Detection and Treatment of Perioperative Corneal Abrasions

Ocular toxicities in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: a real-world study leveraging FAERS database

Aim: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively explore the ocular toxicity associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Materials & methods: Data were assembled from the US FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2017 to 2023. Information component and reporting odds ratio methods were used for signal detection in total/categorized CAR T-cell therapy. Results: A total of 17 positive signals (preferred term) were detected, yet none of them were documented in the product information. Some adverse events were with death outcomes and overlapped a lot with cytokine-release syndrome. Conclusion: The ocular adverse events associated with CAR-T cell therapy are noteworthy, and it is imperative to maintain increased alertness and institute early intervention strategies.

Risk stratification, prevention and management of perioperative corneal abrasion for non-ocular surgery: Systematic Review

Background

A corneal abrasion is a flaw in the cornea's epithelial surface, which is located in the front of the eye. It causes recurrent erosions, corneal inflammation, and chronic corneal defects. In a context with limited resources, the goal of this review was to provide an evidence-based procedure for perioperative risk stratification, prevention, and management of corneal abrasion during non-ocular surgery.

Methods

A medical search engines of PUBMED, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, COCHRANE REVIEW, and PUBMED CENTERAL to get access for current and updated evidence on procedures on risk stratification, prevention and management of corneal abrasion for non-ocular surgery. The authors formulate the key questions, scope, and articles written in English language, human study focuses on corneal abrasion, articles in the last 20 year was implemented to identify or filter high-level evidences were included. Reports contain corneal abrasion due to ocular surgery were excluded. All the research articles, which were identified from searches of electronic databases, were imported into Endnote software, duplicate were removed advanced search strategy of electronic sources from databases and websites was conducted using Boolean operators (cornea AND (abrasion OR injury OR laceration)) AND ("Perioperative Period" OR "general anesthesia"). Screening of literatures was conducted with proper appraisal checklist. This review was reported in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement.

Results

From 8767 identified articles, two hundred articles were removed for duplication and 7720 studies were excluded, 1205 articles were retrieved and evaluated for eligibility. Finally, 24 were included in this systematic review. Advanced age, Prominent eyes, exophthalmus, ocular surface abnormalities (dry eye), expected duration of surgery (>1 h), the favourable position of the surgery, prone,Trendelenburg and lateral, risk of bleeding, surgical site of the surgery(head /neck) and diabetes mellitus were risk for corneal abrasion. The use of appropriate intervention with pharmacological and Non-pharmacological strategies minimizes the occurrence of perioperative corneal abrasion was crucial for the quality of care.

Conclusion

Preventing and managing corneal abrasion improves patients' quality of life. However, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions, and high-quality trials of multimodal interventions matched to risk stratification and prevention of corneal abrasion needed to provide robust evidence to guide prevention and management of perioperative corneal abrasion.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal abrasion

