Intraoral Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy-A Pilot Study in Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

Advances in mechanism and management of bone homeostasis in osteonecrosis: a review article from basic to clinical applications

Osteonecrosis, characterized by bone cell death leading to impaired bone recovery, causes challenges in bone homeostasis maintenance. Bone homeostasis relies on the delicate balance between osteoclasts and osteoblasts, encompassing a series of complex and strictly regulated biological functions. Current treatments, including conservative therapies and surgeries, often fall short of expected outcomes, necessitating a reorientation towards more effective therapeutic strategies according to the pathogenesis. In this review, the authors hierarchically outlined risk factors, emerging mechanisms, and last-decade treatment approaches in osteonecrosis. By connecting mechanisms of bone homeostasis, the authors proposed future research directions should be focused on elucidating risk factors and key molecules, performing high-quality clinical trial, updating practice, and accelerating translational potential.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare condition, typically seen in patients receiving antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drugs. This study aims to synthesize reports and case series of MRONJ regarding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments applied. Following PRISMA guidelines, a search for case reports and case series was carried out in the PubMed-Medline database until March 2024. A total of 88 articles were included in this review, in a total of 151 cases. The key findings reveal that females were the most affected individuals (71% of the cases) with the average age at diagnosis being 66.27 years with a standard deviation of ±13.03. Stage 2 was the most observed stage, in 43% of cases, and zoledronic acid was the most commonly used drug (32% of cases). The oral route was the most common route of administration, in 26% of cases, with an average administration duration of 60.88 months (standard deviation ± 50.92). The mandible was the most commonly affected anatomical location (in 60% of cases). Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (875 mg + 125 mg) and chlorhexidine (0.12%) were the most used antibiotics and mouthwash, with 16% and 26% of the cases, respectively. Surgical debridement was the most common surgical procedure, in 32% of cases, while the use of an L-PRF membrane was the most prevalent unconventional treatment, in 21% of cases. This study identified a statistically significant relationship between unconventional treatments and the cure of MRONJ (p < 0.001), indicating the need for further research to confirm these results.

[Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws]

The number of patients with metabolic osteopathies and oncological diseases occurring with the formation of bone metastases is constantly growing and requires special attention not only of oncologists, but also maxillofacial surgeons, dental surgeons and periodontists, due to severe complications from the oral cavity, against the background of antiresorptive therapy with bisphosphonates. These drugs are associated with the development of necrotic processes of the jaw bones and surrounding tissues. It is worth noting the fact that the development of complications after taking these drugs leads to a significant increase in the suffering of patients. The importance of an integrated approach to the treatment and prevention of such complications is extremely important, as it reduces the risk of possible complications and improves the quality of life of this group of patients.

The Treatment of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ): A Systematic Review with a Pooled Analysis of Only Surgery versus Combined Protocols

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious adverse reaction of antiresorptive and antiangiogenic agents, and it is also a potentially painful and debilitating condition. To date, no specific studies have prospectively evaluated the efficacy of its treatment and no robust standard of care has been established. Therefore, a systematic review (2007-2020) with a pooled analysis was performed in order to compare MRONJ surgical techniques (conservative or aggressive) versus combined surgical procedures (surgery plus a non-invasive procedure), where 1137 patients were included in the pooled analysis. A statistically significant difference in the 6-month improvement rate, comparing combined conservative surgery versus only aggressive (91% versus 72%, p = 0.05), was observed. No significant difference regarding any group with respect to the 6-month total resolution rate (82% versus 72%) was demonstrated. Of note, conservative surgery combined with various, adjuvant, non-invasive procedures (ozone, LLLT or blood component + Nd:YAG) was found to achieve partial or full healing in all stages, with improved results and the amelioration of many variables. In conclusion, specific adjuvant treatments associated with minimally conservative surgery can be considered effective and safe in the treatment of MRONJ, although well-controlled studies are a requisite in arriving at definitive statements.