Radiographic and functional evaluation of low profile dorsal versus volar plating for distal radius fractures

Small volar fragment in the lunate fossa leads to volar tilt loss after volar plate fixation for AO/OTA type-C distal radius fracture

OBJECTIVES

The relationship between volar fragment size and postoperative volar tilt loss in complete articular distal radius fracture is not well known. In this study, we measured precise radiological parameters to help identify other factors that might contribute to volar tilt loss.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the radiological examinations and charts of 256 patients with distal radial fracture who underwent volar locking plate fixation between March 2014 and July 2022. Radiological parameters were measured based on preoperative CT and immediate postoperative radiographs. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify relevant factors associated with volar tilt loss following volar locking plate fixation. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify the cutoff value of the independent parameters.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, 2 radiologic parameters on preoperative CT (volar fragment length at the lunate fossa, and teardrop angle) and 4 on immediate postoperative X-ray (radial inclination, radial length, capitate shift, and volar tilt) were significantly associated with postoperative volar tilt loss. On multivariate linear regression analysis, the risk of volar tilt loss increased as the capitate moved toward the back of the radial shaft. The cut-off for anteroposterior length in the lunate fossa was 6.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

AO/OTA type-C distal radius fractures with <6.5 mm anteroposterior length in the lunate fossa had significantly higher rates of malunion with dorsal deformity. In addition, preoperative teardrop angle <37.2 ° and immediate postoperative volar tilt <3.7º are also predictors of postoperative volar tilt loss.

Are Observational Studies on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment Robust? An E-value Approach to Analysis

BACKGROUND

Reported complication frequencies after distal radius fracture (DRF) treatment vary widely in the literature and are based mostly on observational evidence. Whether that evidence is sufficiently robust to use in practice is controversial. The E-value is an innovative sensitivity analysis that quantitates the robustness of observational evidence against unmeasured confounders, whereby a greater E-value usually implies more robust evidence and vice versa; with DRF complications, this approach can help guide readers to a more confident interpretation of the available evidence.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this study, we sought (1) to compare the complication frequencies among different DRF treatment modalities, and (2) to evaluate the robustness of these observational studies using the E-value as an index for unmeasured confounding.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS for observational studies on the management of DRFs that were published from January 2001 to July 2021 with the last database search performed on July 31, 2021. All articles that compared different DRF treatment modalities with reported complication frequencies were included to accurately capture the quality of the observational studies in research about DRF. Risk ratios (RRs) of the overall complication and major complication risks were calculated for each subgroup comparison: volar plating versus dorsal plating, casting, external fixation, and percutaneous K-wire fixation. The RRs and their corresponding lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to derive the E-values. E-values can have a minimum possible value of 1, which signifies that the treatment-outcome association is not strong and can readily be overturned by unmeasured confounders. By contrast, a large E-value means that the observed treatment-outcome association is robust against unmeasured confounders. We averaged RRs and E-values for the effect estimates and lower limits of CIs across studies in each treatment comparison group. We identified 36 comparative observational studies that met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies compared volar with dorsal plating techniques. Volar plating was also compared with casting (eight studies), external fixation (15 studies), and percutaneous K-wire fixation (six studies).

RESULTS

Total and major complication risks did not differ among different DRF treatments. The mean RRs for total and major complications were 1.2 (95% CI 0.4 to 3.9; p = 0.74) and 1.8 (95% CI 0.4 to 11.4; p = 0.52) for the volar versus dorsal plating group; 1.2 (95% CI 0.3 to 11.2; p = 0.87) and 1.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 14.9; p = 0.74) for the volar plating versus casting group; 0.6 (95% CI 0.2 to 2.2; p = 0.33) and 0.8 (95% CI 0.2 to 6.7; p = 0.86) for the volar plating versus external fixation group; and 0.6 (95% CI 0.2 to 2.6; p = 0.47) and 0.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 4.0; p = 0.67) for the volar plating versus K-wire fixation group. The mean E-values for total and major complication frequencies for the between-group comparison ranged from 3.1 to 5.8; these were relatively large in the context of a known complication risk factor, such as high-energy impact (RR 3.2), suggesting a reasonable level of robustness against unmeasured confounding. However, the E-values for lower limits of CIs remained close to 1, which indicates the observed complication frequencies in these studies were likely to have been influenced by unmeasured confounders.

