Results of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma—Value of Endoscopic Screening: 10-Year Experience

Second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity - a retrospective cohort study of therapeutic procedures and oncological outcome

OBJECTIVES

In the presented study, the occurrence rates of second primary oral carcinomas and their prognostic relevance were analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with surgically treated oral squamous cell carcinomas within the years 2010 and 2022 in our department were included in this retrospective cohort study. Two groups were designed including patients with second primary carcinomas and patients with local tumor recurrences. Occurrence rates, tumor stages and applied therapies were assessed. Primary outcome was overall survival in dependence of the index tumor. Secondary outcomes were overall survival in dependence of local recurrences or second primary tumors.

RESULTS

An overall number of 908 patients was included in the analysis. 98 patients (10.8%) developed a second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with second primary tumors presented significantly (p < 0.001) better overall survival in dependence of the index tumor compared to patients suffering from local recurrences. There was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.4) in dependence of the date of second primary tumor or local recurrence. Patients with second primary tumors were more likely to receive surgery-based therapy compared to patients with local recurrences who more frequently received definitive radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicates different clinical courses in terms of therapy and survival of patients suffering from second primary tumors compared to patients with local tumor recurrences. This may be due to a more aggressive biology of local recurrences and earlier detection of second primaries due to oncological follow-up of the index tumor.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The differentiation of local tumor recurrences and second primary tumors is of clinical relevance, as applicable therapies and resulting prognosis may differ significantly.

Metachronous primary cancer of the tongue and malignant lymphoma of the small intestine: A case report

RATIONALE

Oral cancer often causes secondary primary cancers in the upper gastrointestinal tract. However, there are no reports of secondary primary cancers in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and malignant lymphoma of the small intestine. This report describes a case of metachronous multiple primary cancers of the tongue and small intestine malignant lymphoma.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

The patient was admitted to our department with the chief complaint of pain in the right tongue. Partial tongue resection and supraomohyoid neck dissection were performed. One year after surgery, the patient experienced abdominal pain and bloody stools.

DIAGNOSIS

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was diagnosed via histological examination.

INTERVENTIONS

A terminal ileum resection was performed. Postoperatively, the patient received 6 courses of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP).

OUTCOMES

Five years after his initial diagnosis, there is no evidence of recurrence, metastasis, or other primary cancer.

LESSONS

Oral cancer patients should always be followed up owing to a possibility of malignant tumors in other areas.

The Utility of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Examination Versus Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in the Detection of Second Primary Lesions in Korean Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Head and neck cancer often accompany a synchronous secondary primary lesion in the digestive tract. The aim of this study was to compare detection rates between positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (G-fiber) or colonoscopy (C-fiber) in the initial staging and to analyze risk factors for premalignant, malignant, and total synchronous secondary primary lesions.

METHODS

A total of 739 patients with head and neck cancer who underwent PET-CT, G-fiber, or C-fiber were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Positron emission tomography-CT did not definitely detect any premalignant synchronous secondary primary lesions (0 [0%] of 739) but definitely detected 10 malignant synchronous secondary primary lesions (10 [1.35%] of 739). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy or C-fiber detected all 20 premalignant synchronous secondary primary lesions (20 [2.71%] of 739) and all 37 malignant synchronous secondary primary lesions (37 [5.00%] of 739). The patients with nasopharynx cancer tended to have premalignant synchronous secondary primary lesions (odds ratio [OR]: 3.793; 95% CI: 1.414-10.171; P = .008). Those with distant metastasis tended to have premalignant (OR: 4.743; 95% CI: 1.508-14.916; P = .009), malignant (OR: 3.803; 95% CI: 1.486-9.731; P = .005), and total synchronous secondary primary lesions (OR: 2.753; 95% CI: 1.159-6.538; P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

Premalignant or malignant synchronous secondary primary lesions that were not definitely detected by PET-CT could be found in the endoscopic examination.

Routine panendoscopy in oral squamous cell cancer patients: mandatory or facultative?

