A Bibliometric Analysis of Platelet Derivate Uses in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

The role of platelet-rich plasma in biomedicine: A comprehensive overview

Biomedicine has seen significant advancements in the 21st century, with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) playing a crucial role in clinical practice. This blood derivative, enriched with platelet components, has shown great potential for promoting tissue repair and regeneration. Its wide range of applications and the presence of anti-inflammatory and growth-promoting factors make it a valuable tool in the field of biomedicine. The exploration of PRP in clinical settings has been gaining momentum. Despite its cost-effectiveness, safety, and therapeutic efficacy, the widespread clinical adoption of PRP has been hindered by the absence of consistent preparation standards and standardized treatment protocols. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the clinical uses, physiological roles, molecular mechanisms, and preparation techniques of PRP in biomedicine. The aim is to offer a thorough understanding of the potential applications and benefits of PRP in medical practice.

Evaluating Growth in Dry Socket Publications: A Bibliometric Analysis

Dry socket, a common postextraction complication, occurs when the blood clot in the tooth socket fails to form or is dislodged, leading to severe pain and delayed healing. This study aimed to analyze the publication trends and key features of dry socket research published from 1905 to 2024 worldwide. A quantitative bibliometric approach was employed to extract data from the Web of Science database. The search strategy included Topics = ("dry socket" OR "alveolar osteitis") and covered publications up to December 31, 2024. The search captured all types of documents to provide a comprehensive overview. The study analyzed and extracted several bibliometric parameters, including the classification of clinical versus nonclinical studies, level of evidence, trends in research, and citations over time, as well as information on the leading journals, countries, institutions, authors, and top keywords. Data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel (version 16, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.10, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands) software. Our search identified 713 documents, averaging 18.85 citations per publication. Most studies were clinical, and level 2 was the most frequently observed level of evidence. Approximately 82% of the publications were released in the past 24 years, from 2001 to 2024. Over one-third of the literature was published in the top 10 journals, with the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery being the most preferred. The United States produced the most research and had the highest citation impact. The Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences contributed the largest number of publications, while The University of Manchester had the highest citation impact. Majid Eshghpour was the most productive author. The most influential keywords identified were "dry socket", "alveolar osteitis", and "tooth extraction". This bibliometric study provides valuable insights into the evolving body of research on dry sockets, offering a clear picture of the leading topics, influential journals, and key contributors shaping this field. Future research efforts should continue to build on these findings, focusing on innovative clinical interventions, preventive measures, and further exploration of less studied areas.

A global landscape analysis of the impact, trends, and dissemination in oral and maxillofacial surgery research

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to comprehensively analyze the global landscape of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) literature through bibliometrics. The research focuses on evaluating publication trends, influential topics, and the impact of scholarly works within the field.

METHODS

Following the principles of the Leiden Manifesto, a literature search was conducted using the Web of Science database, encompassing seven OMFS journals. A total of 18,218 publications were analyzed, with indicators such as publication language, geographic location, specialty, year, citation, and authorship examined. Statistical analyses, including Pearson correlation tests and angular coefficient calculations, were performed in RStudio.

RESULTS

The study revealed a strong upward trend in publications related to orthognathic surgery, trauma, and infections. Geographic analysis indicated a dominance of European and Asian contributions, with the USA leading in overall publications. The impact of self-citations was explored, emphasizing nuanced perspectives on their role in scholarly impact metrics. The data provided insights into the scholarly impact of OMFS publications, including the H-index, number of citations, and citing articles.

CONCLUSION

The findings underscored potential global discrepancies in OMFS research, both geographically and in terms of topics covered. The study discussed the influence of language and journal impact on citation counts, emphasizing the role of English publications. Specific topics, such as trauma and infections, exhibited high scholarly interest and citation rates. Recommendations were made to encourage submissions on specific topics, such as cosmetic surgery and pathology, to enhance the diversity of OMFS literature. The study aims to foster international collaboration and leverage bibliometrics for evidence-based decision-making, educational strategies, and advancements in the dynamic field of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Knowledge mapping and research trends of distraction osteogenesis in oral and maxillofacial surgery

BACKGROUND

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has found extensive use in oral and maxillofacial surgery for correcting maxillofacial deformities due to its numerous advantages. However, comprehensive scientific and visual analyses of this field on a global scale are rare. Therefore, this study aims to provide a summary of the global trends and current status of DO in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

METHOD

Publications concerning DO in oral and maxillofacial surgery were comprehensively searched and selected from the Web of Science Core Collection(WOSCC) database. We evaluated the annual contributions from institutions, journals, countries, and authors using bibliometric analysis software.

RESULTS

A total of 541 publications were included in this study. The USA played a predominant role in this field, leading in both publication volume and international collaboration. Harvard University and the University of Hong Kong secured the top position in total publications, while the University of Texas System topped the list in total citations within this field. The Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery emerged as the primary contributing journal, and Cheung LX emerged as the primary contributing author in the field of distraction osteogenesis (DO) in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Keywords such as 'orthognathic surgery,' 'reconstruction,' and 'osteogenesis' are anticipated to be prominent topics in future research.

CONCLUSION

Between 1995 and 2023, there has been rapid growth in the total number of publications within the field of distraction osteogenesis (DO) in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The USA stands out as the predominant country in this field. Surgeries, orthognathic surgery, and osteogenesis have emerged as prominent topics. The findings of our study offer valuable insights for scholars seeking to identify research hotspots and chart the developmental direction of DO in oral and maxillofacial surgery.