Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: A review of the literature

Lumbosacral anatomy is unique in pediatric spondylolysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients with L5 spondylolysis have different lumbosacral anatomy compared to patients without L5 spondylolysis.

METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) scans of pediatric patients with isolated L5 spondylolysis were identified and matched 1:4 (age, sex, BMI) to patients without spondylolysis. Sagittal parameters assessed included sacral slope angle, sacral table angle, L4-S1 and L5-S1 Cobb angles, the horizontal angle of the L5 pars interarticularis, the distances between the L4 inferior articular process (IAP) and the S1 superior articular process (SAP) and their respective individual distances to the L5 pars. Coronal parameters assessed included the percent subluxation of L4 IAP below the facet joint.

RESULTS

1084 CT scans were reviewed. 32 patients with isolated L5 spondylolysis were identified and matched to 122 patients without spondylolysis. The horizontal angle of the L5 pars was greater in spondylolysis patients (142.5 ± 10.2 vs. 119.9 ± 5.9, p < 0.05). There was less distance (mm) between L4 IAP and S1 SAP (11.3 ± 3.9 vs. 14.7 ± 2.9, p < 0.05) and less distance (mm) from both L4 IAP (2.6 ± 1.7 vs. 5.4 ± 2.2, p < 0.05) and S1 SAP (0.7 ± 0.4 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.05), respectively, to the L5 pars in the spondylolysis group. Pearson's analyses revealed that a larger horizontal angle of the L5 pars was strongly associated with spondylolysis (0.59).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients with L5 spondylolysis have a significantly more horizontal L5 pars that is closer to both the L4 IAP and S1 SAP.

Surgical and non-surgical management of spondylolisthesis: a comprehensive review

Spondylolisthesis is a spinal condition characterized by the forward or backward displacement of a vertebral body, most commonly affecting the lower lumbar spine. It can be classified into different types, with isthmic and degenerative being the most prevalent. Early diagnosis is essential to initiate appropriate treatment based on symptom severity, degree of slippage, and neurological deficits. Non-surgical management is the first-line approach for low-grade spondylolisthesis (Grade I-II) and includes physical therapy, activity modification, pain management with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or epidural steroid injections, and, in some cases, bracing. While most patients experience symptom relief with conservative treatment, those with progressive neurological deficits, severe pain, or significant instability may require surgery. Surgical options typically include decompression for nerve compression and fusion to stabilize the spine. The choice between decompression alone and decompression with fusion remains controversial, particularly in degenerative spondylolisthesis without initial instability. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion are the most performed techniques, with minimally invasive surgery gaining popularity due to its less aggressive impact on tissues and faster recovery. Long-term follow-up is necessary to monitor for complications such as adjacent segment disease, pseudarthrosis, or reoperation rate. Advances in imaging, surgical navigation, and regenerative medicine are important for the future of spondylolisthesis treatment, but current management remains centered on optimizing patient outcomes through individualized care and evidence-based treatment selection.

Multi-level spondylolysis at Egiin Gol: A case from Xiongnu period Mongolia

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents and discusses the aetiology of an extreme case of multi-level spondylolysis with unique presentation.

MATERIALS

The affected individual is an adult male from Xiongnu period (209 BCE to 93 CE) Egiin Gol, northern Mongolia.

METHODS

Analyses were limited to macroscopic and non-invasive methods.

RESULTS

Seven complete spondylolytic clefts were documented on four vertebrae between T12 and L4, with only one located on L4, where most cases of spondylolysis occur, and four defects had atypical morphology. Evidence of spondylolisthesis was also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Congenital susceptibility to spondylolysis, combined with a physically demanding lifestyle, likely account for the condition's unusual manifestation.

SIGNIFICANCE

The significance of this case its severity (one of the most extreme documented from archaeological contexts) and unusual presentation (location of the clefts and their atypical morphology).

LIMITATIONS

Only a small sample (< 30) of Xiongnu period human remains were available for comparison.

SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Interpretations from this case study would benefit from a more extensive analysis of spondylolysis, biomechanical stress, and acute trauma on the nomadic pastoral populations of northern Mongolia, including those pre-dating and post-dating the Xiongnu.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Lumbar Spondylolysis in White and Black Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To the best of our knowledge, the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis in white and black populations has never been studied using computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the prevalence and characteristics of lumbar spondylolysis in white and black patients.

METHODS

This study is a cross sectional study. Patients aged 20-79 who underwent abdominal and pelvic CT for trauma screening in the New York City area and whose race was classified as "white" and "black" on the questionnaire were recruited to the study. A total of 1200 white patients (600 women, 600 men) and 1200 black patients (600 women, 600 men) were included for the analysis. The presence of lumbar spondylolysis, level, unilateral/bilateral, and the presence of spondylolisthesis at lumbar spondylolysis level were evaluated using CT.

RESULTS

The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was 3.0% (n = 36) for white patients and .8% (n = 10) for black patients, with 3.3% (n = 20) and 1.0% (n = 6) for white and black females, respectively; and 2.7% (n = 16) and .7% (n = 4) for white and black males, respectively. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was significantly higher in white patients compared with that in black patients (P < .0001). Lumbar spondylolysis was at L5 in 44/46 patients (95.7%) and bilateral in 41/46 patients (89.1%). Spondylolisthesis at lumbar spondylolysis level was found in 40/46 patients (87.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was 3.0% for white patients and .8% for black patients. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was significantly higher in white patients compared with that in black patients.

Correlation analysis of global sagittal alignment of the spine in cases of low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

PURPOSE

Disruptions in global sagittal spinal alignment can lead to changes in global sagittal spinal alignment, often manifesting as sagittal malalignment, where the trunk shifts forward. We proposed that these alignment changes are linked to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS). The objective was to assess global spinal alignment in low-grade DS using sagittal vertical axis (SVA) classification.

METHODS

The patients with DS were categorized into three groups based on the adult spinal deformity classification: type I, defined by a SVA of less than 40 mm; type II, with an SVA ranging from 40 mm to 95 mm; and type III, where the SVA is 95 mm or greater. The study compared age and various sagittal parameters among these groups, including thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI).

RESULTS

Notable differences were observed between type I and type II, as well as between type I and type III, whereas no substantial variation was detected between type II and type III. Additionally, PI increased with advancing type classification, with a distinct contrast observed between type I and type III.

CONCLUSION

A high PI is a key risk factor for worsening SVA in DS, and it may contribute to the initiation and progression of the condition.