Objectives

This study investigated benefits of routine panendoscopy in staging of oral squamous cell cancer patients.

Materials and methods

From 2013 to 2017, 194 oral squamous cell cancer patients were staged. Reports of routine flexible panendoscopy including oropharyngolaryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy were retrospectively analyzed for diagnoses of inflammation and second primary malignancies (carcinoma in situ or cancer) and compared to results of computed tomography. The effects of alcohol and tobacco history of 142 patients were assessed.

Results

Overall, a second primary malignancy was detected in seven patients. In four patients this discovery was only found by panendoscopy. One invasive carcinoma (esophagus) was detected as well as three carcinoma in situ. The second primary malignancies were located in the lung (3), esophagus (3), and stomach (1). In one patient index tumor therapy was modified after panendoscopy. Upper gastrointestinal inflammation was present in 73.2% of patients and 61.9% required treatment. About 91.8% of bronchoscopies and 34.5% of panendoscopies were without therapeutic consequences. Patients with higher risk from smoking were more likely to benefit from panendoscopy and to have a Helicobacter pylori infection.

Conclusion

We do not recommend routine panendoscopy for all oral squamous cell cancer patients. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy benefitted smoking patients primarily concerning the secondary diagnosis of inflammation of the upper digestive tract. Selective bronchoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and oropharyngolaryngoscopy should be performed if clinical examination or medical history indicates risks for additional malignancies of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Clinical relevance

Routine panendoscopy is not recommended in all, especially not in low-risk oral cancer patients like non-smokers and non-drinkers.

Is panendoscopy a necessary staging procedure in patients with lacking risk factors and oral squamous cell carcinoma?

OBJECTIVES

Routine panendoscopy is used to detect synchronous malignancies of the upper aerodigestive tract in staging of oral squamous cell carcinoma. The goal of this study was to investigate the occurrence of synchronous malignancies at time of diagnosis using panendoscopy. To challenge the role of panendoscopy as inherent part of routine staging procedures, we were especially interested in low risk patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, a cohort of 484 patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of primary oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma was investigated. Electronically recorded findings of in-house conducted panendoscopy were retrieved and evaluated for the occurrence of pathological changes of the mucosa. In case of synchronous malignancies, findings were correlated to preoperative radiographic imaging. Patients were classified as high or low risk. Patients with lacking risk factors (no smoking, no drinking in history) were defined as low risk patients.

RESULTS

Overall, we detected three synchronous malignancies of the upper aerodigestive tract (3/484; 0.6%). Two non-small cell lung cancers were detected in patients with a smoking history of 60 pack years. One esophageal carcinoma in situ was detected in a patient with reported alcohol consumption. No synchronous malignancy was detected in patients without risk factors and no malignancy was previously detected by diagnostic imaging.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment panendoscopy can reveal synchronous malignancies of the upper aerodigestive tract in patients with primary oral squamous cell carcinoma. Risk stratification of patients can avoid unnecessarily conducted panendoscopy in patients without risk factors. This may lead to a higher cost-efficacy in public health system, less treatment-related complications and earlier treatment initiation.

Persistence of dysphagia and odynophagia after mediastinal radiation and chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer or lymphoma

Esophageal symptoms are common during radiation and chemotherapy. It is unclear how often these symptoms persist after therapy. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 320 adults treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer (84), lung cancer (109), or Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (127) who were disease-free at 10-14 months after therapy. Treatment included chemotherapy with or without nonmediastinal radiation therapy (150 patients), chemotherapy plus sequential mediastinal radiation therapy (MRT) (48 patients), chemotherapy plus concurrent MRT (61 patients), or non-MRT only (61 patients). Proton pump inhibitor use was documented. All treatment groups had similar prevalence of the esophageal symptom of heartburn before therapy. Rates were higher during treatment in those who received MRT with or without chemotherapy, but declined by 10-14 months after treatment. However, low baseline rates of dysphagia (4%) and odynophagia (2%) increased significantly after combined chemotherapy and MRT to 72% for dysphagia and 62% for odynophagia (P < 0.01) during treatment and stayed significantly elevated over baseline with 27% of the patients having dysphagia and 11% having odynophagia at 10-14 months after treatment. The use of proton pump inhibitors by patients who had MRT with chemotherapy was significantly increased during and after treatment (P = 0.002). Dysphagia, odynophagia and the use of proton pump inhibitors were significantly more common both during and after treatment than before treatment in patients who received both chemotherapy and mediastinal radiation. Our data highlight the important challenge for clinicians of managing patients with lung cancer and lymphoma who have persistent esophageal problems, particularly dysphagia and odynophagia, at approximately 1 year after treatment.