BACKGROUND

Corneal abrasion is a common disorder frequently faced by ophthalmologists, emergency physicians, and primary care physicians. Ocular antibiotics are one of the management options for corneal abrasion. A comprehensive summary and synthesis of the evidence on antibiotic prophylaxis in traumatic corneal abrasion is thus far unavailable, therefore we conducted this review to evaluate the current evidence regarding this important issue.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of topical antibiotic prophylaxis following corneal abrasion. Our objectives were 1) to investigate the incidence of infection with antibiotics versus placebo or alternative antibiotics in people with corneal abrasion; and 2) to investigate time to clinical cure, defined as complete healing (re-epithelialization) of the epithelium, with antibiotics versus placebo or alternative antibiotics in people with corneal abrasion.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2021, Issue 4), Ovid MEDLINE, Embase.com, PubMed, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (LILACS), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 25 April 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotic with another antibiotic or placebo in children and adults with corneal abrasion due to any cause.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence for the prespecified outcomes using the GRADE classification.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search of the electronic databases yielded 8661 records. We screened 7690 titles and abstracts after removal of duplicates. We retrieved 32 full-text reports for further review. We included two studies that randomized a total of 527 eyes of 527 participants in the review. One study was conducted in Denmark, and one was conducted in India. The two studies did not examine most of our prespecified primary and secondary outcomes. The first study was a parallel-group RCT comparing chloramphenicol ocular ointment with fusidic acid ocular gels (frequency was not clearly reported). This study enrolled 153 participants older than 5 years of age with corneal abrasion in Denmark with a one-day follow-up duration. No participants had secondary infection in the fusidic acid group, whereas three (4.1%) participants in the chloramphenicol group had a slight reaction (risk ratio [RR] 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 2.79; 144 participants; very low certainty evidence). Thirty-one (44.3%) participants in the fusidic acid arm and 34 (46.6%) participants in the chloramphenicol arm were cured (defined as the area of abrasion zero and no infection) at day 1 (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.34; 144 participants; very low certainty evidence). Without providing specific data, the study reported that the degree of pain was not affected by the interventions received. The most common adverse events reported were itching and discomfort of the eye, which occurred in approximately one-third of participants in each group (low certainty evidence). A second multicenter, two-arm RCT conducted in India enrolled 374 participants older than 5 years of age with corneal abrasion who presented within 48 hours after injury. This study investigated the effect of a three-day course of either ocular ointment combinations of chloramphenicol-clotrimazole or chloramphenicol-placebo (all three times daily). At day 3, 169 (100%) participants in the chloramphenicol-clotrimazole arm and 203 (99%) out of 205 participants in the chloramphenicol-placebo arm were cured without any complication, defined as complete epithelialization of the cornea without evidence of infection (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03; 374 participants; very low certainty evidence). Four participants assigned to the chloramphenicol-placebo arm experienced mild adverse events: two participants (1%) had mild chemosis and irritation, and two (1%) had small single sterile corneal infiltrates (low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given the low to very low certainty of the available evidence, any beneficial effects of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing ocular infection or accelerating epithelial healing following a corneal abrasion remain unclear. Moreover, the current evidence is insufficient to support any antibiotic regimen being superior to another. There is a need for a well-designed RCT assessing the efficacy and safety of ocular antibiotics in the treatment of corneal abrasion with a particular focus on high-risk populations and formulation of interventions.

A Quality Improvement Project to Decrease Perioperative and Periprocedural Corneal Abrasions

PURPOSE

We assessed our institution's rate of perioperative and periprocedural corneal abrasions (CAs) and implemented a quality improvement project to improve our detection of CAs and decrease their incidence by at least 25% over 12 months.

DESIGN

Retrospective review before and after initiation of a quality improvement project at a single tertiary care institution METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed surgical and procedural patients requiring any type of anesthesia care over three 1-year time periods (2014-2015, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018). Using an electronic pharmacy-based query to identify patients who received proparacaine eye drops in the recovery room, we were able to estimate our incidence of CA during these time periods. We implemented a best practice plan to standardize CA prevention, diagnosis, and treatment after determining our baseline incidence of CA.

FINDINGS

Our baseline incidence rate of perioperative and periprocedural CAs was 0.22% (43/19,790 anesthetics) in the 2014-2015 time period. In the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 time periods, the incidence rate was reduced to 0.09% (21/23,652 anesthetics) and 0.1% (23/23,825 anesthetics), respectively. The use of a standardized CA prevention, diagnosis, and treatment plan reduced the relative risk of CAs by 59% in 2016-2017 (P < .001) and 56% in 2017-2018 (P = .001) compared to baseline, with an absolute reduction of 13% and 12% over those time periods.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that the adoption of a simple, standardized perioperative and periprocedural CA prevention, diagnosis, and treatment plan can result in sustained reductions in the occurrence of perioperative CAs.

Corneal Abrasions in Total Joint Arthroplasty

Introduction

Corneal abrasion (CA) is the most common ocular complication in patients undergoing nonocular surgery. Corneal abrasions can be caused by a variety of mechanisms, the most common being drying of the cornea due to reduced tear secretions, loss of eyelid reflex, and the loss of pain recognition during surgery. Though CA heals well with eye lubricants, it can result in significant ocular pain and some cases may go on to develop ocular complications. With the current switch to outpatient total joint replacement, CA could potentially lead to discharge delays.

