A systematic review of the efficacy and general safety of antibodies to NGF in the treatment of OA of the hip or knee

Nerve Growth Factor and Autoimmune Diseases

NGF plays a crucial immunomodulatory role and increased levels are found in numerous tissues during autoimmune states. NGF directly modulates innate and adaptive immune responses of B and T cells and causes the release of neuropeptides and neurotransmitters controlling the immune system activation in inflamed tissues. Evidence suggests that NGF is involved in the pathogenesis of numerous immune diseases including autoimmune thyroiditis, chronic arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, mastocytosis, and chronic granulomatous disease. Furthermore, as NGF levels have been linked to disease severity, it could be considered an optimal early biomarker to identify therapeutic approach efficacy. In conclusion, by gaining insights into how these molecules function and which cells they interact with, future studies can devise targeted therapies to address various neurological, immunological, and other disorders more effectively. This knowledge may pave the way for innovative treatments based on NGF manipulation aimed at improving the quality of life for individuals affected by diseases involving neurotrophins.

Comparative validation of the knee inflammation MRI scoring system and the MRI osteoarthritis knee score for semi-quantitative assessment of bone marrow lesions and synovitis-effusion in osteoarthritis: an international multi-reader exercise

Background

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and synovitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with symptoms and predict degeneration of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis (OA). Validated methods for their semiquantitative assessment on MRI are available, but they all have similar scoring designs and questionable sensitivity to change. New scoring methods with completely different designs need to be developed and compared to existing methods.

Objectives

To compare the performance of new web-based versions of the Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System (KIMRISS) with the MRI OA Knee Score (MOAKS) for quantification of BMLs and synovitis-effusion (S-E).

Design

Retrospective follow-up cohort.

Methods

We designed web-based overlays outlining regions in the knee that are scored for BML in MOAKS and KIMRISS. For KIMRISS, both BML and S-E are scored on consecutive sagittal slices. The performance of these methods was compared in an international reading exercise of 8 readers evaluating 60 pairs of scans conducted 1 year apart from cases recruited to the OA Initiative (OAI) cohort. Interobserver reliability for baseline status and baseline to 1 year change in BML and S-E was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Feasibility was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS).

Results

Mean change in BML and S-E was minimal over 1 year. Pre-specified targets for acceptable reliability (ICC ⩾ 0.80 and ⩾ 0.70 for status and change scores, respectively) were achieved more frequently for KIMRISS for both BML and synovitis. Mean (95% CI) ICC for change in BML was 0.88 (0.83-0.92) and 0.69 (0.60-0.78) for KIMRISS and MOAKS, respectively. KIMRISS mean SUS usability score was 85.7 and at the 95th centile of ranking for usability versus a score of 55.4 and 20th centile for MOAKS.

Conclusion

KIMRISS had superior performance metrics to MOAKS for quantification of BML and S-E. Both methods should be further compared in trials of new therapies for OA.

Anti-NGF treatment worsens subchondral bone and cartilage measures while improving symptoms in floor-housed rabbits with osteoarthritis

Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disorder often affecting the knee. It is characterized by alterations of various joint tissues including subchondral bone and by chronic pain. Anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) antibodies have demonstrated improvement in pain associated with OA in phase 3 clinical trials but have not been approved due to an increased risk of developing rapidly progressive OA. The aim of this study was to investigate effects of systemic anti-NGF-treatment on structure and symptoms in rabbits with surgically induced joint instability. Methods: This was elicited by anterior cruciate ligament transection and partial resection of the medial meniscus in right knee of 63 female rabbits, housed altogether in a 56 m² floor husbandry. Rabbits received either 0.1, 1 or 3 mg/kg anti-NGF antibody intra-venously at weeks 1, 5 and 14 after surgery or vehicle. During in-life phase, static incapacitance tests were performed and joint diameter was measured. Following necropsy, gross morphological scoring and micro-computed tomography analysis of subchondral bone and cartilage were performed. Results: After surgery, rabbits unloaded operated joints, which was improved with 0.3 and 3 mg/kg anti-NGF compared to vehicle injection during the first half of the study. The diameter of operated knee joints increased over contralateral measures. This increase was bigger in anti-NGF treated rabbits beginning 2 weeks after the first IV injection and became dose-dependent and more pronounced with time. In the 3 mg/kg anti-NGF group, the bone volume fraction and trabecular thickness increased in the medio-femoral region of operated joints compared to contralateral and to vehicle-treated animals, while cartilage volume and to a lesser extent thickness decreased. Enlarged bony areas were found in right medio-femoral cartilage surfaces of animals receiving 1 and 3 mg/kg anti-NGF. Alterations of all structural parameters were particularly distinct in a subgroup of three rabbits, which also exhibited more prominent symptomatic improvement. Conclusion: This study showed that anti-NGF administration exerted negative impact on structure in destabilized joints of rabbits, while pain-induced unloading of joints was improved. Our findings open up the possibility to better understand the effects of systemic anti-NGF, particularly on subchondral bone, and thus the occurrence of rapidly progressive OA in patients.

Osteoarthritis: pathogenic signaling pathways and therapeutic targets

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative joint disorder that leads to disability and affects more than 500 million population worldwide. OA was believed to be caused by the wearing and tearing of articular cartilage, but it is now more commonly referred to as a chronic whole-joint disorder that is initiated with biochemical and cellular alterations in the synovial joint tissues, which leads to the histological and structural changes of the joint and ends up with the whole tissue dysfunction. Currently, there is no cure for OA, partly due to a lack of comprehensive understanding of the pathological mechanism of the initiation and progression of the disease. Therefore, a better understanding of pathological signaling pathways and key molecules involved in OA pathogenesis is crucial for therapeutic target design and drug development. In this review, we first summarize the epidemiology of OA, including its prevalence, incidence and burdens, and OA risk factors. We then focus on the roles and regulation of the pathological signaling pathways, such as Wnt/β-catenin, NF-κB, focal adhesion, HIFs, TGFβ/ΒΜP and FGF signaling pathways, and key regulators AMPK, mTOR, and RUNX2 in the onset and development of OA. In addition, the roles of factors associated with OA, including MMPs, ADAMTS/ADAMs, and PRG4, are discussed in detail. Finally, we provide updates on the current clinical therapies and clinical trials of biological treatments and drugs for OA. Research advances in basic knowledge of articular cartilage biology and OA pathogenesis will have a significant impact and translational value in developing OA therapeutic strategies.

Mechanisms of Peripheral and Central Sensitization in Osteoarthritis Pain

Pain, the primary symptom of osteoarthritis (OA), reduces both the quality and quantity of life for patients. The pathophysiology of OA pain is complex and often difficult to explain solely by radiological structural changes. One reason for this discrepancy is pain sensitization (peripheral sensitization [PS] and central sensitization [CS]) in OA. Thus, an understanding of pain sensitization is important when considering treatment strategies and development for OA pain. In recent years, pro-inflammatory cytokines, nerve growth factors (NGFs), and serotonin have been identified as causative agents that induce peripheral and central sensitization and are becoming therapeutic targets for OA pain. However, the characteristics of the clinical manifestations of pain sensitization elicited by these molecules remain unclear, and it is not well understood who among OA patients should receive the therapeutic intervention. Thus, this review summarizes evidence on the pathophysiology of peripheral and central sensitization in OA pain and the clinical features and treatment options for this condition. While the majority of the literature supports the existence of pain sensitization in chronic OA pain, clinical identification and treatment of pain sensitization in OA are still in their infancy, and future studies with good methodological quality are needed.

The multifaceted role of mast cells in joint inflammation and arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To review current knowledge surrounding the role of mast cells in joint inflammation and arthritis.

METHOD

Narrative review.

RESULTS

Mast cells (MCs) are commonly observed in the synovium of the joint, particularly surrounding blood vessels and nerve endings. Some studies have reported increased MC number and degranulation in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). In two studies, MCs were the only immune cell type found in higher concentrations in synovium of OA patients compared to rheumatoid arthritis patients. Activation of MCs in OA includes signaling pathways such as immunoglobulin E/Fc epsilon Receptor 1 (IgE/FcεR1), immunoglobulin G/Fc gamma receptor (IgG/FcγR), complement, and toll-like cell surface receptor-mediated signaling, resulting in context-dependent release of either pro-inflammatory and/or anti-inflammatory mediators within the joint. Activation of MCs results in the release of pro-inflammatory mediators that ultimately contribute to inflammation of the synovium, bone remodeling, and cartilage damage. However, some studies have proposed that MCs can also exhibit anti-inflammatory effects by secreting mediators that inactivate pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6).

