Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after induced hypertension therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A case-control study

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome triggered by FLOT (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and calcium levofolinate) chemotherapy and thrombocytopenia (docetaxel and cisplatin) chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome is a clinical and imaging syndrome characterized by endothelial dysfunction, blood-brain barrier disruption, and vasogenic edema. The common clinical symptoms of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome include headache, altered consciousness, visual disturbances, and seizures, among which headache and seizures are the most common. The classic imaging patterns usually reveal vasogenic edema.

CASE REPORT

We describe the case of a middle-aged woman with gastric cancer. She was under treatment by fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel regimen and thrombocytopenia regimen after tumor progression, but developed unconsciousness, irritability, and headache shortly after initiation of treatment. Her magnetic resonance imaging in our hospital shows abnormal signals in bilateral frontal parietal occipital lobes with hyperintensities on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging, accompanied by the increased value of apparent diffusion coefficient. And T1-weighted images illustrate hypointense foci, with increased diffusion-weighted imaging signals.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

After admission, she was treated to control blood pressure, reduce brain edema, expand blood vessels, improve consciousness, and symptomatic support treatment. 3 days after the onset of the disease, her headache symptoms and state of consciousness gradually improved, and her blood pressure can be controlled at about 130/80 mmHg.

DISCUSSION

This is the first report that posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome is caused by a thrombocytopenia regimen, and our case highlights the pathogenic role of a thrombocytopenia regimen in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. However, the association between the thrombocytopenia regimen and previous fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel regimens needs further study.

Hemodynamic Management in the Prevention and Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

One of the most serious complications after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is delayed cerebral ischemia, the cause of which is multifactorial. Delayed cerebral ischemia considerably worsens neurological outcome and increases the risk of death. The targets of hemodynamic management of SAH have widely changed over the past 30 years. Hypovolemia and hypotension were favored prior to the era of early aneurysmal surgery but were subsequently replaced by the use of hypervolemia and hypertension. More recently, the concept of goal-directed therapy targeting euvolemia, with or without hypertension, is gaining preference. Despite the evolving concepts and the vast literature, fundamental questions related to hemodynamic optimization and its effects on cerebral perfusion and patient outcomes remain unanswered. In this review, we explain the rationale underlying the approaches to hemodynamic management and provide guidance on contemporary strategies related to fluid administration and blood pressure and cardiac output manipulation in the management of SAH.

Incremental Versus Immediate Induction of Hypertension in the Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Background

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a common complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and contributes to unfavorable outcome. In patients with deterioration despite prophylactic nimodipine treatment, induced hypertension (iHTN) can be considered, although the safety and efficacy of induction are still a matter of debate. In this study, two iHTN treatment algorithms were compared with different approaches toward setting pressure targets.

Methods

In a cohort of 325 consecutive patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, 139 patients were treated by induced hypertension as a first tier treatment. On diagnosing DCI, blood pressure was raised via norepinephrine infusion in 20-mm Hg increments in 37 patients (iHTN_incr), whereas 102 patients were treated by immediate elevation to systolic pressure above 180 mm Hg (iHTN_imm). Treatment choice was based on personal preference of the treating physician but with a gradual shift away from incremental elevation. Both groups were evaluated for DCI-caused infarction, the need of additional endovascular rescue treatment, the occurrence of pressor-treatment-related complications, and clinical outcome assessed by the extended Glasgow outcome scale after 12 months.

Results

The rate of refractory DCI requiring additional rescue therapy was comparable in both groups (48.9% in iHTN_incr, 40.0% in iHTN_imm; p = 0.332). The type of induced hypertension was not independently associated with the occurrence of DCI-related infarction in a logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.004; 95% confidence interval 0.329–3.443; p = 0.942). Similar rates of pressor-treatment-related complications were observed in both treatment groups. Favorable outcome was reached in 44 (43.1%) patients in the immediate vs. 10 (27.0%) patients in the incremental treatment group (p = 0.076). However, only Hunt and Hess grading was identified as an independent predictor variable of clinical outcome (odds ratio 0.422; 95% confidence interval 0.216–0.824; p = 0.012).

Conclusions

Immediate induction of hypertension with higher pressure targets did not result in a lower rate of DCI-related infarctions but was not associated with a higher complication rate compared with an incremental approach. Future tailored blood pressure management based on patient- and time-point-specific needs will hopefully better balance the neurological advantages versus the systemic complications of induced hypertension.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-022-01466-7.

Cerebrovascular Disease in the Setting of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome

Overlap between the pathogenesis of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and that of cerebrovascular disease can confound their clinical and radiological presentations, posing a diagnostic challenge. This article presents a literature review and discussion of the clinical manifestations, pathological mechanisms, and imaging manifestations of subarachnoid hemorrhage and vasculitis leading to posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, coexistence of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, and hemorrhage and infarction secondary to posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. The findings show that posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome shares some overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms with cerebrovascular disease. Importantly, neuroimaging plays an important role in identifying this entity in a timely manner and differentiating it from other diseases.