Patient outcomes: One-stage vs. two-stage lumbar surgery for symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis: A quality outcomes database study

OBJECTIVE

Controversy exists regarding treatment of symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis (LGS). Both one- and two-stage fusions are commonly performed, but it is unclear if one approach is superior. We aim to compare the satisfaction rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with LGS undergoing one- versus two-stage lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

The Quality Outcomes Database was queried for patients with Grades I and II spondylolisthesis who underwent one- (n = 3223) or two-stage (n = 325), 1-2 level lumbar fusion. Demographics, comorbidities, symptom burden, and PROs were extracted and compared. Outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY), and satisfaction index. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, ODI, and QALY were 1.6, 1.7, 14.3, and 0.2, respectively. Patients with pre-existing scoliosis or kyphosis, missing data, and revision procedures were excluded. Categorical variables were compared with a Chi-square test; continuous variables were assessed for normality with a Shapiro Wilk test and compared with a Mann-Whitney U or Student's t-test.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted for baseline characteristics, except for a lower mean age, percentage of female patients, and prevalence of osteoporosis in the two-stage cohort (58 ± 12.4 vs 62 ± 11.6 years; 50 % vs 62 %; 3.0 % vs 7.1 %, respectively; p < 0.01). The average surgery length was longer in the two-stage cohort (p < 0.01). A significantly higher percentage of patients returned to baseline activities within 3 months postoperatively following one-stage procedures (43 % vs. 29 %, p < 0.01), irrespective of whether they had Grade 1 or Grade 2 spondylolisthesis. Comparable proportions of patients achieved the MCID for PROs, with no significant differences in satisfaction indices observed at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, regardless of preoperative spondylolisthesis grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving one and two-stage procedures for symptomatic LGS had similar rates of satisfaction and PROs. More research is necessary to define the benefits of two-stage approaches given their increased time, cost, and risk profile.

Cost-utility of lumbar interbody fusion surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a common surgical intervention for treating lumbar degenerative disorders. Increasing demand has contributed to ever-increasing healthcare expenditure and economic burden. To address this, cost-utility analyses (CUAs) compare value in the context of patient outcomes. CUAs quantify health improvements using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), allowing decision-makers to determine procedure value.

PURPOSE

While there is a growing body of literature assessing LIF value, a comprehensive synthesis of LIF CUAs is lacking. This systematic review aims to address this gap by assessing all available CUAs of LIF techniques, to support evidence-based practices that improve outcomes and promote efficient resource use.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

STUDY SAMPLE

This study sample consisted of adult patients with lumbar degenerative conditions specifically treated with lumbar interbody fusion, including grade I or II degenerative spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, disc degeneration, and spondylosis, with or without low back and/or leg pain.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Direct (healthcare) and indirect (non-healthcare) costs, cost sources and calculation methods, utility scores, QALY gain, cost-utility, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and willingness-to-pay thresholds. Outcomes were reported as median and interquartile ranges (IQR).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to October 23, 2023, for CUAs reporting QALYs and costs of LIF procedures. Relevant studies were selected and data extracted. Subgroup analyses compared minimally invasive versus open surgery and anterior versus posterior approaches. Study quality was assessed using the CHEC-Extended tool. Quantitative meta-analysis was not performed due to methodological heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Out of 2047 identified studies, 14 met inclusion criteria. The mean CHEC-Extended score was 72.1%. Most studies reported on TLIF (n=11) and utilized EQ-5D questionnaire to calculate utility (n=9). Direct costs were sourced from institutional databases, Medicare, DRGs, Redbook, and a variety of other sources. Most indirect costs were estimated from productivity loss. TLIF demonstrated the highest median QALY gain over 1 year (0.43, IQR 0.121-0.705), while PLIF was highest over 2 years (1.33). ALIF was most favorable over 1 year ($30901/QALY) and OLIF was most favorable over 2 years ($11187/QALY). PLIF, TLIF, and LLIF exhibited similar cost-utility over 2 years ($44383, $45628, $48576/QALY). MIS was substantially favorable to OS at 1 year ($42635 vs. $226304), though similar at 2 years ($48576 vs. $45628/QALY). Anterior approach was favorable to posterior approach at 1 year ($30901.5 vs. $81038) and 2 years ($29881.9 vs. $44383). Cost-utility comparisons substantially varied and were sensitive to utility measures, study methodology, cost sourcing, and follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review to comprehensively assess CUAs of all LIF approaches in the existing literature. While certain approaches, such as ALIF and OLIF, may demonstrate favorable outcomes, these conclusions are limited by high methodological heterogeneity and a limited study pool. By addressing existing gaps in study design and reporting, future comparative cost-utility research can better inform evidence-based decision-making and optimize the value of spinal surgical care.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinal Fusion Surgery for Spondylolisthesis Treatment

Background

In recent years, there has been a growing utilization of minimally invasive (MI) techniques, which provide the potential advantages of minimizing surgical stress, post-operative pain, and hospitalization duration. Nevertheless, the existing body of literature primarily comprises of studies conducted at a single medical site, which are of low quality and lack a comprehensive analysis of treatment techniques exclusively focused on spondylolisthesis. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) spinal fusion outcomes for the treatment of spondylolisthesis. OS spinal fusion is an interventional option for patients with spinal illness who have not had success with non-surgical treatments.

Materials and Methods

This systematic review of the literature regarding MI and OS spinal fusion for spondylolisthesis treatment was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines for article identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. Electronic literature search of Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases yielded 1078 articles. These articles were screened against established criteria for inclusion into this study.

Results

A total of eight retrospective and four prospective articles with a total of 3354 patients were found. Reported spondylolisthesis grades were I and II only. Overall, MI was associated with lower operative time (mean difference [MD], -6.44 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], -45.57-32.71; P = 0.0001) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD, -0.49 days; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.40; P = 0.000). There was no significant difference overall between MIS and OS in terms of functional or pain outcomes. Rates of complications were not significantly different between the MI group and the OS group, though overall 75 and 153 complications were observed in MI group and OS group.

Conclusion

Available data indicate that MI spinal fusion is a secure and efficient method for managing Grade I and Grade II spondylolisthesis. Furthermore, whereas prospective trials establish a connection between MI and improved functional outcomes, it is necessary to conduct longer-term and randomized trials to confirm any correlation identified in this study.

Depression predicts decreased lumbar bone mineral density: A scoping review of chronic psychological stress and spinal tissue pathology

Objective

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a complex disease with biological, psychological, and social components and the complex interactions of these components are poorly understood. Chronic psychological stress (CPS) (anxiety, depression, etc.) and pathological changes in spinal tissue (osteoporosis, disc degeneration, etc.) are frequently and independently associated with cLBP, yet their explicit relationship has not been collectively reviewed. The objective of this scoping review is to investigate the current state of research on how CPS may impact spinal tissue pathology.

Design

Five steps were utilized to conduct this scoping review: 1) identify a research objective and establish a search strategy, 2) identify research articles, 3) select research articles that meet search criteria, 4) extract data, 5) summarize and report results.

Results

We identified N ​= ​56 articles relating CPS to spinal pathology. Of those that identified a relationship between CPS and spine pathology (N ​= ​39), most (N ​= ​24) described decreased lumbar vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) between depression and control groups. Animal studies (N ​= ​8) were limited to mice and confirmed a causal relationship between CPS and lower vertebral BMD. Only a few additional human studies (N ​= ​9) documented relationships between other various forms of CPS and spinal tissue pathologies.

Conclusion

This scoping review documents evidence of a relationship between CPS and decreased spine health in humans as well as a causal relationship between the initiation of CPS and decreased BMD in animals. As few studies evaluated disease in other spinal anatomy in relationship to CPS, future work in this area is warranted. Further exploration of CPS beyond depression is warranted as well.

