Clinical Evaluation of BD MAX MDR-TB Assay for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Resistance Markers

Dual-centre evaluation of the FluoroType MTBDR version 2 assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and resistance-conferring mutations in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples from Denmark, Germany and Sierra Leone

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the ability of FluoroType MTBDR version 2 (FTv2; Hain Lifescience), a second-step real-time PCR assay, to simultaneously detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA and mutations conferring resistance to rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH), in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples from patients and compared them with corresponding cultures.

METHODS

FTv2 MTBC was evaluated on 1815 and 432 samples from Denmark (DK) and Germany (DE), respectively. RIF and INH resistance mutations were assessed in the German samples and 110 samples from Sierra Leone and subsequently compared to phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing and a composite reference DNA (CRD) based on the GenoType MTBDR line-probe assay and Sanger sequencing or whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

Of the 584 (557 smear-negative) Danish and 277 (85 smear-negative) German sputum samples, 42 (16) and 246 (54) were culture positive, and 44 (18) and 222 (35) were FTv2 positive, providing an FTv2 sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 (0.63) and 0.98 (DK), 0.90 (0.65) and 1.00 (DE), respectively. The count, sensitivities, and specificities for all pulmonary samples were 1434, 0.79, and 0.99 (DK) and 347, 0.86, and 1.00 (DE), respectively; for extrapulmonary samples, 381, 0.33, 0.99 (DK) and 83, 0.50, and 1.00 (DE). The valid count, sensitivity, and specificity compared with CRD for detecting resistance mutations were RIF 355, 0.99, 0.96, and INH 340, 1.00, and 0.98, respectively.

DISCUSSION

FTv2 reliably detects MTBC DNA in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples and detects resistance mutations for INH and RIF resistance in inhA promoter, katG, and rpoB genes.

Performance of the BD MAX MDR-TB assay in a clinical setting and its impact on the clinical course of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: a retrospective before-after study

BACKGROUND

Missing isoniazid (INH) resistance during tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis can worsen the outcomes of INH-resistant TB. The BD MAX MDR-TB assay (BD MAX) facilitates the rapid detection of TB and INH and rifampin (RIF) resistance; however, data related to its performance in clinical setting remain limited. Moreover, its effect on treatment outcomes has not yet been studied.

METHODS

We compared the performance of BD MAX for the detection of INH/RIF resistances to that of the line probe assay (LPA) in patients with pulmonary TB (PTB), using the results of a phenotypic drug sensitivity test as a reference standard. The treatment outcomes of patients who used BD MAX were compared with those of patients who did not.

RESULTS

Of the 83 patients included in the study, the BD MAX was used for an initial PTB diagnosis in 39 patients. The sensitivity of BD MAX for detecting PTB was 79.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of BD MAX for INH resistance were both 100%, whereas these were 50.0% and 95.8%, respectively, for RIF resistance. The sensitivity and specificity of BD MAX were comparable to those of LPA. The BD MAX group had a shorter time interval from specimen request to the initiation of anti-TB drugs (2.0 days vs. 5.5 days, p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

BD MAX showed comparable performance to conventional tests for detecting PTB and INH/RIF resistances. The implementation of BD MAX as a diagnostic tool for PTB resulted in a shorter turnaround time for the initiation of PTB treatment.

Completely Free from PAM Limitations: Asymmetric RPA with CRISPR/Cas12a for Nucleic Acid Assays

Experimentally, Cas12a can recognize multiple protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences and is not restricted to the "TTTN". However, the application of the CRISPR/Cas12a system is still limited by the PAM for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Here, we developed asymmetric RPA (Asy-RPA) to completely break the limitations of PAM. Asy-RPA not only achieved efficient amplification but also converted dsDNA to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) without complicated steps. The ssDNA products activated the trans-cleavage activity of Cas12a, outputting signals. The application of Asy-RPA completely freed Cas12a from the PAM, which can be more widely used in nucleic acid detection, such as lumpy skin disease virus, with an actual detection limit as low as 1.21 × 101 copies·μL-1. More importantly, Cas12a was intolerant to mutations on ssDNA. This provided technical support for the detection and identification of wild-type Mycobacterium tuberculosis (WT-TB) and rifampin-resistant mutant-type M. tuberculosis (MT-TB). The detection limit was as low as 1 fM for 1% mixed samples. The detection and availability of different treatment options for treatment-resistant and WT-TB were significant for the elimination of TB. In summary, the platform consisting of Asy-RPA and CRISPR/Cas12a was suitable for the detection of various viruses and bacteria and was a boon for the detection of dsDNA without recognizable PAM.

Recent advances in microbiological and molecular biological detection techniques of tuberculous meningitis

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most common type of central nervous system tuberculosis (TB) and has the highest mortality and disability rate. Early diagnosis is key to improving the prognosis and survival rate of patients. However, laboratory diagnosis of TBM is often difficult due to its paucibacillary nature and sub optimal sensitivity of conventional microbiology and molecular tools which often fails to detect the pathogen. The gold standard for TBM diagnosis is the presence of MTB in the CSF. The recognised methods for the identification of MTB are acid-fast bacilli (AFB) detected under CSF smear microscopy, MTB cultured in CSF, and MTB detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Currently, many studies consider that all diagnostic techniques for TBM are not perfect, and no single technique is considered simple, fast, cheap, and efficient. A definite diagnosis of TBM is still difficult in current clinical practice. In this review, we summarise the current state of microbiological and molecular biological diagnostics for TBM, the latest advances in research, and discuss the advantages of these techniques, as well as the issues and challenges faced in terms of diagnostic effectiveness, laboratory infrastructure, testing costs, and clinical expertise, for clinicians to select appropriate testing methods.

