The results of new low dose fractional CO2 Laser – A prospective clinical study in France

Nonestrogen Therapies for Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature and provide clinical practice guidelines regarding various nonestrogen therapies for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to July 2021. We included comparative and noncomparative studies. Interventions and comparators were limited to seven products that are commercially available and currently in use (vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA], ospemifene, laser or energy-based therapies, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, Tibolone, vaginal hyaluronic acid, testosterone). Topical estrogen, placebo, other nonestrogen products, as well as no treatment were considered as comparators.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We double-screened 9,131 abstracts and identified 136 studies that met our criteria. Studies were assessed for quality and strength of evidence by the systematic review group.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Information regarding the participants, details on the intervention and comparator and outcomes were extracted from the eligible studies. Alternative therapies were similar or superior to estrogen or placebo with minimal increase in adverse events. Dose response was noted with vaginal DHEA and testosterone. Vaginal DHEA, ospemifene, erbium and fractional carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) laser, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, tibolone, hyaluronic acid, and testosterone all improved subjective and objective signs of atrophy. Vaginal DHEA, ospemifene, tibolone, fractional CO 2 laser, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, and testosterone improved sexual function.

CONCLUSION

Most nonestrogen therapies are effective treatments for the various symptoms of GSM. There are insufficient data to compare nonestrogen options to each other.

New Innovations for the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy: An Up-to-Date Review

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic progressive disease involving the female genital apparatus and lower urinary tract. This condition is related to hypoestrogenism consequent to menopause onset but is also due to the hormonal decrease after adjuvant therapy for patients affected by breast cancer. Considering the high prevalence of VVA and the expected growth of this condition due to the increase in the average age of the female population, it is easy to understand its significant social impact. VVA causes uncomfortable disorders, such as vaginal dryness, itching, burning, and dyspareunia, and requires constant treatment, on cessation of which symptoms tend to reappear. The currently available therapies include vaginal lubricants and moisturizers, vaginal estrogens and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), systemic hormone therapy, and Ospemifene. Considering, however, that such therapies have some problems that include contraindications, ineffectiveness, and low compliance, finding an innovative, effective, and safe treatment is crucial. The present data suggest great efficacy and safety of a vaginal laser in the treatment of genital symptoms and improvement in sexual function in patients affected by VVA. The beneficial effect tends to be sustained over the long-term, and no serious adverse events have been identified. The aim of this review is to report up-to-date efficacy and safety data of laser energy devices, in particular the microablative fractional carbon dioxide laser and the non-ablative photothermal Erbium-YAG laser.

The evidence behind the use of LASER for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence and lichen sclerosus: A state-of-the-art review

In recent years, LASER has been introduced as a minimally invasive treatment for a broad range of vaginal and vulvar symptoms and diseases. However, the efficacy and safety of vaginal and vulvar LASER has continuously been questioned. The aim of this study is to create an overview of the current literature and discuss the controversies within the use of LASER for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence and lichen sclerosus. A search string was built in PubMed. The search was commenced on August 25, 2021 and closed on October 27, 2021. Two authors screened the studies in Covidence for inclusion according to the eligibility criteria in the protocol. The data were extracted from the studies and are reported in both text and tables. This review included 114 papers, of which 15 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The effect of LASER as a vaginal treatment was investigated for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in 36 studies (six RCTs), vulvovaginal atrophy in 34 studies (four RCTs) and urinary incontinence in 30 studies (two RCTs). Ten studies (three RCTs) investigated the effect of vulvar treatment for lichen sclerosus. Half of the included RCTs, irrespective of indication, did not find a significant difference in improvement in women treated with vaginal CO₂ or Er:YAG LASER compared with their respective controls. However, most non-comparative studies reported significant improvement after exposure to vaginal or vulvar LASER across all indications. Included studies generally had a short follow-up period and only a single RCT followed their participants for more than 6 months post treatment. Adverse events were reported as mild and transient and 99 studies including 51 094 patients provided information of no serious adverse events. In conclusion, this review found that the effect of vaginal and vulvar LASER decreases with higher study quality where potential biases have been eliminated. We therefore stress that all patients who are treated with vaginal or vulvar LASER should be carefully monitored and that LASER for those indications as a treatment should be kept on a research level until further high-quality evidence is available.

CO2-Laser therapy and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a widespread condition with a great impact on quality of life and self-image.