Early postoperative efficacy of a fully automated orthopedic robotic system-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis

To assess the feasibility of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation assisted by a fully automated orthopedic robotic system for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis and evaluate its early postoperative outcome. Totally 20 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical procedure by the same medical group from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 10 patients in the robot-assisted group (RA group) and the other 10 patients in the conventional free-hand technique group (FH group). Accuracy of screw insertion was determined using the Gertzbein-Robbins Scale. The accuracy of the novel robotic system was evaluated by comparing the screw position in the preoperative planning and measuring the entry point deviation distance and the trajectory rotation. The differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, radiographic fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopic dosage, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. The lumbar visual analog scale scores before and 7 days after operation were analyzed to evaluate the improvement of low back pain as the early postoperative outcome. A total of 84 pedicle screws were placed. In the RA group, 97.5% of screws were Grade A, and 2.5% were Grade B. In the FH group, 88.6% of screws were Grade A, 9.1% were Grade B, and 2.3% were Grade C. No statistical difference was found in the operation time between two groups. The RA group showed a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss, radiographic fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopic dosage, and length of hospital stay compared to the FH group. The low back pain in both groups was significantly improved after the operation. The novel orthopedic robotic system-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, with accurate intraoperative screw placement, less surgical damage, less fluoroscopy and shorter length of hospital stay, can be safe and effective for the surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Buck technique supplemented by temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation to repair lumbar spondylolysis in youth

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spondylolysis is a bone defect in the pars interarticularis of the lumbar vertebral, which is a common cause of low back pain in youth. Although non-surgical treatment is a mainstream option, surgery is necessary for patients with persistent symptoms. Buck technique is widely used as a classical direct repair technique, but it cannot achieve reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis and reconstruction of lumbosacral sagittal balance. We have described a novel surgical procedure based on Buck technique with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation, and report a series of clinical outcomes in 5 patients to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of young lumbar spondylolysis.

METHODS

Five young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis with a mean age of 19.20 ± 5.41 years underwent surgical treatment after an average of 7.60 ± 1.52 months of failure to respond to conservative treatment, using a new surgical procedure based on Buck technique combined with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation.

RESULTS

Five patients were successfully operated without serious complications such as nerve and vascular injury. The average operation time was 109.00 ± 7.42 min, the interpretative average blood loss was 148.00 ± 31.14 ml, and the average fusion time was 11.20 ± 1.64 months. All patients were followed up for 2 years after surgery, and the visual analogue score (VAS) of low back pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the Henderson's evaluation were rated excellent or good. After the removal of the internal fixation, it was observed that temporary intersegmental fixation could repair the isthmus, reduce lumbar spondylolisthesis, and reconstruct the sagittal balance of the lumbosacral vertebrae while preserving lumbar motion and preventing intervertebral disc degeneration. Postoperative MRI indicated the Pfirrmann classification of the affected discs: 1 case from grade III to grade II, 3 cases from grade II to grade I, and 1 case remained grade II.

CONCLUSIONS

Buck technique supplemented by temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation is a highly applicable and effective method for the treatment of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis. The isthmic fusion is accurate, and temporary intersegmental fixation can effectively prevent disc degeneration and reconstruct the sagittal balance of lumbosacral vertebra.

Osteopetrosis complicated by multilevel spondylolysis

Osteopetrosis is a heterogenous group of inheritable disorders which manifests as increased bone density and brittleness. The most common and mildest variant typically presents in adulthood with bone pain and pathologic fractures, including spondylolysis. We present the case of an otherwise healthy, active 17-year-old male with a history of osteopetrosis and 1 year of chronic back pain, found to have multilevel (L1-L4) spondylolysis in the setting of severe diffuse bony sclerosis consistent with osteopetrosis. While single-level spondylolysis is an uncommon complication of osteopetrosis, multilevel spondylolysis in the pediatric population is extremely rare and the genetics of prior cases studies have not been reported. Spondylolysis should be considered as one of the types of fractures that may occur in patients with osteopetrosis.

Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Athletes

This article is an update on spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in athletes, from diagnosis to treatment, based on our service experience and a literature review.

Pars Interarticularis Fractures Treated with Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Literature Review

Recurrent stress on the isthmic pars interarticularis often leads to profound injury and symptom burden. When conservative and medical management fail, there are various operative interventions that can be used. The current review details the common clinical presentation and treatment of pars injury, with a special focus on the emerging minimally invasive procedures used in isthmic pars interarticularis repair. PubMed and Google Scholar database literature reviews were conducted. The keywords and phrases that were searched include but were not limited to; "history of spondylolysis", "pars interarticularis", "pars defect", "conventional surgical repair of pars", and "minimally invasive repair of pars". The natural history, conventional presentation, etiology, risk factors, and management of pars interarticularis injury are discussed by the authors. The surgical interventions described include the Buck's repair, Morscher Screw-Hook repair, Scott's Wiring technique, and additional pedicle screw-based repairs. Minimally invasive techniques are also reviewed, including the Levi technique. Surgical intervention has been proven to be safe and effective in managing pars interarticularis fractures. However, minimally invasive techniques often provide additional benefit to patients such as reducing damage of surrounding structures, decreasing postoperative pain, and limiting the time away from sports and other activities.

Reduction of adolescent grade IV L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with anterior joystick manipulation during a combined anterior and posterior surgical approach: A case report

Background

High-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis poses a clinical challenge in the pediatric and adolescent population. Current surgical management using posterior-based approaches may lead to incomplete reduction and restoration of listhesis, disc height, and lordosis. Combined anterior and posterior approach addresses these issues but has been infrequently reported, mainly in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Neither offers good disc space visualization and control of spinal alignment during reduction.

Case Description

A healthy 17-year-old female presented with 9 months of progressively worsening lower back pain radiating down the left lower extremity and 3 inches of height loss. Diagnosis of grade IV L5-S1 spondylolisthesis was made using plain radiographs, CT, and MRI. Management with combined anterior and posterior fusion, involving the manual manipulation of segments using an anterior pedicle screw joystick, was pursued.

Outcome

Satisfactory alignment, solid arthrodesis, no complications, and improved patient reported outcomes.

Conclusions

Combined anterior and posterior fusion with anterior joystick manipulation allowed for full reduction of grade IV spondylolisthesis and restoration of disc/foraminal height and L5-S1 segmental lordosis without neurological complication. Although less commonly performed in children and adolescents, this surgical approach can assist in restoring optimal alignment in isthmic spondylolisthesis.

