1
|
Wang S, Li J, Yan Z, Jiang Q, Li K. Intravitreal conbercept for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy with occult CNV: a retrospective clinical study based on multimodal ophthalmic imaging. Front Med (Lausanne) 2025; 12:1550543. [PMID: 40201323 PMCID: PMC11975556 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1550543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of intravitreal conbercept in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) complicated by occult choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and to explore its potential in improving visual function and various ophthalmic parameters. Methods This retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study included 50 patients diagnosed with cCSC and occult CNV. Patients underwent intravitreal conbercept injections and were monitored over a six-month period. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF) status, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). OCTA parameters such as foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and CNV lesion characteristics were analyzed pre- and post-treatment. Patients were categorized based on changes in CNV lesion size to identify prognostic factors influencing treatment response. Results Significant improvements were observed in mean BCVA from baseline (0.78 ± 0.50 vs. 0.32 ± 0.31, p < 0.01) in all 50 eyes of the patients, except for one eye. Additionally, there were significant improvements in CMT, SRF status, SFCT, FAZ area, and CNV lesion size post-treatment (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis indicated a positive correlation between baseline BCVA and CMT (r = 0.3615, p = 0.0116). Changes in BCVA post-treatment correlated with alterations in CMT, SRF diameter, and CNV lesion size. Patients with a favorable treatment response had significantly lower baseline CMT (312.17 ± 57.39 vs. 428.86 ± 114.54, p < 0.05) and CNV vessel diameter (17.46 ± 2.72 vs. 24.84 ± 4.02, p < 0.01) compared to those with unfavorable responses. Conclusion Intravitreal conbercept injection was found to be safe and effective in improving BCVA and various ophthalmic parameters in patients with cCSC complicated by occult CNV, with no significant adverse effects observed during the study period. Baseline CMT, SRF diameter, CNV lesion size, and mean CNV vessel diameter were identified as valuable indicators for assessing treatment response and prognosis. These findings provide important insights for the clinical management and prognostic evaluation of cCSC patients with occult CNV, highlighting the utility of multimodal imaging in assessing treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Qin Jiang
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Keran Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feenstra HMA, van Dijk EHC, Cheung CMG, Ohno-Matsui K, Lai TYY, Koizumi H, Larsen M, Querques G, Downes SM, Yzer S, Breazzano MP, Subhi Y, Tadayoni R, Priglinger SG, Pauleikhoff LJB, Lange CAK, Loewenstein A, Diederen RMH, Schlingemann RO, Hoyng CB, Chhablani JK, Holz FG, Sivaprasad S, Lotery AJ, Yannuzzi LA, Freund KB, Boon CJF. Central serous chorioretinopathy: An evidence-based treatment guideline. Prog Retin Eye Res 2024; 101:101236. [PMID: 38301969 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2024.101236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a relatively common disease that causes vision loss due to macular subretinal fluid leakage and it is often associated with reduced vision-related quality of life. In CSC, the leakage of subretinal fluid through defects in the retinal pigment epithelial layer's outer blood-retina barrier appears to occur secondary to choroidal abnormalities and dysfunction. The treatment of CSC is currently the subject of controversy, although recent data obtained from several large randomized controlled trials provide a wealth of new information that can be used to establish a treatment algorithm. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of our current understanding regarding the pathogenesis of CSC, current therapeutic strategies, and an evidence-based treatment guideline for CSC. In acute CSC, treatment can often be deferred for up to 3-4 months after diagnosis; however, early treatment with either half-dose or half-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) with the photosensitive dye verteporfin may be beneficial in selected cases. In chronic CSC, half-dose or half-fluence PDT, which targets the abnormal choroid, should be considered the preferred treatment. If PDT is unavailable, chronic CSC with focal, non-central leakage on angiography may be treated using conventional laser photocoagulation. CSC with concurrent macular neovascularization should be treated with half-dose/half-fluence PDT and/or intravitreal injections of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor compound. Given the current shortage of verteporfin and the paucity of evidence supporting the efficacy of other treatment options, future studies-ideally, well-designed randomized controlled trials-are needed in order to evaluate new treatment options for CSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena M A Feenstra
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Elon H C van Dijk
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung
- Singapore Eye Research Institution, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kyoko Ohno-Matsui
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy Y Y Lai
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Hideki Koizumi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Japan
| | - Michael Larsen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giuseppe Querques
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Vita-Salute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Susan M Downes
- Oxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Suzanne Yzer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mark P Breazzano
- Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, Liverpool, NY, USA; Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Yousif Subhi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ramin Tadayoni
- Ophthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Siegfried G Priglinger
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Laurenz J B Pauleikhoff
- Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Eye Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Clemens A K Lange
- Department of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital, Muenster, Germany
| | - Anat Loewenstein
- Division of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Roselie M H Diederen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Reinier O Schlingemann
- Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Ocular Angiogenesis Group, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carel B Hoyng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jay K Chhablani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Frank G Holz
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sobha Sivaprasad
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew J Lotery
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lawrence A Yannuzzi
- Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, NY, USA; LuEsther T. Mertz Retinal Research Center, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - K Bailey Freund
- Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, NY, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Camiel J F Boon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park MS, Lee SJ. Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Aflibercept Injections for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2021. [DOI: 10.3341/jkos.2021.62.7.957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: We examined differences in the treatment effects of intravitreal bevacizumab injections and intravitreal aflibercept injections in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 51 eyes of 49 patients who received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent injections after initial diagnosis with central serous chorioretinopathy. The patients were divided into two groups: one received an intravitreal bevacizumab injection, and another one received an intravitreal aflibercept injection. Patients with no reaction to treatment or a worsened condition, received repeat treatment with the same therapy. After treatment, patients were monitored for >3 months. Data were collected regarding best- corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subfoveal choroidal thickness, injection number, and treatment duration. Results: Both intravitreal bevacizumab injections and intravitreal aflibercept injections led to significant differences in BCVA (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (p < 0.0001, p = 0.011), compared between before and after treatment. However, no differences between groups were observed in mean change of BCVA or subfoveal choroidal thickness. In addition, there were no differences between groups in injection number and treatment duration. Conclusions: In patients with central serous chorioretinopathy, both intravitreal bevacizumab injections and intravitreal aflibercept injections are effective treatment methods. There were no differences between the two medicines in terms of functional and anatomical recovery, or the injection number and treatment duration.
Collapse
|