No. 261-Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy in Singleton Pregnancies

Improved contingent screening strategy increased trisomy 21 detection rate in the second trimester

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish suitable threshold values for biochemical indicators in low-risk pregnant women who underwent second trimester screening and design strategies for consecutive prenatal testing to increase trisomy 21 detection.

METHODS

This study examined singleton pregnant women who underwent double, triple, or quadruple screening in the second trimester over six years. To obtain adequate detection efficiency for low-risk pregnancies, threshold values for serum biochemical indicators were established, and a cost-effectiveness assessment of the improved contingent screening strategy was conducted.

RESULTS

Participants were included in serum double- (n = 88,550), triple- (n = 29,991), and quadruple-screening (n = 15,004) groups. Threshold values were defined as having a free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG) multiple of the median (MoM) ≥ 2.50, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) MoM ≤ 0.50, or unconjugated estriol (uE3) MoM ≤ 0.70 for low risk. Low-risk pregnancies, comprising 1.35% (988/73,183), 4.45% (1,171/26,286), and 11.91% (1,559/13,085) of the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, respectively, underwent further non-invasive prenatal screening. In the double-, triple-, and quadruple-screening groups, we detected 11.76% (2/17), 40.00% (2/5), and 66.67% (2/3) of trisomy 21 cases with false negative results, respectively, with the overall detection rates of 85.00% (85/100), 90.63% (29/32), and 95.24% (20/21), respectively, and decreased ratio of overall costs of 5.26%, 16.63%, and 24.36%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing threshold values of AFP, free β-hCG, and uE3 to trigger further non-invasive prenatal screening may increase trisomy 21 detection in pregnancies deemed low risk in the second trimester while reducing the overall costs of screening strategies.

Best Practice & Research clinical obstetrics & gynaecology

Screening for fetal genetic disorders is a focus of prenatal care. Cell free DNA (cfDNA) screening for aneuploidies became available in 2011. Initially available only to high-risk individuals, this test is now standard of care in many settings. cfDNA screening has expanded to include sex chromosomal aneuploidies, copy number variants, and rare autosomal trisomies. However, the positive predictive value for rarer conditions is significantly lower, the number of conditions tested for is small, and abnormal results may occur due to maternal genetic findings. The field is changing quickly, and national recommendations for the use of cfDNA in screening for fetal and maternal diseases varies internationally. Research on the performance of screening for many different genetic disorders using cfDNA is ongoing, and suggests that this methodology may allow for testing of a much greater number of genetic conditions. Additionally, improved understanding of the cfDNA molecules themselves may provide additional insights: both high and low fetal fractions may suggest adverse pregnancy outcomes, and characteristics of the fragments themselves may help distinguish tissue of origin.

The clinical performance of fetal sex chromosome abnormalities in serum biochemical screening in the second trimester

This study aimed to investigate the serum biochemical markers' propensity associated with sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs) and assess the clinical efficacy of SCAs in serum biochemical screening during the second trimester. A retrospective case-control analysis was conducted on pregnant women who underwent serum biochemical screening during the second trimester. The study compared groups of women with SCAs to those with normal chromosome karyotypes to assess changes in biochemical markers. We analysed and compared the performance of serum biochemical screening in each SCA group. The results showed that the alterations in serum biochemical markers varied among the different SCA groups. Typically, the serum biochemical markers of fetal SCAs were either above the 95th percentile or below the 5th percentile. The proportions of high- and intermediate-risk findings for 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, 47,XYY, and mosaic sex chromosomal abnormalities were 43.48%, 78.95%, 63.89%, 70.59%, and 78.13%, respectively. Besides detecting fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18, the current contingent screening procedures may also accidentally identify various fetal SCAs at a rate of 69.18%.

Antenatal Care: A Comparative Review of Guidelines

Importance

Antenatal care plays a crucial role in safely monitoring and ensuring the well-being of both the mother and the fetus during pregnancy, ultimately leading to the best possible perinatal outcomes.

Objective

The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published guidelines on antenatal care.

Evidence Acquisition

A descriptive review of guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Public Health Agency of Canada, the World Health Organization, and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists regarding antenatal care was conducted.