CONCLUSION

Complication frequencies did not differ among different DRF treatment modalities, but the observed complication frequencies from most comparative observational studies were less robust against potential unmeasured confounders. The E-value method, or another type of sensitivity analysis, should be implemented in observational hand surgery research at the individual-study level to facilitate assessment of robustness against potential unmeasured confounders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Three Column Fixation Through a Single Incision in Distal Radius Fractures

Purpose  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional results of 67 patients with distal radius fracture (DRF), treated with a modified surgical technique that allows three-column fixation through the same palmar approach. Patients and Methods  Between 2014 and 2019, we treated 67 patients using a particular surgical technique. All patients suffered DRF, classified using the universal classification system. Two different intervals were developed palmary: the first ulnarly to the flexor carpi radialis tendon for direct visualization of the distal radius and the second one radially to the radial artery for direct visualization of the styloid process. An anatomic volar locking compression plate was applied to all patients. The radial styloid process was fixed and stabilized either with Kirschner-wires or an anatomic plate through the same incision. Functional results were evaluated based on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Mayo wrist scores. Range of motion and grip strength of the injured wrist were statistically compared with the opposite side. Results  The mean follow-up was 47 months (13-84). All fractures were united, and all patients recovered to the preinjury level of activity. The mean flexion-extension range was 73.8° to 55.2° and the supination-pronation range 82.8° to 67°. No infection or nonunion occurred. No major complications were reported. Conclusion  Open reduction and internal fixation, under specific indications, is the best treatment option in DRF. The described technique provides excellent visualization to the distal radius surfaces and allows the internal fixation of the radial columns through the same skin incision. Therefore, it can constitute an efficient choice in the treatment armamentarium of DRF.

Minimally Invasive Fixation with Dorsal Suspension Button and Volar Plate in Distal Radius Fractures with Dorsal Die Punch Fragments: A Preliminary Study

Objective  The objective of the study is to analyze the clinical and radiological results obtained using a minimally invasive fixation technique with a volar locking plate and a suspension system with a dorsal button in distal articular radius fractures with dorsal comminution. Materials and Methods  Six patients with distal radius fractures, between 19 and 68 years of age, were included in the study. Mean follow-up was of 15 weeks. Range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation, supination, the strength in kilograms, and values on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Mayo Wrist Score (MWS) scales were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperative. Correction of anteroposterior diameter of the radius and concordance between postoperative anteroposterior diameter and the contralateral wrist diameter were evaluated radiologically. Results  The following mean values were obtained at 12 weeks postoperative: ROM in flexion: 40.5°, ROM in extension: 49.5°, ROM in radial deviation: 24.5°, ROM in ulnar deviation: 15°, ROM in pronation: 87°, ROM in supination: 89°, strength: 37.5 kg, pain in VAS scale: 2 points, DASH: 54.5 points, and MWS: 67.5 points. At 12 weeks postoperative, the mean correction of anteroposterior diameter was 0.49 mm. The anteroposterior diameter and that of the contralateral wrist were strongly correlated. Conclusion  Fixation with the volar locking plate and dorsal suspension button could be considered an alternative to dorsal plate fixation for treatment of distal radius fractures with comminution or associated dorsal die punch fragments.

Dorsal Plate Osteosynthesis in Simple and Complex Fractures of the Distal Radius: A Radiological Analysis of 166 Cases

Background  To report the radiologic outcome and rate of complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a dorsal plate fixation of simple and complex distal radius fractures in adult patients. Methods  Patients treated with dorsal ORIF of simple and complex distal radius fractures between December 2008 and April 2013 were included in this single-center retrospective study. Type of fracture, radiographic measurements, and complications were documented. Results  One-hundred and sixty-six patients/fractures were included. Restoration of radial inclination (22° ± 3°) was achieved in 38%. Radial height (14 ± 1 mm) was least likely to be restored to normal values postoperative in 25%. Normal ulnar variance (0.7 ± 1.5 mm) could be observed in 60% and adequate volar tilt (11° ± 5°) was achieved in 50% at final follow-up. We observed one loss of reduction in an AO type C2 fracture and a total of 15 nonimplant-related minor clinical complications. Conclusion  Our radiographic findings after dorsal plating are comparable to those published on volar plating. The changes in radial height and volar tilt could be attributed to projection-related differences in the radiographs and did not signify a loss of reduction in all cases. Clinical Relevance  Dorsal plating of distal radius fractures is safe and remains an important approach in the treatment of complex distal radius fractures. Complications in our study were even less compared to those reported in the literature. Type of Study/Level of Evidence  This is a Type IV study. Level of Experience of Surgeons  The level of experience of surgeons is III-V.

