Threshold and distribution of afterdischarges with electrical cortical stimulation

Disparate properties of afterdischarges elicited by electric cortical stimulation in MRI lesional epilepsy patients with different surgical outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the prognostic value of afterdischarges(ADs) on surgical outcome by comparing the disparate properties in epilepsy patients with different surgical outcomes METHODS: 27 lesional epilepsy patients were retrospectively analyzed. The brain region covered by subdural electrodes in each patient was dichotomized into the area of the brain lobe(s) where the MRI lesion is located (region ML) and other brain areas (region nML). The occurrence of ADs and ADs evolving into clinical seizure, ADs threshold and ADs duration in region ML and nML were compared between seizure-free (SF) and non-seizure-free (nSF) patients.

RESULTS

A total of 2535 contacts were analyzed, and the total occurrence of ADs was 18.6% (471/2535). The overall occurrence of ADs in region ML (24.8%) was significantly higher than that in region nML (10.3%) (P < 0.001). In region ML, compared with SF patients, nSF patients had a lower occurrence of ADs (19.2% vs. 31.2%, P < 0.001), a higher occurrence of ADs evolves into clinical seizure (8.7% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.006), a higher ADs threshold (12.8 ± 4.1 mA vs. 11.0 ± 3.7 mA, P < 0.001) and a shorter ADs duration (15.3 ± 14.2 s vs. 20.6 ± 17.0 s, P < 0.001). However, in region nML, there was no significant difference in properties of ADs between SF and nSF patients.

CONCLUSION

Higher occurrence of ADs in region ML might predict a good outcome, whereas higher occurrence of ADs evolving into clinical seizure, higher ADs threshold and shorter ADs duration might predict an unfavorable surgical outcome. ADs might help predict surgical outcomes in epilepsy patients.

Cortico-cortical evoked potential by single-pulse electrical stimulation is a generally safe procedure

OBJECTIVE

Cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) by single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is useful to investigate effective connectivity and cortical excitability. We aimed to clarify the safety of CCEPs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 29 consecutive patients with intractable partial epilepsy undergoing chronic subdural grid implantation and CCEP recording. Repetitive SPES (1 Hz) was systematically applied to a pair of adjacent electrodes over almost all electrodes. We evaluated the incidences of afterdischarges (ADs) and clinical seizures.

RESULTS

Out of 1283 electrode pairs, ADs and clinical seizures were observed in 12 and 5 pairs (0.94% and 0.39%, per electrode pair) in 7 and 3 patients (23.3% and 10.0%, per patient), respectively. Of the 18-82 pairs per patient, ADs and clinical seizures were induced in 0-4 and 0-3 pairs, respectively. Stimulating 4 SOZ (seizure onset zone) (2.5%) and 8 non-SOZ pairs (0.75%) resulted in ADs. We observed clinical seizures in stimulating 4 SOZ (2.5%) and 1 non-SOZ pair (0.09%). The incidence of clinical seizures varied significantly between SOZ and non-SOZ stimulations (p = 0.001), while the difference in AD incidence tended towards significance (p = 0.058).

CONCLUSION

Although caution should be taken in stimulating SOZ, CCEP is a safe procedure for presurgical evaluation.

SIGNIFICANCE

CCEP is safe under the established protocol.

Electrical Stimulation Mapping of Brain Function: A Comparison of Subdural Electrodes and Stereo-EEG

Despite technological and interpretative advances, the non-invasive modalities used for pre-surgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), fail to generate a concordant anatomo-electroclinical hypothesis for the location of the seizure onset zone in many patients. This requires chronic monitoring with intracranial electroencephalography (EEG), which facilitates better localization of the seizure onset zone, and allows evaluation of the functional significance of cortical regions-of-interest by electrical stimulation mapping (ESM). There are two principal modalities for intracranial EEG, namely subdural electrodes and stereotactic depth electrodes (stereo-EEG). Although ESM is considered the gold standard for functional mapping with subdural electrodes, there have been concerns about its utility with stereo-EEG. This is mainly because subdural electrodes allow contiguous sampling of the dorsolateral convexity of cerebral hemispheres, and permit delineation of the extent of eloquent functional areas on the cortical surface. Stereo-EEG, while having relatively sparse sampling on the cortical surface, offers the ability to access the depth of sulci, mesial and basal surfaces of cerebral hemispheres, and deep structures such as the insula, which are largely inaccessible to subdural electrodes. As stereo-EEG is increasingly the preferred modality for intracranial monitoring, we find it opportune to summarize the literature for ESM with stereo-EEG in this narrative review. Emerging evidence shows that ESM for defining functional neuroanatomy is feasible with stereo-EEG, but probably requires a different approach for interpretation and clinical decision making compared to ESM with subdural electrodes. We have also compared ESM with stereo-EEG and subdural electrodes, for current thresholds required to evoke desired functional responses vs. unwanted after-discharges. In this regard, there is preliminary evidence that ESM with stereo-EEG may be safer than ESM with subdural grids. Finally, we have highlighted important unanswered clinical and scientific questions for ESM with stereo-EEG in the hope to encourage future research and collaborative efforts.