Surgical Outcomes of Orbital Fracture Reconstruction Using Patient-Specific Implants

Accuracy of surgical navigation for patient-specific reconstructions of orbital fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review the recent literature on the technical accuracy of surgical navigation for patient-specific reconstruction of orbital fractures using a patient-specific implant, and to compare surgical navigation with conventional techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane (Core Collection) databases on May 16, 2023. Literature comparing surgical navigation with a conventional method using postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography imaging was collected. Only articles that studied at least one of the following outcomes were included: technical accuracy (angular accuracy, linear accuracy, volumetric accuracy, and degree of enophthalmos), preoperative and perioperative times, need for revision, complications, and total cost of the intervention. MINORS criteria were used to evaluate the quality of the articles.

RESULTS

After screening 3733 articles, 696 patients from 27 studies were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate volumetric accuracy and revision rates. Meta-analysis proved a significant better volumetric accuracy (0.93 cm3 ± 0.47 cm3) when surgical navigation was used compared with conventional surgery (2.17 cm3 ± 1.35 cm3). No meta-analysis of linear accuracy, angular accuracy, or enophthalmos was possible due to methodological heterogeneity. Surgical navigation had a revision rate of 4.9%, which was significantly lower than that of the conventional surgery (17%). Costs were increased when surgical navigation was used.

CONCLUSION

Studies with higher MINORS scores demonstrated enhanced volumetric precision compared with traditional approaches. Surgical navigation has proven effective in reducing revision rates compared to conventional approaches, despite increased costs.

Comparison of patient specific implant reconstruction vs conventional titanium mesh reconstruction of orbital fractures using a novel method

To compare the reconstruction of orbital fractures using patient-specific implants (PSI) and conventional pre-formed titanium mesh; to develop a method of three-dimensional (3D) superimposition and analysis of the reconstructed orbits; and to present the pitfalls in 3D planning of orbital PSI and how to avoid them. This was a retrospective study of patients with orbital fractures who were treated in our institution between the years 2022 and 2023 using PSI or conservative prefabricated titanium mesh. Three different methods for virtual reconstruction of orbital fractures were used and are detailed with advantages, disadvantages and indications. Data acquired included age, gender, method of reconstruction, functional outcomes and aesthetic outcomes. 3D analysis for accuracy of reconstruction was performed. A total of 23 patients were included; 12 were treated using PSI and 11 using prefabricated titanium meshes. There were 8 male and 4 female patients in the PSI group comparted to 5 and 6 in the prefabricated group. All three virtual methods for reconstruction were used successfully, each with the proper indications. When comparing PSI reconstruction to conventional mesh, a significant difference in accuracy was observed; PSI cases showed an inaccuracy of 0.58 mm compared to 1.54 mm with the conventional method. Complications are presented, and tips for avoiding them are detailed. Three different methods for virtual reconstruction were used successfully; automated computerized reconstruction is used for small defects, repositioning is the superior method for non-comminuted cases while mirroring is the method of choice in comminuted fractures. 3D analysis can be performed using a novel method detailed in this report. PSI reconstruction showed superior results, indicating it should be the method of choice when possible. Pitfalls are presented and approaches to prevent them are discussed. Orbital reconstruction is a very important entity in maxillofacial surgery with crucial functional and esthetical implications, and one should use virtual planning and PSI implants, as they significantly improve outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Implantation in the Correction of Long-Term Posttraumatic Enophthalmos

SUMMARY

Long-term enophthalmos is a common orbital fracture sequela. Various autografts and alloplastic materials have been studied in posttraumatic enophthalmos repair. However, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) implantation in late enophthalmos repair has rarely been reported. The authors report novel use of ePTFE for late posttraumatic enophthalmos repair. This retrospective study included patients with posttraumatic long-term enophthalmos who underwent hand-carved ePTFE intraorbital implantation for enophthalmos correction. Computed tomography data were collected preoperatively and at follow-up. The volume of ePTFE, the degree of proptosis (DP), and enophthalmos were measured. Postoperative and preoperative DP and enophthalmos were compared using the paired t test. The correlation between ePTFE volume and DP increment was established using linear regression. Complications were identified by chart review. From 2014 to 2021, 32 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 19.59 months. The mean volume of implanted ePTFE was 2.39 ± 0.89 mL. After surgery, the DP of the affected globe improved significantly, from 12.75 ± 2.12 mm to 15.06 ± 2.50 mm ( P < 0.0001). A significant linear correlation was found between ePTFE volume and DP increment ( P < 0.0001). Enophthalmos was substantially ameliorated from 3.35 ± 1.89 mm to 1.09 ± 2.07 mm ( P < 0.0001). Twenty-five patients (78.23%) had postoperative enophthalmos of less than 2 mm. Infection and implant dislocation were not observed. The authors concluded that ePTFE intraorbital implantation exhibited long-term efficacy and safety for late posttraumatic enophthalmos repair and represents an effective and predictable alternative.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Automatic orbital segmentation using deep learning-based 2D U-net and accuracy evaluation: A retrospective study

The purpose of this study was to verify whether the accuracy of automatic segmentation (AS) of computed tomography (CT) images of fractured orbits using deep learning (DL) is sufficient for clinical application. In the surgery of orbital fractures, many methods have been reported to create a 3D anatomical model for use as a reference. However, because the orbit bone is thin and complex, creating a segmentation model for 3D printing is complicated and time-consuming. Here, the training of DL was performed using U-Net as the DL model, and the AS output was validated with Dice coefficients and average symmetry surface distance (ASSD). In addition, the AS output was 3D printed and evaluated for accuracy by four surgeons, each with over 15 years of clinical experience. One hundred twenty-five CT images were prepared, and manual orbital segmentation was performed in all cases. Ten orbital fracture cases were randomly selected as validation data, and the remaining 115 were set as training data. AS was successful in all cases, with good accuracy: Dice, 0.860 ± 0.033 (mean ± SD); ASSD, 0.713 ± 0.212 mm. In evaluating AS accuracy, the expert surgeons generally considered that it could be used for surgical support without further modification. The orbital AS algorithm developed using DL in this study is extremely accurate and can create 3D models rapidly at low cost, potentially enabling safer and more accurate surgeries.

