Implementing novel imaging methods for improved diagnosis of disorder of consciousness patients

Advances in neuroimaging in disorders of consciousness

Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are a heterogeneous spectrum of clinical conditions, including coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, and minimally conscious state. DoC are clinically defined on the basis of behavioral cues expressed by the patients, on the assumption that such behavioral responses of the patient are representative of the patient's degree of consciousness impairment. However, many studies have highlighted the issues arising from formulating a DoC diagnosis merely on behavioral assessment. Overcoming the limitations of behavioral assessment, neuroimaging provides a direct window on the cerebral activity of the patient, bypassing the motor, perceptual, or cognitive deficits that might hamper the patient's ability to produce an appropriate behavioral response. This chapter provides an overview of available molecular, functional, and structural neuroimaging evidence in patients with DoC. This chapter introduces the neuroimaging tools available in the clinical settings of nuclear medicine and neuroradiology and presents the evidence on the role of neuroimaging tools to improve the clinical management of DoC patients, from the standpoint of differential diagnosis and prognosis. Last, we outline the open questions in the field, and point at actions that are urgently needed to fully exploit neuroimaging tools to advance scientific understanding and clinical management of DoC.

Neuroimaging biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with disorders of consciousness

The progress in neuroimaging and electrophysiological techniques has shown substantial promise in improving the clinical assessment of disorders of consciousness (DOC). Through the examination of both stimulus-induced and spontaneous brain activity, numerous comprehensive investigations have explored variations in brain activity patterns among patients with DOC, yielding valuable insights for clinical diagnosis and prognostic purposes. Nonetheless, reaching a consensus on precise neuroimaging biomarkers for patients with DOC remains a challenge. Therefore, in this review, we begin by summarizing the empirical evidence related to neuroimaging biomarkers for DOC using various paradigms, including active, passive, and resting-state approaches, by employing task-based fMRI, resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and positron emission tomography (PET) techniques. Subsequently, we conducted a review of studies examining the neural correlates of consciousness in patients with DOC, with the findings holding potential value for the clinical application of DOC. Notably, previous research indicates that neuroimaging techniques have the potential to unveil covert awareness that conventional behavioral assessments might overlook. Furthermore, when integrated with various task paradigms or analytical approaches, this combination has the potential to significantly enhance the accuracy of both diagnosis and prognosis in DOC patients. Nonetheless, the stability of these neural biomarkers still needs additional validation, and future directions may entail integrating diagnostic and prognostic methods with big data and deep learning approaches.

European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with acquired brain injury and acute or prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC) are challenging. Evidence to support diagnostic decisions on coma and other DoC is limited but accumulating. This guideline provides the state-of-the-art evidence regarding the diagnosis of DoC, summarizing data from bedside examination techniques, functional neuroimaging and electroencephalography (EEG).

METHODS

Sixteen members of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Scientific Panel on Coma and Chronic Disorders of Consciousness, representing 10 European countries, reviewed the scientific evidence for the evaluation of coma and other DoC using standard bibliographic measures. Recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The guideline was endorsed by the EAN.

RESULTS

Besides a comprehensive neurological examination, the following suggestions are made: probe for voluntary eye movements using a mirror; repeat clinical assessments in the subacute and chronic setting, using the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised; use the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score instead of the Glasgow Coma Scale in the acute setting; obtain clinical standard EEG; search for sleep patterns on EEG, particularly rapid eye movement sleep and slow-wave sleep; and, whenever feasible, consider positron emission tomography, resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), active fMRI or EEG paradigms and quantitative analysis of high-density EEG to complement behavioral assessment in patients without command following at the bedside.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized clinical evaluation, EEG-based techniques and functional neuroimaging should be integrated for multimodal evaluation of patients with DoC. The state of consciousness should be classified according to the highest level revealed by any of these three approaches.

Can Salient Stimuli Enhance Responses in Disorders of Consciousness? A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diagnostic classification of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) is based on clinician's observation of volitional behaviours. However, patients' caregivers often report higher levels of responsiveness with respect to those observed during the clinical assessment. Thus, increasing efforts have been aimed at comprehending the effects of self-referential and emotional stimuli on patients' responsiveness. Here we systematically reviewed the original experimental studies that compared behavioural and electrophysiological responses with salient vs. neutral material in patients in vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or in minimally conscious state.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most of the reviewed studies showed that salient stimuli (i.e. patient's own or familiar faces, patient's own name, and familiar voices) seem to elicit a higher amount of behavioural or electrophysiological responses with respect to neutral pictures or sounds. Importantly, a quite high percentage of patients seem to respond to salient stimuli only. The present review could foster use of personally salient stimuli in assessing DoC. However, the low overall quality of evidence and some limitations in the general reviewing process might induce caution in transferring these suggestions into clinical practice.