Survival of the native hip after spinopelvic fusion

Does timing of lumbar fusion affect dislocation rate after total hip arthroplasty?

Introduction

The impact of lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) on pelvic mobility and increased risk for THA dislocation are recognized. However, there is still controversy on whether THA should be performed prior or following LSF. This study aims to compare the rates of hip dislocation in patients undergoing THA prior to or following LSF.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 109 primary THA and LSF. There were 34 men and 75 women with a mean age of 66.9. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: 1) THA prior to lumbar fusion (n = 42) and 2) THA following lumbar fusion (n = 67). Radiographic parameters including acetabular component abduction, anteversion, pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope, standing lumbar lordosis (LL) and PI-LL mismatch were determined for each patient. The surgical approach and THA parameters were also recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Patients with fracture, malignant disease, and prior hip hardware were excluded.

Results

The mean follow up was 14.7 months. Overall, 8 patients (7.3%) had a postoperative hip dislocation (0 in group 1 (0%), and 8 in group 2 (11.9%) (p = 0.022). The mean cup abduction and anteversion in patients that dislocated was 37.7° and 23.4° respectively while patients who did not dislocate had an average cup abduction of 37.6° (p = 0.970) and anteversion of 25.9° (p = 0.367). Patients who dislocated had decreased lumbar lordosis (p = 0.022) and higher PI-LL mismatch (p = 0.0004) compared to that did not dislocate. There were no other significant differences in the spinopelvic parameters between the 2 groups. Neither surgical approach nor dual mobility articulations use had a significant impact on postoperative dislocations.

Conclusion

Higher rates of hip dislocation were observed in patients undergoing primary THA following LSF. Dislocators had decreased lumbar lordosis and increased PI-LL mismatch. Patients who require both spinal fusion and THA should undergo hip arthroplasty first to minimize the risk of postoperative instability.

How much does lumbar fusion change sagittal pelvic tilt in individuals receiving total hip arthroplasty?

Background

This study primarily aims to examine the effect of lumbar fusion on changes in sagittal pelvic tilt (SPT) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients.

Methods

We reviewed 19 hip osteoarthritic patients undergoing THA with or without lumbar fusion. The gender, age, primary disease, Deyo comorbidity score, and year of surgery were sorted and matched. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. They were compared in terms of the SPT angle, Harris hip score (HHS) and complications.

Results

On average, the patients receiving lumbar fusion had a − 3.9 (95% CI − 7.7 to − 1.5) degrees of SPT before THA and − 2.7 (95% CI − 6.5 to 1.1) degrees postoperatively, and the THA patients without lumbar fusion averaged 2.5 (95% CI − 0.1 to 5.0) degrees and 4.2 (95% CI 2.0 to 6.4) degrees, respectively. In the lumbar fusion patients, the mean SPT was − 3.9 (95% CI − 9.9 to 2.0) degrees with L5S1 fusion and − 4.0(95% CI − 10.0 to 2.1) degrees without L5S1 fusion on the standing radiograph before THA (t = 0.01, P = 0.99). The mean SPT was − 1.2 (95% CI − 4.9 to 2.6) degrees with one- and two-segment fusion and − 10.0 (95% CI − 18.5 to 1.5) degrees with three- and four-segment fusion before THA (t = 2.60, P = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in cup inclination and cup anteversion after THA between the lumbar fusion and control groups. These patients in the two groups achieved a similar HHS 12 months after THA despite the fact that they had different SPT and HHS before THA.

Conclusion

Lumbar fusion appears to increase the posterior SPT by approximately 6 degrees in the patients undergoing THA. Lumbar fusion of more than two segments is a predictor of more posterior SPT changes, but fusion of L5S1 is not.

Female Sex and Longer Fusion Constructs Significantly Increase the Risk of Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Spinal Fusion

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have noted the progression of arthritis due to increased forces in articular structures adjacent to a fused joint. It is unknown whether spinal fusion generates increased forces at the hip joint causing progression to arthritis leading to total hip arthroplasty (THA). We sought to determine (1) is there a relationship between spinal fusion and THA, (2) what are risk factors for subsequent THA, and (3) is there a time interval from spinal fusion to THA?

METHODS

A large patient discharge dataset was utilized to evaluate all patients who underwent spinal fusion and subsequent THA in California from 2004 through 2013. Patients were categorized by age, sex, hospital type, hospital volume, and number of spinal levels fused. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between spinal fusion and THA. Hazard ratios were calculated for risk factors for THA after spinal fusion. Patients were excluded for previous spinal fusion or hip arthroplasty, inflammatory arthropathy, cancer, and an age of ≤40 years, a surrogate for adolescent and neuromuscular scoliosis.

RESULTS

A total of 101,206 patients underwent spinal fusion; 2,803 (2.77%) subsequently underwent THA. In a bivariate analysis comparing 1 to 2 levels versus >2 levels fused, males had a 17% increased relative risk of undergoing subsequent THA (relative risk [RR] = 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16 to 1.17) and female patients had a 35% increased relative risk (RR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.35) when the fusion involved >2 levels. For females, the relative risk increased by 119% when >7 levels were fused compared with 1 to 7 levels (RR = 2.19; 95% CI = 2.16 to 2.21). Using multivariate random-effects analysis, significant risk factors for THA after spinal fusion included female sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.31; p < 0.0001) and spinal fusion of >7 levels (HR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.24; p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with longer spinal fusion constructs, especially female patients, had a significantly increased risk of undergoing subsequent THA. Patients should be educated regarding the potential for the progression to hip arthritis after spinal fusion and the possibility of future THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.