CONCLUSIONS

MCs may play a role in mediating synovial inflammation and OA progression. However, the mechanisms governing MC activation, the downstream pro- and/or anti-inflammatory effects, and their impact on osteoarthritis pathogenesis remains to be elucidated and requires extensive further study. Furthermore, it is important to establish the pathways of MC activation in OA to determine whether MCs exhibit varying phenotypes as a function of disease stage. Ultimately, such research is needed before understanding whether MCs could be targeted in OA treatments.

Efficacy, General Safety, and Joint Safety of Tanezumab in Japanese Patients with Osteoarthritis: Subgroup Analyses from Two Randomized, Phase 3 Studies

INTRODUCTION

Tanezumab is a monoclonal antibody against nerve growth factor that is under investigation for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) pain. We conducted subgroup analyses of two randomized phase 3 studies to summarize efficacy, general safety, and adjudicated joint safety of tanezumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe OA.

METHODS

In Study 1 (NCT02528188), patients received subcutaneous tanezumab 2.5 mg or 5 mg every 8 weeks or daily oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) for 56 weeks. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain subscale score and WOMAC Physical Function subscale score at Week 16 (overall study and Japan-specific endpoints) as well as Patient Global Assessment (PGA)-OA score at Week 16 (overall study endpoint only). In Study 2 (NCT02709486), patients received subcutaneous tanezumab 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or placebo every 8 weeks for 24 weeks. Safety monitoring included adjudicated composite joint safety endpoint (CJSE) including rapidly progressive osteoarthritis type 1 (RPOA1), RPOA2, primary osteonecrosis, pathological fracture, or subchondral insufficiency fracture.

RESULTS

For Study 1, Japanese patients (n = 200) treated with tanezumab 2.5 mg and 5 mg showed numerically greater improvements in WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, and PGA-OA scores versus NSAID at Week 16. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were generally similar between tanezumab 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and NSAID groups. In the integrated safety analysis (Studies 1 + 2; n = 306), ten patients were adjudicated to have a component of CJSE: RPOA1 [tanezumab 2.5 mg (n = 2), tanezumab 5 mg (n = 5)], RPOA2 [tanezumab 2.5 mg (n = 1), tanezumab 5 mg (n = 1)], or primary osteonecrosis [tanezumab 2.5 mg (n = 1)]. Time-adjusted adjudicated rates of RPOA1 and RPOA2 were higher with tanezumab than NSAID or placebo and increased with dose of tanezumab.

CONCLUSION

Observations from the Japanese subgroup were generally consistent with the overall study populations.

Clinical Meaningfulness of Response to Tanezumab in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Analysis From a 56-Week, Randomized, Placebo- and Tramadol-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial

INTRODUCTION

A recent phase 3, randomized, placebo- and tramadol-controlled trial (56-week treatment/24-week safety follow-up) demonstrated efficacy of tanezumab 10 mg in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and a history of inadequate response to standard-of-care analgesics. Here, we report on the clinical meaningfulness of treatment response in this study, focused on secondary measures of pain, interference with daily functions, overall disease status, and satisfaction with treatment.

METHODS

Patients received placebo (up to week 16; n = 406), subcutaneously administered (SC) tanezumab 5 mg (every 8 weeks; n = 407), SC tanezumab 10 mg (every 8 weeks; n = 407), or orally administered tramadol prolonged-release (100-300 mg/day; n = 605) for 56 weeks. Patient's global assessment of low back pain (PGA-LBP), Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI-sf), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), and modified Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (mPRTI) were assessed at weeks 16 and 56.

RESULTS

At week 16, significant (p < 0.05) improvements over placebo were evident with tanezumab for the PGA-LBP (10 mg) and most BPI-sf (both doses), TSQM (both doses), and mPRTI (both doses) items assessed. Improvements over baseline persisted for the PGA-LBP and BPI-sf at week 56. However, the magnitude of improvements was modestly lower at week 56 relative to week 16. Tramadol did not improve PGA-LBP or BPI-sf scores versus placebo at week 16. Most differences between tanezumab and tramadol at week 56 did not reach the level of statistical significance for all endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

The totality of the evidence as captured by measures of pain, interference with daily function, patient overall assessment of disease status, and satisfaction with treatment demonstrates the clinically meaningful benefit of tanezumab for some patients with CLBP compared with placebo.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT02528253.

Chronic Pain in Musculoskeletal Diseases: Do You Know Your Enemy?

Musculoskeletal pain is a condition that characterises several diseases and represents a constantly growing issue with enormous socio-economic burdens, highlighting the importance of developing treatment algorithms appropriate to the patient’s needs and effective management strategies. Indeed, the algic condition must be assessed and treated independently of the underlying pathological process since it has an extremely negative impact on the emotional and psychic aspects of the individual, leading to isolation and depression. A full understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in nociceptive stimulation and central sensitization is an important step in improving approaches to musculoskeletal pain. In this context, the bidirectional relationship between immune cells and neurons involved in nociception could represent a key point in the understanding of these mechanisms. Therefore, we provide an updated overview of the magnitude of the musculoskeletal pain problem, in terms of prevalence and costs, and summarise the role of the most important molecular players involved in the development and maintenance of pain. Finally, based on the pathophysiological mechanisms, we propose a model, called the “musculoskeletal pain cycle”, which could be a useful tool to counteract resignation to the algic condition and provide a starting point for developing a treatment algorithm for the patient with musculoskeletal pain.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti–Nerve Growth Factor Antibody Therapy for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis

Background:

The efficacy and safety of anti–nerve growth factor (NGF) antibody therapy used for osteoarthritis (OA) pain are controversial.

Purpose:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-NGF antibody therapy via a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods:

PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and the Web of Science databases were searched for RCTs assessing anti-NGF antibody treatments for hip and knee OA. A total of 623 records were retrieved from the databases. A random-effects model was used to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, funnel plots, and the Egger test. Subgroup analyses were used to assess the efficacy and safety of the independent variables. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of tanezumab and the effectiveness of anti-NGF antibodies compared to active comparator drugs. We present the effects of dose, administration mode, and treatment duration on the efficacy and safety of anti-NGF antibody therapy.

Results:

There were 19 RCTs included in our meta-analysis. Anti-NGF antibody treatment showed significant improvements on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for pain, physical function, and stiffness as well as on a patient global assessment (PGA). The overall standardized mean differences were as follows: WOMAC pain (–0.31 [95% CI, –0.36 to –0.26]; Z = 11.75; P < .001; I² = 38%), WOMAC physical function (−0.36 [95% CI, –0.41 to –0.30]; Z = 12.67; P < .001; I² = 44%), WOMAC stiffness (–3.59 [95% CI, –4.87 to –2.30]; Z = 5.47; P < .001; I² = 98%), and PGA (−0.28 [95% CI, –0.34 to –0.22]; Z = 9.39; P < .001; I² = 50%). Anti-NGF antibody treatment resulted in a greater incidence of adverse events (risk ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.12]; Z = 5.60; P < .001; I² = 0%). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between the treatment and control groups (risk ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.34]; Z = 1.71; P = .09; I² = 0%).

Conclusion:

Anti-NGF antibody treatment significantly relieved pain and improved function in patients with hip and knee OA. However, no conclusion could be drawn regarding the optimal treatment plan for anti-NGF antibodies when all 3 variables (dose, administration mode, and treatment duration) were combined in the analyses.

Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: What Internists Need to Know

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and morbid condition. No disease-modifying therapies exist; hence the goals of current treatment are to palliate pain and to retain function. OA pain is significantly influenced by the placebo effect. Nonpharmacologic interventions are essential and have been shown to improve outcomes. Canes, unloading braces, and therapeutic heating/cooling may be valuable. Pharmacotherapy options include topical and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, duloxetine, and periodic intra-articular glucocorticoids and hyaluronans. Opioids, intra-articular stem cells, and platelet-rich plasma are not recommended. Novel targets such as nerve growth factor are under investigation and may be approved soon for OA pain.

