Is Tongue-Lip Adhesion or Mandibular Distraction More Effective in Relieving Obstructive Apnea in Infants With Robin Sequence?

Diagnosis and Early Management of Robin Sequence

The results of a survey of twenty-four neonatal units in the United Kingdom and Ireland are presented. A structured ten-item questionnaire was used, and demonstrated the variation in how infants with RS are diagnosed and managed. Notably, the survey revealed that a minority of infants were diagnosed antenatally. There were significant discrepancies in diagnostic criteria used and 79% of the units referred the patients to tertiary services. A preference for minimally invasive approaches to managing upper airway obstruction, such as a trial of prone positioning before progressing to a nasopharyngeal airway, was reported by 96% of the centers. A narrative review was undertaken which discusses the current practices for diagnosis and early management of Robin sequence (RS). The challenges of antenatal diagnosis, strategies to enhance outcomes through early detection and controversies surrounding the management of neonatal upper airway obstruction associated with RS are included. The results of the survey and our comprehensive review of the literature emphasize that there remains uncertainty regarding the best approach to treating Robin sequence.

Computerized Surgical Planning for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis is a technically challenging procedure due to complex mandibular anatomy, especially in the treatment of Pierre-Robin Sequence due to variable bone thickness in the infant mandible and the presence of tooth buds. Computerized surgical planning (CSP) simplifies the procedure by preoperatively visualizing critical structures, producing cutting guides, and planning distractor placement. This paper describes the process of using CSP to plan mandibular distraction osteogenesis, including discussion of recent advances in the use of custom distractors.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical approaches for improving airway stability in infants with Robin sequence: evaluating complications and outcomes

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the most effective and least morbid surgical technique for relieving retroglossal airway obstruction in infants with Robin sequence (RS). The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included 25 studies (24 cohorts and one case series) that investigated interventions for airway improvement, including conservative measures, tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), and tracheostomy. The primary outcome variable was complication rate, while predictor variable was the use of interventions for airway improvement. Results showed that conservative measures were the preferred initial management strategy in most studies, while TLA was recommended for infants with mild obstruction, and MDO or tracheostomy was reserved for severe cases. Only complications could be analysed via meta-analysis due to data heterogeneity, revealing that tracheostomy had a summary odds ratio of 5.39 in favour of TLA, while MDO had a ratio of 2.8 over TLA, and the complication rates were similar between MDO and tracheostomy. If conservative measures fail, the study recommends mandibular distraction as the preferable technique for stable airway improvement. If the infant is unsuitable for distraction, tongue-lip adhesion may serve as an alternative, while tracheostomy should be reserved for cases of severe multi-level obstruction. The authors propose that large-scale, multicentre trials comparing long-term outcomes are required to establish definitive guidelines.

Surgical Outcome and Treatment Trends in 1289 Infants with Micrognathia: A Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND

Studies of infants with micrognathia, especially Robin sequence, are limited by its rarity and both phenotypic and diagnostic variability. Most knowledge of this condition is sourced from small, single-institution samples.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study including infants with micrognathia admitted to 38 Children's Hospital Neonatal Consortium centers from 2010 through 2020. Predictor variables included demographic data, birth characteristics, cleft, and syndrome status. Outcome variables included length of stay, death, feeding or respiratory support, and secondary airway operations.

RESULTS

A total of 1289 infants with micrognathia had surgery to correct upper airway obstruction. Mean age and weight at operation were 34.8 ± 1.8 weeks and 3515.4 ± 42 g, respectively. A syndromic diagnosis was made in 150 (11.6%) patients, with Stickler (5.4%) and Treacher Collins (2.2%) syndromes being the most common. Operations included mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) in 66.3%, tracheostomy in 25.4%, and tongue-lip adhesion (TLA) in 8.3%. Patients receiving a tracheostomy had lower birthweight, head circumference, gestational age, and Apgar scores. Patients undergoing MDO were less likely to need a second airway operation compared with patients undergoing TLA (3.5% versus 17.8%; P < 0.001). The proportion of infants feeding exclusively orally at hospital discharge differed significantly, from most to least: MDO, TLA, and tracheostomy. Hospital length of stay was not statistically different for patients who had MDO or TLA, but was longer for those with primary tracheostomy. The mortality rate was low for all operations (0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this surgical patient cohort, MDO was associated with shorter hospital stay, improved oral feeding, and lower rates of secondary airway operations. Prospective multicenter studies are necessary to support these conclusions.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Mid-term effect of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on clinical and polysomnography findings of patients with Robin sequence