AIM

We aimed to systematically review the current literature on CO2-Laser therapy efficacy for the treatment of GSM.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase databases were systematically queried in December 2020 Studies included women with a diagnosis of Vulvo-Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) or GSM without an history of gynaecological and/or breast cancer, pelvic organ prolapse staged higher than 2, pelvic radiotherapy or Sjogren's Syndrome. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42021238121.

OUTCOMES

Effects of CO2-Laser therapy on GSM symptoms assessed through subjective or objective efficacy measurement methods.

RESULTS

A total of 803 articles were identified. Of these, 25 studies were included in this review for a total of 1,152 patients. All studies showed a significant reduction in VVA and/or GSM symptoms (dryness, dyspareunia, itching, burning, dysuria). The pooled mean differences for the symptoms were: dryness -5.15 (95% CI:-5.72,-4.58; P < .001; I2:62%; n = 296), dyspareunia -5.27 (95% CI:-5.93,-4.62; P < .001; I2:68%; n = 296), itching -2.75 (95% CI:-4.0,-1.51; P < .001; I2:93%; n = 281), burning -2.66 (95% CI:-3.75, -1.57; P < .001; I2:86%; n = 296) and dysuria -2.14 (95% CI:-3.41,-0.87; P < .001; I2:95%; n = 281). FSFI, WHIS and VMV scores also improved significantly. The pooled mean differences for these scores were: FSFI 10.8 (95% CI:8.41,13.37; P < .001; I2:84%; n = 273), WHIS 8.29 (95% CI:6.16,10.42; P < .001; I2:95%; n = 262) and VMV 30.4 (95% CI:22.38,38.55; P < .001; I2:24%; n = 68). CO2-Laser application showed a beneficial safety profile and no major adverse events were reported.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Vaginal laser treatment resulted in both a statistically and clinically significant improvement in GSM symptoms. FSFI improved significantly in all 8 included studies but it reached a clinically relevant level only in 2 of them.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

The strength of the current meta-analysis is the comprehensive literature search. We reported data from a high number of patients (1,152) and high number of laser applications (more than 3,800). The main limitations are related to the high heterogeneity of the included studies investigating laser effects. Moreover, most of them are single center and nonrandomized studies.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that CO2-Laser is a safe energy-based therapeutic option for the management of VVA and/or GSM symptoms in postmenopausal women; however, the quality of the body of evidence is "very low" or "low". Filippini M, Porcari I, Ruffolo AF, et al., CO2-Laser therapy and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med 2022;19:452-470.

Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy with Fractional CO2 Laser: Evaluating Real-World Data

Objective: We aimed to evaluate real-world data for the use of fractional CO₂ laser therapy for treating symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). Background: VVA is widespread and can reduce the patients' quality of life. There is a lack of data regarding its therapy with laser, especially for daily practice (i.e., real-world data). Methods: Thirty-six patients were treated in a single medical center. They consisted of pre- and postmenopausal women and received three fractional CO₂ laser therapy treatments with 3-6 weeks between each treatment. Each patient financed the treatment privately. The symptoms pain, pruritus, dyspareunia, burning, dryness, and dysuria were recorded with a visual analog scale (1-10) before the first, second, and third laser treatment. The data were examined retrospectively. Results: Pain was reduced from a mean of 2.5 points (minimum 0, maximum 9 points) to 1.1 (minimum 0, maximum 8 points) before the third laser treatment. Pruritus showed a mean score of 3.8 (minimum 0, maximum 10 points). This decreased to 1.4 (minimum 0, maximum 8 points). Dyspareunia scored a mean of 6.8 (minimum 0, maximum 10 points). After two laser therapies, the score was 3.3 (minimum 0, maximum 8 points). Burning showed 4.2 points (minimum 0, maximum 10 points). Having experienced two laser therapy sessions, the patients scored 1.5 (minimum 0, maximum 9 points) points. The severity of dryness dropped from 6.5 (minimum 0, maximum 10 points) to 3.3 (minimum 0, maximum 9 points). Dysuria was stated with 1.8 points (minimum 0, maximum 10 points) before the first and 0.5 points (minimum 0, maximum 6 points) before the third laser therapy. All changes showed statistical significance (p < 0.002). Conclusions: This real-world data propose fractional CO₂ laser to reduce VVA-associated genital discomfort, thus being a valuable therapy option for pre- and postmenopausal women.

