1
|
Drummen SJJ, Aitken D, Balogun S, Bennell KL, Hinman RS, Callisaya ML, Otahal P, Blizzard L, Antony B, Munugoda IP, Winzenberg T, Jones G, Scheepers LEJM. Pre-exercise and acute movement-evoked pain trajectories during a 24-week outdoor walking program for knee osteoarthritis (WALK). OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2024; 6:100481. [PMID: 38883805 PMCID: PMC11176753 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Exploring (1) pre-exercise and acute movement-evoked pain (AMEP) during an outdoor walking program in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA); and (2) comparing baseline physical performance and AMEP flares initiated by walking between participants with either a higher or lower attendance rate. Methods Individuals with knee OA were prescribed a 24-week walking program, including one unsupervised walk and two supervised walk classes per week. Participants self-reported knee pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10) before and after each supervised class. Mixed-effects models were used to investigate trajectories over time for pre-exercise pain and AMEP change (post-minus pre-exercise pain; positive value indicates flare-up). Baseline physical performance (6 tests) and AMEP flares were compared between participants with higher (attending ≥70% of supervised classes) and lower attendance rates. Results Of 24 participants commencing the program, 7 (29%) withdrew. Over 24 weeks, pre-exercise pain improved by 1.20 NRS (95% CI -1.41 to -0.99), with estimated largest per class improvements during the first 8 weeks (-0.05 (-0.06 to -0.03) and plateauing around 20-weeks. The AMEP was estimated to improve by 0.19 NRS (95% CI -0.38 to -0.004) over 24-weeks, with improvements plateauing around 12-weeks. Participants with lower attendance (n = 11) scored poorer on all physical performance tests and experienced a slight increase in AMEP during the first two weeks of the program. Conclusions Participants improved in pre-exercise pain and AMEP in the first 20 and 12 weeks, respectively. Despite supervision, physical performance and AMEP flares may have contributed to lower attendance. Trial registration number 12618001097235.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D Aitken
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - S Balogun
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
- Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - K L Bennell
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R S Hinman
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M L Callisaya
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Otahal
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - L Blizzard
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - B Antony
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | | | | | - G Jones
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marriott KA, Birmingham TB. Fundamentals of osteoarthritis. Rehabilitation: Exercise, diet, biomechanics, and physical therapist-delivered interventions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023; 31:1312-1326. [PMID: 37423596 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Insights related to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) have informed rehabilitative treatments that aim to mitigate the influence of several known impairments and risk factors for OA, with the goal to improve pain, function, and quality of life. The purpose of this invited narrative review is to provide fundamental knowledge to non-specialists about exercise and education, diet, biomechanical interventions, and other physical therapist-delivered treatments. In addition to summarizing the rationale for common rehabilitative therapies, we provide a synthesis of current core recommendations. Robust evidence based on randomized clinical trials supports exercise with education and diet as core treatments for OA. Structured, supervised exercise therapy is advised. The mode of exercise may vary but should be individualized. The dose should be based on an initial assessment, the desired physiological changes, and progressed when appropriate. Diet combined with exercise is strongly recommended and studies demonstrate a dose-response relationship between the magnitude of weight loss and symptom improvement. Recent evidence suggests the use of technology to remotely deliver exercise, diet and education interventions is cost-effective. Although several studies support the mechanisms for biomechanical interventions (e.g., bracing, shoe inserts) and physical therapist-delivered (passive) treatments (e.g., manual therapy, electrotherapeutic modalities) fewer rigorous randomized trials support their clinical use; these therapies are sometimes recommended as adjuncts to core treatments. The mechanisms of action for all rehabilitative interventions include contextual factors such as attention and placebo effects. These effects can challenge our interpretation of treatment efficacy from clinical trials, yet also provide opportunities to maximize patient outcomes in clinical practice. When evaluating rehabilitative interventions, the field may benefit from increased emphasis on research that considers contextual factors while evaluating mechanistic, longer-term, clinically-important and policy-relevant outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendal A Marriott
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Trevor B Birmingham