Materials and Methods

We examined the results of a quality improvement project to reduce CA during general anesthesia to determine the rates of CA during hip and knee total joint replacement. We compared rates of CA for 6 months before and 6 months after the intervention.

Results

A total of 670 hip and knee arthroplasty procedures were performed during this period. Two events of CA occurred, one occurred before and one after the intervention to decrease eye injuries. Both incidences occurred during total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures with the patient in the lateral decubitus position and recovered without long-term deficit.

Discussion

Surgeons and anesthesiologists alike should be cognizant of this avoidable complication and take precaution to protect the eyes during surgery, especially during THA when the patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position.

Conclusion

Corneal abrasion during total joint arthroplasty is a rare complication and is infrequently addressed in the literature. CA is mostly self-limiting, however, but may lead to patient dissatisfaction and to delays if same-day discharge is attempted. Preventative measures and attentive care may help reduce the incidence of CA in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. The lateral decubitus position and longer surgeries times are risk factors for CA.

Dexmedetomidine and Tear Production: Evaluation in Dogs as Spontaneous Model for Ocular Surface Disorders

Simple Summary

The general anesthesia or sedation reduces both the tear production and the stability of tear film that protect corneal surface, predisposing itself to the exposure keratopathy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of intramuscular dexmedetomidine (DEX) on canine tear production, measured by standardized Schirmer Tear Test 1 (STT-1) strips, for the 8 h following sedation, in dogs. A significant effect of time on canine tear production was found, highlighting that dexmedetomidine sedative protocol significantly affects tear production in dogs. It is recommended to treat the canine eyes with tear substitutes to protect ocular surface health and the welfare of the dogs. The ocular lubrication should be performed during and up to 12 h after sedation. The present report could provide preliminary information to better understand the effect of DEX on the tear film dynamics.

Abstract

Tear film provides lubrication and protection to the ocular surface. The sedation reduces tear production, often leading to perioperative exposure keratopathy. The aim of the present study was to report the effects of intramuscular dexmedetomidine on canine tear production, measured by STT-1, for an experimental period of 8 h after sedation. Ten dogs who underwent sedation for routine radiologic assessment were recruited for the study. In all animals, tear production in right and left eyes was measured 15 min before sedation (T0: basal values) and 20 min (T20), 1 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 4 h (T4) and 8 h (T8) after drug administration. Analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni test (p < 0.05) were performed. A significant effect of time on canine tear production was found. The tear production returned to basal values at T8. So, it is recommended to treat the canine eyes with tear substitutes during and up to 12 h after sedation.

Corneal injury after routine gastrointestinal endoscopy with moderate sedation

We report a case series of 4 patients who underwent routine gastrointestinal endoscopy under moderate sedation and developed corneal injuries. Although corneal abrasion has been reported as the most common ocular complication during non-ocular surgery under general anesthesia, the risk for corneal abrasion during routine endoscopic procedures using moderate sedation has not been previously reported. Symptoms reported included ocular burning, scratchy sensation, redness, and pain reported post-procedure. Endoscopists and staff should be alert to the occurrence of this potentially serious complication, as this is paramount for its prevention, diagnosis, and management. Treatment of corneal abrasion includes referral to ophthalmology for close monitoring, pain management, pressure patch, and antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Postoperative Management of Corneal Abrasions and Clinical Implications: a Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Total patient care is of extreme importance during the administration of anesthesia. Proper care of the eye is necessary during all anesthetic administrations, especially during the administration of general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care. By paying attention to details, the likelihood of an occurrence of eye injuries is reduced.

RECENT FINDINGS

Though perioperative eye injuries are rare during general anesthesia, they do account for 2-3% of claims against anesthesiologists. Ocular injuries may occur during general anesthesia even when tape has been utilized for eye closure. Corneal abrasions are the most common injuries that have been attributed to direct trauma to the eye, exposure keratopathy, or chemical injury. Using a hydrogel patch during general anesthesia is also associated with more frequent corneal injury than previously thought. Prevention of anesthesia-related eye injuries assumes a high priority since the eye is one of the major sense organs of the body. The eye can be damaged during anesthesia for both non-ophthalmic and ophthalmic surgeries.

