Validation and Characterization of FGFR2 Rearrangements in Cholangiocarcinoma with Comprehensive Genomic Profiling

Pharmacologic features, clinical applications, and drug safety evaluation of futibatinib in the treatment of biliary tract cancer (BTC)

INTRODUCTION

Futibatinib is a small, potent, covalent, irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 inhibitor that has been added as a new standard of care for previously treated unresectable and/or advanced FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive BTC. FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements play a key role in BTC survival, proliferation, invasion, and development of distant metastasis. The inhibition of this pathway is an important target in the treatment of BTC.

AREAS COVERED

The article covers the development of futibatinib for the treatment of refractory unresectable/advanced BTC, its mechanism of action, and key pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic data with a focus on the safety profile. Data are based on published clinical trials, pooled analysis, and retrospective studies indexed in PubMed (2010-2024).

EXPERT OPINION

Futibatinib is an FDA and EMA approved FGFR2 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with refractory BTC with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. Ongoing drug development strategies are centered on designing new FGFR2 fusion inhibitors able to overcome on-target and off-target resistances coupled with a high target selectivity to spare the most common treatment-related adverse events (hyperphosphatemia, stomatitis, alopecia, nail toxicity, skin reactions, eye toxicity).

FGFR2 fusions assessed by NGS, FISH, and immunohistochemistry in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

FGFR2 fusion has become a promising therapeutic target in iCCAs; however, the procedure for screening FGFR2 fusion has not been conventionally developed.

METHODS

FGFR2 fusion was identified using DNA + RNA-based NGS and FISH, and the concordance between DNA + RNA-based NGS, FISH, and IHC was compared.

RESULTS

FGFR2 fusions were detected in 9 out of 76 iCCAs (11.8%). The consistency of FISH and DNA + RNA-based NGS for FGFR2 fusions was high (κ value = 0.867, P = 0.001), while the consistency of IHC and DNA + RNA-based NGS was lower (κ value = 0.464, P = 0.072). All nine FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCAs were MSS with a median TMB of 2.1 mut/Mb, and only one had a CPS (PD-L1) above 5. Two FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCA patients were treated with and benefited from FGFR inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

FGFR2 fusion should be assessed for advanced iCCA patients. We recommend DNA + RNA-based NGS as the preferred option to supply all possible therapeutic targets. FISH should be preferred if the tumor sample is insufficient for NGS or if the patient is inclined to receive FGFR inhibitors promptly. Although IHC is not the preferred method to identify FGFR2 fusion, it might be used as preliminary screening for FGFR2 alterations if the hospital cannot offer NGS or FISH, and the results need to be validated before FGFR2 inhibitors treatment.

Clinical Value of Liquid Biopsy in Patients with FGFR2 Fusion-Positive Cholangiocarcinoma During Targeted Therapy

PURPOSE

FGFR2 fusions occur in 10% to 15% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), potentially benefiting from FGFR inhibitors (FGFRi). We aimed to assess the feasibility of detecting FGFR2 fusions in plasma and explore plasma biomarkers for managing FGFRi treatment.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study in 18 patients with iCCA and known FGFR2 fusions previously identified in tissue samples from prior FGFRi treatment. Both tissue and synchronous plasma samples were analyzed using a custom hybrid capture gene panel with next-generation sequencing (VHIO-iCCA panel) and validated against commercial vendor results. Longitudinal plasma analysis during FGFRi was performed. Subsequently, we explored the correlation between plasma biomarkers, liver enzymes, tumor volume, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (88.9%) were positive for FGFR2 fusion events in plasma. Remarkably, the analysis of plasma suggests that lower levels of ctDNA are linked to clinical benefits from targeted therapy and result in improved progression-free survival and overall survival. Higher concentrations of cell-free DNA before FGFRi treatment were linked to worse overall survival, correlating with impaired liver function and indicating compromised cell-free DNA removal by the liver. Additionally, increased ctDNA or the emergence of resistance mutations allowed earlier detection of disease progression compared with standard radiologic imaging methods.

CONCLUSIONS

VHIO-iCCA demonstrated accurate detection of FGFR2 fusions in plasma. The integration of information from various plasma biomarkers holds the potential to predict clinical outcomes and identify treatment failure prior to radiologic progression, offering valuable guidance for the clinical management of patients with iCCA.

Adverse events with pemigatinib in the real world: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

To data, there is insufficient large-scale data on the adverse events (AEs) of pemigatinib. Consequently, we conducted a pharmacovigilance study utilizing the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to investigate these AEs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The OpenVigil 2.1 was used to extract AE data from the FAERS database. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratios (ROR), and bayesian analysis confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) were used to assess the association between pemigatinib and AEs. The clinical importance of AE signals were prioritized using a rating scale.

RESULTS

A total of 848 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, and 421 AE reports were identified after the data cleaning process. After accounting for indication bias and removal of medication errors, 59 positive signals were finally included. The 59 positive signals emerged in 11 system organ classes (SOCs). Besides, 19 positive AEs were classified as moderate clinical priority, while 40 were deemed weak in terms of priority. 9 positive AEs were not included in the drug label.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided valuable evidence for clinicians to mitigate the risk of pemigatinib-related toxicities in the real world.