The study aimed to evaluate the mid-term effect of MDO in children with Robin sequence (RS). In this case series, 13 patients with RS who underwent MDO were followed up for more than 5 years. Data were collected using clinical history and physical examination. Polysomnography was performed and endoscopic evaluations of the airway was performed if patients still presented obstructive signs of upper airways and/or dysphagia. The patients' clinical signs improved in the mid-term after versus before MDO (inspiratory noise, 92,3% vs 30,8%; apnea, 84,6% vs 7,7%; cyanosis, 76,9% vs 0%; desaturations, 69,2% vs 0%; and suprasternal/intercostal retractions, 61,5% vs 0%; p < 0.05). Statistically significant improvement was noted in the following polysomnographic parameters evaluated in the pre and postoperative mid-term: apnea-hypopnea index, total sleep time and desaturation index (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of the study it seems that MDO is an effective surgical option for children with RS, not only in the short term as previously demonstrated, but also in the mid-term.

MicroNAPS: A Novel Classification for Infants with Micrognathia, Robin Sequence, and Tongue-based Airway Obstruction

Background

Robin sequence (RS) describes a heterogeneous population with micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction (UAO). Workup, treatment, outcomes assessment, and research inclusion are widely variable. Despite several classifications and algorithms, none is broadly endorsed. The objective of this investigation was to develop and trial a novel classification system designed to enhance clinical communication, treatment planning, prognostication, and research.

Methods

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. A classification system was developed with five elements: micrognathia, nutrition, airway, palate, syndrome/comorbidities (MicroNAPS). Definitions and a framework for "stage" assignment (R0-R4) were constructed. Stage "tongue-based airway obstruction" (TBAO) was defined for infants with glossoptosis and UAO without micrognathia. MicroNAPS was applied to 100 infants with at least 1-year follow-up. Clinical course, treatment, airway, and feeding characteristics were assessed. Descriptive and analytic statistics were calculated and a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Of the 100 infants, 53 were male. Mean follow-up was 5.0 ± 3.6 years. R1 demonstrated feeding-predominant mild RS for which UAO was managed nonoperatively but gastrostomy tubes were prevalent. R2 was characterized by airway-predominant moderate RS, typically managed with mandibular distraction or tongue-lip adhesion, with few gastrostomy tubes and short lengths-of-stay. R3 denoted severe RS, with similar UAO treatment to R2, but with more surgical feeding tubes and longer admissions. R4 represented a complex phenotype with 33% tracheostomies, protracted hospitalizations, and delayed palatoplasty. R0 ("at risk") and TBAO groups displayed the most variability.

Conclusions

MicroNAPS is easy to use and associated with relevant disease characteristics. We propose its adoption in clinical and research settings.

Is a Difficult Airway Team Needed for Intubation at Removal of Mandibular Distraction Devices for Infants With Robin Sequence?

