3-year Outcome of Patients with Persistent Pain after Root Canal Treatment: The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Are dentists aware of post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain? A web-based epidemiological survey

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain represents neuropathic pain in the distribution of the trigeminal nerve caused by trauma to the trigeminal nerve. Dental traumatic interventions, such as root-canal therapy and extractions, are reported to precede, in some cases, the onset of the disease. The current study aims to investigate how much dentists are trained to recognize, treat or properly address patients suffering from Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain.

METHODS

Data were collected from a large sample of Italian dentists in 2021. The setting of this study relates to an epidemiological survey conducted on the web. Google Forms, a product of Google Inc., was used as the operating system. An online questionnaire was sent to each participant, and the degree of knowledge of the disease along with the direct experience of having encountered it was investigated through specific multiple-choice questions.

RESULTS

634 dentists participated in the survey. 29% of participants declared to be unaware of the existence of Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain. 70% of dentists reported to have had patients suspicious of such pain in their clinical activity, following endodontic treatment (60%), tooth extraction (43%), spontaneously (37%) or other dental therapies (21%). When encountered, only in one out of three cases were patients sent to a pain specialist, and in most cases dentists performed irreversible therapies the site of the pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study evidences a major public health problem, such as the incapability of clinicians to perform a correct diagnosis and management of Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain. Such a lack of knowledge costs the patients mistaken and irreversible surgical therapies in many cases, and resulting delays in receiving proper diagnosis and management that could affect the success of the treatment. Furthermore, the unawareness had high socioeconomic costs for both the healthcare system and the patients due to the disability.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NP/2021/5460, Institutional Review Boards of the University of Cagliari, Italy.

Management of Persistent Post-Endodontic Pain With a Standardized Gabapentin Pyramid Protocol: A Case Series and Clinical Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Persistent postendodontic pain following endodontic therapy is a rare but substantial clinical challenge. Mechanisms that mediate peripheral neuropathy and/or central sensitization likely play a pivotal role in its development and chronification. The objective of this case series is to describe a management plan for persistent postendodontic pain and provide prescription guidelines using a standardized "Gabapentin Pyramid Protocol" for clinical practice.

METHODS

Four cases of persistent postendodontic pain are presented. A peripheral etiology for pain was eliminated in all 4 cases. All patients were also refractory to conventional analgesics. Patients received the "Gabapentin Pyramid Protocol."

RESULTS

Three of the 4 cases experienced complete resolution of symptoms within the prescribed treatment period. In 1 case, symptoms were greatly reduced but recurred upon discontinuation of the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

The "Gabapentin Pyramid Protocol" represents an effective treatment option for persistent postendodontic pain, demonstrating significant symptom relief and potential for complete resolution.

The link between cutaneous allodynia and pain/sensitivity in teeth and gums during migraine episodes

BACKGROUND

Migraine is one of the most common primary headaches worldwide, while toothache is the most common pain in the orofacial region. The association of migraine pain, and oral pain is unknown. This study aims to investigate the association between migraine and dental and gingival pain with the presence of allodynia.

METHODS

A questionnaire comprising demographic data with the ID-Migraine (IDM) tool, an Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC), and inquiries about pain and sensitivity in the teeth and gums during migraine attacks was administered to the participants and 762 responded the survey. The study classified participants based on the ASC, and the relationship between allodynia and pain/sensitivity in the teeth and/or gums during migraine attacks was analyzed. The statistical analyses utilized Chi-square tests and the Fisher-Exact test.

RESULTS

Among 762 migraine patients, 430 (56.44%) were classified as allodynia (+), while 332 (43.56%) were classified as allodynia (-) (p < 0.001). Additionally, 285 participants (37.5%) reported experiencing pain and sensitivity in the teeth and gums during migraine attacks, with a significant relationship observed between allodynia and pain/sensitivity in the teeth and/or gums during migraine attacks (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study have important clinical implications. For migraine patients who are non-allodynic, the presence of pain and sensitivity in their teeth and gums during migraine attacks may indicate underlying dental diseases or the need for dental treatment especially root canal treatment. However, for allodynic patients, such symptoms may not necessarily indicate the presence of dental diseases or the need for dental treatment especially root canal treatment. These results underscore the significance of considering the presence of allodynia in the assessment and management of oral symptoms during migraine attacks.

