeneity in thyroid cancer, we determined the frequency of this phenomenon in FT-UMPs and minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinomas. DNA was extracted from several tissue blocks from 16 FT-UMPs as well as 10 minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinomas, and interrogated using Sanger sequencing as well as digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Mutational heterogeneity was observed by Sanger sequencing in four of seven (57%) FT-UMPs. In two FT-UMPs with C228T mutations, analyses of additional blocks gave wild-type results using Sanger sequencing in one or several blocks interrogated, whereas ddPCR found low-frequency C228T mutations in one of these fractions. In two additional FT-UMPs with the C228T and C250T mutation, respectively, sequencing of additional blocks revealed the opposite mutation. Moreover, in the C250T mutated area in one of these tumors, the ddPCR displayed a co-occurring C228T mutation that failed detection through Sanger sequencing. To conclude, most TERT promoter mutated FT-UMPs display mutational heterogeneity when analyzed by Sanger sequencing, thereby emphasizing the importance of the tissue sampling process. The ddPCR technique might overcome this phenomenon because of increased sensitivity and should be considered for clinical screening purposes.