The recent paper "Multimodal imaging demonstrates concomitant changes in bone and cartilage after destabilization of the medial meniscus and increased joint laxity"

OA foundations - experimental models of osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly recognised as a disease of diverse phenotypes with variable clinical presentation, progression, and response to therapeutic intervention. This same diversity is readily apparent in the many animal models of OA. However, model selection, study design, and interpretation of resultant findings, are not routinely done in the context of the target human (or veterinary) patient OA sub-population or phenotype. This review discusses the selection and use of animal models of OA in discovery and therapeutic-development research. Beyond evaluation of the different animal models on offer, this review suggests focussing the approach to OA-animal model selection on study objective(s), alignment of available models with OA-patient sub-types, and the resources available to achieve valid and translatable results. How this approach impacts model selection is discussed and an experimental design checklist for selecting the optimal model(s) is proposed. This approach should act as a guide to new researchers and a reminder to those already in the field, as to issues that need to be considered before embarking on in vivo pre-clinical research. The ultimate purpose of using an OA animal model is to provide the best possible evidence if, how, when and where a molecule, pathway, cell or process is important in clinical disease. By definition this requires both model and study outcomes to align with and be predictive of outcomes in patients. Keeping this at the forefront of research using pre-clinical OA models, will go a long way to improving the quality of evidence and its translational value.

Sex- and injury-based differences in knee biomechanics in mouse models of post-traumatic osteoarthritis

Sex and joint injury are risk factors implicated in the onset and progression of osteoarthritis (OA). In mouse models of post-traumatic OA (ptOA), the pathogenesis of disease is notably impacted by sex (often worse in males) and injury model (e.g. meniscal versus ligament injury). Increasing ptOA progression and severity is often associated with greater relative instability of the joint but few studies have directly quantified changes in joint mechanics after injury and compared outcomes across multiple models in both male and female mice. Passive anterior-posterior knee biomechanics were evaluated in 10-week-old, male and female C57BL/6J mice. PtOA injury models included destabilisation of the medial meniscus (DMM), anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) or mechanical rupture (ACLR), and combined DMM and ACLT (DMM + ACLT). Sham operated and non-operated controls (NOC) were included for baseline comparisons. The test apparatus loaded hindlimbs at 60° flexion between ± 1 N at 0.5 mm/s (build specifications available for download: https://doi.org/10.17632/z754455x3c.1). Measures of joint laxity (range of motion, neutral zone) and stiffness were calculated. Joint laxity was comparable between male and female mice while joint stiffness was greater in females (P ≤ 0.002, correcting for body-mass and injury-model). Anterior-posterior joint mechanics were minimally altered by DMM but significantly affected by loss of the ACL (P < 0.001), with equivalent changes between ACL-injury models despite different injury mechanisms and adjacent meniscal damage. These findings suggest that despite the important role of joint injury; sex- and model-specific differences in ptOA progression and severity are not primarily driven by altered anterior-posterior knee biomechanics.