Neurophysiological characteristics of MuSK antibody positive myasthenia gravis mice: focal denervation and hypersensitivity to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

A clinical perspective on muscle specific kinase antibody positive myasthenia gravis

The discovery of autoantibodies directed against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) in "seronegative" myasthenia gravis (MG) patients marked a milestone in MG research. In healthy muscle, MuSK regulates a phosphorylation pathway, which is essential for the development and maintenance of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clusters at the neuromuscular junction. Autoantibodies directed against MuSK are predominantly of the IgG4 subclass, but there is increasing evidence that IgG1-3 could also contribute to the pathology underlying MuSK-MG. MuSK-IgG4 are monovalent and block the binding site for LRP4 on MuSK, thereby inhibiting the downstream phosphorylation pathway and compromising the formation of AChR clusters. Clinically, MuSK-MG is commonly associated with the predominant involvement of bulbar, facial, shoulder and neck muscles. Cholinesterase inhibitors should be avoided in MuSK-MG due to the risk of clinical impairment and cholinergic crisis. Corticosteroids and other non-steroidal immunosuppressants are less effective with the need for higher doses and prolonged treatment. Rituximab, by contrast, has been shown to be particularly effective and is now often used early in the disease course. Its use is associated with a significant improvement in the clinical outcome of MuSK-MG patients over time. This review aims to describe the pathophysiology underlying MuSK-MG and provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical features and therapeutic options.

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are ineffective in MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis: Results of a study on 202 patients

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) with MuSK antibodies (MuSK-MG) represents a distinct subtype with different responses to treatments compared to patients with AChR antibodies, especially in terms of tolerance to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI). However, AChEI are often used as first line symptomatic treatment in MuSK-MG, despite reports that they are poorly tolerated, seldom effective or even deleterious.

METHODS

We analyzed demographic, clinical and therapeutic responses and side-effects in the large cohort of 202 MuSK-MG patients cared for at the MG Clinic of Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana.

RESULTS

165 patients had received AChEI at first evaluation. Only 7/165 patients (4.2%) reported an initial clinical benefit. Conversely, 76.9% of patients reported at least one side effect, most commonly neuromuscular hyperexcitability (68.4%), gastrointestinal (53.9%) and neurovegetative (35.8%) disturbances. 56 (33.9%) patients reported a concomitant worsening of muscle weakness and twelve patients (7.3%) suffered a cholinergic crisis. According to these patients, the severity of cholinergic side effects was greater at higher doses of AChEI, but side effects occurred regardless of the dose administered and ceased once the drug was discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest population of MuSK-MG patients reported for perceived responsiveness and tolerance to AChEI treatment. Our obervations strongly suggest avoiding this treatment in MuSK-MG.

Immunotherapies in MuSK-positive Myasthenia Gravis; an IgG4 antibody-mediated disease

Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) Myasthenia Gravis (MG) represents a prototypical antibody-mediated disease characterized by predominantly focal muscle weakness (neck, facial, and bulbar muscles) and fatigability. The pathogenic antibodies mostly belong to the immunoglobulin subclass (Ig)G4, a feature which attributes them their specific properties and pathogenic profile. On the other hand, acetylcholine receptor (AChR) MG, the most prevalent form of MG, is characterized by immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 and IgG3 antibodies to the AChR. IgG4 class autoantibodies are impotent to fix complement and only weakly bind Fc-receptors expressed on immune cells and exert their pathogenicity via interfering with the interaction between their targets and binding partners (e.g. between MuSK and LRP4). Cardinal differences between AChR and MuSK-MG are the thymus involvement (not prominent in MuSK-MG), the distinct HLA alleles, and core immunopathological patterns of pathology in neuromuscular junction, structure, and function. In MuSK-MG, classical treatment options are usually less effective (e.g. IVIG) with the need for prolonged and high doses of steroids difficult to be tapered to control symptoms. Exceptional clinical response to plasmapheresis and rituximab has been particularly observed in these patients. Reduction of antibody titers follows the clinical efficacy of anti-CD20 therapies, a feature implying the role of short-lived plasma cells (SLPB) in autoantibody production. Novel therapeutic monoclonal against B cells at different stages of their maturation (like plasmablasts), or against molecules involved in B cell activation, represent promising therapeutic targets. A revolution in autoantibody-mediated diseases is pharmacological interference with the neonatal Fc receptor, leading to a rapid reduction of circulating IgGs (including autoantibodies), an approach already suitable for AChR-MG and promising for MuSK-MG. New precision medicine approaches involve Chimeric autoantibody receptor T (CAAR-T) cells that are engineered to target antigen-specific B cells in MuSK-MG and represent a milestone in the development of targeted immunotherapies. This review aims to provide a detailed update on the pathomechanisms involved in MuSK-MG (cellular and humoral aberrations), fostering the understanding of the latest indications regarding the efficacy of different treatment strategies.

