Endometriosis and Negative Perception of the Medical Profession

A systematic review to determine use of the Endometriosis Health Profiles to measure quality of life outcomes in women with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

The Endometriosis Health Profiles (EHPs), the EHP-30 and EHP-5, are patient-reported outcome measures that were developed to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of women living with endometriosis. Prior to their development, a systematic review was undertaken which identified that the HRQoL of women living with endometriosis was poorly understood, with only three medical and one surgical study identified.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The 20-year anniversary of the EHP-30 provided a timely opportunity to assess how the tools have been used and explore what the findings tell us about the impact of endometriosis and its associated treatments upon women's QoL. Applying robust systematic review methodology, following PRISMA guidelines, we sought to answer: How many studies have used the EHP and for what purpose?; What are the demographic characteristics and international context of the studies?; What is the methodological nature and quality of the studies?; Which interventions have been assessed and what are the reported EHP outcomes?; and Can the EHP outcomes of these interventions be analysed using a meta-analysis and, if so, what do the results show?

SEARCH METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched from the year the EHP was first published, in 2001 to 26 February 2020 using the search terms 'EHP30', 'EHP5', 'EHP-30', 'EHP-5', 'endometriosis health profile 30', and 'endometriosis health profile 5'. We updated the searches on 9 April 2021. All included studies were quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

OUTCOMES

The review included 139 papers. In clinical intervention studies, the EHPs were deployed most frequently to measure the outcomes of medical (n = 35) and surgical (n = 21) treatment. The EHPs were also used in 13 other intervention studies, 29 non-interventional studies, 32 psychometric/cross cultural validation studies; six diagnostic studies, and in three other studies to measure outcomes in related conditions. They were mainly deployed in studies undertaken in Europe and North America. Overall, regardless of the nature of the intervention, most women reported improvements in HRQoL after treatment. Surgical interventions generally resulted in significant improvements for the longest amount of time. There was also evidence that when participants stopped taking medication their EHP scores worsened, perhaps reinforcing the temporary impact of medical treatment. Younger patients reported more negative impact upon their HRQoL. Further evidence using classical test theory to support the EHPs' robust psychometric properties, including acceptability, dimensionality, reliability, validity (including cross-cultural), and responsiveness, was demonstrated, particularly for the EHP-30. Strikingly, using anchor-based methods, EHP-30 responsiveness studies demonstrate the largest mean changes in the 'control and powerlessness' domain post-intervention, followed by 'pain'. MMAT outcomes indicated the quality of the papers was good, with the exception of five studies. A meta-analysis was not undertaken owing to the heterogeneity of the interventions and papers included in this review.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Women with endometriosis face a lifetime of surgical and/or medical interventions to keep the condition under control. Less invasive treatments that can lead to improved longer term physical and psycho-social outcomes are needed. The EHPs are reliable, valid, acceptable, and responsive tools, but more assessment of EHP outcomes using modern psychometric methods and in the context of women from ethnically diverse backgrounds and in routine clinical care would be beneficial. Given the brevity of the EHP-5, it may be the most appropriate version to use in routine clinical practice, whereas the longer EHP-30, which provides more granularity, is more appropriate for research.

"SO FAR AWAY" How Doctors Can Contribute to Making Endometriosis Hell on Earth. A Call for Humanistic Medicine and Empathetic Practice for Genuine Person-Centered Care. A Narrative Review

"SO FAR AWAY" * How Doctors Can Contribute to Making Endometriosis Hell on Earth [* by Knopfler M. In Dire Straits. Brothers in Arms. Vertigo Records, U.K., 1985].