Current Trends in Head and Neck Trauma

The practicing otolaryngologist frequently encounters consultation for injuries in the head and neck. Restoration of form and function is essential to normal activities of daily living and quality of life. This discussion intends to provide the reader with an up-to-date discussion of various evidence-based practice trends related to head and neck trauma. The discussion focuses on the acute management of trauma with minor emphasis on secondary management of injuries. Specific injuries related to the craniomaxillofacial skeleton, laryngotracheal complex, vascularity, and soft tissues are explored.

A retrospective comparison between one-stage and two-stage orbital reconstruction in patients suffering from combined injuries of the midface

Reconstruction of the bony orbit in patients with combined midface injuries is frequently discussed in the current literature. Two main concepts can be distinguished: single-stage reconstruction, usually with a hand-bent titanium orbital mesh, and two-stage reconstruction, in which osteosynthesis of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) is followed by orbital reconstruction with a virtually-planned, patient-specific titanium implant in a second surgery. This study aimed to compare one-stage and two-stage surgical approaches on combined midface fractures regarding postoperative diplopia. A total of 58 patients treated with one-stage (n = 29) or two-stage (n = 29) reconstruction of the ZMC and orbit were included, and their postoperative course over five months was retrospectively analysed. A descriptive quantitative analysis of the course of occurrence of diplopia was recorded to calculate the success of orbital repair in complex midface fractures including the orbit. The two workflows differed in the prevalence of postoperative clinical diplopia and eyelid complications. Multiple factors affect the decision whether or not to reconstruct the orbit first, and in the same intervention as the associated midface fracture. Thorough evaluation of each individual patient with a patient-specific choice of surgical concept is crucial, and includes multiple factors.

Virtual Planning and 3D Printing in the Management of Acute Orbital Fractures and Post-Traumatic Deformities

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and three-dimensional (3D) printing have advanced surgical reconstruction of orbital defects. Individualized 3D models of patients' orbital bony and soft tissues provide the surgeon with corrected orbital volume based on normalized anatomy, precise location of critical structures, and when needed a better visualization of the defect or altered anatomy that are paramount in preoperative planning. The use of 3D models preoperatively allows surgeons to improve the accuracy and safety of reconstruction, reduces intraoperative time, and most importantly lowers the rate of common postoperative complications, including over- or undercontouring of plates, orbital implant malposition, enophthalmos, and hypoglobus. As 3D printers and materials become more accessible and cheaper, the utility of printing patient-specific implants becomes more feasible. This article summarizes the traditional surgical management of orbital fractures and reviews advances in VSP and 3D printing in this field. It also discusses the use of in-house (point-of-care) VSP and 3D printing to further advance care of acute orbital trauma and posttraumatic deformities.

Patient-specific Implants for Orbital Fractures: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Orbital fractures are common facial fractures that can be challenging to repair and require careful attention to avoid unacceptable ophthalmic complications. Customized implants that are unique to an individual patient, or patient-specific implants (PSIs), have been increasingly used to repair orbital wall fractures. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence regarding custom-made orbital wall implants.

METHODS

A keyword search of published literature from January 2010 to September 2021 was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases. Original articles that included more than 3 human subjects with an orbital fracture repaired with a PSI were included. The search results were reviewed, duplicates were removed and relevant articles were included for analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The articles were categorized into 3 separate groups based on the method of PSI fabrication: manual molding of a PSI on a 3D-printed orbital model (53%), directly from a 3D printer (27%), or via a template fabricated from a 3D printer (20%). Three primary postoperative outcomes were assessed: rates of diplopia, enophthalmos, and orbital volume. Postoperative rates of diplopia and enophthalmos improved regardless of the PSI technique, and postoperative orbital volumes were reduced compared with their preoperative state. When PSIs were compared to conventional implants, patient outcomes were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of existing PSI orbital implant literature highlights that while PSI can accurately and safely repair orbital fractures, patient outcomes are largely comparable to orbital fractures repaired by conventional methods, and PSI do not offer a definitive benefit over conventional implants.

Personalized Medicine Workflow in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction

Restoration of the orbit is the first and most predictable step in the surgical treatment of orbital fractures. Orbital reconstruction is keyhole surgery performed in a confined space. A technology-supported workflow called computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has become the standard for complex orbital traumatology in many hospitals. CAS technology has catalyzed the incorporation of personalized medicine in orbital reconstruction. The complete workflow consists of diagnostics, planning, surgery and evaluation. Advanced diagnostics and virtual surgical planning are techniques utilized in the preoperative phase to optimally prepare for surgery and adapt the treatment to the patient. Further personalization of the treatment is possible if reconstruction is performed with a patient-specific implant and several design options are available to tailor the implant to individual needs. Intraoperatively, visual appraisal is used to assess the obtained implant position. Surgical navigation, intraoperative imaging, and specific PSI design options are able to enhance feedback in the CAS workflow. Evaluation of the surgical result can be performed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Throughout the entire workflow, the concepts of CAS and personalized medicine are intertwined. A combination of the techniques may be applied in order to achieve the most optimal clinical outcome. The goal of this article is to provide a complete overview of the workflow for post-traumatic orbital reconstruction, with an in-depth description of the available personalization and CAS options.