Afterdischarges in Myasthenia Gravis

Introduction: This study aimed to analyze the clinical features of myasthenia gravis (MG) in combination with the afterdischarges and compare the characteristics of afterdischarges in MG with different serum antibodies. Methods: Ninety-two patients with MG were analyzed retrospectively. The afterdischarges were investigated using motor nerve conduction examination, F-wave examination, and repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS). Results: Afterdischarges were observed after the M wave in 14 of 92 patients. Three of these 14 patients tested positive for the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibody (MuSK-Ab), and 11 patients tested positive for the acetylcholine receptor antibody (AchR-Ab). The characteristics of the afterdischarges on RNS differed distinctly between the two antibody groups. The afterdischarges occurred on the first stimulation, but decreased on the second and subsequent stimulations in patients with MuSK-MG, while the afterdischarges continued to occur on each stimulation in patients with AchR-MG. Discussion: The characteristics of the afterdischarges on RNS enabled easy identification of their synaptic or neurogenic nature.

Drugs That Induce or Cause Deterioration of Myasthenia Gravis: An Update

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder which is characterized by presence of antibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) or other proteins of the postsynaptic membrane resulting in damage to postsynaptic membrane, decreased number of AChRs or blocking of the receptors by autoantibodies. A number of drugs such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, penicillamine, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and interferons may induce de novo MG by altering the immune homeostasis mechanisms which prevent emergence of autoimmune diseases such as MG. Other drugs, especially certain antibiotics, antiarrhythmics, anesthetics and neuromuscular blockers, have deleterious effects on neuromuscular transmission, resulting in increased weakness in MG or MG-like symptoms in patients who do not have MG, with the latter usually being under medical circumstances such as kidney failure. This review summarizes the drugs which can cause de novo MG, MG exacerbation or MG-like symptoms in nonmyasthenic patients.

Nature and Action of Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis

This article discusses antibodies associated with immune-mediated myasthenia gravis and the pathologic action of these antibodies at the neuromuscular junctions of skeletal muscle. To explain how these antibodies act, we consider the physiology of neuromuscular transmission with emphasis on 4 features: the structure of the neuromuscular junction; the roles of postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors and voltage-gated Na⁺ channels and in converting the chemical signal from the nerve terminal into a propagated action potential on the muscle fiber that triggers muscle contraction; the safety factor for neuromuscular transmission; and how the safety factor is reduced in different forms of autoimmune myasthenia gravis.

Reversible spontaneous EMG activity during myasthenic crisis: Two case reports

Background

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated autoimmune neuromuscular disorder, clinically presenting with fatigable variable muscle weakness. Typical electrodiagnostic findings are a decremental response to repetitive nerve stimulation with post-exercise facilitation, and motor unit instability expressed as increased jitter on single fibre-EMG. Presence of spontaneous activity on standard EMG is traditionally considered inconsistent with a diagnosis of MG and would direct the differential diagnosis towards a primary denervating or usually inflammatory myopathic process.Case reportWe herein present two patients with progressive severe bulbar symptomatology, whose needle-EMG examinations showed spontaneous activity and led to erroneous initial diagnoses of inflammatory myopathy and anterior horn cell disease respectively. Follow-up neurophysiological investigations, positive anti-AchR titres and good response to IVIg and steroids eventually established the diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis.

Conclusions

Clinically severe Myasthenia Gravis can potentially present with spontaneous activity on EMG, mimicking acute myopathic or neurogenic processes. This can prove particularly perplexing and cause significant delays in the diagnosis and treatment of a myasthenia relapse.

