Developing and testing of an air dilution flow olfactometer with known rates of concentration change

Psychological states affecting initial pupil size changes after olfactory stimulation in healthy participants

Odor perception affects physiological and psychological states. Pupillary light reflex (PLR) parameters can be affected by olfactory stimulation and psychological states, although it remains unclear whether the olfactory stimulation-induced psychological changes can associate with PLR parameter changes. This study aimed to investigate effects of olfactory stimulation-induced psychological changes on PLR parameter changes with repeated measurements. We collected data on six mood subscales of the profile of mood states, and on five PLR parameter measurements from 28 healthy participants. Participants underwent a 10-min olfactory stimulation on different days with six odorants available with the T&T olfactometer. As obtained data were clustered, we used linear mixed-effects models for statistical analyses. The olfactory stimulation using the no-odor liquid did not affect mood states and the initial pupil size (INIT). The sweat odorant worsened all mood subscales including fatigue-inertia (Fatigue)/Vigor-Activity (Vigor), and decreased INIT compared to the no-odor liquid. When comparing INIT responses related to changes in mood subscales between the no-odor liquid and the sweat odorant, worsened states of Fatigue/Vigor were associated with decreased INIT in the sweat odorant. Fatigue/Vigor can be used as mental fatigue indicators. Thus, mental fatigue can be associated with decreased INIT in the olfactory stimulation.

Gain control in olfactory receptor neurons and the detection of temporal fluctuations in odor concentration

The ability of the cockroach to locate an odor source in still air suggests that the temporal dynamic of odor concentration in the slowly expanding stationary plume alone is used to infer odor source distance and location. This contradicts with the well-established view that insects use the wind direction as the principle directional cue. This contribution highlights the evidence for, and likely functional relevance of, the capacity of the cockroach's olfactory receptor neurons to detect and process-from one moment to the next-not only a succession of odor concentrations but also the rates at which concentration changes. This presents a challenge for the olfactory system because it must detect and encode the temporal concentration dynamic in a manner that simultaneously allows invariant odor recognition. The challenge is met by a parallel representation of odor identity and concentration changes in a dual pathway that starts from olfactory receptor neurons located in two morphologically distinct types of olfactory sensilla. Parallel processing uses two types of gain control that simultaneously allocate different weight to the instantaneous odor concentration and its rate of change. Robust gain control provides a stable sensitivity for the instantaneous concentration by filtering the information on fluctuations in the rate of change. Variable gain control, in turn, enhances sensitivity for the concentration rate according to variations in the duration of the fluctuation period. This efficiently represents the fluctuation of concentration changes in the environmental context in which such changes occur.

Silencing the odorant receptor co-receptor impairs olfactory reception in a sensillum-specific manner in the cockroach

Insects detect odors via a large variety of odorant receptors (ORs) expressed in olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs). The insect OR is a heteromeric complex composed of a ligand-specific receptor and the co-receptor (ORco). In this study, we identified the ORco gene of the cockroach, Periplaneta americana (PameORco), and performed RNAi-based functional analysis of PameORco. All OSNs in the basiconic sensilla expressed PameORco and received a large variety of odors including sex pheromones. In trichoid sensilla, a PameORco-positive OSN was consistently paired with a PameORco-negative OSN tuned to acids. In adult cockroaches injected with PameORco dsRNA at the nymphal stage, the expression of PameORco, odor receptions via ORs, and its central processing were strongly suppressed. These results provide new insights into the molecular basis of olfactory reception in the cockroach. The long-lasting and irreversible effects of PameORco RNAi would be an effective method for controlling the household pest.

•

Whole sequence of ORco in the American cockroach (PameORco) was characterized

•

PameORco expressed in olfactory sensory neurons in a sensillar type-specific manner

•

RNAi chronically and irreversibly suppressed the PameORco expression beyond molts

•

PameORco was essential for receptions of sex pheromones and general odors

The Performance of Olfactory Receptor Neurons: The Rate of Concentration Change Indicates Functional Specializations in the Cockroach Peripheral Olfactory System

Slow and continuous changes in odor concentration were used as a possible easy method for measuring the effect of the instantaneous concentration and the rate of concentration change on the activity of the olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) of basiconic sensilla on the cockroach antennae. During oscillating concentration changes, impulse frequency increased with rising instantaneous concentration and this increase was stronger the faster concentration rose through the higher concentration values. The effect of the concentration rate on the ORNs responses to the instantaneous concentration was invariant to the duration of the oscillation period: shallow concentration waves provided by long periods elicited the same response to the instantaneous concentration as steep concentration waves at brief periods. Thus, the double dependence remained unchanged when the range of concentration rates varied. This distinguishes the ORNs of basiconic sensilla from those of trichoid sensilla (Tichy and Hellwig, 2018) which adjust their gain of response according to the duration of the oscillating period. The precision of the ORNs to discriminate increments of slowly rising odor concentration was studied by applying gradual ramp-like concentration changes at different rates. While the ORNs of the trichoid sensilla perform better the slower the concentration rate, those of the basiconic sensilla show no preference for a specific rate of concentration increase. This suggests that the two types of sensilla have different functions. The ORNs of the trichoid sensilla may predominately analyze temporal features of the odor signal and the ORNs of the basiconic sensilla may be involved in extracting information on the identity of the odor source instead of mediating the spatial-temporal concentration pattern in an odor plume.