[Stress injuries of bone in children and adolescents]

Stress injuries of bone in childhood and adolescence are the result of an imbalance between physical stress on the growing musculoskeletal system and its intrinsic resilience. Children who are very active in sports are particularly affected. The classical stress injuries mainly occur in the area of the lower leg, the metatarsus and the lower lumbar spine due to the disproportionate load on healthy bone; however, overuse syndromes can also occur in the area of the growth plates and possibly lead to growth plate disorders. The anamnesis usually shows stress-related pain that has existed for a long time without trauma. As part of the differential diagnosis, a stress injury must first be included in the considerations due to it being a rare entity. An X‑ray examination can show the first signs of a stress reaction. In the event of a conspicuous periosteal reaction, a malignant event must also be considered. As a rule, the MRI examination is then groundbreaking and in some rare cases biopsies have to be considered. The treatment of stress injuries is usually conservative. Recurrences should be counteracted by exercise control.

The adult with low back pain: causes, diagnosis, imaging features and management

Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. This article highlights the importance of succinct history taking and a thorough clinical examination when managing a patient with lower back pain in hospital. Furthermore, it encourages the clinician to consider the pertinent causes of low back pain such as age-related degeneration, malignancy, trauma, infection and seronegative inflammatory spondyloarthropathies, and looks at the diagnosis, imaging features and key management options which are available in secondary care.

Superior Cluneal Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: Thought to Be Spondylolysis

A rare but typically overlooked diagnosis in the orthopaedic surgery community is superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment syndrome. The cluneal nerves function as purely sensory fibers, and the SCNs provide cutaneous innervation to the posterior parasacral, gluteal, and posterolateral thigh regions. When irritated, this syndrome can cause acute and chronic lower back pain and lower extremity symptoms. A 14-year-old adolescent girl presented to the clinic for an evaluation of pain in the right side of her lower back. The patient's physical examination showed tenderness to palpation on the right posterior iliac crest seven centimeters from the midline. Her neurologic examination demonstrated normal deep tendon reflexes, muscle strength, and sensation in the L2-S1 dermatomal distribution. Although imaging showed evidence of a left L5 spondylolysis, she responded positively to a steroid injection over the posterior iliac crest but negatively to one over the L5 pars defect. She later underwent a right SCN decompression surgery. After the procedure, she reported at least 90% improvement in her pain and rated it as a one in severity, on a scale of 0 to 10. Research regarding SCN entrapment syndrome has increased in the past several years. However, most of these studies are limited to the adult population. Therefore, more reports highlighting the potential for this syndrome in adolescents are needed as well.

Staphylococcal enterotoxin C as a novel strategy for treating lumbar spondylolysis in adolescents: Description of technique

Lumbar spondylolysis is one of the most common causes of low back pain and primarily affects children and adolescents. Traditional posterior lumbar fixation and interbody fusion surgery has always been the most effective method to treat spondylolysis. However, traditional surgical management has limitations of large trauma, complex operation, high cost, postoperative biomechanical deterioration, and resulting complications. In order to avoid the trauma and complications of surgical treatment, and reduce the cost of treatment. Based on the successful clinical experience of using staphylococcal enterotoxin C (SEC) to treat nonunion after a limb fracture, we identified a minimally invasive method to effectively treat lumbar spondylolysis. A novel minimally invasive therapeutic approach is presented herein of an SEC injection guided by C-arm fluoroscopy to treat lumbar spondylolysis. We describe a novel technique applied in a patient with lumbar spondylolysis, who showed significantly improved low back pain symptoms and a computed tomography scan, including osseous fusion of the bilateral isthmus at L4 after SEC therapy. This is the first reported case description of using an SEC injection to treat lumbar spondylolysis with a successful clinical outcome.

MRI image features with an evident relation to low back pain: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent health condition worldwide and responsible for the most years lived with disability, yet the etiology is often unknown. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used for treatment decision even though it is often inconclusive. There are many different image features that could relate to low back pain. Conversely, multiple etiologies do relate to spinal degeneration but do not actually cause the perceived pain. This narrative review provides an overview of all possible relevant features visible on MRI images and determines their relation to LBP.

METHODS

We conducted a separate literature search per image feature. All included studies were scored using the GRADE guidelines. Based on the reported results per feature an evidence agreement (EA) score was provided, enabling us to compare the collected evidence of separate image features. The various relations between MRI features and their associated pain mechanisms were evaluated to provide a list of features that are related to LBP.

RESULTS

All searches combined generated a total of 4472 hits of which 31 articles were included. Features were divided into five different categories:'discogenic', 'neuropathic','osseous', 'facetogenic', and'paraspinal', and discussed separately.

CONCLUSION

Our research suggests that type I Modic changes, disc degeneration, endplate defects, disc herniation, spinal canal stenosis, nerve compression, and muscle fat infiltration have the highest probability to be related to LBP. These can be used to improve clinical decision-making for patients with LBP based on MRI.

Biomechanical Effects of a Novel Pedicle Screw W-Type Rod Fixation for Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Finite Element Analysis

Lumbar spondylolysis involves anatomical defects of the pars interarticularis, which causes instability during motion. The instability can be addressed through instrumentation with posterolateral fusion (PLF). We developed a novel pedicle screw W-type rod fixation system and evaluated its biomechanical effects in comparison with PLF and Dynesys stabilization for lumbar spondylolysis via finite element (FE) analysis. A validated lumbar spine model was built using ANSYS 14.5 software. Five FE models were established simulating the intact L1-L5 lumbar spine (INT), bilateral pars defect (Bipars), bilateral pars defect with PLF (Bipars_PLF), Dynesys stabilization (Bipars_Dyn), and W-type rod fixation (Bipars_Wtyp). The range of motion (ROM) of the affected segment, the disc stress (DS), and the facet contact force (FCF) of the cranial segment were compared. In the Bipars model, ROM increased in extension and rotation. Compared with the INT model, Bipars_PLF and Bipars_Dyn exhibited remarkably lower ROMs for the affected segment and imposed greater DS and FCF in the cranial segment. Bipars_Wtyp preserved more ROM and generated lower stress at the cranial segment than Bipars_PLF or Bipars_Dyn. The injury model indicates that this novel pedicle screw W-type rod for spondylolysis fixation could return ROM, DS, and FCF to levels similar to preinjury.

Spontaneous Fusion of L5/S1 Spondylolisthesis in an Elderly Female: A Case Report

We report a case of a 65-year-old female presenting with an Anterolisthesis grade I, L5-S1. With a history of lower back pain that started two years ago with weak big toe extension. CT scan revealed that There is anterolisthesis grade I, L5-S1. No pars defect was seen, and degenerative changes in the bilateral facet joint L5-S1, with narrow joint space & sclerosis. The patient underwent conservative management to strengthen and stretch her back muscles for three months and had spontaneous fusion develop at an unstable level with relief of symptoms after nonoperative treatment.

Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spondylolysis repair with various fixation options: A finite element analysis

Objective: This study was designed to compare the biomechanical properties of lumbar spondylolysis repairs using different fixation methods by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Methods: Five finite element models (A, B, C, D, and E) of L4-S1 vertebral body were reconstructed by CT images of a male patient (A: intact model; B: spondylolysis model; C: spondylolysis model with intrasegmental direct fixation by Buck screw; D: spondylolysis model with intersegmental indirect fixation by pedicle screw system; E: spondylolysis model with hybrid internal fixation). L5-S1 level was defined as the operative level. After the intact model was verified, six physiological motion states were simulated by applying 500 N concentrated force and 10 Nm torque on the upper surface of L4. The biomechanical properties of the three different internal fixation methods were evaluated by comparing the range of motion (ROM), maximum stress, and maximum displacement. Results: Compared with Model B, the ROM and maximum displacement of Model C, D, and E decreased. The maximum stress on L5/S1 disc in models A, B, and C was much higher than that in Model D and E under extension and lateral bending conditions. Under axial rotation and lateral bending conditions, the maximum stress of interarticular muscle and internal fixation system in Model B and Model C was significantly higher than that in Model D and Model E. In contrast to Model D, the stress in Model E was distributed in two internal fixation systems. Conclusion: In several mechanical comparisons, hybrid fixation had better biomechanical properties than other fixation methods. The experimental results show that hybrid fixation can stabilize the isthmus and reduce intervertebral disc stress, which making it the preferred treatment for lumbar spondylolysis.

Spondylolysis

Spondylolysis is a bony defect of the pars interarticularis and most often results from repetitive stress. Although spondylolysis is usually asymptomatic, symptomatic spondylolysis is the most common cause of identifiable back pain in children and adolescent athletes. A thorough history and physical exam, as well as appropriate imaging studies are helpful in diagnosis. General first-ine therapy for spondylolysis is conservative and consists of rest from sports, core strengthening, as well as spinal bracing. Patients who have failed conservative therapy may consider surgical repair. This article aims to review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and treatment options of spondylolysis.

Spondylolisthesis

Spondylolisthesis refers to the anterior, lateral, or posterior slippage of a superior vertebral disc over the adjacent inferior disc, and is often separated into categories based on the causative etiology. Spondylolisthesis is often asymptomatic but may present with low back pain and neurogenic claudication which is worsened with spinal extension and activity. A detailed history and physical exam, along with appropriate imaging tests are useful in making the diagnosis. Conservative therapy is first-line and includes pain management with physical therapy. Patients who fail conservative therapy may consider surgical decompression, stabilization, and fusion. This review aims to discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and treatment options of spondylolisthesis.

Does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) influence functional outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in isthmic spondylolisthesis?

PURPOSE

We assessed the efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

We included 24 symptomatic patients who underwent MIS-TLIF between December 2017 and December 2020. Patients were followed up clinically by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and VAS for leg pain, as well as radiological radiographs after 6 weeks, 6 months, and at final follow-up (at least 12 months). Measured parameters included C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), Meyerding slip grades, lumbar lordosis (LL), L1-L4 angle, L4-S1 angle, and segmental lordosis (SL) of the affected segment. The mismatch between the PI and LL was also measured.

RESULTS

VAS for back, VAS for leg pain, and ODI significantly improved postoperatively (all p < 0.001). We observed significantly decreased mean values of PT and slip percentage and increased mean values of SS and LL (all p < 0.05). We observed a significant reduction in L1-L4 lordosis and a significant increase in L4-S1 lordosis. The final PT, SS, and LL (total and L1-L4) were significantly higher in group III patients (n = 15) than the values of group II patients (n = 9). None of the patients became unbalanced postoperative, and all patients had a normal matching between the PI and the LL postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS-TLIF is a safe procedure for managing low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis with significant improvement in clinical and radiological outcomes. It can correct and maintain a proper spinopelvic alignment.

Risk factor analysis of disc and facet joint degeneration after intersegmental pedicle screw fixation for lumbar spondylolysis

Background

Patients who do not respond to conservative treatment of the isthmus are often treated with surgery. We used direct repair plus intersegment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. The aim of this observational study was to assess the effects of this technique and evaluate various risk factors potentially predicting the probability of disc and facet joint degeneration after instrumentation.

Methods

The study included 54 male L5 spondylolysis patients who underwent pars repair and intersegment fixation using pedicle screws. Bony union was evaluated using reconstruction images of computed tomography. Radiographic changes, including disc height, vertebral slip, facet joint and disc degeneration in the grade of adjacent and fixed segments, were determined from before to final follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of disc and facet joint degeneration.

Results

Bony union was achieved in all cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed that instrumentation durations of greater than 15.5 months and 21.0 months were significant risk factors for the incidence of L4/5 and L5S1 facet degeneration, respectively.

Conclusions

Intersegmental pedicle screw fixation provides good surgical outcomes and good isthmic bony union rates in patients with lumbar spondylolysis. The duration of fixation was confirmed as a risk factor for facet joint degeneration. Once bony union is achieved, instrument removal should be recommended.

Differentiating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis from its mimics: a narrative review

Background

Optimal treatment of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis depends on accurate and timely diagnosis of the underlying disease; however, patients present with common symptoms that, in the absence of radiographic changes, may confound diagnosis.

Methods and findings

In this narrative review, a PubMed literature search was conducted through January 2021, with no date limits, to identify English-language publications discussing classification of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, with an emphasis on clinical features and presentation, differential diagnoses, and mimics of disease. This review describes the epidemiology, clinical features, and burden of disease of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis as it relates to the overall axial spondyloarthritis spectrum and discusses mimics and differential diagnoses of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis that should be considered when evaluating patients with suspected nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis in clinical practice.

Conclusions

Recognition of clinical features of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, along with an understanding of comorbid conditions such as fibromyalgia, allows for differentiation from its mimics. Appropriate diagnosis of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis is important for aggressive management of disease to reduce pain, avoid loss of function, and improve quality of life.

Complications of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis surgery in patients over 80 s: comparative study with over 60 s and 70 s. Experience with 678 cases

Purpose

Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a debilitating condition that carries a high economic burden. As the global population ages, the number of patients over 80 years old demanding spinal fusion is constantly rising. Therefore, neurosurgeons often face the important decision as to whether to perform surgery or not in this age group, commonly perceived at high risk for complications.

Methods

Six hundred seventy-eight elder patients, who underwent posterolateral lumbar fusion for DS (performed in three different centers) from 2012 to 2020, were screened for medical, early and late surgical complications and for the presence of potential preoperative risk factors. Patients were divided in three categories based on their age: (1) 60–69 years, (2) 70–79 years, (3) 80 and over. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the predictive power of age and of other risk factors (i.e., ASA score; BMI; sex; presence or absence of insulin-dependent and -independent diabetes, use of anticoagulants, use of antiaggregants and osteoporosis) for the development of postoperative complications.

Results

In univariate analysis, age was significantly and positively correlated with medical complications. However, when controls for other risk factors were added in the regressions, age never reached significance, with the only noticeable exception of cerebrovascular accidents. ASA score and BMI were the two risk factors that significantly correlated with the higher numbers of complication rates (especially medical).

Conclusion

Patients of different age but with comparable preoperative risk factors share similar postoperative morbidity rates. When considering octogenarians for lumbar arthrodesis, the importance of biological age overrides that of chronological.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-022-05118-9.

Diagnosis and Management of Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Children

»

Spondylolysis is defined as a defect of the pars interarticularis, and spondylolisthesis is defined as a slippage of a vertebra relative to the immediately caudal vertebra.