The Neuroimmune Interplay in Joint Pain: The Role of Macrophages

Chronic pain associated with joint disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA) and implant aseptic loosening (AL), is a highly debilitating symptom that impacts mobility and quality of life in affected patients. The neuroimmune crosstalk has been demonstrated to play a critical role in the onset and establishment of chronic pain conditions. Immune cells release cytokines and immune mediators that can activate and sensitize nociceptors evoking pain, through interaction with receptors in the sensory nerve terminals. On the other hand, sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers release neurotransmitters that bind to their specific receptor expressed on surface of immune cells, initiating an immunomodulatory role. Macrophages have been shown to be key players in the neuroimmune crosstalk. Moreover, macrophages constitute the dominant immune cell population in RA, OA and AL. Importantly, the targeting of macrophages can result in anti-nociceptive effects in chronic pain conditions. Therefore, the aim of this review is to discuss the nature and impact of the interaction between the inflammatory response and nerve fibers in these joint disorders regarding the genesis and maintenance of pain. The role of macrophages is highlighted. The alteration in the joint innervation pattern and the inflammatory response are also described. Additionally, the immunomodulatory role of sensory and sympathetic neurotransmitters is revised.

Observed efficacy and clinically important improvements in participants with osteoarthritis treated with subcutaneous tanezumab: results from a 56-week randomized NSAID-controlled study

BACKGROUND

A recent phase 3 study demonstrated that treatment with tanezumab, a nerve growth factor inhibitor, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) improves pain and physical function in participants with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee. Here, we evaluated the time course and clinical importance of these initial efficacy findings using a mixture of primary, secondary, and post hoc endpoints.

METHODS

Participants on stable NSAID therapy and with a history of inadequate response to other standard OA analgesics were enrolled in an 80-week (56-week treatment/24-week safety follow-up), randomized, NSAID-controlled, phase 3 study primarily designed to assess the safety of tanezumab for moderate-to-severe OA of the knee or hip. Participants received oral NSAID (twice daily naproxen, celecoxib, or diclofenac) or subcutaneous tanezumab (2.5mg or 5mg every 8 weeks). Non-responders were discontinued at week 16. Changes from baseline in WOMAC Pain and Physical Function, Patient's Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis (PGA-OA), and average pain in the index joint were compared between tanezumab and NSAID groups over the 56-week treatment period. Clinically meaningful response (e.g., ≥30% and ≥50% improvement in WOMAC Pain and Physical Function), rescue medication use, and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

All groups improved WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, PGA-OA, and average pain in the index joint over the 56-week treatment period relative to baseline. Across all groups, improvements generally occurred from the time of first assessment (week 1 or 2) to week 16 and then slightly decreased from week 16 to 24 before stabilizing from weeks 24 to 56. The magnitude of improvement and the proportion of participants achieving ≥30% and ≥50% improvement in these measures was greater (unadjusted p≤0.05) with tanezumab than with NSAID at some timepoints on or before week 16. Adverse events of abnormal peripheral sensation, prespecified joint safety events, and total joint replacement surgery occurred more frequently with tanezumab than with NSAID.

CONCLUSIONS

Tanezumab and NSAID both provided early and sustained (up to 56 weeks) efficacy relative to baseline. Improvements in pain and function were clinically meaningful in a substantial proportion of participants. Adverse events of abnormal peripheral sensation and joint safety events occurred more frequently with tanezumab than with NSAID.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02528188 . Registered on 19 July 2015.

Based on minimal clinically important difference values, a moderate dose of tanezumab may be a better option for treating hip or knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background:

Tanezumab is a nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody that may regulate pain in hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low and moderate doses of tanezumab in treating hip or knee OA.

Methods:

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched for clinical trials published before 1 May 2021. Patients were assessed via efficacy and safety outcomes.

Results:

Twelve randomized controlled trials including 6022 patients were identified. Both low and moderate doses of tanezumab significantly improved efficacy outcomes. However, only the point estimates (mean difference, MD) of moderate-dose tanezumab significantly exceeded the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). There were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs), withdrawals due to AEs, serious AEs, and total joint replacement between the tanezumab and placebo groups, whereas the incidence of AEs was higher in the tanezumab group (relative risk, RR = 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 1.04–1.17). The incidence of rapidly progressive OA was significantly higher in the combined low- and moderate-dose tanezumab groups than in the placebo group (RR = 5.01; 95% CI = 1.17–21.33). Furthermore, both low and moderate doses of tanezumab significantly increased the incidence of abnormal peripheral sensation (RR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.21–3.28; RR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.91–3.67, respectively). Compared with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids, tanezumab showed significantly improved efficacy outcomes (p < 0.05). However, the point estimates (MD) of tanezumab were not greater than the MCID. Pooled analysis showed no significant differences between tanezumab and NSAIDs and opioids in safety outcomes (p > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Tanezumab is efficacious in patients with hip or knee OA. Tanezumab is relatively well tolerated and safe but increases the incidence of AEs and reversible abnormal peripheral sensation. Additional studies on the occurrence of rapidly progressive OA are needed. A moderate dose of tanezumab may maximize the benefits for hip or knee OA.

Relative Efficacy and Safety of Tanezumab for Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tanezumab for the treatment of patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 2020. Randomized-controlled trials comparing tanezumab with placebo or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with OA. Two investigators identified studies and independently extracted data, and conventional meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3. The outcomes were pain relief, functional improvement, and risk of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 8 articles, comprising 9 randomized-controlled trials, were included. Overall, tanezumab was superior to placebo for relieving pain and improving function, as well as in the patient's global assessment. Tanezumab also had significant advantages over nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for relieving pain and improving function, as well as in the patient's global assessment. Significantly more patients discontinued treatment because of AEs after treatment with tanezumab. However, the differences in serious AEs and total joint replacement were not significant. Moreover, tanezumab-treated patients experienced significantly more rapid progression of osteoarthritis.

DISCUSSION

Tanezumab can alleviate pain and improve function for patients with OA of the hip or knee. Although tanezumab does not cause serious AEs, rapid progression of OA occurred in a small number of participants, so more clinical trials are needed to explore its safety.

Effectiveness of Various Dosages and Administration Methods of Tanezumab for the Treatment of Pain in Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis: a Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses have reported the superiority of tanezumab versus placebo in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). However, they did not compare different injection methods (intravenous or subcutaneous), doses of injection.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of different dosages and methods of injection of tanezumab on relieving pain in patients with OA.

METHODS

An online systematic search was performed by using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to November 9, 2019. The goal was to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that concentrated on the therapeutic effects of different dosages and methods of injection of tanezumab in patients with OA. The pairwise meta-analyses with the fixed effects model were undertaken with the "meta" package using R 3.6.0 programming language. In addition, an NMA with fixed effects was assessed using a gemtc software. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve value of each intervention was calculated to obtain a hierarchy of treatments.

RESULTS

Of the 328 RCTs identified through the literature search, 12 RCTs were included in the current NMA. In terms of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and physical function subscales, the most effective treatment was intravenous injection of tanezumab (10 mg; surface under the cumulative ranking curve values of 90% and 88%, respectively), and the least effective therapy was subcutaneous injection of tanezumab (2.5 mg; 20% and 19%).

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve high therapeutic efficacy and avoid treatment failure, an intravenous injection of tanezumab (10 mg) is recommended as an efficacious therapy, facilitating pain relief in patients with OA. However, this conclusion may also be affected by the limitations of this study owing to the small sample size and data heterogeneity, and further research should therefore be conducted to eliminate these limitations and to confirm the findings.

Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Inhibitors and Related Agents for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Comprehensive Review

Musculoskeletal pain such as osteoarthritis (OA) and low back pain (LBP) are very common and contribute to enormous burden and societal costs, despite dramatic therapeutic advances over recent decades. Novel approaches and targeted therapies are required to satisfy the urgent unmet medical need of musculoskeletal pain relief in both conditions. Nerve growth factor (NGF) inhibitors have utilized novel mechanisms different from conventional drugs, which have a variety of gastrointestinal, cardiac, or renal adverse effects. Several phase 2/3 studies have been accomplished for these drugs, such as tanezumab, fasinumab, and tyrosine receptor kinase A (TrkA) inhibitors. We searched the literature using the PubMed database and clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov to identify original papers, meta-analyses as well as ongoing clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs. In this narrative review, we briefly overview the disease burden of musculoskeletal pain, the role of NGF signaling and its receptors in the genesis of pain, and the mechanisms of action of inhibitors of NGF signaling and downstream pathways, and then discuss the efficacy and safety of each investigational drug in OA and LBP. Finally, we briefly review two serious adverse effects of NGF inhibitors, namely rapidly progressive OA and sympathetic system effects, and conclude with possible barriers and potential research directions to overcome these.