Carbon Dioxide Laser Vulvovaginal Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) causes significant symptomatic aggravation that affects the quality of life (QoL). Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), the hallmark of GSM, is managed with topical non-hormonal therapy, including moisturizers and lubricants, and topical estrogen application. Patients not responding/being unsatisfied with previous local estrogen therapies are candidates for a noninvasive modality. Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy, especially the fractionated type (FrCO2), has drawn considerable attention over the past two decades as a non-invasive treatment for GSM. This systematic review describes the accumulated evidence from 40 FrCO2 laser studies (3466 participants) in GSM/VVA. MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched through April 2021. We analyze the effects of FrCO2 laser therapy on symptoms, sexual function, and QoL of patients with GSM/VVA. As shown in this review, FrCO2 laser therapy for GSM shows good efficacy and safety. This modality has the potential to advance female sexual wellness. Patient satisfaction was high in the studies included in this systematic review. However, there is a lack of level I evidence, and more randomized sham-controlled trials are required. Furthermore, several clinical questions, such as the number of sessions required that determine cost-effectiveness, should be addressed. Also, whether FrCO2 laser therapy may exert a synergistic effect with systemic and/or local hormonal/non-hormonal treatments, energy-based devices, and other modalities to treat GMS requires further investigation. Lastly, studies are required to compare FrCO2 laser therapy with other energy-based devices such as erbium:YAG laser and radiofrequency.

Vaginal laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause - systematic review

BACKGROUND

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) can have a great impact on the quality of life (QOL), and affects between 53.8% and 90% of postmenopausal women. The literature suggests that vaginal laser therapy could be an effective treatment for GSM symptoms, but its efficacy and safety have not been established and international societies do not endorse its use. Despite that, there has been an increase in the use of vaginal laser therapy globally over the last decade.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the literature which assesses the efficacy and safety of the vaginal laser therapy in the treatment of GSM.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted electronically using Embase and PubMed to retrieve studies assessing evidence for the efficacy and safety of vaginal laser therapy for GSM or vulvovaginal atrophy up to June 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 64 studies were finally included in the review. There were 10 controlled intervention studies, 7 observational cohort and cross-sectional studies and 47 before-after studies without a control group.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal laser seems to improve scores on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Vaginal Health Index (VHI) in GSM over the short term. Safety outcomes are underreported and short-term. Further well-designed clinical trials with sham-laser control groups and evaluating objective variables are needed to provide the best evidence on efficacy.

The Efficacy of Vaginal Laser and Other Energy-based Treatments on Genital Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review examined energy-based treatments of the vagina for postmenopausal vaginal symptoms.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic review from April 2017 (the end date of our previous review) to April 2020, searching Medline, Embase, and Scopus.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The inclusion criteria were all randomized studies, prospective studies with >10 cases, and retrospective studies with >20 cases published in English or French that assessed change in postmenopausal vaginal symptoms and/or sexual function in women after energy-based vaginal treatments. Meta-analyses were performed on randomized data.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Of the 989 results retrieved, 3 randomized studies, 16 prospective studies, and 7 retrospective studies were included in the review, representing data from 2678 participants. Pooled data from 3 randomized controlled trials show no difference between vaginal laser and topical hormonal treatments for change in vaginal symptoms (-0.14, 95% confidence interval -1.07 to 0.80) or sexual function scores (2.22, 95% confidence interval -0.56 to 5.00). Furthermore, no difference among vaginal laser, topical hormone, and lubricant was demonstrated in sexual function (p = .577). As in our previous review, non-randomized data support energy-based treatments in improving vaginal symptoms, sexual function, and clinician-reported outcomes. No severe adverse events were reported in the included studies. Significant heterogeneity of data arising from differing measures and reported outcomes continues to be an issue, with data remaining low quality, with high risk of bias, and no double-blind or placebo-controlled randomized trials yet reported, although 1 has now completed recruitment.

CONCLUSION

There are 3 randomized trials comparing energy-based systems with hormonal treatment, with no clinical difference in these 2 approaches. Although prospective data continue to show promising outcomes, without strong evidence from well-powered, double-blind placebo-controlled trials to determine the efficacy of treatment compared with placebo, the use of energy-based treatments should continue to be undertaken in research studies only, with high-quality studies essentially free from bias (International Prospective Register of Systematic Review registration number: 178346).