»

Most cases of spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis can be treated nonoperatively. Depending on a patient's age, nonoperative treatment may include a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO), physical therapy, and activity modification. Bracing and physical therapy have been found to be more effective than activity modification alone.

»

Patients with dysplastic spondylolisthesis are at higher risk for progression and should be monitored with serial radiographs every 6 to 9 months.

»

Operative management is recommended for symptomatic patients with failure of at least 6 months of nonoperative management or patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis.

»

Surgical techniques include pars defect repair, reduction, and fusion, which may include posterior-only, anterior-only, or circumferential fusion.

Suggested Applications of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound to Identify the Etiologies of Low Back Pain

Collapse

Acute Cauda Equina Syndrome Due to Spondylolisthesis in the Midst of a Pandemic: A Case Report

CASE

A 54-year-old woman with chronic lumbar radiculopathy due to grade II spondylolisthesis at lumbar 4 to 5 developed acute cauda equina syndrome (CES) after an elective lumbar decompression, and fusion was delayed because of statewide bans on elective procedures during the pandemic. The diagnosis was made largely through telehealth consultation and eventually prompted urgent neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

This case report illustrates a rare presentation of acute CES and highlights some of the challenges of practicing clinical medicine in the midst of a pandemic.

The fate of nonoperative management in patients with lytic spondylolisthesis

Introduction: There is a lack of consensus within the current literature about the role of nonoperative management in lytic spondylolisthesis. Our objective was to assess the fate that nonoperative management plays in patients diagnosed with lytic spondylolisthesis. Material and Methods: Data was collected from 41 patients between May 2015 to February 2020 who were initially referred specifically for instrumented lumbar fixation but were instead planned for nonoperative management as they opted to avoid surgery. MRI scans were used to determine spondylolisthesis grade, type of deformity and radiological features. Patient notes were reviewed to establish management plans. Furthermore, patients were also contacted via telephone to assess their symptoms and disease progression. Results: 26 of the 41 patients had lytic spondylolisthesis (63.4%). Of these patients the male to female ratio was 10:16. The median age was 60 (range: 22 to 76). A total of 12 patients were managed nonoperatively for 5 years or longer with 2 patients showing progression from grade I to II. Conclusion: Nonoperative management of lytic spondylolisthesis is a reasonable option in a selected cohort of patients. The longer in duration, patients are managed conservatively the less likely they are to require a surgical intervention. Even severe radiological foraminal stenosis without radicular pain does not seem to push patients towards surgery. Management decisions must be made on an individual basis. This data can give some reassurance to patients that wish to consider nonoperative management and help guide clinicians.

Prevalence of Incidentally Detected Spondylolysis in Children

Purpose

To assess the prevalence of incidentally detected lumbar spondylolysis in children.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 809 patients under the age of 11 years (mean age, 7.0 ± 2.7 years; boys:girls = 479:330) who underwent abdominal and pelvic CT between March 2014 and December 2018. We recorded the presence, level, and laterality (unilateral or bilateral) of spondylolysis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of spondylolysis: the spondylolysis (SP) and non-SP groups.

Results

In total, 21 cases of spondylolysis were detected in 20 patients (20/809, 2.5%). The mean age of the SP group was higher than that of the non-SP group (7.8 ± 1.8 vs. 6.9 ± 2.7 years, p > 0.05). The prevalence of spondylolysis in boys was higher than that in girls (15/479 [3.1%] vs. 5/330 [1.5%], p > 0.05). The prevalence of spondylolysis in school-age children (6–10 year olds) was higher than that in preschool-age children (0–5 year olds) (17/538 [3.2%] vs. 3/271 [1.1%], p > 0.05). L5 was the most common level of spondylolysis (76.2%); one 8-year-old boy had twolevel spondylolysis. One case of isthmic spondylolisthesis was detected in a 10-year-old boy (1/809, 0.1%). There were 11 unilateral spondylolysis cases (11/21, 52.4%).

Conclusion

In our study, the prevalence of spondylolysis in children under the age of 11 was 2.5%. The prevalence was higher in boys than in girls and in school-age than in preschool-age children, despite the lack of any statistically significant differences.

Experimental Rat Model of Bony Defects in the Facet Joint Maintained with Bone Wax for the Study of Spinal Pain

Purpose

Studies using experimental rat models for low back pain due to facet-joint defects are scarce. This study used a novel experimental rat model to determine whether bony defects induced by facetectomy could be maintained by bone wax, thus mimicking spondylolysis, and to analyze the effect of the facetectomy on rat behavior.

Patients and Methods

Twelve 10-week-old male Wistar rats weighing 300–350 g were divided into group A (n = 6) that underwent unilateral facetectomy of the right L5-6 facet joint and group B (n = 6) that additionally applied water-soluble bone wax at the facetectomy site. The difference in the left and right stride length, detected by the footprint test, and change in the left and right facet joint area were compared before and 4 weeks after the experiment.

Results

Even though the difference between the left and right stride lengths of groups A and B was not statistically significant, in contrast to group A, group B showed a shorter stride length on the right side (p = 0.22 and 0.46, in group A and group B, respectively). The right facet joint area, where the facetectomy was performed, was significantly smaller in group B 4 weeks after surgery, but not in group A (p = 0.50 and < 0.01, in group A and group B, respectively).

Conclusion

Based on the results, we concluded that the bony defects, induced by facetectomy at the L5-6 facet joint, were maintained with bone wax. This study will provide an experimental model for bony defects in the facet joint.

Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, rheumatic disease characterized by inflammation of the sacroiliac joint, spine, and entheses. Axial spondyloarthritis affects up to 1.4% of adults in the United States and is associated with decreased quality of life, increased mortality, and substantial health care-related costs, imposing a high burden on patients, their caregivers, and society.

SUMMARY OF WORK

Diagnosing axSpA can be difficult. In this review, we seek to help rheumatologists in recognizing and diagnosing axSpA.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

A discussion of challenges associated with diagnosis is presented, including use and interpretation of imaging, reasons for diagnostic delays, differences in disease presentation by sex, and differential diagnoses of axSpA.

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

The early diagnosis of axSpA and advances in available therapeutic options have improved patient care and disease management, but delays in diagnosis and treatment remain common. Additional research and education are critical for recognizing diverse axSpA presentations and optimizing management early in the course of disease.

