Reporting laboratory experiments

Multivariable models in orthopaedic research: a methodological review of covariate selection and causal relationships

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods used for including or excluding covariates in a multivariable model and to find out how common is the Table 2 Fallacy in studies recently published in high-quality orthopaedic journals.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in the MEDLINE database. We included all studies that presented the results of a multivariable model in a table and published in seven orthopaedic journals with the highest ranked impact factors in 2019.

RESULTS

Table 2 Fallacy was found in 67% (129/193) of the evaluated studies in which a multivariable model was used. Only 16% (31/193) of all studies had included the variables based on causal inference. Furthermore, only three of these studies used causal diagrams to illustrate the causal inference. Altogether, 35% (67/193) of the studies included variables based on statistical methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Confounder selection and the interpretation of the results of the multivariable model showed notable challenges in orthopaedic studies recently published in the top orthopaedic journals. Based on the results of our review, it seems that more education in statistics and increased knowledge is required to decrease the occurrence of these statistical issues in orthopaedic research.

Investigating ADAMTS-mediated aggrecanolysis in mouse cartilage

Proteolysis of the cartilage proteoglycan aggrecan is a feature of arthritis. We present a method for analyzing aggrecanolysis in in vitro cultures of 3-week-old mouse femoral head cartilage based on traditional methods developed for large animal species. Investigators can choose either a simple analysis that detects several aggrecan fragments released into culture medium only or a more comprehensive study that detects all fragments present in both the medium and the cartilage matrix. The protocol comprises (i) cartilage culture and optional cartilage extraction, (ii) a quick and simple colorimetric assay for quantitating aggrecan and (iii) neoepitope western blotting to identify specific aggrecan fragments partitioning to the medium or cartilage compartments. The crucial difference between the methods for mice and larger animals is that the proportion of aggrecan in a given sample is normalized to total aggrecan rather than to tissue wet weight. This necessary break from tradition arises because tiny volumes of liquid clinging to mouse cartilage can increase the apparent tissue wet weight, causing unacceptable errors. The protocol has broad application for the in vitro analysis of transgenic mice, particularly those with mutations that affect cartilage remodeling, arthritic disease and skeletal development. The protocol is robust, reliable and takes 7-11 d to complete.