PURPOSE

Difficult airway teams (DATs) are typically present to assist intubation at the initial mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) operation for infants with Robin sequence (RS). In some institutions, the RS diagnosis triggers a "difficult airway" label for the infant, requiring DAT presence for future operations. By the time of distractor removal, however, breathing and airway anatomy are significantly improved. The objective of this study was to measure intubation difficulty and perioperative respiratory complications at MDO device removal as a proxy for the necessity for coordination with a DAT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including infants with RS from 2013 to 2021 who had MDO during infancy. Patients were excluded if they had a tracheostomy or MDO device failure. Predictor variables included demographic data, comorbidities, and apnea-hypopnea indices (AHIs) from pre- and immediate post-MDO polysomnograms. The primary outcome measures were number of intubation attempts, laryngoscopy grade, and perioperative respiratory events at the distractor removal operation. Descriptive statistics were computed including Fisher's exact, paired sample t-tests, and Wilcoxon rank tests, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The sample included 47 (60% male) patients with a mean age at MDO of 12.0 ± 15.7 weeks. Significant improvement in AHI was seen after MDO (pre-MDO: 26.8 ± 18.4 events/hour; post-MDO 2.78 ± 2.66 events/hour; P < .001). Average number of intubation attempts decreased from 2.09 ± 1.36 to 1.30 ± 0.75 (P < .001) and the most common post-MDO laryngoscopy grade was 1 (69%). There were no intraoperative and 2 (4%) minor postoperative respiratory events, both in patients with repaired congenital cardiac disease and not related to traumatic intubation.

CONCLUSION

Neither difficult intubations nor perioperative respiratory events associated with intubation trauma were seen at distractor removal, suggesting that specialty airway assistance is not routinely needed after successful MDO. DAT presence should be determined on a case-by-case basis based on specific patient risk factors.

Pierre Robin and breathing: What to do and when?

Robin sequence is characterized by mandibular retrognathia, airway obstruction, and glossoptosis; 80%-90% also have a cleft palate. Various treatment approaches exist, and although controlled studies are rare, objective assessment of treatment outcomes that address the leading clinical issues, namely obstructive sleep apnea and failure to thrive, are essential. Sleep-disordered breathing may be detected using cardiorespiratory polygraphy or polysomnography. Pulse oximetry alone may miss infants with frequent obstructive apneas, yet no intermittent hypoxia. Among conservative treatment options, the Tubingen Palatal Plate with a velar extension shifting the tongue base forward is the only approach that corrects the underlying anatomy and that has undergone appropriate evaluation. Of the surgical treatment options, which are not necessarily the first line of therapy, mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is effective and has been most extensively adopted. Notwithstanding, it is puzzling that MDO is frequently used in some countries, yet hardly ever in others, despite similar tracheostomy rates. Thus, prospective multicenter studies with side-by-side comparisons aimed at identifying an optimal treatment paradigm for this potentially life-threatening condition are urgently needed.

Dental outcomes after neonatal mandibular distraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to understand dental complications associated with neonatal mandibular distraction and subsequent dental outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dental injury is often associated with neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Newer technology offers safer techniques to minimize this risk. Long-term follow up and dental outcomes in permanent dentition are needed to better understand the actual risk associated with the procedure.

SUMMARY

Surgeons performing neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis need to understand the associated risks to deciduous and permanent dentition as well as techniques to mitigate this risk.

Safety of Mandibular Osteotomies in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence: Computer-Aided Modeling to Characterize the Risks of Various Techniques

BACKGROUND

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis is effective for the correction of severe tongue-based airway obstruction in infants with Pierre Robin sequence. Involved osteotomies may damage developing tooth buds and/or the inferior alveolar nerve. The authors evaluated the theoretical safety of various osteotomy techniques to better define infantile mandibular anatomy using computer-aided modeling.

METHODS

Seven mandibular osteotomy techniques (oblique, inverted-L, multiangular, walking stick, high oblique, vertical/high inverted-L, and horizontal) were simulated using computed tomography studies from infants with Pierre Robin sequence and without other associated conditions. Software was used to manually segment the mandibular bone, inferior alveolar nerve, and tooth buds.