Forced expression of muscle specific kinase slows postsynaptic acetylcholine receptor loss in a mouse model of MuSK myasthenia gravis

We investigated the influence of postsynaptic tyrosine kinase signaling in a mouse model of muscle‐specific kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis (MG). Mice administered repeated daily injections of IgG from MuSK MG patients developed impaired neuromuscular transmission due to progressive loss of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) from the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. In this model, anti‐MuSK‐positive IgG caused a reduction in motor endplate immunolabeling for phosphorylated Src‐Y418 and AChR β‐subunit‐Y390 before any detectable loss of MuSK or AChR from the endplate. Adeno‐associated viral vector (rAAV) encoding MuSK fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein (MuSK‐EGFP) was injected into the tibialis anterior muscle to increase MuSK synthesis. When mice were subsequently challenged with 11 daily injections of IgG from MuSK MG patients, endplates expressing MuSK‐EGFP retained more MuSK and AChR than endplates of contralateral muscles administered empty vector. Recordings of compound muscle action potentials from myasthenic mice revealed less impairment of neuromuscular transmission in muscles that had been injected with rAAV‐MuSK‐EGFP than contralateral muscles (empty rAAV controls). In contrast to the effects of MuSK‐EGFP, forced expression of rapsyn‐EGFP provided no such protection to endplate AChR when mice were subsequently challenged with MuSK MG IgG. In summary, the immediate in vivo effect of MuSK autoantibodies was to suppress MuSK‐dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins in the postsynaptic membrane, while increased MuSK synthesis protected endplates against AChR loss. These results support the hypothesis that reduced MuSK kinase signaling initiates the progressive disassembly of the postsynaptic membrane scaffold in this mouse model of MuSK MG.

Electrophysiological analysis of neuromuscular synaptic function in myasthenia gravis patients and animal models

Study of the electrophysiological function of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is instrumental in the understanding of the symptoms and pathophysiology of myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disorder characterized by fluctuating and fatigable muscle weakness. Most patients have autoantibodies to the acetylcholine receptor at the NMJ. However, in recent years autoantibodies to other crucial postsynaptic membrane proteins have been found in previously 'seronegative' MG patients. Electromyographical recording of compound and single-fibre muscle action potentials provides a crucial in vivo method to determine neuromuscular transmission failure while ex vivo (miniature) endplate potential recordings can reveal the precise synaptic impairment. Here we will review these electrophysiological methods used to assess NMJ function and discuss their application and typical results found in the diagnostic and experimental study of patients and animal models of the several forms of MG.

Guidelines for pre-clinical animal and cellular models of MuSK-myasthenia gravis

Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies are the hallmark of a form of myasthenia gravis (MG) that can challenge the neurologist and the experimentalist. The clinical disease can be difficult to treat effectively. MuSK autoantibodies affect the neuromuscular junction in several ways. When added to muscle cells in culture, MuSK antibodies disperse acetylcholine receptor clusters. Experimental animals actively immunized with MuSK develop MuSK autoantibodies and muscle weakness. Weakness is associated with reduced postsynaptic acetylcholine receptor numbers, reduced amplitudes of miniature endplate potentials and endplate potentials, and failure of neuromuscular transmission. Similar impairments have been found in mice injected with IgG from MG patients positive for MuSK autoantibody (MuSK-MG). The active and passive models have begun to reveal the mechanisms by which MuSK antibodies disrupt synaptic function at the neuromuscular junction, and should be valuable in developing therapies for MuSK-MG. However, translation into new and improved treatments for patients requires procedures that are not too cumbersome but suitable for examining different aspects of MuSK function and the effects of potential therapies. Study design, conduct and analysis should be carefully considered and transparently reported. Here we review what has been learnt from animal and culture models of MuSK-MG, and offer guidelines for experimental design and conduct of studies, including sample size determination, randomization, outcome parameters and precautions for objective data analysis. These principles may also be relevant to the increasing number of other antibody-mediated diseases that are now recognized.