Frunevetmab, a felinized anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of pain from osteoarthritis in cats

Background

Frunevetmab, a felinized antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, effectively decreases osteoarthritis (OA) pain in cats.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of frunevetmab given at monthly intervals in a randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, double‐blind superiority study.

Animals

Two hundred seventy‐five client‐owned cats with naturally‐occurring OA pain and associated mobility impairment and disability.

Methods

Randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, double‐blind, superiority study. Following screening, cats received frunevetmab (nominal dose of 1.0 mg/kg, SC [effective dose range of 1.0‐2.8 mg/kg]) or placebo on days 0, 28, and 56. Outcome measures were owner questionnaires and veterinary physical and orthopedic evaluations at days 28, 56, and 84. Success/failure rates (and numbers needed treat, NNT) and change in scores (and standardized effect size, ES) were analyzed.

Results

Frunevetmab (182) and placebo (93) treated cats were enrolled and received at least 1 treatment. Significant improvement with frunevetmab over placebo occurred at days 28 and 56 for the client specific outcome measures (CSOM) questionnaire (success rates and total scores [NNT of 9 and ES of 0.3 at day 56]); at days 28 and 56 for owner‐assessed global treatment response; and at days 56 and 84 for veterinarian‐assessed joint pain (ES of 0.18 at day 56). Adverse events did not differ between groups, except skin disorders which collectively occurred significantly more frequently in frunevetmab treated (32/182 cats) vs placebo (8/93 cats).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Frunevetmab has the potential to address a critical gap in the treatment of pain because of osteoarthritis in cats.

Neuropharmacological basis for multimodal analgesia in chronic pain

Managing chronic pain remains a major unmet clinical challenge. Patients can be treated with a range of interventions, but pharmacotherapy is the most common. These include opioids, antidepressants, calcium channel modulators, sodium channel blockers, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Many of these drugs target a particular mechanism; however, chronic pain in many diseases is multifactorial and induces plasticity throughout the sensory neuroaxis. Furthermore, comorbidities such as depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances worsen quality of life. Given the complexity of mechanisms and symptoms in patients, it is unsurprising that many fail to achieve adequate pain relief from a single agent. The efforts to develop novel drug classes with better efficacy have not always proved successful; a multimodal or combination approach to analgesia is an important strategy in pain control. Many patients frequently take more than one medication, but high-quality evidence to support various combinations is often sparse. Ideally, combining drugs would produce synergistic action to maximize analgesia and reduce side effects, although sub-additive and additive analgesia is still advantageous if additive side-effects can be avoided. In this review, we discuss pain mechanisms, drug actions, and the rationale for mechanism-led treatment selection.Abbreviations: COX - cyclooxygenase, CGRP - calcitonin gene-related peptide, CPM - conditioned pain modulation, NGF - nerve growth factor, NNT - number needed to treat, NMDA - N-methyl-d-aspartate, NSAID - nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, TCA - tricyclic antidepressant, SNRI - serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, QST - quantitative sensory testing.

Targeting Neurotrophic Factors for Low Back Pain and Sciatica: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of medicines that target neurotrophic factors for low back pain (LBP) or sciatica.

METHODS

We searched published and trial registry reports of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of medicines that target neurotrophic factors to LBP or sciatica in seven databases from inception to December 2020. Two reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty in the evidence.

RESULTS

Nine studies (3349 participants) were included in the meta-analyses. Low certainty evidence showed that anti-NGF may reduce pain at four weeks (MD -6.63, 95% CI -8.51 to -4.76), and 12 weeks (MD -6.10, -8.34 to -3.87), and may increase adverse effects for chronic LBP (OR 1.16, 0.99-1.36). Higher doses of anti-NGF may offer a clinically important reduction in pain at the cost of increased adverse effects for chronic LBP. Very low certainty evidence showed that anti-NGF and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (pro-GDNF) may not reduce pain for sciatica at four weeks (MD -1.40, -8.26-5.46), at 12 weeks (MD -2.91, -13.69-7.67), and may increase adverse effects for sciatica (OR 3.27, 1.78-6.00).

CONCLUSION

Anti-NGF may offer small reductions in pain intensity for chronic LBP. The effect may depend on the dose and types of medicines. For sciatica, anti-NGF or pro-GDNF may not reduce pain. Medicines that target neurotrophic factors for LBP or sciatica are associated with different adverse effects from commonly prescribed medicines for these conditions.

NGF-TrkA signaling dictates neural ingrowth and aberrant osteochondral differentiation after soft tissue trauma

Pain is a central feature of soft tissue trauma, which under certain contexts, results in aberrant osteochondral differentiation of tissue-specific stem cells. Here, the role of sensory nerve fibers in this abnormal cell fate decision is investigated using a severe extremity injury model in mice. Soft tissue trauma results in NGF (Nerve growth factor) expression, particularly within perivascular cell types. Consequently, NGF-responsive axonal invasion occurs which precedes osteocartilaginous differentiation. Surgical denervation impedes axonal ingrowth, with significant delays in cartilage and bone formation. Likewise, either deletion of Ngf or two complementary methods to inhibit its receptor TrkA (Tropomyosin receptor kinase A) lead to similar delays in axonal invasion and osteochondral differentiation. Mechanistically, single-cell sequencing suggests a shift from TGFβ to FGF signaling activation among pre-chondrogenic cells after denervation. Finally, analysis of human pathologic specimens and databases confirms the relevance of NGF-TrkA signaling in human disease. In sum, NGF-mediated TrkA-expressing axonal ingrowth drives abnormal osteochondral differentiation after soft tissue trauma. NGF-TrkA signaling inhibition may have dual therapeutic use in soft tissue trauma, both as an analgesic and negative regulator of aberrant stem cell differentiation.

Treating osteoarthritis pain: mechanisms of action of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and nerve growth factor antibodies

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common difficult-to-treat condition where the goal, in the absence of disease-modifying treatments, is to alleviate symptoms such as pain and loss of function. Acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids are common pharmacologic treatments for OA. Antibodies directed against nerve growth factor (NGF-Abs) are a new class of agents under clinical investigation for the treatment of OA. This narrative review describes (and uses schematics to visualize) nociceptive signaling, chronification of pain, and the mechanisms of action (MOAs) of these different analgesics in the context of OA-related pain pathophysiology. Further, the varying levels of efficacy and safety of these agents observed in patients with OA is examined, based on an overview of published clinical data and/or treatment guidelines (when available), in the context of differences in their MOAs.

The Effectiveness of Anti-Nerve Growth Factor Monoclonal Antibodies in the Management of Pain in Osteoarthritis of the Hip and Knee: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) monoclonal antibodies in osteoarthritis pain (hip and knee).

DESIGN

Grade the evidence for anti-NGF use.

METHODS

An interdisciplinary work group conducted a literature search for anti-NGF use in osteoarthritis. The systematic review was performed in accordance with methods described by the Cochrane collaboration. General inclusion criteria included all osteoarthritis trials studying any monoclonal anti-NGF antibody at any dose/phase. Excluded studies were those where participants received NSAIDs or analgesics other than anti-NGF antibodies. The Jadad Scale score was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the analysis, involving 8145 participants with a diagnosis of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. Anti-NGF antibody treatment was associated with a significant improvement in all Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) indices when compared to placebo. These agents were not associated with a significantly increased incidence of serious adverse events but were associated with significant increases in therapy discontinuation due to adverse events or side effects (e.g., peripheral neuropathy).

CONCLUSIONS

Future randomized clinical trials are needed to characterize the overall risk-to-benefit ratio of anti-NGF antibodies in managing pain associated with OA, particularly with long-term use, in order to verify their efficacy and safety in clinical practice.