RESULTS

Sixty-five computed tomography scans were included, yielding 130 hemimandibles. The horizontal osteotomy pattern had significantly lower theoretical risk of tooth bud (p < 0.001) and inferior alveolar nerve involvement (p < 0.001) than all other patterns. Osteotomies with high vertical components (i.e., vertical, walking stick, and multiangular) had lower theoretical tooth bud involvement than the more proximal oblique and inverted-L osteotomies (p < 0.001). Average lingula location was measured at a point 65 percent of the mandibular width from anterior mandibular border and 63 percent of the mandibular height from the inferior mandibular border.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical planning with computed tomography scans can help evaluate an infant's mandibular anatomy to select an osteotomy that reduces morbidity risks. Regardless of technique, tooth buds and the inferior alveolar nerve are often included in osteotomies. The lingula location in this study demonstrates a position more superior and posterior than that previously described.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Neonates

Neonates have distinctive anatomic and physiologic features that predispose them to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The overall prevalence of neonatal OSA is unknown, although an increase in prevalence has been reported in neonates with craniofacial malformations, neurological disorders, and airway malformations. If remained unrecognized and untreated, neonatal OSA can lead to impaired growth and development, cardiovascular morbidity, and can even be life threatening. Polysomnography and direct visualization of the airway are essential diagnostic modalities in neonatal OSA. Treatment of neonatal OSA is based on the severity of OSA and associated co-morbidities. This may include medical and surgical interventions individualized for the affected neonate. Based on this, it is expected that infants with OSA have more significant healthcare utilization.

The Effect of Timing of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis on Weight Velocity in Infants Affected by Severe Robin Sequence

Background: Impaired weight gain is prevalent in Robin Sequence (RS) newborns. Although mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) has been proven to improve oral feeding, its impact on postoperative weight gain remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore whether MDO can help RS babies reach a normal weight, as well as the effect of MDO timing on weight velocity. Methods: One hundred infants with severe RS and one hundred with normal controls met the inclusion criteria for the study. Included patients underwent MDO. Weights at different timing points were recorded and analyzed and compared to normal controls. Results: After the distractor removal weights of patients undergoing MDO at <1 month and 1−2 months were close to the normal control (6.81 ± 0.93 kg versus 7.18 ± 0.61 kg, p = 0.012, and 6.82 ± 0.98 kg versus 7.37 ± 0.75 kg, p = 0.033, respectively), the weights of patients undergoing MDO at 2−3 months and 3−4 months still lagged behind (7.56 ± 1.29 kg versus 8.20 ± 0.61 kg, p = 0.000206 and 7.36 ± 1.05 kg versus 8.25 ± 0.77 kg, p = 0.004, respectively). The weights of all RS infants undergoing MDO showed no significant difference compared to the controls when they aged to 1 year (9.34 ± 0.99 kg versus 9.55 ± 0.45 kg, p = 0.254 for MDO at <1 month; 9.12 ± 0.91 kg versus 9.33 ± 0.46 kg, p = 0.100 for MDO at 1 to 2 months; 9.38 ± 0.29 kg versus 9.83 ± 0.53 kg, p = 0.098 for MDO at 2 to 3 months; and 9.38 ± 0.29 kg versus 9.83 ± 0.53 kg, p = 0.098 for MDO at 3 to 4 months). Conclusion: The MDO procedure helped patients with severe RS to reach a normal weight; and MDO intervention was recommended at an early stage for early weight gain.

Early weight gain in infants with Robin sequence after mandibular distraction

This retrospective cohort study was performed to assess weight gain in infants with Robin sequence (RS) treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). The primary outcome variable was average daily weight gain for the following time periods: (1) birth to MDO (T1), (2) MDO to distractor removal (T2), (3) distractor removal to 6 months later (T3), and (4) 6 months to 12 months following distractor removal (T4). Published growth curves were used for comparison. Differences were assessed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Twenty-two infants were included in the study. During T1, the infants had 9.47 ± 12.61 g/day less weight gain than expected (P = 0.001). However, for T2, T3, and T4, the infants demonstrated 3.48 ± 6.17 g/day (P = 0.028), 2.19 ± 4.47 g/day (P = 0.030), and 1.83 ± 3.25 g/day (P = 0.028) more weight gain than expected. Feeding tube use resulted in improved weight gain during T1 (P < 0.001), but was associated with poorer weight gain in T3 (P = 0.003) and T4 (P = 0.001). In conclusion, infants with RS treated by MDO demonstrated poorer weight gain relative to their peers between birth and the MDO operation. However, from the MDO procedure to 12 months post-distractor removal, infants who had MDO showed faster weight gain than their age-matched peers.