Rapid and Ultrasensitive Approach for the Simultaneous Detection of Multilocus Mutations to Distinguish Rifampicin-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The untested empirical medications exacerbated the development of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Here, we develop a rapid and specific method based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification and duplex-specific nuclease for distinguishing rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis. Three probes were designed for the codons 516, 526, and 531 on the RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoB) gene. These three sites accounted for more than 90% of the total mutations of the ropB gene in the rifampicin-resistant strain. The approach can perform simultaneous and sensitive detection of three mutant sites with the actual detection limit as 10 aM of DNA and 62.5 cfu·mL^-1 of bacteria in 67 min under isothermal conditions. Moreover, the positive mode of the approach for MDR-TB can not only deal with the randomness and diversity of mutations but also provide an easier way for medical staff to read the results. Therefore, it is a particularly valuable method to handle major and urgent MDR-TB diagnostics.

In silico evaluation of WHO-endorsed molecular methods to detect drug resistant tuberculosis

Universal drug susceptibility testing (DST) for tuberculosis is a major goal of the END TB strategy. PCR-based molecular diagnostic tests have been instrumental in increasing DST globally and several assays have now been endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for use in the diagnosis of drug resistance. These endorsed assays, however, each interrogate a limited number of mutations associated with resistance, potentially limiting their sensitivity compared to sequencing-based methods. We applied an in silico method to compare the sensitivity and specificity of WHO-endorsed molecular based diagnostics to the mutation set identified by the WHO mutations catalogue using phenotypic DST as the reference. We found that, in silico, the mutation sets used by probe-based molecular diagnostic tests to identify rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, amikacin, capreomycin and kanamycin resistance produced similar sensitivities and specificities to the WHO mutation catalogue. PCR-based diagnostic tests were most sensitive for drugs where mechanisms of resistance are well established and localised to small genetic regions or a few prevalent mutations. Approaches using sequencing technologies can provide advantages for drugs where our knowledge of resistance is limited, or where complex resistance signatures exist.

Estimating tuberculosis drug resistance amplification rates in high-burden settings

Background

Antimicrobial resistance develops following the accrual of mutations in the bacterial genome, and may variably impact organism fitness and hence, transmission risk. Classical representation of tuberculosis (TB) dynamics using a single or two strain (DS/MDR-TB) model typically does not capture elements of this important aspect of TB epidemiology. To understand and estimate the likelihood of resistance spreading in high drug-resistant TB incidence settings, we used epidemiological data to develop a mathematical model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission.

Methods

A four-strain (drug-susceptible (DS), isoniazid mono-resistant (INH-R), rifampicin mono-resistant (RIF-R) and multidrug-resistant (MDR)) compartmental deterministic Mtb transmission model was developed to explore the progression from DS- to MDR-TB in The Philippines and Viet Nam. The models were calibrated using data from national tuberculosis prevalence (NTP) surveys and drug resistance surveys (DRS). An adaptive Metropolis algorithm was used to estimate the risks of drug resistance amplification among unsuccessfully treated individuals.

Results

The estimated proportion of INH-R amplification among failing treatments was 0.84 (95% CI 0.79–0.89) for The Philippines and 0.77 (95% CI 0.71–0.84) for Viet Nam. The proportion of RIF-R amplification among failing treatments was 0.05 (95% CI 0.04–0.07) for The Philippines and 0.011 (95% CI 0.010–0.012) for Viet Nam.

Conclusion

The risk of resistance amplification due to treatment failure for INH was dramatically higher than RIF. We observed RIF-R strains were more likely to be transmitted than acquired through amplification, while both mechanisms of acquisition were important contributors in the case of INH-R. These findings highlight the complexity of drug resistance dynamics in high-incidence settings, and emphasize the importance of prioritizing testing algorithms which allow for early detection of INH-R.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07067-1.

Evaluation of the performance of the BD MAX MDR-TB test in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in extrapulmonary and pulmonary samples

BACKGROUND

The BD MAX MDR-TB is a recently marketed molecular test for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC), rifampin, and isoniazid drug resistance.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study aimed to evaluate the BD MAX MDR-TB test performance in 933 extrapulmonary and 774 pulmonary samples.

RESULTS

Test MTC detecting sensitivity was 90.6%, 82.5%, and the specificity was 98.5%, 98.9%, in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples, respectively. In smear-positive samples, sensitivity, and specificity were 100% for all samples. However, in smear-negative samples, the test's sensitivity and specificity were 82.3%, 98.5% in pulmonary samples, and 76.7%, 98.9% in extrapulmonary samples. Test sensitivity in detecting isoniazid resistance was 71.4%, specificity 96.8%, and in detecting rifampin resistance was 100%, specificity 93.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BD MAX MDR-TB is a reliable, rapid, user-friendly test for detecting MTC in extrapulmonary and pulmonary samples and its resistance toward isoniazid and rifampin. It can be used as an alternative to the Xpert system assays.