Clinical Outcomes of Tanezumab With Different Dosages for Patient With Osteoarthritis: Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) high disability rate will increase as people getting older, and is the most prevalent form of arthritis in the future. This study identified the clinical effects of optimum doses of tanezumab for patients with OA. Method: Three electronic databases were searched up until January 15, 2021. The mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) was considered an effect measure. The design-by-treatment interaction model was adopted for network meta-analyses. Analyses were conducted using WinBUGS 1.4.3 and R 4.0.5 software. Results: nine publications with 10 studies were included. Compared with placebo in network meta-analysis, except the outcomes of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) stiffness subscale and joints replaced, all dosages of tanezumab in the other effectiveness outcome were superior to placebo, and the difference was statistically significant. However, there was no statistical difference among all different doses of tanezumab. Compared with placebo, except the outcomes of adverse events (AEs) and AEs of abnormal peripheral sensation, all different dosages of tanezumab weren't superior to placebo in the other effectiveness outcome, and the difference was statistically significant. The 10 mg of tanezumab with highest SUCRA had the best effect, but it was associated with a higher safety event. Compared with placebo, except the outcomes of WOMAC stiffness subscale and joints replaced, all dosages of tanezumab in the other effectiveness outcome were superior to placebo, and the difference was statistically significant. Compared with placebo, except for the outcomes of AEs and AEs of abnormal peripheral sensation, all dosages of tanezumab in the other effectiveness outcome were superior to placebo, and the difference was statistically significant. Other direct comparisons showed no statistical difference. Conclusion: This study recommended that clinicians should give priority to the treatment of OA patients with a low dose of 2.5 mg according to the patient's condition and actual situation. If the effect using tanezumab with 2.5 mg is not satisfactory, the increase up to 10 mg should be carefully pondered, because of a more unbalanced risk/benefit ratio.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Tanezumab Versus Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs for Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term safety and 16-week efficacy of subcutaneous tanezumab in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

This was a phase III randomized, double-blind, active treatment-controlled (using nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] as the active treatment control) safety trial of tanezumab (56-week treatment/24-week posttreatment follow-up) in adults who were receiving stable-dose NSAID therapy at the time of screening and who had Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores of ≥5; patient global assessment (PtGA) of OA of fair, poor, or very poor; history of inadequate pain relief with standard analgesics; and no history or radiographic evidence of prespecified bone/joint conditions beyond OA. Patients received oral naproxen, celecoxib, or diclofenac twice daily (NSAID group; n = 996) or tanezumab 2.5 mg (n = 1,002) or 5 mg (n = 998) subcutaneously every 8 weeks. Coprimary efficacy end points at week 16 were changes in WOMAC pain and physical function scores and changes in PtGA. The primary joint safety end point over 80 weeks comprised adjudicated rapidly progressive OA type 1 or 2, primary osteonecrosis, subchondral insufficiency fracture, or pathologic fracture. Mean values, least squares mean values, and least squares mean differences between groups (with 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 3,021 randomized patients, 2,996 received ≥1 treatment dose. Adverse events (AEs) were similar between patients treated with tanezumab 2.5 mg and those treated with NSAIDs, and were more prevalent in those treated with tanezumab 5 mg. Composite joint safety events were significantly more prevalent with tanezumab 2.5 mg and tanezumab 5 mg than with NSAIDs (observation time-adjusted rate/1,000 patient-years 38.3 [95% CI 28.0, 52.5] and 71.5 [95% CI 56.7, 90.2], respectively, versus 14.8 [95% CI 8.9, 24.6]; P = 0.001 for tanezumab 2.5 mg versus NSAIDs; P < 0.001 for tanezumab 5 mg versus NSAIDs). Tanezumab 5 mg significantly improved pain and physical function but did not improve PtGA at week 16 when compared to NSAIDs; corresponding differences between the tanezumab 2.5 mg and NSAID groups were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In patients previously receiving a stable dose of NSAIDs, tanezumab administered subcutaneously resulted in more joint safety events than continued NSAIDs, with differences being dose dependent. Pain and physical function improved with both doses of tanezumab compared to NSAIDs, reaching statistical significance with tanezumab 5 mg at 16 weeks.

Safety of Low-Dose Tanezumab in the Treatment of Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of low-dose tanezumab in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Databases were searched up to September 2019 for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eleven phase III RCTs comprising 11,455 patients were eligible. The pooled estimates of safety outcomes were assessed and expressed using relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Tanezumab significantly increased the incidence of rapidly progressive OA (RPOA; RR = 9.07, 95% CI = 1.21-67.90, P = 0.03) and abnormal peripheral sensation (APS; RR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.64-4.37, P < 0.00001) compared with placebo. No significant difference was found in terms of incidence of total joint replacement (TJR; RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.76-1.68, P = 0.55) or withdrawal due to adverse effects (AEs; RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.79-2.00, P = 0.33). The tanezumab group showed a statistically higher incidence of RPOA (RR = 3.96, 95% CI = 2.23-7.04, P < 0.00001) and APS (RR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.44-2.56, P < 0.00001) compared with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids group. No significant difference was found in terms of TJR (RR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.65-3.47, P = 0.33) and withdrawal (RR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.20-1.40, P = 0.20). Subgroup analysis revealed that 2.5 mg of tanezumab did not show an advantage over 5 mg of tanezumab in reducing AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that RPOA and APS should be the most concerning AEs when using tanezumab in OA patients. Additional data are needed to define the optimal dose to minimize risk and to determine the optimal subjects to receive this treatment.

The predictive value of quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review on chronic postoperative pain and the analgesic effect of pharmacological therapies in patients with chronic pain

Studies have suggested that quantitative sensory testing (QST) might hold a predictive value for the development of chronic postoperative pain and the response to pharmacological interventions. This review systematically summarizes the current evidence on the predictive value of QST for chronic postoperative pain and the effect of pharmacological interventions. The main outcome measures were posttreatment pain intensity, pain relief, presence of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, responders of 30% and 50% pain relief, or validated questionnaires on pain and disability. A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE yielded 25 studies on surgical interventions and 11 on pharmacological interventions. Seventeen surgical and 11 pharmacological studies reported an association between preoperative or pretreatment QST and chronic postoperative pain or analgesic effect. The most commonly assessed QST modalities were pressure stimuli (17 studies), temporal summation of pain (TSP, 14 studies), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM, 16 studies). Of those, the dynamic QST parameters TSP (50%) and CPM (44%) were most frequently associated with chronic postoperative pain and analgesic effects. A large heterogeneity in methods for assessing TSP (n = 4) and CPM (n = 7) was found. Overall, most studies demonstrated low-to-moderate levels of risk of bias in study design, attrition, prognostic factors, outcome, and statistical analyses. This systematic review demonstrates that TSP and CPM show the most consistent predictive values for chronic postoperative pain and analgesic effect, but the heterogeneous methodologies reduce the generalizability and hence call for methodological guidelines.

Macro, Micro, and Molecular. Changes of the Osteochondral Interface in Osteoarthritis Development

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a long-term condition that causes joint pain and reduced movement. Notably, the same pathways governing cell growth, death, and differentiation during the growth and development of the body are also common drivers of OA. The osteochondral interface is a vital structure located between hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone. It plays a critical role in maintaining the physical and biological function, conveying joint mechanical stress, maintaining chondral microenvironment, as well as crosstalk and substance exchange through the osteochondral unit. In this review, we summarized the progress in research concerning the area of osteochondral junction, including its pathophysiological changes, molecular interactions, and signaling pathways that are related to the ultrastructure change. Multiple potential treatment options were also discussed in this review. A thorough understanding of these biological changes and molecular mechanisms in the pathologic process will advance our understanding of OA progression, and inform the development of effective therapeutics targeting OA.

Estrogen Regulation of the Expression of Pain Factor NGF in Rat Chondrocytes

Objective

Pain is the main symptom of osteoarthritis (OA). Nerve growth factor (NGF) plays a crucial role in the generation of OA pain. And estrogen-alone used resulted in a sustained joint pain reduction in postmenopausal women. So we aim to find whether estrogen alters chondrocytes’ NGF level, affecting OA pain.

Methods

Primary chondrocytes and cartilage explants isolated from Sprague Dawley rat knees were cultured with physiological concentrations of estrogen (17β-Estradiol ≥ 98%, E2), Estrogen Receptor α (ERα) inhibitor and stimulants. Then, chondrocytes NGF mRNA expression and protein release were analyzed by a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) respectively. Additionally, cultures were pre-incubated with MEK-ERK inhibitor to identify the signaling pathway that estrogen alters NGF mRNA and protein levels.

Results

We found that chondrocytes NGF expression and release were decreased by E2. E2 also reduced chondrocytes IL-1β-stimulated or TGF-β1-stimulated NGF expression. Phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinasep1/2 (p-ERK1/2) signals were detected stronger than the control group by Western Blotting (WB). When we cultured chondrocytes with PD98059 (MEK-ERK inhibitor, PD), NGF mRNA expression was added to 1.41Ct (2.07±0.1 fold).