Comparison of PET imaging with 64Cu-liposomes and 18F-FDG in the 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced hamster buccal pouch model of oral dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Currently, 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is the gold standard radiotracer for staging of head and neck cancer; however, the low sensitivity of this tracer can impede detection of early lesions. (64)Cu-liposomes accumulate in various cancers and provide both a sensitive tracer and an indication of the biodistribution of nanotherapeutics. Here, the accumulation of (64)Cu-liposomes in early and established cancers is assessed and compared with (18)F-FDG in a head and neck cancer model.

METHODS

Lesions ranging from mild dysplasia to squamous cell carcinoma were induced in a hamster model of head and neck cancer by topical application of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene to the buccal pouch. The hamsters were imaged with micro-positron emission tomography using (18)F-FDG and (64)Cu-liposomes.

RESULTS

At 24 h postinjection, (64)Cu-liposome accumulation exceeded the accumulation of (18)F-FDG in every pathologic grade. The lesion-to-cheek pouch (background) ratio and lesion-to-brain ratio were also higher for (64)Cu-liposomes than for (18)F-FDG.

CONCLUSION

Imaging of a nanotracer such as (64)Cu-liposomes can improve the visualization of head and neck tumors. Accumulation of liposomal particles in head and neck tumors over various pathologic grades averaged 3.5%ID/cc demonstrating the potential for liposomal therapy with targeted chemotherapeutic agents.

Second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer

This is a review on second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer. These patients have a high risk of developing other cancers simultaneously or subsequently. The incidence of multiple primary tumors in this population can be as high as 27%. Recurrences are the most common cause of treatment failure within the first 2 years of follow-up. After the third year the diagnosis of a second primary tumor becomes the most important cause of morbimortality in head and neck cancer patients, especially in those treated for cancers early diagnosed. Most second primary tumors occur in the upper aerodigestive tract (40%-59%), lung (31%-37.5%), and esophagus (9%-44%). Patients who develop second primary tumor have a significant reduction of survival expectancy.

Esophageal pathology in patients after treatment for head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of esophageal pathology following treatment for primary head and neck cancer (HNCA).

STUDY DESIGN: Case series with planned data collection.

SETTING: Academic medical practice.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised HNCA survivors. Esophagoscopy was prospectively performed on 100 patients at least three months after treatment for HNCA. Patient demographics including cancer stage, cancer treatment, use of reflux medications, symptoms surveys, and esophageal findings were prospectively determined.

RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 64 (± 10) years; 75 percent were male. The mean time between the end of treatment and endoscopy was 40 (± 51) months. Eighty-one percent of HNCA was advanced stage (3 or 4). The distribution of site of the primary HNCA was as follows: oropharynx (38%), larynx (33%), oral cavity (17%), unknown primary (10%), hypopharynx (1%), and nasopharynx (1%). Treatment modalities included surgery alone (15%), surgery with radiation (34%), radiation alone (6%), chemoradiation alone (24%), and chemoradiation with surgery (20%). The findings on esophagoscopy included peptic esophagitis (63%), stricture (23%), candidiasis (9%), Barrett metaplasia (8%), gastritis (4%), and carcinoma (4%). Only 13 percent had a normal esophagoscopy.

CONCLUSION: Esophageal pathology is extremely common in patients treated for HNCA. These findings support routine esophageal screening after HNCA treatment.

© 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. All rights reserved.