Construction of dental pulp decellularized matrix by cyclic lavation combined with mechanical stirring and its proteomic analysis

The decellularized matrix has a great potential for tissue remodeling and regeneration; however, decellularization could induce host immune rejection due to incomplete cell removal or detergent residues, thereby posing significant challenges for its clinical application. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate detergent concentration, further optimization of tissue decellularization technique, increased of biosafety in decellularized tissues, and reduction of tissue damage during the decellularization procedures are pivotal issues that need to be investigated. In this study, we tested several conditions and determined that 0.1% Sodium dodecyl sulfate and three decellularization cycles were the optimal conditions for decellularization of pulp tissue. Decellularization efficiency was calculated and the preparation protocol for dental pulp decellularization matrix (DPDM) was further optimized. To characterize the optimized DPDM, the microstructure, odontogenesis-related protein and fiber content were evaluated. Our results showed that the properties of optimized DPDM were superior to those of the non-optimized matrix. We also performed the 4D-Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of DPDM and demonstrated the preservation of proteins from the natural pulp. This study provides a optimized protocol for the potential application of DPDM in pulp regeneration.

Characteristics and impact of pain from root-filled teeth. A practice-based cross-sectional study comparing painful teeth with and without signs of inflammatory dental disease

To compare pain characteristics, impact of pain and characteristics of patients with painful root-filled teeth with and without signs of inflammatory dental disease. This cross-sectional study was performed in the Public Dental Health services, Region Örebro County, Sweden. Adult patients with ≥1 root-filled tooth identified at their regular check-up were included and assigned to one of two groups; those with ≥1 sign of inflammatory dental disease (DD+) and those without any such sign (DD-). Patients/teeth were compared regarding pain characteristics (intensity, frequency, duration, quality and provoking factors), impact of pain (medication intake, impact on life) and patient characteristics as background factors (general health, other bodily and orofacial pain). Statistics included descriptive data (frequency tables) and group comparisons (Chi-square, Fisher's Exact and Mann-Whitney U-tests). The DD+ group included 27 participants (30 teeth) and the DD- group 22 participants (23 teeth). On average, pain intensity was mild, the frequency most often recurrent, and the impact was low. Average pain duration since onset exceeded 2 years in both groups. The only observed between-group differences were average pain intensity; 3.1 (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)) in DD- group compared to 1.6 for DD+ (p = 0.030), and tenderness to apical palpation; only reported in the DD+ group. The similarities in clinical presentation between the two groups underscore the difficulties in correctly distinguishing between pain of odontogenic and non-odontogenic origin in root-filled teeth with a standard clinical investigation. Additional diagnostic methods need to be investigated for their ability to differentiate between tooth pain or discomfort of different origins.

A Scoping Review of 4 Decades of Outcomes in Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment, Nonsurgical Retreatment, and Apexification Studies-Part 2: Outcome Measures

INTRODUCTION

Inconsistencies in the definitions of endodontic outcome terminology jeopardize evaluations of proposed interventions and patient care quality. This scoping review aimed to provide groundwork to develop a set of basic outcomes in endodontics.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series (≥10 patients) published after 1980 with patients ≥10 years of age with any preoperative pulpal and periapical diagnosis in permanent teeth requiring nonsurgical root canal treatment, retreatment, or apexification. Abstracted data on outcome assessment methods, assessors, and domains were reported after univariate and bivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Treatment outcomes were evaluated radiographically (88%) or clinically (73%). Although 2-dimensional radiography exceeded 3-dimensional radiography, the use of the latter has increased since 2010, mostly for nonsurgical retreatments. Of 19 identified outcomes, 5 were most frequent: success (168 studies, 40%), radiographic healing (128 studies, 30%), survival (of an asymptomatic tooth [48 studies, 12%] or of a procedure code in administrative databases [31 studies, 7%]), pain assessment (14 studies, 3%), and quality of life (11 studies, 3%). Clinician-centered outcomes have been most frequently studied since the 1980s (71%), in academic settings (76%), and using a prospective design (45%). Patient-centered outcomes were reported in 19% of studies before 2010 and 30% since 2010. They were more common among retrospective studies (49%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-centered outcome measures are lacking in endodontic studies. The state of available research can provide a baseline for the development of a core outcome set in endodontics, which should represent the important patient-centered outcomes in conjunction with well-validated clinician-centered outcomes.