Carotid artery angioplasty versus stenting for management of acute tandem occlusions

Single vs. Multiphase Computed Tomography angiography in acute internal carotid artery occlusion: An accuracy and interobserver agreement study

OBJECTIVE

Accurate differentiation between the intracranial and extracranial location of the acute internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion is essential for guiding treatment decisions and mechanical thrombectomy planning. Multiphase Computed Tomography angiography (mCTA) appears to be superior to Single-phase Computed Tomography angiography (sCTA) in the evaluation of acute ICA occlusions. The main objective of our research is to study the accuracy of mCTA compared to sCTA in distinguishing isolated acute intracranial ICA occlusion from extracranial or tandem occlusion.

METHODS

Two observers independently analyzed sCTA and mCTA of patients with acute ICA occlusion at two different time points. The location of the occlusion was categorized as intracranial or extracranial for both imaging techniques and then compared with digital subtraction angiography (gold standard). Sensitivity and specificity rates for isolated intracranial ICA occlusion on sCTA and mCTA were calculated. Kappa statistics were used to assess interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of sCTA and mCTA was 48.28% (28.36%-68.19%) and 79.31% (62.84%-95.78%) respectively for the diagnosis of isolated intracranial ICA occlusion, with an almost perfect interobserver agreement between both observers (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our research suggests that mCTA is more accurate than sCTA in distinguishing isolated intracranial occlusions from extracranial or tandem occlusions.

Accuracy of Computed Tomography Angiography for Diagnosing Extracranial Mural Lesions in Patients with Acute Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Correlation with Digital Subtraction Angiography

Extracranial carotid mural lesions (CML), caused by atherosclerosis or dissection, are frequently observed in acute internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion, often requiring angioplasty or stenting. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in differentiating extracranial CML from thromboembolic etiology in acute ICA occlusion in patients eligible for endovascular treatment. Two neuroradiologists retrospectively studied patients with apparent extracranial ICA occlusion on CTA. Patients were divided into two groups: thromboembolism and CML, based on findings from CTA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). CTA sensitivity and specificity were calculated using DSA as the gold standard. Occlusive patterns and cervical segment widening were evaluated for atherosclerosis, dissection, and thromboembolism etiologies. CTA had a sensitivity of 84.91% (74.32-95.49%) and a specificity of 95.12% (87.31-100%) in detecting extracranial CML. Atherosclerosis was the most common cause, distinguishable with high accuracy using CTA (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in occlusive patterns between dissection and thromboembolism (p = 0.568). Cervical segment widening was only observed in dissection cases due to mural hematoma. Conclusions: CTA accurately differentiates extracranial CML from thromboembolic etiology in acute ICA occlusion. The pattern of the occlusion and the artery widening help to establish the location and the etiology of the occlusion.

Emergent carotid stenting versus no stenting for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) is performed during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion. However, the optimal management strategy in this setting is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of eCAS in patients with tandem occlusion.

METHODS

Systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from January 1, 2004 to March 7, 2022 for studies evaluating eCAS and no-stenting approach in patients with stroke with tandem occlusion. Primary endpoint was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2; secondary outcomes were (1) symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), (2) recurrent stroke, (3) successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3), (4) embolization in new territories, and (5) restenosis rate. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method and random-effects modeling.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies reached synthesis. eCAS was associated with higher good functional outcome compared with the no-stenting approach (OR=1.52, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.95), despite a significantly increased risk of sICH (OR=1.97, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.15), and higher successful recanalization rate (OR=1.91, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.85). Restenosis rate was lower in the eCAS group than in the no-stenting group (2% vs 9%, p=0.001). Recanalization rate was higher in retrograde than antegrade eCAS (OR=0.51, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.93). Intraprocedural antiplatelets during eCAS were associated with higher rate of good functional outcome (60% vs 46%, p=0.016) and lower rate of sICH (7% vs 11%; p=0.08) compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In observational studies, eCAS seems to be associated with higher good functional outcome than no-stenting in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion, despite the higher risk of sICH. Dedicated trials are needed to confirm these results.

Emergent Management of Tandem Occlusions in Anterior Circulation Stroke: A Single-Centre Experience

OBJECTIVE

For anterior circulation tandem occlusions, the optimal management strategy for extracranial carotid lesions is controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of acute stenting (AS) with balloon angioplasty (BA) only.

METHODS

Clinical data were collected from 98 patients with anterior circulation tandem occlusion who underwent endovascular treatment at our center. Of these patients, 64 and 34 were assigned to the AS and BA groups, respectively. The clinical characteristics and outcome data of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with good outcomes was 59.2%. The AS group had a higher rate of successful recanalization (98.4% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.007) and a lower rate of occlusion of the responsible vessel at 90 days (14.1% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.039) than the BA group. The AS group was also significantly better than the BA group in terms of good outcomes (67.2% vs. 44.1%, P = 0.027), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of 90-day mortality (6.3% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.691) and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.3% vs. 5.9%, P = 1.000). Lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were associated with good outcomes (P < 0.001), and the presence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was associated with 90-day mortality (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute stent placement in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation tandem occlusion may have a better outcome than BA alone, and the safety of both approaches is comparable.

A clinical application study of a stent placement assessment

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic acute carotid occlusion is a specific type of stroke, and controversy exists regarding the surgical strategy, that is, whether an internal carotid artery stent should be placed immediately after opening the occluded vessel. There is no objective evaluation system for this procedure. In a previous study, we summarized an evaluation decision system Emergent Carotid Artery Stent placement decision Evaluation System (ECASES) for emergency stent placement.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion confirmed by imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography/digital subtraction angiography) will be randomly divided into the study and control groups, with 101 patients in each group. The study group will undergo surgery according to the ECASES system and the control group will undergo surgery according to the operator's experience. The postoperative outcomes of the 2 groups will be compared.

STUDY OUTCOMES

Primary outcome: Neurological functional status (modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores) of patients 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes: neurological function changes, hemorrhage events, cerebral edema, postoperative modified treatment in cerebral infarction grade, new cerebral infarction, and reocclusion of responsible vessels.

DISCUSSION

Currently, no prospective controlled data exist regarding the efficacy and safety of carotid stenting in the acute phase. Previously, we had developed an ECASES stent placement system for acute carotid artery occlusion. The present study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ECASES in a randomized, double-blind prospective study and clarify its guiding significance in acute atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion surgery.