Conclusion

We showed that E2 reduces chondrocytes NGF expression significantly, even after stimulation by TGF-β1 or IL-1β. MEK-ERK signaling is involved in this process.

Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: What Internists Need to Know

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and morbid condition. No disease-modifying therapies exist; hence the goals of current treatment are to palliate pain and to retain function. OA is significantly influenced by the placebo effect. Nonpharmacologic interventions are essential and have been shown to improve outcomes. Canes, unloading braces, and therapeutic heating/cooling may be valuable. Pharmacotherapy options include topical and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, duloxetine, and periodic intra-articular glucocorticoids and hyaluronans. Opioids, intra-articular stem cells, and platelet-rich plasma are not recommended. Novel targets such as nerve growth factor are under investigation and may be approved soon for OA pain.

Efficacy and Safety of Medicines Targeting Neurotrophic Factors in the Management of Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Most people with LBP receive the diagnosis of nonspecific LBP or sciatica. Medications are commonly prescribed but have limited analgesic effects and are associated with adverse events. A novel treatment approach is to target neurotrophins such as nerve growth factor (NGF) to reduce pain intensity. NGF inhibitors have been tested in some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in recent years, showing promise for the treatment of chronic LBP; however, their efficacy and safety need to be evaluated to guide regulatory actions.

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of medicines targeting neurotrophins in patients with LBP and sciatica.

Methods

In this systematic review, we will include published and unpublished records of parallel RCTs and the first phase of crossover RCTs that compare the effects of medicines targeting neurotrophins with any control group. We will search the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, and WHO International Clinical Registry Platform databases from inception. Pairs of authors will independently screen the records for eligibility, and we will independently extract data in duplicate. We will conduct a quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) with the studies that report sufficient data and compare the medicines of interest versus placebo. We will use random-effects models and calculate estimates of effects and heterogeneity for each outcome. We will assess the risk of bias for each study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and form judgments of confidence in the evidence according to GRADE recommendations. We will use the PRISMA statement to report the findings. We plan to conduct subgroup analyses by condition, type of medication, and time point. We will also assess the impact of a potential new trial on an existing meta-analysis. Data from studies that meet inclusion criteria but cannot be included in the meta-analysis will be reported narratively.

Results

The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework on May 19, 2020. As of December 2020, we have identified 1932 records.

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis will assess the evidence for the efficacy and safety of NGF inhibitors for pain in patients with nonspecific LBP and sciatica. The inclusion of new studies and unpublished data may improve the precision of the effect estimates and guide regulatory actions of the medications for LBP and sciatica.

Trial Registration

Open Science Framework; https://osf.io/b8adn/

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/22905

What's new in chronic pain pathophysiology

The understanding of pain pathophysiology is continuously evolving. Identifying underlying cellular and subcellular pathways helps create opportunities for targeted therapies that may prove to be effective interventions. This article is an update on four areas of developing knowledge as it pertains to clinical management of patients with pain: nerve growth factor antagonists, microglial modulation, AMP-activated protein kinase activators, and genetic pain factors. Each of these areas represents novel targets for targeted therapies to prevent, treat, and modify the disease course of acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain. Currently most pain management techniques do not target these pathways directly, but there is promising evidence to suggest that the field is advancing toward available therapies in the near future.

Targeting nerve growth factor, a new option for treatment of osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of comparative efficacy and safety with traditional drugs

OBJECTIVE

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease and leading cause of pain and disability in the elderly population. Most guidelines recommend the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids for the non-operative treatment of OA. Monoclonal nerve growth factor (NGF) antibodies are new drugs with the potential to provide pain relief and functional improvement in OA. We compared the efficacy (pain reduction and functional improvement), and safety of monoclonal NGF antibodies with NSAIDs and opioids in the treatment of OA with a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

38 articles, comprising 41 trials and 20489 patients with OA were included. Overall from the network meta-analysis, anti-NGFs were the most effective drugs for pain relief (Standardized Mean Difference or SMD compared with placebo 4.25, 95% CI 2.87 to 5.63, Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking curve or SUCRA=93.7%) and for functional improvement (SMD 4.90, 95% CI 3.46 to 6.33, SUCRA=98.3%). Although anti-NGFs were associated with higher risk of peripheral sensation abnormality (paresthesia and pruritus), they were not associated with higher risk of other AEs (headaches and nausea) or with higher withdrawal rates related to AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Monoclonal NGF antibodies provide significantly greater pain relief and functional improvement in OA compared to NSAIDs and opioids. Monoclonal NGF antibodies are not associated with severe AEs. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.

METHODS

PubMed, CNKI, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies (OA treated with anti-NGFs, opioids, selective COX-2 inhibitors or NSAIDs) published between January 1999 to January 2020. Bayesian network and conventional meta-analyses were conducted. Pain relief, functional improvement and AEs were assessed.

The evolution of nerve growth factor inhibition in clinical medicine

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a neurotrophin that activates nociceptive neurons to transmit pain signals from the peripheral to the central nervous system and that exerts its effects on neurons by signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors. Antibodies that inhibit the function of NGF and small molecule inhibitors of NGF receptors have been developed and tested in clinical studies to evaluate the efficacy of NGF inhibition as a form of analgesia in chronic pain states including osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain. Clinical studies in individuals with painful knee and hip osteoarthritis have revealed that NGF inhibitors substantially reduce joint pain and improve function compared with NSAIDs for a duration of up to 8 weeks. However, the higher tested doses of NGF inhibitors also increased the risk of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis in a small percentage of those treated. This Review recaps the biology of NGF and the studies that have been performed to evaluate the efficacy of NGF inhibition for chronic musculoskeletal pain states. The adverse events associated with NGF inhibition and the current state of knowledge about the mechanisms involved in rapidly progressive osteoarthritis are also discussed and future studies proposed to improve understanding of this rare but serious adverse event.

Spezielle Schmerztherapie bei rheumatischen Erkrankungen

Schmerz als Hauptsymptom vieler chronisch-entzündlicher Erkrankungen stellt für den Patienten, aber auch für den behandelnden Arzt besonders in seiner chronifizierten Form eine große Herausforderung dar. Es gibt leider keine „Wunderpille“ mit der man Schmerzen für jeden gleich zuverlässig beseitigen kann. Es gibt aber viele Ansätze pharmakologischer als auch nicht-pharmakologischer Art und deren Kombination, um für den einzelnen Patienten wirksame Behandlungsstrategien zu finden. Um diese Strategien für jeden Patienten individuell optimal festzulegen, bedarf es zum einen eines fundamentierten Wissens über das Spektrum zur Verfügung stehender Mittel, zum anderen aber auch Erkenntnis darüber, wie diese sinnvoll nach Art der vorliegenden Schmerzformen einzusetzen sind. In dieser Übersicht wird beides behandelt, mit einem Fokus auf die medikamentöse Therapie von Schmerzen bei entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankungen. Dabei wird herausgearbeitet, dass es für die in diesem Zusammenhang relevantesten Formen des Schmerzes, akut-entzündlich nozizeptiv, neuropathisch und durch periphere und zentrale Sensibilisierung chronifizierte Schmerzen, jeweils andere wirksame Konzepte gibt.

The opposing contribution of neurotrophin-3 and nerve growth factor to orofacial heat hyperalgesia in rats

It has been proposed that neurotrophin-3 acts in a manner that is opposed to nerve growth factor, especially in the modulation of heat hyperalgesia. Injury to the constriction of the infraorbital nerve (CION) is a well-established model of trigeminal neuropathic pain that leads to robust heat, cold, and mechanical hyperalgesia. Here, we assessed the effect of local neurotrophin-3 treatment on CION-induced hyperalgesia, and we examined some mechanisms related to the effect of neurotrophin-3. Neurotrophin-3 (1 µg/50 µl) injected into the upper lip of CION rats caused a significant and long-lasting reduction of CION-induced heat hyperalgesia, but failed to affect cold and mechanical hyperalgesia. Increased levels of neurotrophin-3 were detected in the injured nerve at the time point that represents the peak of heat hyperalgesia. The anti-hyperalgesic effect of neurotrophin-3 was markedly reduced in the presence of an antagonist of TrkA receptors (K-252a, 1 μg/50 μl). Moreover, association of lower doses of neurotrophin-3 with an antibody anti-nerve growth factor resulted in a synergistic anti-hyperalgesic effect in CION rats. Local injection of nerve growth factor (3 µg/50 µl) or the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin (1 μg/50 μl), but not neurotrophin-3 injection (1 µg/50 µl), resulted in long-lasting facial heat hyperalgesia, which was both significantly reduced by previous neurotrophin-3 local treatment. In conclusion, we suggest that neurotrophin-3 is a potent modulator of facial heat hyperalgesia, which may exert an inhibitory influence on the trkA pathway. Neurotrophin-3 treatment may represent a promising approach, especially in pain conditions associated with increased levels of nerve growth factor.

