Medical decision-making capacity and its cognitive predictors in progressive MS: Preliminary evidence

Role of white matter in cognitive impairment among relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) associated cognitive impairment is believed to be mostly connected with damage to gray matter. The contribution of white matter is still poorly understood. We aim to examine the relationship between cognition and white matter tracts among relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients.

METHODS

Thirty RRMS patients were selected undergo the (3-seconds-interstimulus-interval paced auditory serial addition test) PASAT-3, the (symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) and full-brain MRI scans on a SIEMENS 3 Tesla Verio scanner. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) parameters, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were examined in 37 white matter (WM) tracts. WM tracts were selected from the association pathways, projection pathways, commissural pathways by applying Human Connectome project (HCP)842 tractography atlas after DTI data reconstruction and registration to HCP1065 diffusion template in DSI Studio (version March 2021) In SPSS v26, Spearman's rank correlation analysis was used to examine the connection between DTI WM tracts and cognitive scores. The power of the study was increased by using false discovery rate (FDR) software.

RESULTS

The mean scores on the PASAT-3 and SDMT were 31.5 ± 12.8 and 46.9 ± 16.7 respectively. Better cognitive performance was correlated to higher FA values, while lower cognitive function was correlated to higher MD values. There was a positive correlation between FA values in the right medial lemniscus and superior cerebellar peduncle and SDMT scores (p 0.05). Additionally, there was a trend for significance between the FA values in the left corticothalamic tract and SDMT scores. MD values in the superior cerebellar peduncle, left arcuate Fasciculus and left extreme capsule were negatively correlated with SDMT scores (p<0.05). PASAT-3 scores were negatively correlated with MD values in the right cerebellum, however, there was no significant correlation between PASAT-3 and FA values.

CONCLUSIONS

White matter tracts, particularly the superior cerebellar peduncle, contribute to the cognitive impairment in RRMS. Larger sample sizes for longitudinal research are necessary.

Patients with multiple sclerosis choose a collaborative role in making treatment decision: results from the Italian multicenter SWITCH study

BACKGROUND

Clinicians are increasingly recognizing the importance of shared decision-making in complex treatment choices, highlighting the importance of the patient's rationale and motivation for switching therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between different modalities of changing multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments, cognitive profile and attitude and preferences of patients concerning treatment choice.

METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at 28 Italian MS centers in the period between June 2016 and June 2017. We screened all MS patients treated with any DMT, with a treatment compliance of at least 80% of therapy administered during the 3 last months who needed to modify MS therapy because of efficacy, safety or other reasons during a follow-up visit. At the time of switching the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) and the Control Preference Scale (CPS) were evaluated. According to the CPS, patients were classified as "active" (i.e. who prefer making the medical decision themselves), "collaborative" (i.e. who prefer decisions be made jointly with the physician), or "passive" (i.e. who prefer the physician make the decision).

RESULTS

Out of 13,657 patients recorded in the log, 409 (3%) changed therapy. Of these, 336 (2.5%) patients, 69.6% were female and with mean age 40.6 ± 10.5 years, were enrolled. According to the CPS score evaluation, a significant high percentage of patients (51.1%) were considered collaborative, 74 patients (22.5%) were passive, and 60 (18.2%) patients were active. Stratifying according to CPS results, we found a higher SDMT score among collaborative patients compared to active and passive ones (45.8 ± 12.3 versus 41.0 ± 13.2 versus 41.7 ± 12.8, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the CPS evaluation showed that more than 50% of patients who needed to change therapy chose a "collaborative" role in making treatment decision. Cognitive profile with SDMT seems to correlate with patients' preference on treatment decision, showing better scores in collaborative patients.

Cognitive Correlates of Impaired Testamentary Capacity in Alzheimer's Dementia

BACKGROUND

Testamentary capacity (TC) is a legal construct about the ability to make or change a will. Although studies of financial and medical capacities have noted a strong association between capacity and cognition, no study has examined the cognitive correlates of TC in Alzheimer's disease (ad).

METHODS

Study participants were 22 cognitively healthy controls and 20 persons with mild to moderate ad who were administered a neuropsychological battery and the Testamentary Capacity Instrument (TCI), a new performance-based measure of TC. Both TCI Element and TCI Total scores were calculated. TCI Total scores were calculated for the purposes of expanding correlational analyses (i.e., Pearson's product-moment) and are not intended for forensic TC evaluations. Final predictors were identified using linear and logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

All ad participants but one obtained TCI Totals that fell >2.5 standard deviations below the control group mean. Initial cognitive correlates of TCI performance were measures of general cognition, language, verbal memory, executive function, and processing speed. The four cognitive variables showing the highest t values and correlating with TCI Total score > 0.7 were entered into logistic and linear regression models. Final predictor models consisted of measures of verbal memory, executive function, and semantic knowledge and demonstrated shared variance of 0.71 (linear) and 0.82 (logistic).