From Stoop to Squat: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lumbar Loading Among Different Lifting Styles

Lifting up objects from the floor has been identified as a risk factor for low back pain, whereby a flexed spine during lifting is often associated with producing higher loads in the lumbar spine. Even though recent biomechanical studies challenge these assumptions, conclusive evidence is still lacking. This study therefore aimed at comparing lumbar loads among different lifting styles using a comprehensive state-of-the-art motion capture-driven musculoskeletal modeling approach. Thirty healthy pain-free individuals were enrolled in this study and asked to repetitively lift a 15 kg-box by applying 1) a freestyle, 2) a squat and 3) a stoop lifting technique. Whole-body kinematics were recorded using a 16-camera optical motion capture system and used to drive a full-body musculoskeletal model including a detailed thoracolumbar spine. Continuous as well as peak compressive, anterior-posterior shear and total loads (resultant load vector of the compressive and shear load vectors) were calculated based on a static optimization approach and expressed as factor body weight (BW). In addition, lumbar lordosis angles and total lifting time were calculated. All parameters were compared among the lifting styles using a repeated measures design. For each lifting style, loads increased towards the caudal end of the lumbar spine. For all lumbar segments, stoop lifting showed significantly lower compressive and total loads (-0.3 to -1.0BW) when compared to freestyle and squat lifting. Stoop lifting produced higher shear loads (+0.1 to +0.8BW) in the segments T12/L1 to L4/L5, but lower loads in L5/S1 (-0.2 to -0.4BW). Peak compressive and total loads during squat lifting occurred approximately 30% earlier in the lifting cycle compared to stoop lifting. Stoop lifting showed larger lumbar lordosis range of motion (35.9 ± 10.1°) than freestyle (24.2 ± 7.3°) and squat (25.1 ± 8.2°) lifting. Lifting time differed significantly with freestyle being executed the fastest (4.6 ± 0.7 s), followed by squat (4.9 ± 0.7 s) and stoop (5.9 ± 1.1 s). Stoop lifting produced lower total and compressive lumbar loads than squat lifting. Shear loads were generally higher during stoop lifting, except for the L5/S1 segment, where anterior shear loads were higher during squat lifting. Lifting time was identified as another important factor, considering that slower speeds seem to result in lower loads.

Lumbar spondylolisthesis: STATE of the art on assessment and conservative treatment

INTRODUCTION

There is weak relationship between the presence of lumbar spondylolisthesis [SPL] and low back pain that is not always associated with instability, either at the involved lumbar segment or at different spinal levels. Therefore patients with lumbar symptomatic SPL can be divided into stable and unstable, based on the level of mobility during flexion and extension movements as general classifications for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Different opinions persist about best treatment (conservative vs. surgical) and among conservative treatments, on the type, dosage, and progression of physical therapy procedures.

PURPOSE AND IMPORTANCE TO PRACTICE

The aim of this Masterclass is to provide clinicians evidence-based indications for assessment and conservative treatment of SPL, taking into consideration some subgroups related to specific clinical presentations.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This Masterclass addresses the different phases of the assessment of a patient with SPL, including history, imaging, physical exam, and questionnaires on disability and cognitive-behavioral components. Regarding conservative treatment, self- management approaches and graded supervised training, including therapeutic relationships, information and education, are explained. Primary therapeutic procedures for pain control, recovery of the function and the mobility through therapeutic exercise, passive mobilization and antalgic techniques are suggested. Moreover, some guidance is provided on conservative treatment in specific clinical presentations (lumbar SPL with radiating pain and/or lumbar stenosis, SPL complicated by other factors, and SPL in adolescents) and the number/duration of sessions.

FUTURE RESEARCH PRIORITIES

Some steps to improve the diagnostic-therapeutic approach in SPL are to identify the best cluster of clinical tests, define different lumbar SPL subgroups, and investigate the effects of treatments based on that classification, similarly to the approach already proposed for non-specific LBP.

Repair of symptomatic bilateral L5 spondylolysis with autogenous iliac crest graft and temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation in youth

Background

When symptomatic spondylolysis fail to respond to nonoperative treatment, surgical management may be required. A number of techniques have been described for repair by intrasegmental fixation with good results; however, there are still some problems. We reported a repair technique with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation and autogenous iliac crest graft. The aim of present study is to assess the clinical outcomes of L5 symptomatic spondylolysis with this technique.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 128 patients with L5 spondylolysis treated with this method was performed. According to CT scan, the spondylolysis were classified into 3 categories: line, intermediate, and sclerosis type. The diagnostic block test of L5 bilateral pars defect was done in all patients preoperatively. The sagittal and axial CT images were used to determine the bone union. The healing time, complications, number of spina bifida occulta, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and VAS for back pain were recorded. After fixation removal, the rate of ROM preservation at L5S1 was calculated.

Results

There were 97 patients (194 pars) followed with mean follow-up of 23 months (range, 12–36 months). The union rate of pars was 82.0% at 12 months and 94.3% at 24 months postoperatively. Low back pain VAS significantly (P < 0.05) improved from preoperative mean value of 7.2 to 1.3 at the final follow-up postoperatively (P < 0.05). JOA score increased significantly postoperatively (P < 0.05) with average improvement rate of 79.3%. The rates of L5S1 ROM preservation were 79.8% and 64.0% after fixation removal at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. There were 3 patients of delayed incision healing without other complications.

Conclusions

Although sacrificing L5S1 segment motion temporarily, more stability was obtained with intersegmental fixation. This technique is reliable for spondylolysis repair which has satisfactory symptom relief, high healing rate, low incidence of complications, and preserve a large part of ROM for fixed segment.

Effect evaluation of acupuncture combined with nerve block treatment on patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical effect of acupuncture combined with nerve block treatment on Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Seventy patients with Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis were randomly divided into a control group (n=70) treated with merely nerve block and an observation group (n=70) treated with acupuncture based on the nerve block treatment in the control group. The clinical efficacy rate, pain severity evaluated by VAS (on the 3^rd day and in one week after treatment), recovery of spinal functions evaluated by Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) and the quality of life reflected by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The overall efficacy rate (94.29% vs 77.14%, P=0.036) and SF-36 score of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (both P<0.05). The VAS and ODI scores of the two groups after treatment were decreased and the observation group had lower scores (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Acupuncture combined with nerve block can improve the efficacy rate of treatment of Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis, relieve the pain of patients, restore their spinal functions and improve their quality of life, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

A comparative study of L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 vertebral fusion in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis

Introduction:

One of the most common types of spinal diseases is spondylolisthesis, which in advanced cases requires surgical intervention. This study aimed to compare the results of L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 vertebral fusion treatment in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Methods:

A study design that randomized controlled trial. A total of 70 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of spondylolisthesis at Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan, Iran, were evaluated from July 2020 to February 2021 (35 patients underwent L4-L5-S1 and 35 received L5-S1 vertebral fusion treatment). The radicular and low back pain (LBP) intensity (Vanguard Australian Shares), blood loss, wound infection, reduction, and quality of life (SF-12 scores) were quantified before the surgery, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery in two groups.

Results:

Patients involved in the two groups had similar baseline demographic characteristics. The percent slip in L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 group, respectively, postoperative 81.11% and 57.89%, P = 0.0001. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative were higher in the L4-L5-S1 group when compared to the L5-S1 group (P < 0.05). The wound infection rate of the L4-L5-S1 group was similar to that of the L5-S1 group (8.6% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.303). There was no difference in radicular and LBP intensity, SF-12 scores among patients with L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Both L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 were equally beneficial in improving short-term functional outcomes for patients with high grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. However, L4-L5-S1 was associated with statistically significant higher incidences of blood loss, but it was accompanied by a better reduction. Therefore, caution should be exercised when considering L4-L5-S1.

