Single loop interrupted suture technique for cerebrovascular anastomosis: Technical note

Validation of Novel Microsurgical Vessel Anastomosis Techniques: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

 Thorough validation of novel microsurgical techniques is deemed essential before their integration into clinical practice. To achieve proper validation, the design of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be undertaken, accompanied by the execution of comprehensive statistical analyses, including confounder adjustment and power analysis. This systematic review aims to provide an encompassing overview of the validation methodologies employed in microsurgical studies, with a specific focus on innovative vessel anastomosis techniques.

METHODS

 A literature search was conducted in PubMed for articles describing the validation of novel microsurgical vessel anastomosis techniques in animal or human subjects.

RESULTS

 The literature search yielded 6,658 articles. A total of 6,564 articles were excluded based on title and abstract. Ninety-four articles were assessed for full-text eligibility. Forty-eight articles were included in this systematic review. Out of 30 comparative studies, 9 studies validated novel modified interrupted suture techniques, 6 studies modified continuous techniques, 6 studies modified sleeve anastomosis techniques, 1 study a modified vesselotomy technique, 7 studies sutureless techniques, and 1 study a modified lymphaticovenular anastomosis technique. Twenty-eight studies contained animals (n = 1,998). Fifteen animal studies were RCTs. Two studies contained human/cadaveric subjects (n = 29). Statistical power analysis and confounder adjustment were performed in one animal study. Out of 18 noncomparative studies, 5 studies validated novel modified interrupted suture techniques, 1 study a modified continuous technique, 2 studies modified sleeve anastomosis techniques, 4 studies modified vesselotomy techniques, 4 studies sutureless techniques, and 2 studies modified lymphaticovenular anastomosis techniques. Ten studies contained animal subjects (n = 320), with two RCTs. Eight studies contained human subjects (n = 173). Statistical power analysis and confounder adjustment were performed in none of the animal or human studies.

CONCLUSION

 The current methods of microsurgical technique validation should be reconsidered due to poor study design. Statistical analysis including confounder adjustment and power analysis should be performed as a standard method of novel technique validation.

Interrupted Versus Running Sutures for Superficial Temporal Artery to Middle Cerebral Artery Cranial Bypass

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass is the workhorse for flow augmentation surgery. Although either interrupted or running sutures can be used to complete the anastomosis with high intraoperative patency rates, no previous study in the cranial bypass literature has compared long-term patency and maturity of end-to-side STA-MCA anastomoses. We compared STA-MCA anastomoses performed with running vs interrupted sutures by evaluating bypass flow and anastomotic maturation on follow-up vascular imaging.

METHODS

Ninety-six STA-MCA anastomoses were performed from 1/2019 to 6/2024. Forty-seven anastomoses (40 patients) with long-term vascular imaging were retrospectively analyzed. All anastomoses were intraoperatively patent on initial revascularization. Patient demographics, clinical course, and imaging were reviewed. All images were reviewed by a neuroradiologist or a cerebrovascular neurosurgeon.

RESULTS

Twenty-five anastomoses were performed with interrupted sutures and compared with 22 anastomoses performed with running sutures. All patients underwent a preoperative perfusion assessment confirming a significant hypoperfusion state. There were no significant differences between cohorts in demographics, bypass indication, or time to follow-up. Formal digital subtraction angiography was performed for 35 anastomoses (21 interrupted, 14 running). On digital subtraction angiography follow-up, there was no difference in STA caliber between cohorts (P = .204), but there was a difference in anastomotic growth (P = .014), with 5/21 (23.8%) anastomoses stable or enlarged in the interrupted cohort vs 9/14 (64.3%) stable or enlarged in the running cohort. Notably, of the 47 total anastomoses, there was no difference in long-term bypass patency between interrupted and running anastomoses (22/25 (88.0%) vs 22/22 (100.0%), respectively, P = .380).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in patency or STA caliber on follow-up imaging were observed between STA-MCA anastomoses performed with interrupted vs running sutures although a difference in anastomotic maturity was observed, with the running suture cohort having a higher proportion of enlarged or stable anastomoses. Further studies are needed for validation.

Needle Parking Interrupted Suturing Technique for Microvascular Anastomosis: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Interrupted and continuous suturing are 2 common techniques for microvascular anastomosis in cerebrovascular surgery. One of the technical complexities of interrupted suturing includes the risk of losing the needle in between interrupted sutures during knot tying, which may result in unnecessary movements and wasted time.

OBJECTIVE

To report a new needle parking technique for microvascular anastomosis that addresses a needle control problem during interrupted suturing.

METHODS

The needle parking technique involves puncturing both vessel walls at the site of the next provisional suture and leaving the needle parked in place while the knots at the first suture are being made. The thread is then cut, the needle is pulled through, and the process is repeated. Illustrative cases in which the needle parking technique was used are presented. We also compared time of anastomosis completion between the conventional interrupted, needle parking interrupted, and continuous suturing techniques during an in vitro study on standardized artificial vessels.

RESULTS

This technique is being used successfully by the senior author for various cerebrovascular bypass surgeries. The in vitro study demonstrated that the needle parking technique can be significantly faster than the conventional interrupted suturing technique and may be as fast as continuous suturing.

CONCLUSION

Needle parking technique is a modification of conventional interrupted suturing and solves the problem of losing the needle during knot tying. This technique is simple, prevents unnecessary movements, and may result in a faster anastomosis time.