An Exploratory Study of the Texture Research Investigational Platform (TRIP) to Evaluate Bone Texture Score of Distal Femur DXA Scans - A TBS-Based Approach

Update on the utility of trabecular bone score (TBS) in clinical practice for the management of osteoporosis: a systematic review by the Egyptian Academy of Bone and Muscle Health

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a grayscale textural assessment resulting from a computed evaluation of pixel gray-level variations in previously obtained lumbar spine DXA images. It is an index of bone microarchitecture correlated with parameters of bone strength. Higher values of TBS indicate a better microarchitecture, whereas lower values indicate a degraded microarchitecture. TBS can be used alongside Fracture Risk Assessment tool “FRAX” and bone mineral density (BMD) to enhance the assessment of fracture risk and to inform treatment initiation and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out aiming to update the evidence on the clinical use of the TBS in the management of both primary and secondary osteoporosis. Results revealed that in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, TBS enhances the prediction of fracture risk, and when adjust with BMD and clinical risk factors, it is able to inform the decision-making process regarding initiating osteoporosis therapy and the choice of anti-osteoporosis medication. Evidence also implies that TBS provides valuable adjunctive information in monitoring osteoporosis therapy. In conclusion, this work provides an up-to-date evidence-based review and recommendations which informs the utility of trabecular bone score in standard clinical practice.

Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) under the auspices of WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging

PURPOSE

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a grey-level textural measurement acquired from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry lumbar spine images and is a validated index of bone microarchitecture. In 2015, a Working Group of the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) published a review of the TBS literature, concluding that TBS predicts hip and major osteoporotic fracture, at least partly independent of bone mineral density (BMD) and clinical risk factors. It was also concluded that TBS is potentially amenable to change as a result of pharmacological therapy. Further evidence on the utility of TBS has since accumulated in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and the introduction of FRAX and BMD T-score adjustment for TBS has accelerated adoption. This position paper therefore presents a review of the updated scientific literature and provides expert consensus statements and corresponding operational guidelines for the use of TBS.

METHODS

An Expert Working Group was convened by the ESCEO and a systematic review of the evidence undertaken, with defined search strategies for four key topics with respect to the potential use of TBS: (1) fracture prediction in men and women; (2) initiating and monitoring treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis; (3) fracture prediction in secondary osteoporosis; and (4) treatment monitoring in secondary osteoporosis. Statements to guide the clinical use of TBS were derived from the review and graded by consensus using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 96 articles were reviewed and included data on the use of TBS for fracture prediction in men and women, from over 20 countries. The updated evidence shows that TBS enhances fracture risk prediction in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and can, when taken with BMD and clinical risk factors, inform treatment initiation and the choice of antiosteoporosis treatment. Evidence also indicates that TBS provides useful adjunctive information in monitoring treatment with long-term denosumab and anabolic agents. All expert consensus statements were voted as strongly recommended.

CONCLUSION

The addition of TBS assessment to FRAX and/or BMD enhances fracture risk prediction in primary and secondary osteoporosis, adding useful information for treatment decision-making and monitoring. The expert consensus statements provided in this paper can be used to guide the integration of TBS in clinical practice for the assessment and management of osteoporosis. An example of an operational approach is provided in the appendix. This position paper presents an up-to-date review of the evidence base, synthesised through expert consensus statements, which informs the implementation of Trabecular Bone Score in clinical practice.