Results

There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the necessary appointments during the antenatal period, the proper timing for induction of labor, the number and frequency of laboratory examinations for the assessment of mother's well-being, and management strategies for common physiological problems during pregnancy, such as nausea and vomiting, heartburn, pelvic pain, leg cramps, and symptomatic vaginal discharge. In addition, special consideration should be given for mental health issues and timely referral to a specialist, reassurance of complete maternal vaccination, counseling for safe use of medical agents, and advice for cessation of substance, alcohol, and tobacco use during pregnancy. Controversy surrounds clinical evaluation during the antenatal period, particularly when it comes to the routine use of an oral glucose tolerance test and symphysis-fundal height measurement for assessing fetal growth, whereas routine cardiotocography and fetal movement counting are suggested practices only by Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Of note, recommendations on nutritional interventions and supplementation are offered only by Public Health Agency of Canada and World Health Organization, with some minor discrepancies in the optimal dosage.

Conclusions

Antenatal care remains a critical factor in achieving positive outcomes, but there are variations depending on the socioeconomic status of each country. Therefore, the establishment of consistent international protocols for optimal antenatal care is of utmost importance. This can help provide safe guidance for healthcare providers and, consequently, improve both maternal and fetal outcomes.

A new contingent screening strategy increased detection rate of trisomy 21 in the first trimester

BACKGROUND

Although the traditional contingent screening strategy is effective, there are still undetected low-risk trisomy 21. This study aims to define appropriate cut-off values of serum biochemical markers at low-risk and develop a strategy for sequential prenatal testing associated with first-trimester screening to increase the detection rate of trisomy 21.

METHODS

This was a 9-year retrospective analysis of singleton pregnant women who underwent serum biochemical screening or combined first-trimester screening (CFTS) in the first trimester. For the low-risk group, the cut-off values of the serum biochemical markers were adjusted to determine the appropriate detection efficiency. Gravidas with abnormal serum biochemical markers at low-risk were advised to undergo further non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), whereas others continued with routine prenatal care.

RESULTS

When cut-off values of free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG) multiples of the median (MoM) or pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) MoM were defined with ≥ 2.75 or ≤ 0.5, 7.72% (2,194/28,405) in the serum biochemical screening group and 12.36% (4,005/32,403) in CFTS group could be detected as abnormal results for further NIPS. Finally, 55.56% (5/9) and 85.71% (6/7) of trisomy 21 cases with false-negative results were detected, and the overall detection rate for trisomy 21 was improved by 10.64% (5/47) and 12.77% (6/47), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The new contingent screening strategy can increase the detection rate of trisomy 21 compared with the traditional contingent screening strategy.

The importance of the trisomy 21 local cutoff value evaluation for prenatal screening in the second trimester of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to compare different local cutoff values (LCV) and inline cutoff values (ICV) in pregnant women in the second trimester at high risk for carrying fetuses with trisomy 21.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed prenatal screening outcomes in pregnant women (n = 311,561). The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic significance of the trisomy 21 risk value, alpha-fetoprotein, and free beta human chorionic gonadotropin multiple of the median for predicting trisomy 21 risk. The cutoff value corresponding to the maximal Youden index was taken as the LCV. The screening efficiency of both cutoff values was compared.

RESULTS

The LCV cutoff value was lower than the ICV cutoff value (1/643 vs 1/270). The sensitivity increased by 19.80%, the positive predictive value decreased by 0.20%, and the false-positive rate increased by 6.50%.

CONCLUSION

The LCV should be used to determine trisomy 21 risk, which can increase the detection rate of trisomy 21 in the second trimester.

Patient attitudes and preferences about expanded noninvasive prenatal testing

Introduction: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is typically carried out to screen for common fetal chromosomal anomalies, with the option to screen for a wider range of chromosomal changes (expanded NIPT) becoming increasingly available. However, little is known about pregnant patients' attitudes and preferences regarding expanded NIPT. Methods: To address this gap, we surveyed general-risk patients having first-tier cfDNA screening at a private prenatal clinic on their expectations for expanded NIPT. Patients were asked questions regarding their current pregnancy and previous pregnancy history, their opinions on fetal DNA screenings during pregnancy and incidental findings, information and opinions on financial resources for NIPT, as well as socio-cultural questions to determine patient demographics. Results: Of the 200 survey participants, the majority were educated, self-reported as white, had a higher than average income, and reported no aneuploidy risk factors. When asked what information they would like to receive from cfDNA screening, the vast majority of participants wanted all information available that could have an immediate impact on fetal health (88%) or an immediate impact on infant health from birth (82%). Many participants also wanted information that could have a future impact on the child's health or an immediate or future impact on the pregnant woman's own health. Most participants wanted information about the sex of fetus (86%) and common trisomies (71%), with almost half of participants desiring information about rare autosomal aneuploidies and/or all genetic information that may affect the baby. In addition, participants were found to be comfortable screening for conditions that are well-known, influence care during pregnancy, and are treatable. Finally, while most respondents either had insurance coverage for NIPT or were able to afford NIPT out of pocket, the majority of our participants felt that expanded NIPT should be either free for everyone or for those considered high risk. Discussion: Our findings suggest that with appropriate pre-test counseling, pregnant patients may choose NIPT for an expanding list of conditions.