Overreporting of the disc herniation in lumbar spine MRI scans performed for patients with spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Spondylolisthesis is often misdiagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the slip may reduce to a normal alignment when the patient lies supine. Often, disc herniation is reported at the level of spondylolisthesis.

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence rates of disc herniation at the level of spondylolisthesis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study included 258 consecutive patients with spondylolisthesis who had lumbar spine MRI. The archived reports were collectively put in Group 1. A musculoskeletal radiologist and a spine surgeon reviewed the imaging studies together. Their readings were referred to as Group 2. The findings of both groups were compared to evaluate whether disc herniation was overreported.

RESULTS

Group 1 reported findings of true disc herniation in 112 (41.6%) cases and pseudo disc herniation or no findings of disc herniation at the level of spondylolisthesis in 157 (58.4%) cases. Group 2 reported findings of a true disc herniation in 25 (9.3%) cases and pseudo disc herniation or no findings of disc herniation in the remaining 244 (90.7%) cases. There was a statistically significant difference in the reporting rates between these two groups (P < 0.02). The most overreported finding was the disc bulging (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The current study showed overreporting of disc herniation in lumbar spine MRI scans performed for patients with established spondylolisthesis. The majority of disc pathology at the level of spondylolisthesis are pseudo disc rather than a true disc herniation. An accurate diagnosis is vital in planning surgical intervention.

End-To-End Computerized Diagnosis of Spondylolisthesis Using Only Lumbar X-rays

Lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS) is the anterior shift of one of the lower vertebrae about the subjacent vertebrae. There are several symptoms to define LS, and these symptoms are not detected in the early stages of LS. This leads to disease progress further without being identified. Thus, advanced treatment mechanisms are required to implement for diagnosing LS, which is crucial in terms of early diagnosis, rehabilitation, and treatment planning. Herein, a transfer learning-based CNN model is developed that uses only lumbar X-rays. The model was trained with 1922 images, and 187 images were used for validation. Later, the model was tested with 598 images. During training, the model extracts the region of interests (ROIs) via Yolov3, and then the ROIs are split into training and validation sets. Later, the ROIs are fed into the fine-tuned MobileNet CNN to accomplish the training. However, during testing, the images enter the model, and then they are classified as spondylolisthesis or normal. The end-to-end transfer learning-based CNN model reached the test accuracy of 99%, whereas the test sensitivity was 98% and the test specificity 99%. The performance results are encouraging and state that the model can be used in outpatient clinics where any experts are not present.

CONSIDERATION OF SPORT DEMANDS FOR AN 18-YEAR-OLD LACROSSE PLAYER WITH RECALCITRANT SYMPTOMATIC SPONDYLOLYSIS: A CASE REPORT

Background and Purpose

Spondylolysis is an anatomical defect or fracture of the pars interarticularis and encompasses almost half of all cases of low back pain in adolescent athletes. Most athletes return to sport with conservative treatment, but it is possible that consideration of sport demands may further improve rate of successful return. When surgery is performed, complication rate is high, so all conservative measures should be explored before considering surgical intervention. The purpose of this case report is to present a program where demands of sport were considered and allowed successful return to sport for a subject with recalcitrant symptomatic spondylolysis that had failed to respond to prior treatment.

Case Description

An 18-year-old lacrosse player with a history of recalcitrant symptomatic spondylolysis that failed three courses of conservative treatment and had been unsuccessful in returning to sport. A multi-phase program with a focus on multi-planar and full kinetic chain activities that addressed the nature of the sport demands is described, along with improvements in pain level, strength, range of motion, and subjective outcome scores.

Outcomes

The subject was able to successfully return to sport after 10 weeks of physical therapy and complete the remaining few months of his lacrosse season without reinjury. Range of motion and strength testing was markedly improved upon discharge. The subject's Modified Oswestry Disability Index improved from 16% to 0% and his pain level did not rise above 2/10 with any sport activity upon return.

Discussion/Conclusions

Although return to sport rates following spondylolysis in young athletes is high, this case report demonstrates that a consideration of sport demands may increase return to sport rates in athletes that do not respond to standard care and prevent surgical intervention.

Level of Evidence

Level 4, single case report.

Successful Bony Healing For An Adult Patient With Isthmic Spondylolysis At Terminal Stage After Conservative Treatment: A Case Report

Purpose

Spondylolysis, a defect or fracture of the pars interarticularis due to mechanical stress, is a common cause of lower back pain (LBP) in children and adolescents. Although conservative treatment has been shown to be most effective for young patients at early or progressive stage, few studies have reported the outcomes of conservative treatment for adult spondylolysis at terminal stage. We present the possibility of bony healing in the isthmic defect at terminal stage after conservative treatment.

Patients and methods

A 50-year-old male patient complaining of moderate LBP was diagnosed as having L5 bilateral pars defect accompanied with related grade I spondylolisthesis though radiological evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed the sclerotic change in the defect of the isthmus, indicating spondylolysis at the terminal stage. This patient was treated with conservative management including lower back muscle functional exercises and medication when necessary.

Results

After five years of follow-up, the patient had a good recovery without reoccurrence. The repeated radiography and computed tomography demonstrated the pars defect had disappeared and been replaced by trabeculation, with no evidence of progressive segmental instability or vertebrae slip.

Conclusion

Symptomatic adult patients with isthmus spondylolysis at terminal stage might still have an opportunity to be effectively managed with rigorous conservative treatment for obtaining bony healing. However, the progression of listhesis or persistent debilitating pain should warrant consideration for surgical treatment.

Posterior Vertebral Endplate Fractures: A Retrospective Study on a Rare Etiology of Back Pain in Youth and Young Adults

BACKGROUND

Posterior lumbar vertebral endplate fracture occurs with avulsion of the ring apophysis from the posterior vertebral body. Although this has been described in adolescents and young adults, proper diagnosis is often delayed or missed entirely. Surgery may be curative.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the common clinical features and treatment outcomes in youth and young adults with posterior lumbar vertebral endplate fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Academic medical institution.

PATIENTS

Patients 10 to 25 years old from 2000 through 2012 with posterior vertebral endplate fracture diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Demographic characteristics, diagnostic studies, interventions, and change in symptoms postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients had posterior vertebral endplate fractures (8 male patients; mean age, 15.2 years)-8.3% of 192 patients with inclusion age range undergoing spinal surgery for causes unrelated to trauma, scoliosis, or malignancy. The most common signs and symptoms were low back and radiating leg pain, positive straight leg raise, hamstring contracture, and abnormal gait. Cause was sports related for 12 patients (75%). Mean (range) time to diagnosis was 13.0 (3.0-63.0) months. Diagnosis was most commonly made with lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (n = 6). Most fractures occurred at L5 (n = 8, 50%) and L4 (n = 5, 31.3%). Conservative measures were trialed before surgery. Nine patients had "complete relief" following surgery and seven "improved."

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior vertebral endplate fracture should be considered in differential diagnosis of a youth or young adult with back pain, radiating leg pain, and limited knee extension, regardless of symptom onset. For patients in whom conservative management fails, consultation with an experienced physician whose practice specializes in spine medicine is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.