Airway and Feeding Outcomes in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Three Management Strategies

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains regarding optimal management of Pierre Robin sequence (PRS). The goal of this study was to compare airway and feeding outcomes in infants with PRS who underwent surgical intervention, specifically mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) or tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), or who had conservative management (CM) without surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive patients treated for PRS at a pediatric academic medical center, with at least one year follow-up, were included. Patients who underwent tracheostomy as an index procedure were excluded. Patients were divided into those who underwent MDO, TLA or CM. Feeding status and data from initial and follow-up polysomnograms were collected. Comparisons between groups were made using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Mann-Whitney pairwise comparison with a Bonferroni correction, when appropriate.

RESULTS

67 neonates were included. 19 underwent TLA, 29 underwent MDO and 19 underwent CM. The proportions of syndromic patients were similar between groups. Patients undergoing CM had the lowest baseline AHI (9.1), but there were no significant differences between TLA (20.1) and MDO (25.4). At follow-up, the three groups had similar mean AHI (MDO 1.3, TLA 4.2, CM 4.5). A similar proportion of patients achieved AHI 5 or less (TLA 89.5%, MDO 96.6%, CM 84.2%). At one year, there were no significant differences in weight percentiles or in risk of failure-to-thrive between groups. One patient from the TLA group required a tracheostomy.

CONCLUSION

The three treatment modalities achieved high airway and feeding success rates. All three modalities should have a place in the armamentarium of the craniofacial surgeon.

A parent's view on the care of their baby with Robin sequence

A Robin sequence parent presents the view that Robin sequence healthcare providers are engaging in practices which may be outdated, excessively invasive, and unnecessarily detrimental to quality of life, and proposes possible areas of research to improve patient outcomes.

Advantages and disadvantages of mandibular distraction in Robin sequence

Robin sequence (RS) is diagnosed in infants born with micrognathia, glossoptosis and varying degrees of upper airway obstruction (UAO). Due to the variable levels of hypoxia, severe breathing and feeding problems can occur. Treatment is determined by clinical severity, ranging from conservative interventions for mild cases to surgical interventions for severe cases. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a surgical technique that gradually lengthens the mandible after an osteotomy by using an internal or external distraction device, directly correcting the micrognathia. This review will focus on advantages and disadvantages of mandibular distraction in infants with RS.

The Surgical Treatment of Robin Sequence: Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in the Unfavorable Patient

INTRODUCTION

Neonates with severe Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) can be treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), tongue-lip adhesion, or tracheostomy; however, there is an active debate regarding the indications of MDO in this patient population. Published algorithms identify tracheomalacia, bronchomalacia, laryngomalacia, hypotonic syndromes, and central sleep apnea as contraindications for MDO and indications for tracheostomy, but these comorbidities may exist along a spectrum of severity. The authors propose that appropriately selected neonates with PRS who concurrently express 1 or more of these traditional contraindications may be successfully treated with MDO.

METHODS

The authors performed a 5-year retrospective chart review of all neonates who underwent MDO for treatment of severe PRS. All patients expressed a comorbidity previously identified as an indication for tracheostomy. Pre- and postoperative characteristics were recorded. Apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) before and after MDO were compared using 2-tailed repeated measures t-test.

