Awake right hemisphere brain surgery

Functional and oncological outcomes after right hemisphere glioma resection in awake versus asleep patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The right hemisphere has been underestimated by being considered as the non-dominant hemisphere. However, it is involved in many functions, including movement, language, cognition, and emotion. Therefore, because lesions on this side are usually not resected under awake mapping, there is a risk of unfavorable neurological outcomes. The goal of this study is to compare the functional and oncological outcomes of awake surgery (AwS) versus surgery under general anesthesia (GA) in supratentorial right-sided gliomas. A systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines was performed up to March 2023. Four databases were screened. Primary outcome to assess was return to work (RTW). Secondary outcomes included the rate of postoperative neurological deficit, postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score and the extent of resection (EOR). A total of 32 articles were included with 543 patients who underwent right hemisphere tumor resection under awake surgery and 294 under general anesthesia. There were no significant differences between groups regarding age, gender, handedness, perioperative KPS, tumor location or preoperative seizures. Preoperative and long-term postoperative neurological deficits were statistically lower after AwS (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively), even though no difference was found regarding early postoperative course (p = 0.32). A subsequent analysis regarding type of postoperative impairment was performed. Severe postoperative language deficits were not different (p = 0.74), but there were fewer long-term mild motor and high-order cognitive deficits (p < 0.05) in AwS group. A higher rate of RTW (p < 0.05) was documented after AwS. The EOR was similar in both groups. Glioma resection of the right hemisphere under awake mapping is a safer procedure with a better preservation of high-order cognitive functions and a higher rate of RTW than resection under general anesthesia, despite similar EOR.

Comparative outcomes of awake spine surgery under spinal versus general anesthesia: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Awake surgery, under spinal anesthesia (SA), is an alternative to surgery under general anesthesia (GA), in neurological and spine surgery. In the literature, there seem to be some evidence supporting benefits associated with the use of this anesthetic modality, as compared to GA. Currently, there is a notable lack of updated and comprehensive review addressing the complications associated with both awake SA and GA in spine surgery. We hence aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the topic.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that assessed SA in spine surgery from database inception to April 14, 2023, in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Outcomes of interest included estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, operative time, and overall complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models.

RESULTS

In total, 38 studies that assessed 7820 patients were included. The majority of the operations that were treated with SA were single-level lumbar cases. Awake patients had significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay (Mean difference (MD): - 0.40 days; 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.17) and operative time (MD: - 19.17 min; 95% CI - 29.68 to - 8.65) compared to patients under GA. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in patients under GA than SA (RR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.47-0.74]). Patients under GA had significantly higher rates of postoperative nausea/vomiting RR, 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.90]) and urinary retention (RR, 0.61 [95% CI 0.37-0.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing awake spine surgery under SA had significantly shorter operations and hospital stays, and fewer rates of postoperative nausea and urinary retention as compared to GA. In summary, awake spine surgery offers a valid alternative to GA and added benefits in terms of postsurgical complications, while being associated with relatively low morbidity.

Early Postoperative Seizures Following Awake Craniotomy and Functional Brain Mapping for Lesionectomy

OBJECTIVE

Awake craniotomy with electrocorticography (ECoG) and direct electrical stimulation (DES) facilitates lesionectomy while avoiding adverse effects. Early postoperative seizures (EPS), occurring within 7 days following surgery, can lead to morbidity. However, risk factors for EPS after awake craniotomy including clinical and ECoG data are not well defined.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the incidence and risk factors of EPS following awake craniotomy for lesionectomy, and report short-term outcomes between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022.

RESULTS

We included 138 patients (56 female) who underwent 142 awake craniotomies, average age was 50.78 ± 15.97 years. Eighty-eight (63.7%) patients had a preoperative history of tumor-related epilepsy treated with antiseizure medication (ASM), 12 (13.6%) with drug-resistance. All others (36.3%) received ASM prophylaxis with levetiracetam perioperatively and continued for 14 days. An equal number of cases (71) each utilized a novel circle grid or strip electrodes for ECoG. There were 31 (21.8%) cases of intraoperative seizures, 16 with EPS (11.3%). Acute abnormality on early postoperative neuroimaging (P = 0.01), subarachnoid hemorrhage (P = 0.01), young age (P = 0.01), and persistent postoperative neurologic deficits (P = 0.013) were associated with EPS. Acute abnormality on neuroimaging remained significant in multivariate analysis. Outcomes during hospitalization and early outpatient follow up were worse with EPS.

CONCLUSIONS

We report novel findings using ECoG and clinical features to predict EPS, including acute perioperative brain injury, persistent postoperative deficits and young age. Given worse outcomes with EPS, clinical indicators for EPS should alert clinicians of potential need for early postoperative EEG monitoring and perioperative ASM adjustment.

Indication and eligibility of glioma patients for awake surgery: A scoping review by a multidisciplinary perspective

Background

Awake surgery (AS) permits intraoperative mapping of cognitive and motor functions, allowing neurosurgeons to tailor the resection according to patient functional boundaries thus preserving long-term patient integrity and maximizing extent of resection. Given the increased risks of the awake scenario, the growing importance of AS in surgical practice favored the debate about patient selection concerning both indication and eligibility criteria. Nonetheless, a systematic investigation is lacking in the literature.

Objective

To provide a scoping review of the literature concerning indication and eligibility criteria for AS in patients with gliomas to answer the questions:1) "What are the functions mostly tested during AS protocols?" and 2) "When and why should a patient be excluded from AS?".

