Clinical validation of the cingulate island sign visual rating scale in dementia with Lewy bodies

Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging, Soderlund KA, Austin MJ, Ben-Haim S, Chu S, Ivanidze J, Joshi P, Kalnins A, Kennedy M, Kulshreshtha A, Kuo PH, Masdeu JC, Nikumbh T, Soares BP, Thaker AA, Wang LL, Yasar S, Shih RY. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dementia: 2024 Update

Dementia is defined by significant chronic or acquired impairment in a single domain or loss of two or more cognitive functions by brain disease or injury. It is a common chronic syndrome in adults and constitutes the fifth leading cause of death in patients >65 years of age. Multiple etiologies of dementia exist, most notably Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies, as well as other neurologic diseases such as vascular dementia and normal pressure hydrocephalus. In addition to aiding clinicians in selecting the most appropriate imaging test for patients suspected of one of these dementia syndromes, this document highlights the most appropriate initial imaging tests for patients with suspected mild cognitive impairment and rapidly progressive dementia, as well as the most appropriate pre- and posttreatment imaging tests for patients undergoing therapy with antiamyloid monoclonal antibodies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Clinical validity and reproducibility of a visual rating scale for cingulate island sign in a real-world memory clinic: An FDG-PET/MRI study

PURPOSE

Brain [18F]FDG-PET is a supportive biomarker for cognitive impairment in Lewy bodies disease (LBD) showing reduced occipital metabolism and presence of the cingulate island sign (CIS), a relative preservation of posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) metabolism compared with precuneus and cuneus. We assess validation, clinical utility, and reproducibility of a qualitative visual CIS scale in the differential diagnosis with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a memory clinic setting.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients were studied: 36 LBD, of whom 30 with dementia (DLB) and 6 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI-LB), and 31 AD (20 typical and 11 atypical presentations). They underwent FDG-PET/MRI scans and were followed for at least 24 months. The visual CIS rating scale was scored by a nuclear medicine physician and a neurologist independently. Qualitative CIS scores were validated with ROI-based semiquantitative FDG analysis.

RESULTS

Mean CIS scores were 1.84 ± 1.69 for LBD and 0.9 ± 1.24 for AD (p = 0.001). With a cutoff CIS score ≥2, sensitivity was 0.56, and specificity 0.81 (accuracy 0.67). Positive CIS in patients with AD was due to atypical presentations. Negative CIS in LBD was due to (i) normal FDG-PET in MCI-LB or (ii) marked hypometabolism of both the PCC and cuneus. Visual CIS scores correlated with FDG-uptake (r = 0.45; p < 0.001) and held a high inter-specialists concordance.

DISCUSSION

The visual CIS scale can be successfully scored by different specialists. Lower sensitivity is expected in cases of MCI-LB or dementia due to mixed LBD/AD changes. Specificity may be influenced by the inclusion of atypical AD cases.

The cingulate island sign in a mixed memory clinical cohort: Prevalence and diagnostic accuracy

INTRODUCTION

Visual rating of the cingulate island sign (CIS) on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has a high specificity for dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) in selected cohorts such as DLB versus Alzheimer's disease (AD). In a mixed memory clinical population this study aimed to uncover the prevalence of CIS, the diagnostic accuracy for DLB, and the relationship between CIS and disease severity.

METHODS

CIS on [18F]FDG-PET was retrospectively assessed with the visual CIS rating scale (CISRs) in 1000 patients with a syndrome diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia with no restrictions in etiological diagnosis.

RESULTS

In this cohort 24.3 % had a CISRs score ≥1 and 3.5 % had a CISRs score = 4. The prevalence of a CISRs score ≥1 was highest in DLB (74.0 %, n = 57). A CISRs score ≥1 was present in at least 9 % in other diagnostic groups. The prevalence of CIS across disease severities showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.23). To differentiate DLB from non-DLB the optimal cut-off was a CISRs score ≥1 (balanced accuracy = 77.1 %) in MCI/mild dementia and a CISRs score ≥2 (balanced accuracy = 80.6 %) in moderate/severe dementia. The positive predictive value of a CISRs score = 4 for DLB was 57.7 % in MCI/mild dementia and 33.3 % in moderate/severe dementia.

CONCLUSION

The CISRs is useful in differentiating DLB from other etiologies in a mixed memory clinical population. Balanced accuracy and positive predictive value may vary across disease severities in the population studied.