Abstract

The distance physicians may create within the relationship with their patients by not having a humanistic approach to their practice may strongly influence clinical outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to convey the well-known narrative of patient dissatisfaction into pro-action by discussing the aspects of dehumanization, which may occur in the relationship between physicians and women with endometriosis. Eight dimensions of dehumanization are examined and related to everyday scenarios occurring in endometriosis care settings and the possible downstream consequences on patients' clinical outcomes are described. Objectification, which may come across as minimization of pain, may not only increase patients' perception of pain but also lead to undertreatment of unrecognized forms of endometriosis, especially among adolescents. Passivity, that is not favoring shared decision-making nor self-management, may compromise adherence to treatment, reducing patients' trust in physicians and quality of life. The same consequences may result from homogenization, that is giving for granted that all patients have the same access to care. Both isolation, ie not practicing therapeutic empathy, and loss of meaning, ie not supporting patients in the re-definition of their life plans, may affect women's psychological wellbeing and further increase pain perception. Ignoring women's personal journey by not providing clear information on the consequences endometriosis may have on their lives may favor women's self-silencing. Not promoting an un-biased communication and not setting aside scientific polarization are the main features of dislocation, which may jeopardize patient empowerment. Lastly, having a reductionist approach to the body may contribute to chronicization of pain, thus compromising quality of life. This considered, taking time to listen to women with endometriosis and tailoring decisions on the basis of their individual needs should be fostered as a moral duty. Physicians should always keep in mind that they are not only deliverers of treatment; they are a form of treatment themselves.

Proposal for targeted, neo-evolutionary-oriented secondary prevention of early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis. Part II: medical interventions

According to consistent epidemiological data, the slope of the incidence curve of endometriosis rises rapidly and sharply around the age of 25 years. The delay in diagnosis is generally reported to be between 5 and 8 years in adult women, but it appears to be over 10 years in adolescents. If this is true, the actual onset of endometriosis in many young women would be chronologically placed in the early postmenarchal years. Ovulation and menstruation are inflammatory events that, when occurring repeatedly for years, may theoretically favour the early development of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Moreover, repeated acute dysmenorrhoea episodes after menarche may not only be an indicator of ensuing endometriosis or adenomyosis, but may also promote the transition from acute to chronic pelvic pain through central sensitization mechanisms, as well as the onset of chronic overlapping pain conditions. Therefore, secondary prevention aimed at reducing suffering, limiting lesion progression, and preserving future reproductive potential should be focused on the age group that could benefit most from the intervention, i.e. severely symptomatic adolescents. Early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis should be promptly suspected even when physical and ultrasound findings are negative, and long-term ovulatory suppression may be established until conception seeking. As nowadays this could mean using hormonal therapies for several years, drug safety evaluation is crucial. In adolescents without recognized major contraindications to oestrogens, the use of very low-dose combined oral contraceptives is associated with a marginal increase in the individual absolute risk of thromboembolic events. Oral contraceptives containing oestradiol instead of ethinyl oestradiol may further limit such risk. Oral, subcutaneous, and intramuscular progestogens do not increase the thromboembolic risk, but may interfere with attainment of peak bone mass in young women. Levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine devices may be a safe alternative for adolescents, as amenorrhoea is frequently induced without suppression of the ovarian activity. With regard to oncological risk, the net effect of long-term oestrogen-progestogen combinations use is a small reduction in overall cancer risk. Whether surgery should be considered the first-line approach in young women with chronic pelvic pain symptoms seems questionable. Especially when large endometriomas or infiltrating lesions are not detected at pelvic imaging, laparoscopy should be reserved to adolescents who refuse hormonal treatments or in whom first-line medications are not effective, not tolerated, or contraindicated. Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, including self-reported outcome measures, for young individuals with a clinical suspicion of early-onset endometriosis or adenomyosis are proposed.

Women's lived experience of endometriosis-related fertility issues

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to conduct a qualitative investigation to provide a deeper understanding of women's views about endometriosis, fertility and their perception of reproductive options.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted by two female psychiatrists, specialized in gynecology and obstetrical consultation-liaison psychiatry, trained in qualitative procedures, with experience in qualitative studies and in psychological support of women attending infertility consultations. No prior relationship with respondents was established before data collection. Interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. Interviews lasted 45-75 minutes. The transcripts were then analysed using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine women were contacted. Twelve agreed to an interview at the hospital's infertility clinic. Eleven women with diverse sociodemographic characteristics were included. The key findings of thematic content analysis can be grouped into four topics: (1) Diagnostic announcement and initial delay; (2) Negative perceptions of initial care: pre-diagnosis phase; (3) Struggle with endometriosis and its treatment; (4) Issues related to health problems, fertility and reproductive options.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of the interviews corroborates the distressing impact of the trivialization of pain and the uncertainty of or the long quest for diagnosis. The findings also stress various associated issues, from the diagnostic delay to the low success rates of fertility treatments. This qualitative analysis contributes to better understand the accumulation of negative emotions within the illness trajectory and the poor dyadic adjustment within the couple.

