Negative-FLAIR vascular hyperintensities serve as a marker of no recanalization during hospitalization in acute stroke

FLAIR vascular hyperintensity combined with asymmetrical prominent veins in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke: prediction of collateral circulation and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

To investigate the value of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH) within asymmetrical prominent veins sign (APVS) on susceptibility-weighted imaging predicting collateral circulation and prognosis in patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke.

METHOD

Patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of ICA or MCA M1, who underwent MRI within 72 h from stroke onset were reviewed. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score was used to evaluate the volume of infarction on DWI, the degree of FVH and APVS. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between FVH and APVS. All patients were divided into the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group according to the score of the modified ranking scale (mRS) 90 days after the stroke. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between FVH and APVS and functional prognosis, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to assess the value of FVH and APVS in predicting prognosis.

RESULTS

Spearman correlation analysis revealed moderate positive correlations between FVH and APVS (r = 0.586, P < 0.001). The poor prognosis group had a higher rate of a history of atrial fibrillation, a larger cerebral infarction volume, a higher NIHSS score at admission, and a higher FVH and APVS score compared with the good prognosis group (all P < 0.05). A further logistic regression indicated that the NIHSS score, cerebral infarction volume, FVH and APVS were independent risk factors for a poor functional prognosis. In terms of FVH, APVS, alone and their combination for the diagnosis of poor prognosis, the sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 86.8%, 83.3%, 0.899 (95% CI 0.830-0.968); 60.5%, 93.7%, 0.818 (95% CI 0.723-0.912); 86.8%, 89.6%, 0.921 (95% CI 0.860-0.981), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The presence of FVH and APVS can provide a comprehensive assessment of collateral circulation from the perspective of veins and arteries, and the correlation between the two is positively correlated. Both of them were independent risk factors for poor prognosis, their combination is complementary and can improve the predictive value.

Prognostic value of post-treatment fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity in ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy

OBJECTIVES

To explore the value of post-treatment fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH) in predicting clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed data from consecutive patients with large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation between July 2017 and February 2021. Together with other variables, status of post-treatment FVH was assessed for each patient. Good outcome was defined as a 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, independent-samples t test, multivariate logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

Among 84 included patients, 48 (57.1%) patients showed post-treatment FVH. Post-treatment FVH significantly correlated with incomplete recanalization (p < 0.05) and low Alberta Stroke Project Early CT Changes Score on post-treatment diffusion-weighted imaging (p < 0.05). Higher incidence of hemorrhage transformation was observed in patients with post-treatment FVH than those without (27.1% vs. 16.7%); however, the difference did not reach significance (p = 0.259). Successful recanalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.024; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.003-0.194; p < 0.05), lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at admission (NIHSS_pre) (OR, 1.196; 95% CI, 1.017-1.406; p < 0.05), and no post-treatment FVH (OR, 74.690; 95% CI, 4.624-1206.421; p < 0.05) were found to be independent predictors of good outcomes. Combined models integrating all three independent predictors (recanalization+NIHSS_pre+post-treatment FVH) significantly outperformed the combined model without post-treatment FVH (recanalization+NIHSS_pre) in predicting clinical outcome (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-treatment FVH may be an effective prognostic marker associated with clinical outcome in patients with AIS after EVT.

KEY POINTS

• Post-treatment FVH correlates with incomplete recanalization and higher infarct volume. • Post-treatment FVH is independently associated with an unfavorable outcome. • Post-treatment FVH may provide prognostic information in patients with AIS after EVT.

Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Vascular Hyperintensity in Cerebrovascular Disease: A Review for Radiologists and Clinicians

Neuroradiological methods play important roles in neurology, especially in cerebrovascular diseases. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) is frequently encountered in patients with acute ischemic stroke and significant intracranial arterial stenosis or occlusion. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and the clinical implications of FVH have been a matter of debate. FVH is associated with large-vessel occlusion or severe stenosis, as well as impaired hemodynamics. Possible explanations suggested for its appearance include stationary blood and slow antegrade or retrograde filling of the leptomeningeal collateral circulation. However, the prognostic value of the presence of FVH has been controversial. FVH can also be observed in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA), which may have different pathomechanisms. Its presence can help clinicians to identify patients who have a higher risk of stroke after TIA. In this review article, we aim to describe the mechanism and influencing factors of FVH, as well as its clinical significance in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

The impact of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity on clinical severity and outcome : A retrospective study in stroke patients with proximal middle cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH) has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of FVH on the clinical severity and long-term prognosis of patients with proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion or severe stenosis.

METHOD

Because their clinical and imaging data is not accessible, we excluded the patients being treated with IV thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Clinical and imaging characteristics were documented in 282 consecutive AIS patients with proximal MCA occlusion or severe stenosis. We assessed clinical severity using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and clinical outcomes using mRS scores. The average time interval between symptom onset and imaging was 16-18 h. The FVH score according to FVH-ASPECTS ranged from 0 to 7, based on the numbers of territories where FVH is positive.

RESULTS

FVH was observed in 235 (83.33%) of the AIS patients. The FVH(+) group tended to have more alcoholics (65 [27.66%] vs 6 [12.77%], P = 0.032), a higher NIHSS score on the 7th day (3 [1-6] vs 2 [1-3], P = 0.039), more instances of early neurological deterioration (END) (27 [11.4%] vs 1 [2.12%], P = 0.05), and more patients with MCA occlusion (94 [40.00%] vs 3 [6.38%]). Among the patients with positive FVH, a high FVH score represented severe clinical impairment (higher NIHSS score on admission [P = 0.009] and 7th day since admission [P = 0.02]) and poor clinical outcomes. Spearman's rank correlations showed that FVH scores were positively correlated with NIHSS scores on admission and NIHSS scores on the 7th day (P = 0.039; P = 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients with proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion or stenosis ≥ 70%, a high FVH score represented severe clinical impairment and poor clinical outcomes. In acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with proximal MCA occlusion, a high FVH score represented favorable clinical outcomes.