Perioperative Corneal Abrasions After Nonocular Surgery: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the international literature evaluating the risk factors, preventative steps, and treatments for perioperative corneal injuries for nonocular surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases were searched on April 13, 2018. Two hundred four articles were identified with 16 meeting the inclusion criteria. All studies were evaluated for quality and level of evidence. Two types of studies were included. The first were primary epidemiological studies that looked at the rates of perioperative corneal injuries after nonocular surgery and the second were trials that either studied preventative steps or treatments.

RESULTS

A statistical analysis was completed to reveal trends in perioperative corneal abrasions. Rates ranged from 0.01% to 59% with a cumulative rate of 0.64% (95% confidence interval 0.36%-1.35%). Primary risk factors were identified as longer procedures, general anesthesia, and advanced age. The most commonly associated ocular injuries were found to include chemical injury, conjunctivitis, blurred vision, and conjunctival congestion. Treatment strategies for corneal abrasion in the literature recommended erythromycin ointment and ample ocular lubrication for the fastest recovery. Education interventions alone, as studied in 2 of the 16 articles, demonstrated a significant decrease in the rate of corneal abrasions.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized ocular protection, reporting, and education initiatives were found to maximally decrease rates of perioperative corneal abrasions after nonocular surgery. However, no gold standard currently exists for intraoperative ocular protection. More research needs to be conducted on specific prevention strategies and content of educational initiatives in hopes of standard development across facilities nationwide.

Corneal abrasion and microbial contamination in horses following general anaesthesia for non-ocular surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of corneal abrasions/ulceration and microbial contamination in horses undergoing general anaesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, observational, clinical study.

ANIMALS

A total of 40 client-owned healthy horses scheduled for elective non-ophthalmic procedures.

METHODS

Conjunctival sac swabs were taken, fluorescein dye applied and digital images recorded from both eyes of the horses after preanaesthetic medication and 24 hours after recovery from general anaesthesia. A paraffin-based bland ophthalmic ointment was applied on the ocular surface intraoperatively following collection of a sample into a sterile container. All samples underwent aerobic, anaerobic and fungal culture. Subject demographics, chronology of ophthalmic ointment use, anaesthesia duration, recumbency after induction, during surgery and recovery, fluorescein uptake and culture results were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

Complete data were collected from 34 horses; six (17.6%) developed mild unilateral generalized fluorescein uptake consistent with corneal abrasions. Recumbency on the operating table was the only risk factor significantly associated with corneal abrasions. A total of 11 bacterial species were identified; Staphylococcus spp. (15 eyes) and Micrococcus spp. (eight eyes) were the most frequently isolated bacteria. Two fungal species were isolated postoperatively (Aspergillus spp., Saccharomyces spp.) in two eyes. Ointment contamination was recorded in two cases (5%) but cross-contamination was not recognized.

CONCLUSIONSAND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Incidence of corneal abrasion/ulceration in horses undergoing general anaesthesia and contamination rate of ophthalmic solutions are similar to those previously reported in dogs.

Perioperative Corneal Abrasion: Updated Guidelines for Prevention and Management

Corneal abrasion is the most common ocular complication in surgery. Treatment requires pain control, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and close monitoring. Pain improves significantly after 24 hours and should be resolved by 48 hours. Persistent, worsening, or new symptoms warrant immediate specialist consultation. The authors review the pathophysiology of perioperative corneal abrasion, and propose updated evidence-based guidelines for improved patient care.

Ocular Complications in Laparoscopic Surgery: Review of Existing Literature and Possible Prevention and Treatment

During laparoscopic surgery, ocular complications are possible, sometimes leading to devastating visual losses, hardly susceptible to recovery, although rare. Principal ocular adverse events are represented by corneal abrasions and the perioperative visual loss (POVL). POVL onset is related to intraocular pressure elevations (particularly after patient positioning in Trendelenburg or prone decubitus, depending on the surgical procedure), anesthesiologic factors and patients' characteristics. In the light of evidence from the existing literature, the authors suggest surgical and anesthesiologic measures to prevent and manage ocular complications in laparoscopic surgery. Apart from general recommendations, this article indicates practical guidelines specific for robot-assisted laparoscopic interventions and spinal surgery, as well as laparoscopic colorectal resection, radical prostatectomy, and gynecologic surgery. In conclusion, in order to better manage these complications, it is advisable to develop an interdisciplinary collaboration between surgeons, anesthesiologists, and ophthalmologists, on a procedural and medico-legal level, with the intent of mutual training.