Diagnostic value of maternal alpha-fetoprotein variants in second-trimester biochemical screening for trisomy 21 and 18

To evaluate the clinical predictive value of serum alpha-fetoprotein variants (AFP-L2, AFP-L3) in combination with maternal serum prenatal screening biomarkers in predicting fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. We analyze the data of singleton pregnant women at 15–20⁺⁶ weeks of 731,922 gravidas from October 2007 to September 2019. The research objects were separated into the following groups: control (n = 569), trisomy 21 (n = 116), and trisomy 18 (n = 52). The cases were diagnosed by chromosomal karyotypic analysis of amniotic fluid cells. Level of AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 were detected in maternal serum among control women and patients. Receiver operator characteristic analysis, detection rate, false positive rate, false negative rate, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio, comprehensive discriminant improvement, net weight classification improvement, decision curve analysis and Hosmer–lemeshow (H-L) test were used to investigate the predictive value of free β-hCG, AFP, AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 on the risk models of trisomy 21, 18. There was a statistically significant difference in maternal serum AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 multiple of the median (MoM) among the trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and control groups. The AUCs of AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 for the screening trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 fetus were 0.785, 0.758 and 0.775, 0.754. According to ROC, the optimal cut-off values of AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 for predicting trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 fetuses all were 1.09 MoM and 1.30 MoM, respectively. The risk-calculation model constructed by AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 MoM manifested better efficiency than the original single-value truncation method using AFP MoM alone. Compared with different modeling methods, the AUC of trisomy 21 fetuses predicted by AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 + free β-hCG achieved an optimal value (0.938), while the AUC of trisomy 18 fetus predicted by AFP-L2 + free β-hCG was the best (0.991). Compared with AFP, the IDI of AFP-L2 or AFP-L3 alone increased 9.56% and 12.34%; the NRI increased 26.50% and 26.70 in predicting trisomy 21. For trisomy 18, the IDI of AFP-L2 or AFP-L3 alone declined with 8.12% and 1.52%; the NRI declined with 13.84% and 8.54%. In the combined model, the model with best detection rate, false positive rate and positive likelihood ratio was AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 + free β-hCG, followed by AFP-L2 + free β-hCG and AFP-L3 + free β-hCG, and finally AFP + free β-hCG. Maternal serum AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 in the second trimester is a good marker for screening trisomy 21 and trisomy18 with high sensitivity and specificity. The combined screening results are better than the single marker, and the efficiency of AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 + free β-hCG is the best.

Every Mother and Every Fetus Matters: A Positive Pregnant Test = Multiple Offerings of Reproductive Risk Screening for personal, family, and specific obstetrical-fetal conditions

Structured OBJECTIVE: The requirement and need for a focused 'pregnant person -centered' antenatal care process with time for informed consent and shared decision making are important for optimal antenatal care. This commentary focuses on the evidenced -based screening test options and timing as part of the overall 'pregnant person-centered' preconception and antenatal care journey.

METHODS

A structured quality improvement (QI) review (Squire 2.0) was undertaken to examine the appropriate reproductive screening process in the periods of preconception and during pregnancy.

RESULTS

First, evaluated the broader antenatal care structure which, second, enabled the directed reproductive risk screening processes to be offered within an informed consent process. Four international pre-conception and antenatal evidenced-based consensus would routinely offer specific gestational age reproductive risk screening elements: totaling 21 screening elements (preconception 3; 1st trimester 9; 2nd trimester 3; 3rd trimester 4; intrapartum 1; postpartum 1).

CONCLUSION

The best evidenced-based opportunity for comprehensive and collaborative antenatal care with appropriate screening elements requires: single national access healthcare system; expert evidenced-based guideline creation; collaborative maternity care providers based for risk assessment, triage, and management; pregnant person (women) centered care model of maternity care; clearly identified evidenced-based gestational age directed screening elements; international pre-conception and antenatal guideline consensus.