RESULTS

The authors identified 12 patients with severe PRS and conditions associated with contraindications to MDO: 9 (75.0%) patients had laryngomalacia, 6 (50.0%) patients had tracheomalacia, 2 (16.6%) patients had bronchomalacia, 1 (8.3%) patient had central sleep apnea, and 3 (25.0%) patients had hypotonia. Five (41.7%) patients underwent concurrent gastrostomy tube placement due to feeding insufficiency. Average birthweight was 3.0 kg. Average pre-op AHI was 34.8. Average post-op AHI was 7.3. All patients successfully underwent MDO with avoidance of tracheostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

By employing an interdisciplinary evaluation of patient candidacy, MDO can safely and effectively treat upper airway obstruction and avoid tracheostomy in higher-risk neonatal patients with traditional indications for tracheostomy.

A Systematic Review of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthodontic Airway Plate for Airway Obstruction Treatment in Pierre Robin Sequence

OBJECTIVE

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is frequently performed to address airway obstruction in patients with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS), though more recently the technique of orthodontic airway plating (OAP) has gained traction. We aimed to evaluate OAP compared to MDO for airway obstruction in PRS.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar identified all studies published in English, which involved MDO or any form of OAP as treatments for PRS. All relevant articles were reviewed in detail and reported on, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Airway (tracheostomy avoidance, decannulation rate), feeding (full oral feeding tolerance).

RESULTS

Literature search identified 970 articles, of which 42 MDO studies and 9 OAP studies met criteria for review. A total of 1159 individuals were treated with MDO, and 322 individuals were treated with OAP. Primary outcomes appear similar for MDO and OAP at face value; however, this must be interpreted with different pretreatment contexts in mind.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthodontic airway plating may be considered for airway obstruction in PRS, as some airway-related and feeding-related outcomes appear similar with MDO, per existing evidence in the literature. However, since PRS severity differed between studies, OAP cannot be uniformly considered a replacement for MDO. Further research is required to more comprehensively assess these treatment modalities inclusive of metrics that allow for direct comparison.

Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis as a Primary Intervention in Infants With Pierre Robin Sequence

BACKGROUND

Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a triad of congenital facial abnormalities that can present as a syndrome (syndromic PRS [sPRS]) or an isolated entity (isolated PRS [iPRS]). Patients with PRS can develop airway and feeding problems that may result in failure to thrive. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a method for improving the functional issues associated with breathing and feeding. There is a Paucity of literature evaluating the outcomes of MDO between sPRS and iPRS patients.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of PRS patients managed by a single surgeon and treated with MDO between January 2015 and December 2019 at a tertiary referral hospital was performed. The patients were stratified into iPRS or sPRS based on gene testing. Airway outcome measures included avoidance of tracheostomy, relief of sleep apnea, and oxygen saturation improvement. Primary feeding measures included achievement of full oral feeds and growth/weight gain. Statistical analysis included t tests and χ2 tests where appropriate using SPSS.

RESULTS

Over the study period, of the 29 infants with PRS, 55% identified as iPRS and 45% as sPRS. There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics, apnea-hypoxia index (22.27 ± 12.27) and laryngeal view (3 ± 0.79) pre-MDO. After MDO, 83% of the subjects achieved a positive feeding outcome and 86% achieved a positive airway outcome with no statistical significance between sPRS and iPRS (P = 0.4369). There was a statistically significant change post-MDO in apnea-hypoxia index (5.24 ± 4.50, P = 0.02) and laryngeal view (1.59 ± 1.00, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our recent experience would lead us to believe that sPRS patients have greater morbidities and challenging clinical developments that, when properly evaluated, can be managed by MDO. There is a potential role for MDO in reducing the need for traditional surgical interventions for respiratory and feeding problems in both iPRS and sPRS patients.

Robin Sequence: Neonatal Mandibular Distraction

Pierre Robin sequence is defined by the clinical triad: mandibular hypoplasia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a standard treatment of Robin sequence associated with severe airway obstruction and is the only intervention that directly corrects the underlying anatomic pathologic condition. Compared with tongue-lip adhesion, MDO has demonstrated more success in treating airway obstruction in infants with Pierre Robin sequence, including patients with syndromic diagnoses and concomitant anomalies. This article provides a current, comprehensive review of neonatal mandibular distraction and offers treatment guidelines based on a combined surgical experience of more than 400 patients.