Clinical and Electrophysiologic Responses to Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in MuSK-Antibody-Positive Myasthenia Gravis: Evidence for Cholinergic Neuromuscular Hyperactivity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody (MuSK-Ab)-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) show distinct responses to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs). Although clinical responses to AChEIs in MuSK-Ab MG are reasonably well known, little is known about the electrophysiologic responses to AChEIs. We therefore investigated the clinical and electrophysiologic responses to AChEIs in MuSK-Ab-positive MG patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and electrodiagnostic findings of 17 MG patients (10 MuSK-Ab-positive and 7 MuSK-Ab-negative patients) who underwent electrodiagnostic testing before and after a neostigmine test (NT).

RESULTS

The frequency of intolerance to pyridostigmine bromide (PB) was higher in MuSK-Ab-positive patients than in MuSK-Ab-negative patients (50% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.044), while the maximum tolerable dose of PB was lower in the former (90 mg/day vs. 480 mg/day, p=0.023). The frequency of positive NT results was significantly lower in MuSK-Ab-positive patients than in MuSK-Ab-negative patients (40% vs. 100%, p=0.035), while the nicotinic side effects of neostigmine were more frequent in the former (80% vs. 14.3%, p=0.015). Repetitive compound muscle action potentials (R-CMAPs) developed more frequently after NT in MuSK-Ab-positive patients than in MuSK-Ab-negative patients (90% vs. 14.3%, p=0.004). The frequency of a high-frequency-stimulation-induced decrement-increment pattern (DIP) was higher in MuSK-Ab-positive patients than in MuSK-Ab-negative patients (100% vs. 17.7%, p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that MuSK-Ab-positive MG patients exhibit unique and hyperactive responses to AChEIs. Furthermore, R-CMAP and DIP development on a standard AChEI dose may be a distinct neurophysiologic feature indicative of MuSK-Ab-positive MG.

Muscle-specific regulation of the mTOR signaling pathway in MuSK antibody seropositive (MuSK+) experimental autoimmune Myasthenia gravis (EAMG)

Myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with antibodies against muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK+) typically present focal fatigue and atrophy of the facial and bulbar muscles, including the masseter muscle, whereas leg muscles often are clinically spared. This study addresses the regulation of the mTOR signaling pathway in the masseter muscle versus the leg muscle tibialis anterior (TA). We analyzed muscle morphology, protein levels of mTOR components as well as atrogenes and mitochondrial markers in these muscles of healthy control mice and mice with different clinical severity grades of MuSK+ experimental autoimmune MG (EAMG). Protein levels of mTOR components were reduced in the atrophic masseter muscle of MuSK+ EAMG mice, whereas enhanced accumulation of mTOR components was observed in the TA muscles. Two other muscles: omohyoid and soleus showed intermediate spectra. In conclusion, the anabolic mTOR signaling pathway is differentially regulated even in muscles with the same activity pattern in the same neuromuscular disease. This could in part explain the clinical phenotype in MuSK+ EAMG as well as in muscular dystrophies.

Pyridostigmine but not 3,4-diaminopyridine exacerbates ACh receptor loss and myasthenia induced in mice by muscle-specific kinase autoantibody

In myasthenia gravis, the neuromuscular junction is impaired by the antibody-mediated loss of postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). Muscle weakness can be improved upon treatment with pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, or with 3,4-diaminopyridine, which increases the release of ACh quanta. The clinical efficacy of pyridostigmine is in doubt for certain forms of myasthenia. Here we formally examined the effects of these compounds in the antibody-induced mouse model of anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis. Mice received 14 daily injections of IgG from patients with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis. This caused reductions in postsynaptic AChR densities and in endplate potential amplitudes. Systemic delivery of pyridostigmine at therapeutically relevant levels from days 7 to 14 exacerbated the anti-MuSK-induced structural alterations and functional impairment at motor endplates in the diaphragm muscle. No such effect of pyridostigmine was found in mice receiving control human IgG. Mice receiving smaller amounts of MuSK autoantibodies did not display overt weakness, but 9 days of pyridostigmine treatment precipitated generalised muscle weakness. In contrast, one week of treatment with 3,4-diaminopyridine enhanced neuromuscular transmission in the diaphragm muscle. Both pyridostigmine and 3,4-diaminopyridine increase ACh in the synaptic cleft yet only pyridostigmine potentiated the anti-MuSK-induced decline in endplate ACh receptor density. These results thus suggest that ongoing pyridostigmine treatment potentiates anti-MuSK-induced AChR loss by prolonging the activity of ACh in the synaptic cleft.