CONCLUSIONS

A diagnosis of ad dementia is associated with clinical impairment in TC and associated cognitive abilities and indicates that a legal assessment of TC is warranted. Second, the results offer insight into the cognitive basis of TC in persons with Alzheimer's dementia.

Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?

Background

Brain tumor patients are at high risk of impaired medical decision-making capacity (MDC), which can be ethically challenging because it limits their ability to give informed consent to medical treatments or participation in research. The European Association of Neuro-Oncology Palliative Care Multidisciplinary Task Force performed a systematic review to identify relevant evidence with respect to MDC that could be used to give recommendations on how to cope with reduced MDC in brain tumor patients.

Methods

A literature search in several electronic databases was conducted up to September 2019, including studies with brain tumor and other neurological patients. Information related to the following topics was extracted: tools to measure MDC, consent to treatment or research, predictive patient- and treatment-related factors, surrogate decision making, and interventions to improve MDC.

Results

A total of 138 articles were deemed eligible. Several structured capacity-assessment instruments are available to aid clinical decision making. These instruments revealed a high incidence of impaired MDC both in brain tumors and other neurological diseases for treatment- and research-related decisions. Incapacity appeared to be mostly determined by the level of cognitive impairment. Surrogate decision making should be considered in case a patient lacks capacity, ensuring that the patient's "best interests" and wishes are guaranteed. Several methods are available that may help to enhance patients' consent capacity.

Conclusions

Clinical recommendations on how to detect and manage reduced MDC in brain tumor patients were formulated, reflecting among others the timing of MDC assessments, methods to enhance patients' consent capacity, and alternative procedures, including surrogate consent.

The therapeutic effect of treatment with RehaCom software on verbal performance in patients with multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by central nervous system lesions that lead to neurological dysfunctions including fatigue, depression and anxiety. MS is affecting almost 2.3 million people around the world, with the significant highest prevalence in the North America. MS also affects different cognitive abilities, such as attention, memory and executive functions. Furthermore, a significant impairment in verbal fluency and naming abilities in patients with MS has been reported. RehaCom, is a software that has improvement effects on cognitive functions. The goal of this research is to investigate the effect of treatment with RehaCom on verbal performance in patients with MS. To select the participants, 60 patients with MS who referred to our clinic were chosen randomly and divided into Control (n = 30) and Experimental (n = 30) groups. The participants in the experimental group were treated by RehaCom software for 10 sessions during 5 weeks (2 sessions per week and each session was 1 h). Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) and California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II), were used to assess verbal performance (verbal fluency, and verbal learning and memory) at weeks 0 (baseline), 5 (post-test) and 10 (follow-up). The results showed that, treatment with RehaCom improved verbal performance in patient with MS, at both post-test and follow-up stages. In conclusion, treatment with RehaCom cognitive rehabilitation software can improve verbal fluency, and verbal learning and memory in patient with MS, possibly by affecting the brain regions involved in language performance.

Association Between White Matter Microstructure and Verbal Fluency in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Verbal fluency refers to the ability to generate words quickly and efficiently according to predefined phonological or semantic criteria. Deficits in verbal fluency limit patients' ability to communicate effectively and to function well in social setups. Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients suffer from various cognitive impairments, and some of them experience language deficits as well. The goal of this study is to examine the contribution of the dorsal and ventral language pathways to verbal fluency in MS patients. All patients (N = 33) underwent diffusion MRI (dMRI) and fluency measurements. Diffusion parameters were calculated along dorsal and ventral language-related pathways and their right-hemispheric homologs, identified individually in each patient. Significant correlations were found between fluency measures and mean fractional anisotropy (FA) in several pathways, including the left fronto-temporal arcuate fasciculus (AFft), bilateral inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), and bilateral frontal aslant tract. Along-tract correlations revealed a more selective pattern of associations: letter-based fluency was associated with FA in a segment of the left AFft (dorsal pathway), while category-based fluency was associated with FA in a segment of the right IFOF (ventral pathway). The observed pattern of associations, mapping letter-based fluency to the dorsal stream and category-based fluency to the ventral stream, fits well within the dual stream framework of language processing. Further studies will be necessary to assess whether these associations generalize to the typical adult population or whether they are tied to the clinical state.

Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care

Purpose:

To promote understanding of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS), recommend optimal screening, monitoring, and treatment strategies, and address barriers to optimal management.

Methods:

The National MS Society (“Society”) convened experts in cognitive dysfunction (clinicians, researchers, and lay people with MS) to review the published literature, reach consensus on optimal strategies for screening, monitoring, and treating cognitive changes, and propose strategies to address barriers to optimal care.

Recommendations:

Based on current evidence, the Society makes the following recommendations, endorsed by the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers and the International Multiple Sclerosis Cognition Society: