Xie T, Qian J, Wu X, Lu Y, Hu G, Luo C. Unilateral, multilevel, interlaminar fenestration in the removal of a multisegment cervical intramedullary ependymoma.
Spine J 2013;
13:747-53. [PMID:
23541449 DOI:
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.048]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2011] [Revised: 08/30/2012] [Accepted: 02/18/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Laminectomy is the traditional approach to intramedullary ependymomas and may lead to spinal instability and spinal deformities. Hemilaminectomy and laminoplasty have been developed to preserve the spinal stability and have been found to be effective. Unilateral, multilevel, interlaminar fenestration is another approach that may have more advantages in preserving the spinal stability; however, it has rarely been used by now.
PURPOSE
Unilateral, multilevel, interlaminar fenestration was often used in the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis; however, it was rarely used for tumors. The aim of this study was to discuss the characteristics and advantages of its use for a multisegment intramedullary ependymoma.
STUDY DESIGN
Case report and literature review.
METHODS
The 22-year-old man suffered from muscular atrophy of the left hand and the right hand for a period of 1.5 years and 3 months, respectively, and the cervical magnetic resonance imaging revealed an intramedullary mass of C4-C7. A right, unilateral, multilevel, interlaminar fenestration of the C3-C7 was performed with the help of high-speed air drills, and a midline myelotomy was made under microscope. The tumor was removed totally using piecemeal resection.
RESULTS
The magnetic resonance imaging, obtained 1 year after the operation, revealed that there were no residual mass lesion and no spinal instability, and the patient acquired an excellent functional outcome. So, this technique proved to be safe and easy in this case.
CONCLUSIONS
Unilateral, multilevel, interlaminar fenestration allows good access to a long intraspinal segment, protects the structures essential to spinal stability as much as possible, preserves the spinal stability, and results in no additional injury to the spinal cord. It may be applicable to many other kinds of intraspinal tumors.
Collapse