Do Infants With Robin Sequence Have Improved Feeding and Weight Gain After Mandibular Distraction?

PURPOSE

Infants with Robin sequence (RS) typically have impaired weight gain, presumed to result primarily from upper airway obstruction. Operations that improve airway obstruction are therefore theorized to facilitate feeding and weight gain, but the relationship between airway intervention and feeding improvement remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate weight gain over the first 3 years of life in patients with RS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with RS treated at Boston Children's Hospital from 1995 to 2016. The primary predictor variable was type of intervention (no operation, tongue-lip adhesion, mandibular distraction osteogenesis [MDO]). The primary outcome measure was weight-for-age Z-score. A control group of patients with isolated cleft palate without RS was also included. Individuals with tracheostomy or insufficient growth data were excluded. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 222 subjects were included: no operation, n = 61 (27.5%); tongue-lip adhesion, n = 78 (35.1%); MDO, n = 22 (9.9%); and control, n = 61 (27.5%). Mean age at tongue-lip adhesion was 37 ± 99 days compared with 247 ± 312 days for MDO (P < .05). At 6 months of age, the MDO group had the lowest mean weight (Z = -2.34 ± 1.88, P < .05) and both surgical groups were underweight compared with controls (P < .05). By 24 months of age, there were no weight differences between any study group. Individuals that had MDO at <3 months of age had significantly faster weight gain than those that had later operations (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RS who had an airway operation in the first year of life demonstrated poorer early weight gain but caught up to controls by 2 years of age. Patients that had MDO before 3 months of age had faster weight gain than those that had later operations. Neither age at operation nor type of intervention affected growth outcomes by 3 years of age, which were comparable with controls.

Total facial nerve injury during mandibular distraction osteogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Over the last 10-15 years, usage of internal mandibular distraction systems has increased in the pediatric population, particularly for craniofacial syndromes. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) has been shown to be effective in avoiding tracheostomy or achieving early decannulation in patients with micro-retrognathic mandibles in hemifacial microsomia or Pierre Robin sequence. As the frequency of the application of MDO has increased, so has the awareness and management of subsequent complications from the procedure. In this study, we discuss a complication involving paresis and eventual recovery of cranial nerve (CN) VII after the application of an MDO internal device at our institution in two cases. We also review the literature and propose multiple anatomic considerations that can impact more than just the marginal branch of CN VII.

METHOD

This study is a retrospective case study from our institution and a review of the literature. Pubmed was queried for terms singularly and in combination including "mandibular distraction osteogenesis", "facial nerve", "cranial nerve", "complications", "micrognathia", "retrognathia". After reviewing the results, studies discussing complications of MDO that involved CN VII were reviewed and included.

RESULTS

In the literature review and our retrospective review, CN VII injuries from MDO vary in their length and timing of onset. Management of this complication depended on the timing of onset and ranged from conservative management to removal of the distraction device. Majority (7/9) of the cases resolved to an eventual House-Brackmann of 0/6 with conservative measures.

CONCLUSION

Total facial nerve injury in association with MDO, has been scarcely reported, though the facial nerve is at great risk given its intimate location near the mandible particularly in neonates. It is encouraging that though it could be a devastating complication, out of all the cases reported, the large majority resolve with a combination of time and steroids.

Is Intensive Care Unit Admission Necessary After Removal of Mandibular Distraction Devices in Infants With Robin Sequence?

OBJECTIVE

Intensive care unit (ICU) care is routinely required after the operation to initiate mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) in infants with Robin sequence (RS). Many patients are also managed in the ICU after subsequent device removal. It is uncertain if ICU care, which is expensive and limited, is necessary after this second operation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of respiratory events following device removal. We hypothesized that respiratory events would be infrequent and non-ICU inpatient monitoring would be adequate.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study of patients with RS from 2013 to 2018.

