King Devick computerized neurocognitive test scores in professional football players with learning and attentional disabilities

Effects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disability on vestibular and ocular baseline concussion assessment in pediatric athletes

Vestibular and ocular motor assessment has gained popularity as a tool for sport-related concussion among healthcare professionals. With awareness of premorbid risk factors, such as attentional problems, it is imperative to understand their effects at baseline. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and diagnosed learning disability (LD) on vestibular and oculomotor baseline concussion assessment in pediatrics. Pediatric athletes between the ages of 8 and 14 years with ADHD/LD (n = 30) and match controls without ADHD/LD (n = 30) completed baseline concussion testing, consisting of symptom provocation on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and oculomotor performance on near point of convergence (NPC) and King-Devick (K-D) tools. Those diagnosed with ADHD/LD performed worse on baseline saccades (p range = .02-.10), convergence (p = .04), vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) (p = .03) and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (p = .04) of the VOMS. Base rate analyses revealed that 26% of athletes in the ADHD/LD group had ≥1 and 13.3% had ≥2 VOMS domains over clinical cutoff levels, compared to 3.3% (≥1 domain) and 0 (≥2 domains) of controls. Individuals with ADHD/LD also performed worse on K-D assessment (p = .005). However, no differences were reported on NPC distance (p = .19). These findings suggest worse baseline concussion assessment scores on vestibular/ocular motor assessment domains in pediatric athletes diagnosed with ADHD/LD. Additional research is needed on assessment outcomes to determine if special consideration to those diagnosed with ADHD/LD is warranted.

Evaluating the construct validity of the King-Devick test in a psychological outpatient clinical sample

The King-Devick test (K-D) has demonstrated sensitivity as a screener measure of ocular motor and cognitive problems. Despite its empirical support in the assessment of patients with certain injuries and disorders (e.g., concussion, reading disorders), less is known about the construct validity of the K-D. This study examined this topic in an outpatient, diagnostically heterogeneous clinical sample. A total of 70 individuals seen for an outpatient psychoeducational evaluation completed the K-D in addition to measures of intellectual abilities, speeded reading ability, simple and sustained attention, and executive functioning. Pearson correlation coefficients revealed that poorer K-D performance was associated with poorer processing speed, speeded reading ability and response time to target stimuli (r = .26-.31, p < .05). K-D performance was unrelated to other intellectual abilities, other aspects of attention, or executive functioning (all p > .05). Results suggest that the K-D demonstrates good convergent and discriminant validity in a heterogeneous outpatient clinical sample including individuals with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, specific learning disorders, and a number of different depressive and anxiety disorders. Findings support its wider use as a measure of reading ability and processing speed in clinical contexts.