Nerve growth factor antibody for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain and chronic low-back pain: mechanism of action in the context of efficacy and safety

Chronic pain continues to be a significant global burden despite the availability of a variety of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment options. Thus, there is a need for new analgesics with novel mechanisms of action. In this regard, antibodies directed against nerve growth factor (NGF-Abs) are a new class of agents in development for the treatment of chronic pain conditions such as osteoarthritis and chronic low-back pain. This comprehensive narrative review summarizes evidence supporting pronociceptive functions for NGF that include contributing to peripheral and central sensitization through tropomyosin receptor kinase A activation and stimulation of local neuronal sprouting. The potential role of NGF in osteoarthritis and chronic low-back pain signaling is also examined to provide a mechanistic basis for the observed efficacy of NGF-Abs in clinical trials of these particular pain states. Finally, the safety profile of NGF-Abs in terms of common adverse events, joint safety, and nerve structure/function is discussed.

Nerve growth factor-mediated photoablation of nociceptors reduces pain behavior in mice

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

A ligand-guided, light-activated photosensitizer tool targets TrkA-expressing nociceptors, reversing acute and chronic pain in mice.

Nerve growth factor (NGF) and its receptors TrkA and p75 play a key role in the development and function of peripheral nociceptive neurons. Here, we describe novel technology to selectively photoablate TrkA-positive nociceptors through delivery of a phototoxic agent coupled to an engineered NGF ligand and subsequent near-infrared illumination. We demonstrate that this approach allows for on demand and localized reversal of pain behaviors in mouse models of acute, inflammatory, neuropathic, and joint pain. To target peripheral nociceptors, we generated a SNAP-tagged NGF derivative NGF^R121W that binds to TrkA/p75 receptors but does not provoke signaling in TrkA-positive cells or elicit pain behaviors in mice. NGF^R121W-SNAP was coupled to the photosensitizer IRDye700DX phthalocyanine (IR700) and injected subcutaneously. After near-infrared illumination of the injected area, behavioral responses to nociceptive mechanical and sustained thermal stimuli, but not innocuous stimuli, were substantially reduced. Similarly, in models of inflammatory, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain, mechanical hypersensitivity was abolished for 3 weeks after a single treatment regime. We demonstrate that this loss of pain behavior coincides with the retraction of neurons from the skin which then reinnervate the epidermis after 3 weeks corresponding with the return of mechanical hypersensitivity. Thus NGF^R121W-SNAP-mediated photoablation is a minimally invasive approach to reversibly silence nociceptor input from the periphery, and control pain and hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli.

Anti-nerve growth factor antibodies for the treatment of low back pain

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of chronic low back pain (cLBP) often involves multimodal pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies. There remain shortcomings with these tools with regards to both effect size and side effects.

AREAS COVERED

In an effort to better address cLBP, anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are nearing marketing approval. This class of medications has been primarily evaluated for osteoarthritis, but are being examined at higher doses for use in cLBP. We review the efficacy of this class in treating LBP as well as their potential side effects based on nine phase II or III published clinical trials. Five trials evaluated Tanezumab and four trials evaluated Fasinumab, with seven trials evaluating nonspecific LBP, one evaluating sciatica related cLBP, and one evaluating vertebral fracture related cLBP.

EXPERT OPINION

The results of available clinical trials indicate modest effectiveness with regard to reduction of pain in the low back, and improved functionality, compared to placebo in keeping with the effect size of other pharmacologic treatment modalities. Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis was infrequently reported. However, the continued observation of this serious side effects warrants careful patient selection and balancing the risks and benefits of anti-NGF mAbs in treating cLBP.

An update on targets for treating osteoarthritis pain: NGF and TRPV1

Purpose of review

a)Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis, and pain is the primary symptom of the disease, yet analgesic options for treating OA pain remain limited. In this review, we aimed to give an update on the current clinical and preclinical studies targeting two pathways that are being investigated for treating OA pain: the nerve growth factor (NGF) pathway and the transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) pathway.

Recent findings

b)Antibodies against NGF, small molecule inhibitors of TrkA, TRPV1 agonists, and TRPV1 antagonists are all in different stages of clinical and pre-clinical testing for the treatment of OA pain. NGF antibodies have shown efficacy in the primary endpoints tested compared to placebo, however, rapidly progressive OA has been consistently observed in a subset of patients and the cause remains unclear. TRPV1 agonists have also demonstrated reduced pain with no serious adverse events - the most common adverse events include a burning or warming sensation upon administration.

Summary

c)Targeting the NGF and TRPV1 pathways appear effective for reducing OA pain, but further work is needed to better understand which patients may benefit most from these treatments. The anti-NGF antibody tanezumab and the TRPV1 agonist CNTX-4975 have both received fast-track designation from the FDA for the treatment of OA pain.

Targeting neurotrophic factors: Novel approaches to musculoskeletal pain

Chronic pain represents a substantial unmet medical need globally. In recent years, the quest for a new generation of novel, safe, mechanism-based analgesic treatments has focused on neurotrophic factors, a large group of secreted proteins that control the growth and survival of different populations of neurons, but that postnatally are involved in the genesis and maintenance of pain, with biological activity in both the periphery and the central nervous system. In this narrative review, we discuss the two families of neurotrophic proteins that have been extensively studied for their role in pain: first, the neurotrophins, nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived growth factor (BDNF), and secondly, the GDNF family of ligands (GFLs). We provide an overview of the pain pathway, and the pain-producing effects of these different proteins. We summarize accumulating preclinical and clinical findings with a focus on musculoskeletal pain, and on osteoarthritis in particular, because the musculoskeletal system is the most prevalent source of chronic pain and of disability, and clinical testing of these novel agents - often biologics- is most advanced in this area.

Subcutaneous tanezumab for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: efficacy and safety results from a 24-week randomised phase III study with a 24-week follow-up period

Objective

Tanezumab, a nerve growth factor inhibitor, was investigated for osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee in a study with 24-week treatment and 24-week safety follow-up.

Methods

This double-blind, randomised, phase III study enrolled adults in Europe and Japan with moderate-to-severe OA who had not responded to or could not tolerate standard-of-care analgesics. Patients were randomised to tanezumab 2.5 mg or 5 mg subcutaneously or matching placebo every 8 weeks (three doses). Co-primary end points were change from baseline to week 24 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain and Physical Function, and Patient’s Global Assessment of OA (PGA-OA). Joint safety and neurological assessments continued throughout the 48-week study.

Results

From March 2016 to December 2017, 849 patients were randomised and evaluated (placebo n=282, tanezumab 2.5 mg n=283, tanezumab 5 mg n=284). At week 24, there was a statistically significant improvement from baseline for tanezumab 5 mg compared with placebo for WOMAC Pain (least squares mean difference±SE –0.62±0.18, p=0.0006), WOMAC Physical Function (–0.71±0.17, p<0.0001) and PGA-OA (–0.19±0.07, p=0.0051). For tanezumab 2.5 mg, there was a statistically significant improvement in WOMAC Pain and Physical Function, but not PGA-OA. Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis (RPOA) was observed in 1.4% (4/283) and 2.8% (8/284) of patients in the tanezumab 2.5 mg and tanezumab 5 mg groups, respectively and none receiving placebo. Total joint replacements (TJRs) were similarly distributed across all three treatment groups (6.7%–7.8%). Tanezumab-treated patients experienced more paraesthesia (5 mg) and hypoaesthesia (both doses) than placebo.

Conclusion

Tanezumab 5 mg statistically significantly improved pain, physical function and PGA-OA, but tanezumab 2.5 mg only achieved two co-primary end points. RPOA occurred more frequently with tanezumab 5 mg than tanezumab 2.5 mg. TJRs were similarly distributed across all three groups.

Trial registration number

NCT02709486.