Assessing the risk of having a child with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency: a new paradigm

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency is a complicated condition genetically, clinically, and treatment wise. Genetically, there are numerus mutations with different effect on enzyme activity that make genetic diagnosis a challenge. Clinically, there are a wide range of presentations from asymptomatic patients to the severe life-threatening classic CAH. Both an asymptomatic heterozygote and a mildly affected non-classical patient can carry a 'severe' mutation and endow it to their offspring. We present a case of non-classic CAH and discuss the problematic relations between biochemical and genetic diagnosis. By integrating the seemingly contradicting literature, we provide a new simple tool to assess the risk of such patients to give birth to a child with classic CAH.

Effect of Shared Decision-making on Anxiety of Women Recommended for Prenatal Screening Tests in Southeast of Iran

Objective: To study the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) on the anxiety of women who were recommended for prenatal screening tests.

Materials and methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on a total of 200 pregnant women who referred to the health centers of Zahedan, Iran, for prenatal care within April 7 to September 7, 2019. The control group received routine care, and the intervention group attended a session based on SDM. The demographic characteristics form and Spielberger Six-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were filled out before and immediately after the counseling, as well as before receiving the results of maternal serum biochemical markers.

Results: No statistically significant effect of SDM on anxiety was reported between the control and intervention groups immediately after the counseling session (P=0.46). However, the obtained data showed that the mean value of anxiety scores (16.52±3.06) was higher among the women in the intervention group than that reported for the control group (13.80±3.55) on the day before receiving the results of the blood tests (P<0.001). Nevertheless, logistic regression analysis showed only women with a university level of education were likely to have higher anxiety scores than women with lower educational levels (AOR=10.60; 95% CI: 2.07-54.24; P=0.005).

Conclusion: Offering prenatal screening can cause a slight increase in the level of anxiety among women with a university level of education. Therefore, it is required to implement supportive strategies to help high-risk pregnant women in coping with anxiety.

A Retrospective Analysis Of Different Contingent Screening Models For Fetal Down Syndrome In Southwestern China

To discuss combinations of traditional screening and noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and to compare which traditional screening is the most suitable first-line screening approach to NIPS, pregnant women were recruited in this retrospective observational study. Pregnant women underwent one of four traditional screening tests. The 9 contingent models were combined by high risk cut-offs of 1:50, 1:100, 1:270 and intermediate risk cut-offs of 1:1000, 1:1500, 1:2000. We analyzed cost and performance of various screening models with contingent screening of different risk cut-offs. Compared with other screening tests, combined first-trimester screening (CFTS) had the lowest proportion of high risk (≥1:270) with the highest detection rate (DR) (78.79%) and the lowest proportion of intermediate risk (1:271~1:1000). When intermediate risk was 1:51 ~1:1500, CFTS as first-line screening had the lowest cost with DR of 93.94%. Other screening tests as the first-line screening with intermediate risk of 1:51~1:1000 had the lowest cost, there DR were 90.91%, 84.62%, 91.67%, respectively. Our study demonstrated if only one traditional screening was allowed to screen pregnant women, CFTS was recommended as the first choice. According to local health and economic conditions, adopting appropriate traditional screening with suitable cut-offs as first-line screening will contributed to a cost-effective screening model.

Canadian Pregnant Women's Preferences Regarding NIPT for Down Syndrome: The Information They Want, How They Want to Get It, and With Whom They Want to Discuss It

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess Canadian pregnant women's and their partners' preferences for information about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

METHODS

Pregnant women and their partners across Canada were surveyed as part of the Personalized Genomics for prenatal Aneuploidy Screening Using maternal blood (PEGASUS) study.

RESULTS

A total of 882 pregnant women and 395 partners participated. Women preferred being informed by a physician (77.2%). They preferred getting information ahead of time, except for information about resources for families with Down syndrome, which they preferred getting with test results. More than half thought that written consent is important (63.7%) and could decide whether to do NIPT on the day they received the information (54.9%). Women preferred to be informed of results by telephone (43.7%) or in person (28%), but they preferred in person if they were considered at high risk for Down syndrome on the basis of the results (76%). The partner was the person whose input was considered most important (62.6%). Partners' preferences were similar, except that partners tended to want information later (at the time of the test or with the results) and felt that their opinion was not considered as highly by health professionals.

CONCLUSION

Canadian women want information about NIPT early, in person, by a knowledgeable physician. Partners also want to be informed and involved in the decision-making process.