Corneal injury and its protection using hydro-gel patch during general anesthesia

AIM

To evaluate corneal injury during general anesthesia and analyze the protective effect of medical hydro-gel eye patch in clinics.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with 152 eyes undergoing general anesthesia were included. None had positive corneal fluorescein staining before surgery. Both eyes of each patient were analyzed, with one randomly allocated to receive medical hydro-gel eye patch, and the other to receive common adhesive tape as a control. Corneal injuries were evaluated by scoring fluorescein staining under a hand-held slit lamp immediately after surgery in postanesthesia care unit and 24h thereafter. Patients' discomforts were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve eyes (15.8%) in the hydro-gel patch group and 30 eyes (39.5%) in the adhesive tape group showed corneal injury immediately after surgery. The eyes protected with hydro-gel patch showed statistically less corneal fluorescein staining than the control group. Four eyes in hydro-gel patch group and 6 eyes in adhesive tape group suffered discomfort immediately after surgery without intergroup difference and all discomforts disappeared after 24h (P=0.257). No side effect was observed in hydro-gel patch group, while 5 eyes had brow avulsion and 2 got skin itching in adhesive tape group.

CONCLUSION

Corneal injury complication was more frequent than we thought following general anesthesia. The medical hydro-gel eye patch can protect the occurrence of corneal injury following general anesthesia.

Evaluation of risk factors for development of corneal ulcer after nonocular surgery in dogs: 14 cases (2009-2011)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for development of corneal ulcers after nonocular surgery performed with general anesthesia in dogs.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

ANIMALS

14 dogs with development of corneal ulcers after nonocular surgery and 718 control dogs.

PROCEDURES

Medical records of dogs evaluated at the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital of Seoul National University from January 2009 to June 2011 were reviewed for assessment of risk factors for development of corneal ulcers.

RESULTS

Among the 732 reviewed cases, 14 (1.9%) dogs of 6 breeds developed a corneal ulcer after nonocular surgery. Duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in dogs with ulcers than dogs without ulcers. The number of medications received and procedures performed were also significantly higher in dogs with ulcers than dogs without ulcers. Dogs with a small skull (OR, 8.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 70.90) and dogs that received neurosurgery (OR, 21.12; 95% CI, 5.77 to 77.25) were more susceptible to development of corneal ulcers. Also, postoperative application of a fentanyl patch was a risk factor for development of corneal ulcers (OR, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.05 to 19.60).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Several risk factors were identified for development of corneal ulcers after nonocular surgery was performed with general anesthesia in dogs. Perioperative eye protection strategies and postoperative ophthalmic examination are needed to reduce the occurrence of corneal ulcers and their progression, especially for high-risk dogs and procedures.

Corneal protection during general anesthesia for nonocular surgery

Corneal abrasion is the most common ophthalmologic complication that occurs during general anesthesia for nonocular surgery. Such abrasions can be caused by a variety of mechanisms and can lead to sight-threatening microbial keratitis and permanent scarring. There is no standard mode of protecting the cornea during general anesthesia for nonocular surgery. Methods described in the literature are not entirely effective and may be associated with unwanted side effects. Taping alone provides protection that is equivalent or superior to other interventions and has fewer side effects. Petroleum gel is flammable and is best avoided when electrocautery and open oxygen are to be used around the face. Preservative-free eye ointment is preferred, as preservative can cause corneal epithelial sloughing and conjunctival hyperemia. Recently, the application of Geliperm and bio-occlusive dressings has been advocated. Geliperm may be particularly useful during endonasal surgery when continuous perioperative observation of the eye is required. In this article, the literature on the etiology of perioperative corneal abrasions is reviewed and various protection strategies are compared in order to identify the best methods to prevent corneal abrasions during general anesthesia.