Is cervical decompression beneficial in patients with coexistent cervical stenosis and multiple sclerosis?

Patients with multiple sclerosis have higher rates of worsening following total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

The progressive nature of multiple sclerosis (MS) may adversely affect outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). As patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in this specific group are not well defined, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and the rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference for improvement (MCID-I) and worsening (MCID-W) between patients with MS and those without MS undergoing THA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 375 THAs, including 75 MS patients and 300 propensity-matched non-MS patients (4:1), performed between 2016 and 2022. Collected PROMs included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Mental and Physical, PROMIS Physical Function short form 10-a (PF-10a), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS). Preoperative and postoperative PROMs and MCID-I/MCID-W rates were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 375 THAs, including 75 MS and 300 matched non-MS patients, were analysed. MS patients had higher 90-day postoperative complication rates (9.3% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.012) and infection rates (4.0% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.006). The rates of achieving MCID-I and MCID-W were similar for PROMIS Global Mental, PROMIS Global Physical, and HOOS-PS, but MS patients had a higher rate of experiencing MCID-W for PROMIS PF-10a compared to non-MS patients (16.7% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.022). Additionally, MS patients had a longer mean hospital stay (2.4 vs. 1.9 days, p = 0.005) and lower rates of being discharged home (82.7% vs. 94.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study found that MS patients experience similar rates of MCID-I and MCID-W in most PROMs but have a higher rate of MCID-W for PROMIS PF-10a and increased postoperative complications. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of postoperative risks despite potential improvements. Further research is needed to explore the impact of MS progression on PROMs and perioperative outcomes.

Evaluating the impact of multiple sclerosis on 2 year postoperative outcomes following long fusion for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

The impact of neuromuscular disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS) on outcomes following long segment fusion is underreported. This study evaluates the impact of MS on two-year (2Y) postoperative complications and revisions following ≥ 4-level fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

Patients undergoing ≥ 4-level fusion for ASD were identified from a statewide database. Patients with a baseline diagnosis of MS were also identified. Patients with infectious/traumatic/neoplastic indications were excluded. Subjects were 1:1 propensity score-matched (MS to no-MS) based on age, sex and race and compared for rates of 2Y postoperative complications and reoperations. Logistic regression models were utilized to determine risk factors for adverse outcomes at 2Y.

RESULTS

86 patients were included overall (n = 43 per group). Age, sex, and race were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). MS patients incurred higher charges for their surgical visit ($125,906 vs. $84,006, p = 0.007) with similar LOS (8.1 vs. 5.3 days, p > 0.05). MS patients experienced comparable rates of overall medical complications (30.1% vs. 25.6%) and surgical complications (34.9% vs. 30.2%); p > 0.05. MS patients had similar rates of 2Y revisions (16.3% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.333). MS was not associated with medical, surgical, or overall complications or revisions at minimum 2Y follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MS experienced similar postoperative course compared to those without MS following ≥ 4-level fusion for ASD. This data supports the findings of multiple previously published case series' that long segment fusions for ASD can be performed relatively safely in patients with MS.

Complications, readmissions, reoperations and patient-reported outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis undergoing elective spine surgery - a propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, neurodegenerative disease that can lead to significant functional disability. Improving treatment regimens have extended life expectancy and led to an increase in the number of elective spine surgeries for degenerative conditions in the MS population. Recent literature has reported mixed results regarding the efficacy of elective spine surgery for patients with MS. There is also a paucity of literature comparing postoperative patient reported outcomes (PROs) and reoperation rates between patients with and without MS.

PURPOSE

To determine if patients with MS have worse PROs and higher complication, readmission and reoperation rates after elective spine surgery compared with patients without neurodegenerative conditions when adjusting for baseline covariates through propensity matching.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), a national, longitudinal, multicenter spine outcomes registry.

PATIENT SAMPLE

For the lumbar cohort, 312 patients with MS and 46,738 patients without MS were included. The cervical myelopathy cohort included 91 patients with MS and 6,426 patients without MS. The cervical radiculopathy cohort consisted of 103 patients with MS and 13,751 patients without MS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

1) complication rates, 2) readmission rates, 3) reoperation rates, and 4) PROs at 3- and 12-months including ODI/NDI, NRS back/neck/arm/leg pain, mJOA scores and patient satisfaction ratings.

METHODS

Data from the QOD was queried for patients with surgeries occurring between 04/2013-01/2019. Three surgical groups were included: 1) Elective lumbar surgery, 2) Elective cervical surgery for myelopathy, 3) Elective cervical surgery for radiculopathy. Patients with any neurodegenerative condition other than MS were excluded. Patients without MS were propensity matched against patients with MS in a 5 to 1 ratio without replacement based on ASA grade, arthrodesis, surgical approach, number of operated levels, age, and baseline ODI/NDI, NRS leg/arm pain, NRS back/neck pain, and EQ-5D. Multivariable regressions with cluster-robust standard errors were used to estimate average effect of how the outcome would change if the MS patient didn't have the disease. The mean difference was used for continuous outcomes and the risk difference was used for binary outcomes.

RESULTS

For the lumbar cohort, no differences were found between the 2 groups at 3 or 12 months in any of the outcome measures. For the myelopathy cohort, patients with MS patients had a lower rate of reoperation at 12 months (risk difference=-0.036, p=.007) and worse 3-month mJOA scores (mean difference=-1.044, p=.004) compared with patients without MS. For the radiculopathy cohort, patients with MS had a lower rate of reoperation at 3 months (risk difference=-0.019, p=.018) and 12 months (risk difference=-0.029, p=.007) compared with those without MS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MS had similar PROs compared with patients without MS when adjusting for baseline covariates through propensity matching, except for 3-month mJOA scores in the myelopathy cohort. Reoperation rates were found to be lower in patients with MS undergoing elective cervical surgery for both myelopathy and radiculopathy. These results suggest that when analyzed independently, a diagnosis of MS does not significantly impact complication, readmission and reoperation rates or PROs, and therefore should not represent a major contraindication to elective spine surgery. Surgical decisions in this patient population should be made based on careful consideration of patient factors including other comorbidities as well as baseline patient functional status.