PATIENTS

Patients were included if they had MDO and distractor removal during the first year of life. Patients were excluded if they had a tracheostomy or remained intubated after distractor removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Postoperative respiratory events.

RESULTS

Twenty-five (60% male) patients were included. Mean age and weight at distractor removal were 142 ± 79 days of life and 5.5 ± 1.1 kg. Mean apnea-hypopnea index after completion of distraction was 1.1 ± 1.5 events/hour. Two (8%) patients experienced postoperative respiratory events that required intervention. In 1 (4% of sample) of these, the event was deemed to have benefited from ICU-level care. Two variables were significantly associated with these events: congenital heart disease (P = .020) and concomitant procedure performed during the same operation (P = .020).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive care unit-level care is rarely needed after distractor removal in infants with RS. Intensive care unit admission should be considered in patients with congenital cardiac disease and when having multiple operations during the same anesthetic.

Short-term condylar and glenoid fossa changes in infants with Pierre Robin sequence undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis

The purpose was to evaluate short-term changes in condylar and glenoid fossa morphology in infants with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) undergoing early (age <4 months) mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) for the management of severe airway obstruction. Computed tomography data from infants with PRS who had MDO were compared to those of age-matched control infants without facial skeletal dysmorphology. Surface/volume, linear, and angular measurements of the condyle and glenoid fossa were obtained and compared between infants with PRS and controls. Eleven infants with PRS met the inclusion criteria. There were five female and six male subjects with a mean age at the time of MDO of 41±32 days. Prior to MDO, PRS mandibles had a smaller condylar articulating surface area and volume than age-matched control mandibles, with a more laterally positioned condylar axis (P≤0.05). Following MDO, there were significant increases in condylar articulating surface area and volume, approaching those of normal controls, with further lateral translation of the condylar axis (P≤0.05). Condyle and glenoid fossa morphology is largely normalized following early MDO in infants with PRS. The condylar axis translates laterally as a result of MDO; this change is not observed with mandibular growth in infants without PRS.

Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Does Not Increase Inpatient Complications

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to determine whether performing mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) during the neonatal period increased inpatient complications as measured through health-care burden.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study of the Kids’ Inpatient Database from 2000 to 2011. Infants receiving MDO prior to 12 months of age were included. The primary study predictor was distraction age, classified as either neonatal or non-neonatal. Secondary predictors were patient demographics, hospitalization characteristics, diagnoses, and procedures. The outcomes were the number of procedures performed, postoperative length of stay (pLOS), hospital charges, and the discharge transfer rate. Outcomes were compared between the primary predictors using χ2 and independent 2-sample t tests. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were created using clinically relevant predictors to assess the independent effect of neonatal age on each outcome.

Results:

The study sample contained 102 patients, of who 50 (49.0%) were distracted in the neonatal period. Neonatal MDO patients were more likely to have a cleft palate (86.0% vs 55.8%; P < .001) and present with feeding difficulties (38.0% vs 19.2%; P = .036) that were treated through total parenteral nutrition (26.0% vs 9.6%; P = .030) but otherwise did not have significantly different characteristics compared to non-neonatal patients. The multiple regression models confirmed that neonatal age did not influence any of the study outcomes, although other secondary predictors were found to influence the pLOS, hospital charges, and number of inpatient procedures.

Conclusions:

Neonatal MDO was not associated with increased complications. At experienced centers, neonatal status should not be considered a contraindication to treatment.

Managing the Child with Persistent Sleep Apnea

Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects 2% to 4% of American children, and is associated with metabolic, cardiovascular, and neurocognitive sequelae. The primary treatment for pediatric OSA is adenotonsillectomy. Children with obesity, craniofacial syndromes, and severe baseline OSA are at risk for persistent disease. Evaluation of persistent OSA should focus on identifying the causes of upper airway obstruction. Interventions should be tailored to address the patient's symptomatology, sites of obstruction, and preference for surgical versus medical management. Further research is needed to identify management protocols that result in improved outcomes for children with persistent OSA.