Transfers among women intending a birth center delivery in the San Diego birth center study

Exploring Why Birth Center Clients Choose Hospitalization for Labor and Birth

OBJECTIVE

To identify demographic and clinical factors associated with birth center clients electing hospitalization for labor and birth and to explore the timing and rationale for elective hospitalization via health records.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of multiyear data from a quality assurance project at a single birth center. We compared two subsamples-birth center preference group and hospital preference group-and described the apparent rationale for transfers among clients in the latter group.

SETTING

A single freestanding birth center where all midwives have admitting privileges at a local hospital and can accompany labor transfers.

PARTICIPANTS

All cases included in the analytic sample represent women with low-risk pregnancies who were eligible for birth center birth. The birth center preference group represents clients planning to give birth at the center, and the hospital preference group consists of clients who elected for hospitalization.

MEASUREMENTS

Relevant demographic and clinical information was provided for the entire analytic sample and was matched with available data collected systematically by birth center staff via chart review. The data set also included anonymous responses to an e-mailed questionnaire from clients identified by birth center staff.

RESULTS

Approximately 56.1% (N = 1,155) of the cases in the data set were eligible for comparative analysis. The birth center preference and hospital preference groups included 899 (77.8%) and 256 (22.2%) individuals, respectively. In the hospital preference group, Black clients (n = 23), those who were publicly insured (n = 49), and primiparas (n = 101) were significantly overrepresented. Chart review data and questionnaire responses highlighted insurance restrictions, family preferences, pain relief options, and postpartum care as influential factors among members of the hospital preference subsample.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis shows associations between certain individual characteristics and elective hospitalization during labor for birth center clients. Health record data and questionnaire responses indicated a variety of reasons for electing hospitalization, illustrating the complexity of clients' decision-making during pregnancy and birth.

Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review

Background

Strengthening of midwives' position and support for freestanding birth centers, frequently referred to as Freestanding Midwife-led Units (FMUs), raise hopes for a return to humanized labor. Our study aimed to review published evidence regarding FMUs to systematize the knowledge of their functioning and to identify potential gaps in this matter.

Materials and Methods

A structured integrative review of theoretical papers and empirical studies was conducted. The literature search included MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases. The analysis included papers published in 1977-2017. Relevant documents were identified using various combinations of search terms and standard Boolean operators. The search included titles, abstracts, and keywords. Additional records were found through a manual search of reference lists from extracted papers.

Results

Overall, 56 out of 107 originally found articles were identified as eligible for the review. Based on the critical analysis of published data, six groups of research problems were identified and discussed, namely, 1) specifics of FMUs, 2) costs of perinatal care at FMUs, 3) FMUs as a place for midwife education, 4) FMUs from midwives' perspective, 5) perinatal, maternal, and neonatal outcomes, and 6) FMUs from the perspective of a pregnant woman.

Conclusions

FMUs offers a home-like environment and complex midwifery support for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Although emergency equipment is available as needed, FMU birth is considered a natural spontaneous process. Midwives' supervision over low-risk labors may provide many benefits, primarily related to lower medicalization and fewer medical interventions than in a hospital setting.

What are the risk factors associated with hospital birth among women planning to give birth in a birth center in Washington State?

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated risk factors associated with hospital birth among women planning to give birth in a birth center in the United States. This study describes the obstetrical risk factors for hospital birth among women intending to deliver in a birth center in Washington State.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of Washington State birth certificate data for women with singleton, term pregnancies planning to give birth at a birth center from 2004 to 2011. We assessed risk factors for hospital birth including demographic, obstetrical, and medical characteristics. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the association between risk factors and hospital birth.

RESULTS

Among the 7118 women planning to give birth at a birth center during the study period, 7% (N = 501) had a hospital birth, and 93% delivered at a birth center (N = 6617). The strongest risk factors for hospital transfer included nulliparity (OR 7.2 [95% CI 5.3-9.8]), maternal age >40 years (OR 3.7 [95% CI 2.1-6.7]), inadequate prenatal care (OR 3.7 [95% CI 2.7-5.0]), body mass index ≥30 (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.6-3.0]), government health insurance (OR 9.3 [95% CI 5.0-17.1]), and hypertension (10.1 [95% CI 5.7-18.1]). Among nulliparous women, all of these demographic and obstetrical factors remained strongly associated with hospital birth.

CONCLUSIONS

This information may be useful for counseling women who plan a birth center birth about the risk of hospital birth.

Factors associated with maternal intrapartum transfers from a freestanding birth centre in São Paulo, Brazil: a case control study

OBJECTIVES

to identify factors associated with maternal intrapartum transfer from a freestanding birth centre to hospital.

DESIGN

case-control study with retrospective data collection.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS

cases included all 111 women transferred from a freestanding birth centre in Sao Paulo to the referral hospital, from March 2002 to December 2009. The controls were 456 women who gave birth in the birth centre during the same period who were not transferred, randomly selected with four controls for each case.

METHODS

data were obtained from maternal records. Factors associated with maternal intrapartum transfers were initially analysed using a χ(2) test of association. Variables with p<0.20 were then included in multivariate analyses. A multiple logistic regression model was built using stepwise forward selection; variables which reached statistical significance at p<0.05 were considered to be independently associated with maternal transfer.

FINDINGS

during the study data collection period, 111 (4%) of 2,736 women admitted to the centre were transferred intrapartum. Variables identified as independently associated factors for intrapartum transfer included nulliparity (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.7-9.8), maternal age ≥35 years (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.1-13.4), not having a partner (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.3), cervical dilation ≤3 cm on admission to the birth centre (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2) and between 5 and 12 antenatal appointments at the birth centre (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.9-7.5). In contrast, a low correlation between fundal height and pregnancy gestation (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) appeared to be protective against transfer.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

identifying factors associated with maternal intrapartum transfer could support decision making by women considering options for place of birth, and support the content of appropriate information about criteria for admission to a birth centre. Findings add to the evidence base to support identification of women in early labour who may experience later complications and could support timely implementation of appropriate interventions associated with reducing transfer rates.

[Transferring mothers from a free-standing birth center to a reference hospital]

The objective of this descriptive study was to characterize the transfers of mothers from the Sapopemba Birth Center to reference hospitals in São Paulo, from September 1998 to July 2008. The studied population was 229 cases of mother transfers. Data were obtained from medical records and record books of the transferred women. Descriptive analysis was performed. The transfer rate was 5.8% (5.5% in the intrapartum period and 0.3% in the postpartum period). Most women who were transferred to the hospital were nulliparous (78.6%). The most common reason for intrapartum transfers was fetal or pelvis abnormalities (22.6%), and abnormal placental detachment (50%) for women in the postpartum period. Some conditions such as nulliparity, cervical dilation at admission, rupture of the membranes and gestational age over 40 weeks were highlighted as important variables for studying the risk factors for mothers being transferred.