Recurrent shoulder stabilization with open bankart repair and long head biceps transfer

The long head of the biceps tendon: a valuable tool in shoulder surgery

ANATOMY AND FUNCTION

The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) has different properties and characteristics that render it a valuable tool in the hands of shoulder surgeons. Its accessibility, biomechanical strength, regenerative capabilities, and biocompatibility allow it to be a valuable autologous graft for repairing and augmenting ligamentous and muscular structures in the glenohumeral joint.

SHOULDER SURGERY APPLICATIONS

Numerous applications of the LHBT have been described in the shoulder surgery literature, including augmentation of posterior-superior rotator cuff repair, augmentation of subscapularis peel repair, dynamic anterior stabilization, anterior capsule reconstruction, post-stroke stabilization, and superior capsular reconstruction. Some of these applications have been described meticulously in technical notes and case reports, whereas others may require additional research to confirm clinical benefit and efficacy.

CONCLUSION

This review examines the role of the LHBT as a source of local autograft, with biological and biomechanical properties, in aiding outcomes of complex primary and revision shoulder surgery procedures.

Long head of biceps transfer to augment Bankart repair in chronic anterior shoulder instability with and without subcritical bone loss: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability in participants in collision sports, patients with capsulolabral defects, and patients with bipolar bone loss remains challenging. The study purpose was to investigate the effect of long head of the biceps transfer (LHBT) on load-to-dislocation biomechanics in a repetitive serial shoulder dislocation cadaveric model comparing LHBT with the Latarjet and Bankart procedures-the first-line treatment methods for chronic traumatic anterior shoulder instability with and without anterior glenoid bone loss, respectively.

METHODS

In this controlled laboratory study, 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders with different conditions were dislocated in sequence using a custom test frame. The muscle loading configuration simulated the arm in the apprehension position, and biceps loads of 20 N and 40 N were used for the static glenohumeral position analysis to evaluate the sling effect. Sequential experimental conditions consisted of the intact state, second and third dislocations, chronic instability, Bankart repair, first LHBT, subcritical glenoid bone loss, second LHBT, and Latarjet procedure.

RESULTS

The pectoralis major and joint reaction loads to dislocation sequentially decreased with serial dislocations in all specimens, with the lowest value in the subcritical glenoid bone defect condition. In the setting of chronic instability, the pectoralis load to dislocation was significantly higher with the Bankart repair (P = .031) and LHBT (P < .001), at 71% and 85% of the intact value, respectively. Direct comparison of the pectoralis load to dislocation favored LHBT over Bankart repair (P = .015). In the subcritical defect scenario, LHBT did not significantly increase the load to dislocate, and the Latarjet procedure demonstrated a higher load to dislocate than LHBT (P < .001). All 3 surgical procedures tested significantly increased the angle of horizontal abduction at the time of dislocation and restored the glenohumeral position to closer to the intact state. Doubling the biceps load leveraged the sling effect, pulling the humeral head farther posterior-superiorly, but this was not enough to overcome the effect of a 20% subcritical glenoid bone defect.

CONCLUSIONS

In a serial dislocation model, LHBT effectively stabilized the glenohumeral joint in a simulated chronic instability scenario, increasing the pectoralis major load-to-dislocate and glenohumeral joint reaction force components at the time of dislocation and restoring relative glenohumeral positioning to close to the intact state. The Latarjet procedure outperformed LHBT in stabilizing shoulders in the 20% subcritical glenoid bone defect condition.

Double-Sling Augmentation for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

Anterior capsule ligament deficiency occurs in complicated anterior shoulder dislocation and poses a challenge to surgeons because of the irreparability of the capsule labrum structure or the nonoptimal healing potential after repair. Single-sling augmentation with either conjoined tendon or the long head of the biceps brachii has been reported to enhance the anterior stability of the shoulder. However, single-sling augmentation may still not be enough in cases of complicated anterior shoulder dislocation. Thus we introduce a double-sling anterior shoulder augmentation technique in which both the conjoined tendon and the long head of the biceps brachii are transferred to the anterior inferior side of the glenoid. Our clinical experience indicates that this procedure is effective to address complicated anterior shoulder dislocation. We believe that the introduction of this technique will provide a special choice in the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation.

Biomechanical Comparison of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Versus Conjoint Tendon Transfer in a Bone Loss Shoulder Instability Model

Background:

Augmentation of Bankart repair with long head of the biceps tendon transfer has been previously described, although there is a paucity of literature describing its biomechanical effects.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of augmenting Bankart repair with either the conjoint tendon or the long head of the biceps tendon, both with and without subcritical (13%) glenoid bone loss. We hypothesized that, in a cadaveric model, augmenting Bankart repair with the long head of the biceps tendon would restore a greater degree of stability compared with augmenting Bankart repair with the conjoint tendon.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

A total of 12 cadaveric shoulders were tested on a 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic musculoskeletal simulator to measure the peak resistance force due to an anterior displacement of 1 cm. The rotator cuff muscles were loaded during testing to simulate physiological conditions. The following test conditions were used for each specimen: (1) intact shoulder, (2) Bankart lesion with 13% anterior bone loss, (3) 13% bone loss with Bankart repair (anchors placed at the 3-, 4-, and 5-o’clock positions), (4) 13% bone loss with both Bankart repair and transfer of the long head of the biceps tendon, and (5) 13% bone loss with Bankart repair and transfer of the conjoint tendon.

Results:

Labral repair with the addition of long head of the biceps tendon transfer had the greatest peak resistance force to anterior displacement among all groups (54.1 ± 5.5 N) and was significantly stronger than both standard Bankart repair by 16.3% (46.5 ± 7.6 N; P = .039) and the conjoint transfer procedure by 16.6% (46.4 ± 7.7 N; P = .008).

Conclusion:

Given the susceptibility of recurrent instability in shoulders with subcritical bone loss after isolated labral repair, it is important to consider augmenting Bankart repair in high-risk patients to avoid potential recurrence and the need for reoperations. Transferring the long head of the biceps tendon to the anterior glenoid represents one possible augmentation.

Clinical Relevance:

We present biomechanical data for a relatively novel technique for augmenting capsulolabral repair strength in an anterior instability model with subcritical bone loss. These data represent biomechanical justification for the utilization of this relatively novel technique.