Pain and the immune system: emerging concepts of IgG-mediated autoimmune pain and immunotherapies

The immune system has long been recognised important in pain regulation through inflammatory cytokine modulation of peripheral nociceptive fibres. Recently, cytokine interactions in brain and spinal cord glia as well as dorsal root ganglia satellite glia have been identified important- in pain modulation. The result of these interactions is central and peripheral sensitisation of nociceptive processing. Additionally, new insights and the term 'autoimmune pain' have emerged through discovery of specific IgGs targeting the extracellular domains of antigens at nodal and synaptic structures, causing pain directly without inflammation by enhancing neuronal excitability. Other discovered IgGs heighten pain indirectly by T-cell-mediated inflammation or destruction of targets within the nociceptive pathways. Notable identified IgGs in pain include those against the components of channels and receptors involved in inhibitory or excitatory somatosensory synapses or their pathways: nodal and paranodal proteins (LGI1, CASPR1, CASPR2); glutamate detection (AMPA-R); GABA regulation and release (GAD65, amphiphysin); glycine receptors (GLY-R); water channels (AQP4). These disorders have other neurological manifestations of central/peripheral hyperexcitabability including seizures, encephalopathy, myoclonus, tremor and spasticity, with immunotherapy responsiveness. Other pain disorders, like complex regional pain disorder, have been associated with IgGs against β2-adrenergic receptor, muscarinic-2 receptors, AChR-nicotinic ganglionic α-3 receptors and calcium channels (N and P/Q types), but less consistently with immune treatment response. Here, we outline how the immune system contributes to development and regulation of pain, review specific IgG-mediated pain disorders and summarise recent development in therapy approaches. Biological agents to treat pain (anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide and anti-nerve growth factor) are also discussed.

Therapies for osteoarthritis today and tomorrow: Review

Osteoarthritis is a common human disease with well understood pathophysiology, signs and symptoms, prevalence, risk factors, pain, and suffering with great understanding of personal, economic and social effects around the world. There are no drugs or treatments considered "disease modifying", with symptomatic control aiming to stave off the final solution of total joint replacement. Regenerative medicine and use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) promised hope to change that but have so far fallen short. This review focuses on current knowledge and use of MSC in clinic, completed research, and future directions for development of this once so promising biological treatment. Powerful treatment for pain in form of monoclonal antibodies against Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) are getting close to FDA approval in the US. Wnt signaling pathway modulators that decrease inflammation, increase function and potential to regenerate cartilage should be presented to the FDA early next year.

Safety and efficacy of fulranumab in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: results from four early terminated phase III randomized studies

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fulranumab as adjunct or monotherapy in patients with knee or hip pain related to moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.Methods: Osteoarthritic patients (aged ≥18 years) from four phase 3 randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled studies were randomized to receive placebo, fulranumab 1 mg every 4 weeks (Q4wk), or 3 mg Q4wk in 16-week DB phase, followed by a 52-week post-treatment follow-up phase. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and neurological, sympathetic, and joint-related events of interest. Efficacy assessments included pain and physical function sub-scales of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.Results: Of 245 patients from the ITT set (median age = 64 years; 62% women), 84 (34%) completed the DB phase; the majority of discontinuations (57%) were due to early study termination. In the DB phase, the incidence of TEAEs in fulranumab 3 mg (57.8%) and 1 mg (56.8%) was similar to placebo (56.8%). Two events adjudicated as joint-related events of interest include rapidly progressive osteoarthritis and fracture of unknown etiology. There were no new neurological TEAEs. Fulranumab showed evidence of efficacy in improving pain and physical function based on WOMAC sub-scale scores. Due to premature study termination, the number of patients enrolled were too small to make any definitive efficacy claims.Conclusions: Treatment with fulranumab was generally tolerated with no new safety signals. Within the limited sample analyzed, fulranumab showed evidence of improvement of pain and function in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis who had failed prior therapy and were candidates for joint replacement surgery.Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT02336685; NCT02336698; NCT02289716; NCT02301234KEY POINTSFulranumab as adjuvant or monotherapy was well tolerated with no new safety signalsFulranumab demonstrated evidence suggestive of efficacy in osteoarthritic pain of hip and kneeFulranumab demonstrated evidence suggestive of improvement of pain and physical function in osteoarthritis.

Efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of tropomyosin receptor kinase A inhibitor in painful knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of GZ389988A, a tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) inhibitor, in subjects with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHOD

In this single center, double-blind, placebo-controlled and randomized trial, 104 subjects with moderate-to-severe knee OA pain were enrolled to receive a single intra-articular (IA) injection of either GZ389988A or placebo. Efficacy measures were assessed over 12 weeks and included walking pain (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] A1), overall knee pain, WOMAC A, B, C and total score, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), OMERACT-OARSI responder rate and rescue medication use. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored up to 24 weeks.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy endpoint was met with a between-group difference of -7.49 (VAS 0-100) on WOMAC A1 changes over 4 weeks (P < 0.05 favoring GZ389988A). The secondary outcome on WOMAC A1 changes over 12 weeks had a between-group difference of -6.78 (P = 0.064). Among weekly assessments, statistically significant greater improvement in the GZ389988A group was observed in WOMAC A1, overall knee pain and/or WOMAC A at weeks 2-5. Although not statistically significant, improvements over placebo on pain and WOMAC C persisted over 12 weeks. Greater AE incidence was observed in the GZ389988A group including transient and self-limited injection joint inflammatory reactions with a spike of acetaminophen intake within the first week post-injection.

CONCLUSION

IA injection of TrkA inhibitor GZ389988A in knee OA subjects reduced pain with a numerically functional gain and an acceptable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02845271).

The Efficacy, Tolerability, and Joint Safety of Fasinumab in Osteoarthritis Pain: A Phase IIb/III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

To prospectively assess the efficacy, general safety, and joint safety of fasinumab, an anti–nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, in osteoarthritis (OA) hip and/or knee pain.

Methods

Patients with moderate‐to‐severe OA pain (knee or hip) and history of inadequate response or intolerance to analgesics were randomized to receive fasinumab (at 1 mg, 3 mg, 6 mg, or 9 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks over 16 weeks and were followed up to week 36. Efficacy end points were the change from baseline to week 16 in the pain and physical function subscale scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), and patient global assessment (PGA) of OA. Joints were monitored at scheduled assessments (by plain film radiography and magnetic resonance imaging) during treatment and follow‐up, and if prompted, at the time of active joint symptoms.

Results

Of the 421 patients randomized, 342 completed the 36‐week study. All doses of fasinumab yielded statistically significant and clinically important reductions in pain compared to placebo (least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain subscale scores at week 16 ranging −0.78 to −1.40), without any clear dose dependence. Physical function and PGA scores improved in parallel. Treatment‐emergent adverse event rates were 17% with fasinumab and 10% with placebo, and 4% and 1% of patients, respectively, discontinued treatment. Arthropathies (25 in total, 7% of fasinumab‐treated patients and 1% of placebo‐treated patients) occurred in a dose‐dependent manner, with 2 occurring in patients receiving the lowest dose of fasinumab and 10 in patients receiving the highest dose. Most of the arthropathies (16 of 25) were discovered with scheduled radiographs and not based on symptoms. Destructive arthropathy (in 1 of 337 treated patients) occurred in 1 patient who was receiving 6 mg fasimumab.

Conclusion

Fasinumab provided improvements in OA pain and function, even in those benefitting little from previous analgesics. The observed benefit‐to‐risk relationship favors further clinical development to explore the lowest doses of fasinumab in patients with knee or hip OA.

[New findings regarding the neurobiology of pruritus]

Chronic pruritus may arise from different conditions, including dermatological, systemic, neurologic, psychiatric, and psychosomatic diseases, leading to a substantial decrease in the quality of life of affected patients. The neurobiological mechanisms involved in chronic pruritus are not yet fully understood. However, in recent years important achievements have been made in this regard. This article aims to provide an overview of the current understanding of these mechanisms. The complex network of neurons, keratinocytes, inflammatory cells, cytokines, and neurotrophic factors which play a role in the development and maintenance of chronic pruritus are highlighted, as well as the pruritogens involved in pruritic diseases in humans. Additionally, the importance of neuropathy and scratch-induced changes for the pathophysiology of chronic pruritus are discussed. The new findings on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying chronic pruritus have already led to the development of novel therapies, e. g., monoclonal antibodies against specific interleukins, which are important for pruritus transmission. A deeper understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms is necessary in order to develop specifically targeted therapeutic options and thus provide better care for affected patients.