Is surgery beneficial for patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis and degenerative cervical myelopathy? A review of literature

Introduction

Due to an overlap in symptoms, there is significant delay in surgical treatment of patients that have concomitant multiple sclerosis (MS) and degenerative cervical Myelopathy (DCM). The purpose of this review is to evaluate if surgical intervention is beneficial to patients that have concurrent presentations.

Research question

Is surgery beneficial in concurrent MS and DCM?

Materials and methods

A literature search with no date restrictions was conducted on Pubmed and Medline databases. Keywords searched: Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Multiple sclerosis, Treatment, Surgery, Quality of Life. Randomised controlled trials, prospective, retrospective, and case series reporting timing of surgery, post-operative outcomes such as improvement in myelopathic symptoms, quality of life, and any serious complications were included.

Results

The literature search yielded a total of 8 studies across all databases. Seven articles were selected for full text review, and all of them were sectioned for inclusion in this review. Seven studies evaluated 160 participants with concurrent multiple sclerosis and degenerative cervical myelopathy. Earlier studies had discouraged performing surgery in this subset of patients, the majority of studies found it worthwhile to perform early surgery for patients with concomitant multiple sclerosis and degenerative cord compression, if the patients had radiculopathy. Quality of life for MS patients did not improve as much as it did for patients that did not have MS.

Discussion and conclusion

Patients with radiculopathy, neck pain and cord compression are most likely to benefit from early surgery. There is no need for delaying to offer surgery unless other medical/anaesthetic contraindications exist.

Compressive Cervical Myelopathy in Patients With Demyelinating Disease of the Central Nervous System: Improvement After Surgery Despite a Late Diagnosis

Objective We aimed to assess the impact of surgical intervention on outcome in patients diagnosed with demyelinating disorders and cervical degenerative disease warranting surgical intervention. Methods The records of patients with a diagnosis of a demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system who underwent cervical spine surgery at a single institution from 2016 to 2020 were reviewed. Demyelinating disease included multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica, and transverse myelitis (TM). The dates of initial spine symptom onset, recognition of spinal pathology by the primary provider, referral to spine surgery, and spine surgery procedures were collected. Hospital length of stay (LOS) and postoperative outcomes and complications were recorded. Results A total of 19 patients with a diagnosis of demyelinating disorders underwent cervical spine surgery at our institution. Seventeen patients had MS. The average time interval between a documented diagnosis of myelopathy or radiculopathy and referral to the Spine clinic was 67.95 months (M=40, SD=64.87). Twelve patients had imaging studies depicting degenerative spine disease that would warrant surgical intervention at the time of examination by their primary physician. The average delay for referral to the Spine clinic for these patients was 16.5 months (M=5; SD=25.36). More than 89% of patients experienced significant neurologic improvement postoperatively. Conclusions There is a delay in the recognition of cervical spine disease amenable to a surgical resolution in patients with demyelinating disorders. Surgical treatment can lead to significant clinical improvement in this patient population even if delayed, and likely carries similar risk to that of the general population.

Impact of cervical stenosis on multiple sclerosis lesion distribution in the spinal cord

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether demyelinating lesions attributable to multiple sclerosis (MS) occur more commonly in regions of pre-existing cervical stenosis (CS).

DESIGN/METHODS

One hundred comorbid MS/CS patients and 100 MS-only controls were identified via ICD codes and radiology reports from a retrospective chart review of the records of the University of Pennsylvania Hospital System (UPHS) from January 1^st, 2009 to December 31^st, 2018. For each patient, axial and sagittal T2 sequences of cervical MRI scans were examined. The cervical cord was split into 7 equal segments comprising the disc space and half of each adjacent vertebral body. Each segment was assessed for the presence of MS lesions and grade 2 CS or higher by previously published criteria. Lesions which were concerning for spondylotic-related signal change based on imaging characteristics were excluded (n=6, 3.2%). Clinical data was extracted from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Average age at the time of MRI was 57.0 +/- 10.5 years and average time with MS diagnosis was 15.3 +/- 9.2 years. The majority of patients had a diagnosis of relapse-remitting MS (81.0%) and the F:M ratio was 3.5. Eighty-five percent of patients were on treatment at the time of MRI, most often glatiramer acetate (35.0%). Spinal segments with at least grade 2 stenosis were significantly associated with the presence of an MS lesion in the same segment (χ² = 19.0, p < 0.001, OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.8-3.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest there is a significant association between segments of spinal cord with at least moderate CS and segments with MS lesions. Further analysis is required to assess if cervical stenosis is a causative or aggravating factor in multiple sclerosis.

Is Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Effective in Patients Suffering from Concomitant Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson's Disease?

A subset of patients with a demyelinating disease suffer from concurrent cervical spondylotic myelopathy, both of which evince similar symptomatology. Differentiating the cause of these symptoms is challenging, and little research has been done on patients with coexisting diseases. This review explores the current literature on the appropriate surgical management of patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis (MS) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), and those with both Parkinson’s disease (PD) and CSM. MS and CSM patients may benefit from surgery to reduce pain and radiculopathy. Surgical management in PD and CSM patients has shown minimal quality-of-life improvement. Future studies are needed to better characterize demyelinating disease patients with concurrent disease and to determine ideal medical or surgical treatment.