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Germano Maciel D, Cerqueira MS, Brito Vieira WHD. Use of rating of perceived exertion during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055786. [PMID: 34907073 PMCID: PMC8672024 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders of the knee. Rehabilitation with progressive resistance training is recommended for both disorders. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is widely used to prescribe, monitor, and control exercise load. However, the lack of detailed methodological description and variability in the use of RPE may hinder its validity. This scoping review summarises methodological aspects of the use of RPE in resistance exercises during ACL reconstruction and KOA rehabilitation. We also aim to identify possible methodological issues related to the use of RPE and provide recommendations for future studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This scoping review protocol was developed following the Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement extension for Scoping Reviews. The search will be conducted in Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, Central and SPORTDiscus databases. The terms "anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation", "knee osteoarthritis" and "resistance exercise" and their synonymous will be used isolated and combined (boolean operators AND/OR/NOT). Two reviewers will independently conduct title and abstract screening and evaluate full texts of potentially eligible articles. Data related to study design, sample, intervention characteristics and RPE outcomes will be extracted, summarised and qualitatively analysed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The proposed scoping review does not require ethical approval since it will synthesise information from publicly available studies. Regarding dissemination activities, results will be submitted for publication in a scientific journal and presented at conferences in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Germano Maciel
- Neuromuscular Performance Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
| | - Mikhail Santos Cerqueira
- Neuromuscular Performance Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
| | - Wouber Hérickson de Brito Vieira
- Neuromuscular Performance Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang L, Xie S, Bao T, Zhu S, Liang Q, Wang X, Zhang R, Xiang X, Du C, He C. Exercise and education for community-dwelling older participants with knee osteoarthritis: a video-linked programme protocol based on a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:470. [PMID: 34022825 PMCID: PMC8141198 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04331-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Neuromuscular and quadriceps exercises have been shown to be effective approaches to relieve pain and to improve function for patients with knee osteoarthritis. In this study, we aim to provide an informative feasible model in which therapeutic exercise and education will be undertaken with physiotherapy supervision and instruction via video link. We also aim to explore the relationship between program-induced pain alleviation/functional improvements and reduction in irritability, which might be mediated through program-induced psychosocial benefits. Methods In this proposed two-parallel group (neuromuscular exercise versus quadriceps exercise), single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, participants aged ≥50 years with osteoarthritic knee pain will undergo a 12-week intervention, comprising video-linked education, supervised exercises, and a 12-week follow-up. Seven measurements will be taken to collect longitudinal data. A generalised estimating equation will be used to establish the adjusted difference in effectiveness on pain, function, irritability, and psychosocial outcomes between participants undertaking neuromuscular exercises and those undertaking quadriceps exercises. The primary outcomes are overall average pain in the knee joint during walking, as assessed through the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index physical function subscale. Furthermore, pressure pain threshold and changes in self-report pain scores pre-, during, and post-exercise were also measured as an indication of irritability. In addition, both the 6-min walk test and a timed up & go test were used to assess walking function performance. Finally, patients’ emotions (e.g., fear and catastrophising), self-trust, needs in terms of disease knowledge, mental resilience, social support and health-related quality of life were investigated. Two four-wave cross-lagged models will be used to investigate directional relationships, aiming to investigate the complex mechanisms concerning the effects of exercise programmes. Discussion Through summarising the study’s strengths and limitations, this study may provide promising insights in terms of exercise therapy optimisation for people with knee osteoarthritis and/or other chronic pain within a psychosocial framework. Trial registration ChiCTR2100041978 (chictr.org.cn), January 10, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Wang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Suhang Xie
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Tianjie Bao
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Siyi Zhu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Qiu Liang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Xiaoyi Wang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Ruishi Zhang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Xiaona Xiang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Chunping Du
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China. .,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
| | - Chengqi He
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China. .,Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China. .,Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|