Interventions for Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Comparison Studies

Background  Distal radius fractures are one of the most frequent orthopaedic injuries. There are many effective treatment methods, such as volar plate, dorsal plate, percutaneous pins, external fixation, and casting; however, comparison of the treatment outcomes has not been thoroughly investigated. Our purpose is to determine if volar plating is the superior treatment method for distal radius fractures. We will address this through the following questions: First, is volar plating superior to dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting in terms of reported complications? Second, does volar plating produce superior functional outcomes to dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting? Third, are the radiographic outcomes superior for volar plating when compared with dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting? Methods  MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus, and JSTOR databases, as well as manual search, were used to identify papers comparing complications and functional results of volar plating to other treatment methods for distal radius fractures published after the year 2000. Complication data and function scores were recorded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and data was analyzed for meta-analysis using Cochrane ReviewManager software. Results  Compared with dorsal plate, volar plate performed significantly better in Gartland and Werley score. Volar plating outperformed percutaneous pins for loss of reduction, infection, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and ulnar deviation. Loss of reduction, malunion, Patient Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, DASH score, grip strength, ulnar deviation, and supination were significantly better for volar plating when compared with casting. When compared with external fixation, volar plating had significantly less cases of infection, lower QuickDASH score, and higher range of motion for flexion, pronation, and supination. All other complication and functional outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusions  Distal radius fractures treated with volar plating showed relatively better measures of complications, function scores, and range of motion than other treatment methods; however, there was no significant difference in healing time when compared with percutaneous pins. More studies are needed to compare the rest of the treatment methods with each other.

Indications, surgical approach, reduction, and stabilization techniques of distal radius fractures

Distal Radius fractures (DRF) are one of the most common injuries in the upper extremity and incidence is expected to rise due to a growing elderly population. The complex decision to treat patients operatively or conservatively depends on a large variety of parameters which have to be considered. No unanimous consensus has been reached yet, which operative approach and fixation technique would produce the best postoperative functional results with lowest complication rates. This article addresses the available evidence for indications, approaches, reduction, and fixation techniques in treating DRF.

Contact Pressure between Digital Flexors and Plates for Distal Radius Approaches

Background  Flexor tendon irritation or rupture following open reduction and volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures can cause significant morbidity and necessitate additional surgical intervention. Objectives  To compare the impact of the extended flexor carpi radialis (e-FCR) and standard flexor carpi radialis (FCR) approaches on contact pressures between the flexor tendons and volar distal radius plates. Methods  Eight matched pairs of fresh frozen cadavers had each limb randomized to undergo either the e-FCR or standard FCR approach. After the approach, a locking plate was applied to the volar distal radius more distally than ideally to create a worst-case scenario for the digital flexor tendons. Electronic pressure sensors were secured to the volar aspect of each locking plate. Each wrist was pinned in 20 degrees of extension during testing. Using a computer-controlled stepper motor system attached to the digital flexor and extensor tendons, the digits were taken through 4,000 cycles simulating 12 weeks of active flexion and extension. Results  There were no statistically or clinically significant differences when comparing the contact pressures of the e-FCR approach with the standard FCR approach at any time intervals. The e-FCR had statistically significantly higher radial-sided contact pressures than ulnar-sided contact pressures during early-to-intermediate testing intervals. These differences resolved at late and final testing intervals. Conclusions  When comparing the standard FCR approach with the e-FCR approach, with the wrist in 20 degrees of extension, there is no significant difference in contact pressures that occur between the digital flexor tendons and volar distal radius plates. Clinical Relevance  Further study and technique modifications may eventually lead to better methods of avoiding flexor tendon rupture during the volar plating of distal radius fractures.

Outcome after treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly using the IlluminOss® System

Purpose

Distal radius fractures are very common and account for approximately 17% of all fractures treated. Multiple treatment methods are available to treat these fractures, both operative and nonoperative. This study aimed at evaluating the functional and clinical outcomes after treatment of distal radius fractures with the IlluminOss^® System in adult patients.

Methods

A retrospective case series was performed in a single-level two-trauma center. All consecutive adult patients with a distal radius fracture, treated with the IlluminOss^® System between 01 August 2012 and 15 August 2015, were included in this study. Baseline patient characteristics and clinical data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records. Radial inclination, volar/dorsal tilt, ulnar variance, and radial length were measured on the latest available standard radiographs. In addition, patients were prospectively subjected to physical examination and were asked to complete the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, and Short Form-36 questionnaires.

Results

Twenty-six patients with 31 distal radius fractures were included. The median age at time of trauma was 77 years and 96% were females. Five patients developed a total of seven complications. Due to persisting pain one reoperation was performed, removing a small prominent part of the implant. Both patient-reported outcome scores and radiographic results were good to excellent.

