New-generation oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke: Implications for neurosurgery

Deep brain stimulation in patients on chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment

BACKGROUND

In the aging society, many patients with movement disorders, pain syndromes, or psychiatric disorders who are candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery suffer also from cardiovascular co-morbidities that require chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment. Because of a presumed increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage during or after surgery and limited knowledge about perioperative management, chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment often has been considered a relative contraindication for DBS. Here, we evaluate whether or not there is an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage or thromboembolic complications in patients on chronic treatment (paused for surgery or bridged with subcutaneous heparin) as compared to those without.

METHODS

Out of a series of 465 patients undergoing functional stereotactic neurosurgery, 34 patients were identified who were on chronic treatment before and after receiving DBS. In patients with antiplatelet treatment, medication was stopped in the perioperative period. In patients with vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), heparin was used for bridging. All patients had postoperative stereotactic CT scans, and were followed up for 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

In patients on chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment, intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2/34 (5.9%) DBS surgeries, whereas the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 15/431 (3.5%) in those without, which was statistically not significant. Implantable pulse generator pocket hematomas were seen in 2/34 (5.9%) surgeries in patients on chronic treatment and in 4/426 (0.9%) without. There were only 2 instances of thromboembolic complications which both occurred in patients without chronic treatment. There were no hemorrhagic complications during follow-up for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

DBS surgery in patients on chronic antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment is feasible. Also, there was no increased risk of hemorrhage in the first year of follow-up after DBS surgery. Appropriate patient selection and standardized perioperative management are necessary to reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage and thromboembolic complications.

New Target-Specific Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Bleeding: Management and Outcome in a Single-Center Case Series

INTRODUCTION

New target-specific anticoagulants such as the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban are used in an increasing number of patients. Several studies comparing these new oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists revealed a lower risk of severe bleeding complications and reduced thromboembolic events. However, the lack of antidotes is a challenging issue in the treatment of traumatic or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with intracranial bleeding under new oral anticoagulants was performed; these patients were admitted to our department between January 2011 and November 2014. Treatment, reversal management of blood coagulopathy, and outcome of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included. The median age was 80.4 years. Seven patients were treated with dabigatran and 10 with rivaroxaban. Eight patients had traumatic intracranial bleeding and 9 patients had spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. Complex perioperative hematologic treatment followed. In 9 cases, the clinical outcome was devastating with severe neurologic deficits (n = 2), comatose status (n = 4), or death (n = 3). Patients with the indication for acute surgical treatment had a high risk for a critical clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a few case reports have analyzed the clinical course and the outcome after intracranial bleeding under new target-specific oral anticoagulants. Here, one of the first larger series is presented. Because of the lack of reversibility of the anticoagulative effects and the overall risks with geriatric patients, surgical treatment should be delayed as long as possible and comorbidities have to be considered.

The emergent reversal of coagulopathies encountered in neurosurgery and neurology: a technical note

It is imperative for neurologists, neurosurgeons, and neurointensivists to know how to stop life-threatening hemorrhage in both surgical and non-surgical patients. However, knowing how to medically correct a coagulopathy has become increasingly challenging as more contemporary and sophisticated anticoagulation agents are developed and prescribed. In a time-sensitive and life-threatening situation, where there is little margin for error, the neurosurgeon may not have ready access to information about the drug or condition that caused the coagulopathy or the information on how to treat it. This thorough review of the literature provides a comprehensive overview of the medications and conditions that can lead to persistent and/or life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage.

Race against the clock: overcoming challenges in the management of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage

Patients receiving anticoagulation therapy who present with any type of intracranial hemorrhage--including subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)--require urgent correction of their coagulopathy to prevent hemorrhage expansion, limit tissue damage, and facilitate surgical intervention as necessary. The focus of this review is acute ICH, but the principles of management for anticoagulation-associated ICH (AAICH) apply to patients with all types of intracranial hemorrhage, whether acute or chronic. A number of therapies--including fresh frozen plasma (FFP), intravenous vitamin K, activated and inactivated prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)--have been used alone or in combination to treat AAICH to reverse anticoagulation, help achieve hemodynamic stability, limit hematoma expansion, and prepare the patient for possible surgical intervention. However, there is a paucity of high-quality data to direct such therapy. The use of 3-factor PCC (activated and inactivated) and rFVIIa to treat AAICH constitutes off-label use of these therapies in the United States. However, in April 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Kcentra (a 4-factor PCC) for the urgent reversal of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) anticoagulation in adults with acute major bleeding. Plasma is the only other product approved for this use in the United States. (1) Inconsistent recommendations, significant barriers (e.g., clinician-, therapy-, or logistics-based barriers), and a lack of approved treatment pathways in some institutions can be potential impediments to timely and evidence-based management of AAICH with available therapies. Patient assessment, therapy selection, whether to use a reversal or factor repletion agent alone or in combination with other agents, determination of site-of-care management, eligibility for neurosurgery, and potential hematoma evacuation are the responsibilities of the neurosurgeon, but ultimate success requires a multidisciplinary approach with consultation from the emergency department (ED) physician, pharmacist, hematologist, intensivist, neurologist, and, in some cases, the trauma surgeon.