Radiographic horizontal gaze deviation in the setting of acute PICA territory ischemia: A potential mimic of large vessel occlusion

Clinical Differences between Radiographic and Physical Horizontal Gaze Deviation: Utility of Using the Two in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose

Radiographic horizontal gaze deviation (RHGD) has been identified as a useful finding on computed tomography (CT) that indicates the affected side in supratentorial ischemic stroke; however, it remains unclear whether RHGD is essentially the same phenomenon as physical horizontal gaze deviation (PHGD). To resolve the issue, this study was conducted.

Methods

Retrospective analyses were performed for 671 patients with ischemic stroke and 142 controls who were hospitalized and underwent head CT. First, clinical findings were examined to find differences between RHGD-positive and RHGD-negative patients. Second, patients were classified by their stroke mechanisms and/or affected vascular territories. For each subgroup, RHGD was compared with PHGD in frequency. Third, the proportions for patients divided by positivity for PHGD and RHGD were calculated in the subgroups.

Results

Patients with RHGD had PHGD more often than those without. In all stroke subgroups, RHGD was more frequent than PHGD. The frequency difference was prominent in small-artery occlusion (SAO) and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) stroke. In SAO of the basilar artery pontine perforator, RHGD was positive in 25% and largely contralesionally-directed. In PICA stroke, lesions in the vestibulocerebellum were associated with contralesional RHGD. Moreover, lesions in the lateral medulla also caused RHGD, which was mainly directed to the ipsilesional side. PHGD-positive stroke without RHGD was infrequent, whereas RHGD-positive stroke without PHGD was commonly observed (PICA stroke, 45.9%; other subgroups, 21.1%-27.5%).

Conclusions

RHGD had different characteristics from PHGD; therefore, assessments of both PHGD and RHGD may lead to more accurate diagnoses.

Multimodal monitoring: practical recommendations (dos and don'ts) in challenging situations and uncertainty

With the advancements in modern medicine, new methods are being developed to monitor patients in the intensive care unit. Different modalities evaluate different aspects of the patient's physiology and clinical status. The complexity of these modalities often restricts their use to the realm of clinical research, thereby limiting their use in the real world. Understanding their salient features and their limitations can aid physicians in interpreting the concomitant information provided by multiple modalities to make informed decisions that may affect clinical care and outcomes. Here, we present a review of the commonly used methods in the neurological intensive care unit with practical recommendations for their use.