Current status and issues in genomic analysis using EUS-FNA/FNB specimens in hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancers

Comprehensive genomic profiling based on next-generation sequencing has recently been used to provide precision medicine for various advanced cancers. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) play essential roles in the diagnosis of abdominal masses, mainly pancreatic cancers. In recent years, CGP analysis using EUS-FNA/FNB specimens for hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancers has increased; however, the success rate of CGP analysis is not clinically satisfactory, and many issues need to be resolved to improve the success rate of CGP analysis. In this article, we review the transition from EUS-FNA to FNB, compare each test, and discuss the current status and issues in genomic analysis of hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancers using EUS-FNA/FNB specimens.

FGFR families: biological functions and therapeutic interventions in tumors

There are five fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs), namely, FGFR1-FGFR5. When FGFR binds to its ligand, namely, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), it dimerizes and autophosphorylates, thereby activating several key downstream pathways that play an important role in normal physiology, such as the Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, phospholipase C gamma/diacylglycerol/protein kinase c, and signal transducer and activator of transcription pathways. Furthermore, as an oncogene, FGFR genetic alterations were found in 7.1% of tumors, and these alterations include gene amplification, gene mutations, gene fusions or rearrangements. Therefore, FGFR amplification, mutations, rearrangements, or fusions are considered as potential biomarkers of FGFR therapeutic response for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, it is worth noting that with increased use, resistance to TKIs inevitably develops, such as the well-known gatekeeper mutations. Thus, overcoming the development of drug resistance becomes a serious problem. This review mainly outlines the FGFR family functions, related pathways, and therapeutic agents in tumors with the aim of obtaining better outcomes for cancer patients with FGFR changes. The information provided in this review may provide additional therapeutic ideas for tumor patients with FGFR abnormalities.

Role of FGFR3 in bladder cancer: Treatment landscape and future challenges

Bladder cancer is a heterogeneous malignancy and is responsible for approximately 3.2% of new diagnoses of cancer per year (Sung et al., 2021). Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) have recently emerged as a novel therapeutic target in cancer. In particular, FGFR3 genomic alterations are potent oncogenic drivers in bladder cancer and represent predictive biomarkers of response to FGFR inhibitors. Indeed, overall ∼50% of bladder cancers have somatic mutations in the FGFR3 -coding sequence (Cappellen et al., 1999; Turner and Grose, 2010). FGFR3 gene rearrangements are typical alterations in bladder cancer (Nelson et al., 2016; Parker et al., 2014). In this review, we summarize the most relevant evidence on the role of FGFR3 and the state-of-art of anti-FGFR3 treatment in bladder cancer. Furthermore, we interrogated the AACR Project GENIE to investigate clinical and molecular features of FGFR3-altered bladder cancers. We found that FGFR3 rearrangements and missense mutations were associated with a lower fraction of mutated genome, compared to the FGFR3 wild-type tumors, as also observed in other oncogene-addicted cancers. Moreover, we observed that FGFR3 genomic alterations are mutually exclusive with other genomic aberrations of canonical bladder cancer oncogenes, such as TP53 and RB1. Finally, we provide an overview of the treatment landscape of FGFR3-altered bladder cancer, discussing future perspectives for the management of this disease.

Patient Selection Approaches in FGFR Inhibitor Trials-Many Paths to the Same End?

Inhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling have been investigated in various human cancer diseases. Recently, the first compounds received FDA approval in biomarker-selected patient populations. Different approaches and technologies have been applied in clinical trials, ranging from protein (immunohistochemistry) to mRNA expression (e.g., RNA in situ hybridization) and to detection of various DNA alterations (e.g., copy number variations, mutations, gene fusions). We review, here, the advantages and limitations of the different technologies and discuss the importance of tissue and disease context in identifying the best predictive biomarker for FGFR targeting therapies.

Genomic architecture of FGFR2 fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and its implication for molecular testing

Background

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a primary malignancy of the biliary tract with a dismal prognosis. Recently, several actionable genetic aberrations were identified with significant enrichment in intrahepatic CCA, including FGFR2 gene fusions with a prevalence of 10–15%. Recent clinical data demonstrate that these fusions are druggable in a second-line setting in advanced/metastatic disease and the efficacy in earlier lines of therapy is being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials. This scenario warrants standardised molecular profiling of these tumours.

Methods

A detailed analysis of the original genetic data from the FIGHT-202 trial, on which the approval of Pemigatinib was based, was conducted.

Results

Comparing different detection approaches and displaying representative cases, we described the genetic landscape and architecture of FGFR2 fusions in iCCA and show biological and technical aspects to be considered for their detection. We elaborated parameters, including a suggestion for annotation, that should be stated in a molecular diagnostic FGFR2 report to allow a complete understanding of the analysis performed and the information provided.

Conclusion

This study provides a detailed presentation and dissection of the technical and biological aspects regarding FGFR2 fusion detection, which aims to support molecular pathologists, pathologists and clinicians in diagnostics, reporting of the results and decision-making.