Patients' Perspectives on How to Improve Endometriosis Care: A Large Qualitative Study Within the ComPaRe-Endometriosis e-Cohort

Background: Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that affects about 10% of women of reproductive age. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis is often delayed, misdiagnosis is common, and treatment options are poor. This study aimed at capturing ideas to improve endometriosis care from the patients' perspectives. Materials and Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from 1,000 adult patients in ComPaRe-Endometriosis (a French prospective e-cohort focused on endometriosis) who answered to the open-ended question: "If you had a magic wand, what would you change about your health care?". The free-text responses were analyzed by qualitative thematic analysis using an inductive approach. Results: Patients had a mean age of 34.1 years (standard deviation = 8.1); 56% and 42% had stage IV disease or deep endometriosis, respectively. They elicited 2,487 ideas to improve the management of endometriosis, which were categorized into 61 areas of improvement, further grouped into 14 themes. The top five areas of improvement were mentioned by >10% of the patients and were to (1) train caregivers to develop their knowledge on the disease, (2) provide better management of daily pain and pain attacks, (3) take patient-reported symptoms seriously, (4) standardize diagnostic processes to improve early detection, and (5) have caregivers listen more to the patients. Conclusions: We identified 61 areas for improvement in endometriosis care. These results reflect patients' expectations in terms of management of their disease and will be useful to design a better global care for endometriosis from the patients' perspectives.

Endometriosis, an Ongoing Pain—Step-by-Step Treatment

Endometriosis is a disease that is becoming more and more challenging for the medical community. The current therapeutic concepts (surgical therapy and/or hormonal therapies) often do not lead to sufficient pain control, and late diagnosis and high recurrence rates mean that women affected by the disease can suffer for decades before receiving proper treatment. Although the introduction of certified endometriosis centers has created contact points for surgical therapies performed by endometriosis experts, these centers are not sufficient to offer the affected patients the all-encompassing long-term support they need. In recent years, new findings regarding the pathogenesis and correlations of the pain phenomena caused by endometriosis have shown that conventional therapy strategies are not adequate and individual long-term concepts must be developed. Not only can endometriosis cause nociceptive pain, but it can also lead to a nociplastic reaction with central sensitization. Hence, aside from the classic cyclic complaints, patients increasingly suffer from atypical pain. Due to the high number of affected patients who are treated inadequately, it is necessary for gynecologists in private practices to become familiar with multimodal treatment concepts since they are the central point of contact of their patients. The following article will provide an overview of treatment strategies for chronic symptomatic endometriosis.

Pathogenesis of Endometriosis: The Origin of Pain and Subfertility

Endometriosis (EM) and adenomyosis (AM) are common conditions with pain and infertility as the principal symptoms. The pathophysiology of pain in EM and AM comprises sensory and somatoform pain mechanisms. Over time, these may aggravate and lead to individual complex disease patterns if not diagnosed and treated. Despite the known facts, several years often pass between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis. Chronic pain disorders with changes on a neuronal level frequently arise and are linked to depressive disorders, with the process becoming a vicious cycle. Additionally, women with EM and AM suffer from sub- and infertility. Low fecundity rates are caused by anatomical changes in combination with behavioral changes in the sexual activity of women with chronic pain as well as local proinflammatory factors that not only decrease implantation rates but also promote early abortions.

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Evaluation of the Swedish Version of ENDOCARE: An Instrument to Measure Patient Centeredness of Endometriosis Care

OBJECTIVES

The need for quality improvement within endometriosis healthcare is widely acknowledged. The ENDOCARE questionnaire (ECQ) measures patient centeredness of endometriosis care. The aims of this study were (1) to translate and culturally adapt ECQ into Swedish, (2) to evaluate validity (construct validity), and (3) to measure reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability).

DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional randomized study. Participants, Setting, and Methods: ECQ was first translated according to a well-established guideline and was thereafter sent to 500 randomly selected women with endometriosis, who had visited participating clinics during the past 3 years. The first 150 women who returned their questionnaires were immediately sent the same questionnaire again. The ECQ consists of 3 parts. The first part contains demographic and clinical questions, while part II has 38 items that are answered according to 2 aspects: percentage of negative experience of care and mean personal importance. A patient-centeredness score (PCS) is calculated based on these 2 aspects. The items are also divided into 10 dimensions of care. Part III is a grading of overall experience and an open-ended question on any missing aspect in the questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 187 native Swedish-speaking women participated. Data completeness was high (>90%). The overall PCS median was 3.5. The highest median PCS was found in the dimension regarding endometriosis clinic staff and the lowest in emotional support and alleviation of fear and anxiety and the involvement of significant others. Factor analysis could roughly confirm 2 of the 10 dimensions. The Cronbach's α coefficient for PCS ranged from 0.35 to 0.73. The test-rest analysis showed acceptable reliability.

LIMITATIONS

The most important limitation was the relatively low participation rate and the risk of recall bias. It is likely that women gave their answers based on their most recent experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our results indicate that the Swedish version of the ECQ is a usable instrument to measure patient centeredness in endometriosis care, but due to the unstable factor analysis, conclusions based on the dimensions should be made with caution.

[Management of endometriosis pain : Stage-based treatment strategies and clinical experience]

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is associated with various types of intense pain. In addition to nociceptive pain, there is also a nociplastic reaction with central sensitization. Atypical symptoms such as acyclic lower abdominal pain, radiating pain, non-specific bladder and intestinal complaints or even depression are frequent as are classic cyclical complaints such as severe dysmenorrhea, cyclical lower abdominal pain, dyspareunia, dysuria and dyschezia. In cases of a diverse range of symptoms, patients often consult not just gynecologists but specialists from other disciplines (e.g., internal medicine, gastroenterology, orthopedics, pain therapy, psychology).

AIMS

Overview about the pathophysiology and complexity of the disease and the resulting treatment options. A multimodal interdisciplinary concept might be able to take into consideration all aspects of the complex disease.

METHODS

Interdisciplinary concepts should be involved in the treatment of endometriosis patients along with hormonal and surgical therapy, which are generally under the supervision of a gynecologist. Pain management, dietary changes, psychological support, as well as physiotherapy should be included. The present article is intended to provide an overview of possible treatment strategies for chronic, symptomatic endometriosis.

CONCLUSION

The use of multimodal treatment strategies regarding the complex pathophysiological aspects of this disease might be helpful in significantly improving the quality of life of endometriosis patients.

Surgical Decision Regret in Women Pursuing Surgery for Endometriosis or Chronic Pelvic Pain

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify incidence of decision regret associated with surgery for endometriosis or chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

DESIGN

Survey study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing excisional surgery for endometriosis or CPP between January 2016 and June 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

The women were contacted to complete 2 validated questionnaires: the Decision Regret and Patient Global Impression of Improvement scales.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 253 patients were contacted, and 154 patients responded (60.8% response rate) to the survey. A total of 137 women (90%) agreed or strongly agreed that having excisional surgery was the right decision; 134 women (87%) indicated that they would choose to have surgery again. The survey responders did not differ from nonresponders in age (years, 33.9 vs 35; p = .25), robotic route of surgery (83.1% vs 78.8%; p = .66), or performance of hysterectomy (27.3% vs 26.3%; p = .85). The responders were more likely to have stage III/IV endometriosis (50.6% vs 29.3%; p <.01), more previous surgeries for endometriosis (median surgeries, 1 vs 0; p = .01), higher complication rate (8.4% vs 2.0%; p = .03), and pathology test results more frequently positive for endometriosis (87.7% vs 77.8%; p = .03). Overall, 25 patients (16.3%) reported some level of regret after excisional surgery for endometriosis or CPP. Regret was not associated with a lower Patient Global Impression of Improvement score (odds ratio [OR] 4.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-23.7), age (OR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04), time since surgery (OR 1; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04), number of previous surgeries (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.9-1.31), negative pathology test results (OR 2.82; 95% CI, 0.95-8.32), hysterectomy (OR 1.23; 95% CI, 0.45-3.32), or complications (OR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.22-5.16).

CONCLUSION

Most women who pursue excisional surgery for endometriosis or CPP are satisfied with their decision. Regret was not associated with patient-reported lack of improvement, negative pathology test results, hysterectomy, or complications. Gynecologic surgeons should engage in shared decision-making with patients and feel comfortable offering surgical evaluation and management to patients with endometriosis or CPP when clinically indicated.