Materials and methods

Pertinent studies were retrieved from PubMed, PsycArticles and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published until April 2021 according to the PRISMA Statement Extension for Scoping Reviews. The retrieved abstracts were checked for the following features being clearly stated: 1) the population described as being composed of glioma(LGG or HGG) patients; 2) the paper had to declare which cognitive or sensorimotor function was tested, or 2bis)the decisional process of inclusion/exclusion for AS had to be described from at least one of the following perspectives: neurosurgical, neurophysiological, anesthesiologic and psychological/neuropsychological.

Results

One hundred and seventy-eight studies stated the functions being tested on 8004 patients. Language is the main indication for AS, even if tasks and stimulation techniques changed over the years. It is followed by monitoring of sensorimotor and visuospatial pathways. This review demonstrated an increasing interest in addressing other superior cognitive functions, such as executive functions and emotions. Forty-five studies on 2645 glioma patients stated the inclusion/exclusion criteria for AS eligibility. Inability to cooperate due to psychological disorder(i.e. anxiety),severe language deficits and other medical conditions(i.e.cardiovascular diseases, obesity, etc.)are widely reported as exclusion criteria for AS. However, a very few papers gave scale exact cut-off. Likewise, age and tumor histology are not standardized parameters for patient selection.

Conclusion

Given the broad spectrum of functions that might be safely and effectively monitored via AS, neurosurgeons and their teams should tailor intraoperative testing on patient needs and background as well as on tumor location and features. Whenever the aforementioned exclusion criteria are not fulfilled, AS should be strongly considered for glioma patients.

[Crossed aphasia in neurosurgical practice: case report and literature review]

BACKGROUND

Crossed aphasia in dexstral (CAD) is an extremely rare disorder. To date, about 200 cases have been described in the literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors report 4 cases of CAD. Luria's neuropsychological examination was carried out. Functional asymmetry in the arm was analyzed using the Annett questionnaire. MRI and intraoperative findings confirmed localization of lesion in the right hemisphere in all patients.

RESULTS

A 59-year-old right-handed man developed frontotemporal aphasia after previous resection of right-sided glioblastoma of fronto-insular-temporal region. In a 31-year-old right-handed man, crossed aphasia occurred after extensive hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformation into the right frontotemporoparietal region. A 39-year-old right-handed man developed severe combined aphasia after resection of diffuse glioma of the right insular-temporal region. A 10-year-old right-handed boy developed aphasia with word forgetting after resection of a large tumor of the right temporal lobe. All patients had impaired dynamic praxis. Other cognitive functions were intact.

CONCLUSION

The authors discuss possible combinations of functions in one hemisphere for both right-handers and left-handers and emphasize diverse types of functional asymmetries described in the literature. Different localizations of functions in right-handers and left-handers indicate that local zones with different methods of information processing (successive or simultaneous) can coexist in one hemisphere. Therefore, the functions requiring different processing of information (for example, speech with praxis or spatial functions) can develop in one hemisphere. Cognitive impairment depends not only on the type of functional asymmetry, but also on localization of lesion. Crossed aphasia in right-handers indicates the rarest normal type of functional brain asymmetry with localization of speech functions in the right hemisphere. Possible aphasia in right-handers following damage to homologues of speech zones in the right hemisphere can require additional examination of these patients.

The Use of Standardized Intraoperative Language Tests in Awake Craniotomies: A Scoping Review

Assessment of speech and language functions is an essential part of awake craniotomies. Although standardized and validated tests have several advantages compared to homemade (or mixed) batteries, in the literature it is unclear how such tests are used or whether they are used at all. In this study, we performed a scoping review in order to locate standardized and validated intraoperative language tests. Our inquiry included two databases (PubMED and MEDLINE), gray literature, and snowball referencing. We discovered 87 studies reporting use of mixed batteries, which consist of homemade tasks and tests borrowed from other settings. The tests we found to meet the validation and standardization criteria we set were ultimately three (n = 3) and each one has its own advantages and disadvantages. We argue that tests with high sensitivity and specificity not only can lead to better outcomes postoperatively, but they can also help us to gain a better understanding of the neuroanatomy of language.

Comparing Glioblastoma Surgery Decisions Between Teams Using Brain Maps of Tumor Locations, Biopsies, and Resections

Purpose

The aim of glioblastoma surgery is to maximize the extent of resection while preserving functional integrity, which depends on the location within the brain. A standard to compare these decisions is lacking. We present a volumetric voxel-wise method for direct comparison between two multidisciplinary teams of glioblastoma surgery decisions throughout the brain.

Methods

Adults undergoing first-time glioblastoma surgery from 2012 to 2013 performed by two neuro-oncologic teams were included. Patients had had a diagnostic biopsy or resection. Preoperative tumors and postoperative residues were segmented on magnetic resonance imaging in three dimensions and registered to standard brain space. Voxel-wise probability maps of tumor location, biopsy, and resection were constructed for each team to compare patient referral bias, indication variation, and treatment variation. To evaluate the quality of care, subgroups of differentially resected brain regions were analyzed for survival and functional outcome.

Results

One team included 101 patients, and the other included 174; 91 tumors were biopsied, and 181 were resected. Patient characteristics were largely comparable between teams. Distributions of tumor locations were dissimilar, suggesting referral bias. Distributions of biopsies were similar, suggesting absence of indication variation. Differentially resected regions were identified in the anterior limb of the right internal capsule and the right caudate nucleus, indicating treatment variation. Patients with (n = 12) and without (n = 6) surgical removal in these regions had similar overall survival and similar permanent neurologic deficits.

Conclusion

Probability maps of tumor location, biopsy, and resection provide additional information that can inform surgical decision making across multidisciplinary teams for patients with glioblastoma.