Conclusions

The IlluminOss^® System is a feasible option to treat distal radius fractures with seemingly good clinical and functional outcome. One out of seven complications required surgical intervention. These outcomes justify more detailed prospective research.

Radial Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fracture

Background: A radial incision with radial plate fixation for distal radius fracture has historically been avoided due to its risk to the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN). With careful technique, it is possible to avoid injury to the SBRN, thereby minimizing the soft tissue injury associated with other approaches. We compare subjective and objective functional outcomes of radial plate fixation surgeries that we performed with those of dorsal and volar plate fixation in current literature. Methods: Patients at a single center who underwent radial plate fixation for an AO type A or AO type B distal radius fracture between December 2006 and December 2014 were enrolled in the study. Postoperative grip strength and 3-digit pinch strength were measured systematically in the injured and uninjured wrists. Patients also completed a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire to assess subjective outcomes. Results: Thirty-six patients met our inclusion criteria and had available medical records. Postoperative grip strength in the injured wrist was significantly lowered-68% compared with the uninjured wrist. After subgroup analysis of dominant and nondominant wrist injuries, there was no significant difference in grip strength between injured and uninjured wrists. There was no significant decrease in postoperative 3-digit pinch strength in the injured wrist-89% compared with the uninjured wrist. The mean QuickDASH score for our study participants was 20.9. Conclusions: Radial plate fixation is an effective approach for distal radius fractures. Objective and subjective outcomes are noninferior to those of a dorsal or volar approach.

Intramedullary Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures Using CAGE-DR Implant

Purpose  CAGE-DR implant is a novel Food and Drug Administration approved intramedullary fracture fixation device used for distal radius fractures. We examine a series of 22 patients and report the outcomes with this device. Materials and Methods  A total of 24 patients with distal radius fractures (8 articular AO type C1/C2; 16 extra-articular AO type A2/A3) underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using CAGE-DR implant by a single surgeon. Data including fracture type, angle of displacement, radiographic consolidation, grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded at time of surgery and at standard follow-up. Results  All 24 patients underwent uneventful ORIF. At first follow-up visit (9 days), all patients had full digital ROM (measured as 0 cm tip-to-palm distance). Two patients were lost to follow-up. Eighteen of the remaining 22 patients had sufficient radiographic follow-up and all 18 demonstrated healing. At latest follow-up (mean 9.7 months, range, 3-20), VAS pain scores averaged 0.6 (range, 0-8) and PRWE averaged 12.1 (range, 0-53.5). Grip strength of the operated hand averaged 58 lbs (range, 20-130). ROM included: wrist flexion 73° (50-95), wrist extension 78° (60-110), pronation 77° (60-90), supination 79° (60-90), ulnar deviation 31° (5-45), and radial deviation 17° (10-30). Three patients underwent screw removal to prevent tendon irritation. One patient underwent hardware removal due to prominence on imaging but was asymptomatic. There were otherwise no major complications, including complex regional pain syndrome, in the series to date. Conclusion  The CAGE-DR fracture fixation system is a promising alternative to established methods of distal radius internal fixation. This series has a low reported pain score starting immediately postoperatively and a low complication rate. This novel device is a promising option for internal fixation of displaced distal radius fractures with a low complication profile. Level of Evidence  This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

The role of brachioradialis release during AO type C distal radius fracture fixation

INTRODUCTION

Open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures often necessitates release of the brachioradialis from the radial styloid. However, whether this common procedure makes the reduction and fixation easier and affects the elbow function has not been fully understood.

HYPOTHESIS

Brachioradialis (BR) release during volar plate fixation for type C distal radius fractures makes internal reduction and fixation easier, and it does not adversely affect wrist or elbow function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 74 patients treated with 2.4mm volar locking compression column plate (VCP) were analyzed for type C distal radius fractures prospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, group A with BR release and group B without BR release. The two groups were compared in terms of "internal reduction and fixation time" during the operation, wrist and elbow function including the scores of Gartland and Werley (G-W), Patient-related wrist evaluation score (PRWE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and a Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The radial inclination angle, palmar tilt angle and ulnar variance were also measured from the radiographs.

RESULTS

According to the follow-up of the 74 patients, no significant differences were observed between the two groups on MEPS, DASH, G-W, PRWE, VAS and radiological outcomes at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Mean time of reduction and internal fixation was significantly shorter in group A than that in group B.

CONCLUSION

Release of the BR for type C distal radius fractures facilitated the surgical procedure and did not adversely affect elbow and wrist function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, prospective comparative study.