Bone Texture Assessment on Lateral VFAs Using the Texture Research Investigational Platform (TRIP) and its Fracture Discrimination Ability

Texture Research Imaging Platform applies trabecular bone score (TBS) measurement principles to images acquired with multiple modalities to assess bone texture at various skeletal sites. This study aimed to assess the bone texture score in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-acquired lateral vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) images (BTS_VFA), evaluate its reproducibility, and vertebral fracture discrimination ability. Subjects included 178 VF cases and 178 non-VF controls, 136 women and 42 men in each group, age 55-92 years, from two research centers. Cases and controls were matched for age (±5 years), body mass index (±5 kg/m²) and TBS. All participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry TBS assessment from standard posterior-anterior lumbar spine scans and BTS_VFA assessment. VF presence was determined using VFA images applying the Genant's method. BTS_VFA was lower among fractured women compared to non-fractured (0.626 ± 0.109 vs 0.675 ± 0.099, p < 0.01), but not among men. In a binary logistic regression adjusted for study center and sex, for each SD lower BTS_VFA, there was a 40% increase (OR 1.40, 95% CI (1.13-1.74)) in the risk of having a prevalent VF; area under the curve (95% CI) 0.616 (0.557-0.675). Inter-assessor and inter-centers ICCs for BTS_VFA measurements were very good; 0.96 (0.64-0.99) and 0.98 (0.95-0.99), respectively. The BTS_VFA precision (coefficient of variation) was 2.42%. This feasibility study demonstrates the potential to assess trabecular bone texture in lateral VFA images with good reproducibility. BTS_VFA can discriminate between fractured and non-fractured women independent of their age, body mass index and TBS. In conclusion, BTS_VFA, a potential trabecular texture assessment that excludes the posterior elements, may have value in fracture prediction or as a novel approach to be further investigated in spine surgery planning.

Trabecular bone score in the hip: a new method to examine hip bone microarchitecture-a feasibility study

Our study found, in older adults who are residents of long-term care facilities, assessing hip microarchitecture with DXA-derived bone texture score may serve as a supplement to bone mineral density to improve fracture prediction and to facilitate decision-making for pharmacological management.

PURPOSE

Many patients with high fragility fracture risk do not have a sufficiently low bone mineral density (BMD) to become eligible for osteoporosis treatment. They often have deteriorated bone microarchitecture despite a normal or only mildly abnormal BMD. We sought to examine the beta version of the trabecular bone score (TBS) algorithm for the hip: TBS Hip, an indirect index of bone microarchitecture, and assess if TBS Hip brings complementary information to other bone quality indices such as BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) to further improve identifying individuals who are at high risk for fractures.

METHODS

In this analysis, we considered baseline TBS Hip at total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter, TBS at lumbar spine, BMD at all of these skeletal sites, and BTMs in 132 postmenopausal women who were residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled osteoporosis clinical trial.

RESULTS

On average, participants were 85.2 years old and had a BMI of 26.9 kg/m². The correlation coefficient between BMD and TBS Hip at total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter was 0.50, 0.32, and 0.39 respectively (all p < 0.0001). The correlation coefficient between BMD and lumbar spine TBS was 0.52 (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant correlation between BTMs with TBS at lumbar spine or TBS Hip at total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter.

CONCLUSION

Among older women residing in LTC facilities, there was a moderate correlation between measures of BMD and TBS Hip at total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter, suggesting TBS Hip may provide complementary information to BMD .

Beyond Bone Mineral Density: A New Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Index of Bone Strength to Predict Fragility Fractures, the Bone Strain Index

For a proper assessment of osteoporotic fragility fracture prediction, all aspects regarding bone mineral density, bone texture, geometry and information about strength are necessary, particularly in endocrinological and rheumatological diseases, where bone quality impairment is relevant. Data regarding bone quantity (density) and, partially, bone quality (structure and geometry) are obtained by the gold standard method of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data about bone strength are not yet readily available. To evaluate bone resistance to strain, a new DXA-derived index based on the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a greyscale of density distribution measured on spine and femoral scan, namely Bone Strain Index (BSI), has recently been developed. Bone Strain Index includes local information on density distribution, bone geometry and loadings and it differs from bone mineral density (BMD) and other variables of bone quality like trabecular bone score (TBS), which are all based on the quantification of bone mass and distribution averaged over the scanned region. This state of the art review illustrates the methodology of BSI calculation, the findings of its in reproducibility and the preliminary data about its capability to predict fragility fracture and to monitor the follow up of the pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis.