Mid-term survivorship and clinical outcomes of the medial stabilized systems in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

High patient satisfaction with Customized Total Knee Arthroplasty at five year follow-up

PURPOSE

Despite numerous studies demonstrating promising short-term outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with Customized Individually Made (CIM) implants, there is a significant lack of data on their mid-term effectiveness. Given the increasing number of TKAs performed annually, the rising demand for CIM implants, and the associated burden of revision surgeries, understanding the mid-term performance of CIM implants is crucial. Therefore, this study aims to report on the mid-term (minimum 5 years) outcomes of TKA using a CIM implant.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included a consecutive series of 116 patients who received the ConforMIS® iTotal CR implant between 2015 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were end-stage knee osteoarthritis with coronal deformities below 10° and absence of ligamentous instability. Exclusion criteria included simultaneous bilateral TKA. Patients were followed up at a minimum of five years post-surgery. They completed a questionnaire reporting on satisfaction, pain levels using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), current weight, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and the Forgotten Joint Score for the knee (FJS-knee). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics for demographic and clinical variables, and outcomes were reported as means with ranges.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 5.9 ± 0.8 years (range 5-7.4 years). 90% of patients stated they would undergo the same operation again, and 93% were either satisfied or very satisfied. The mean VAS for pain at rest was 2 ± 1.5 (range 0-6) and during exercise was 3 ± 2 (range 0-8). 58 patients (53%) managed to lose weight. The mean OKS was 41 ± 9 points (range 15-48), and the mean FJS-knee was 67 ± 23 points (range 4-100). No severe complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

CIM TKA using the ConforMIS® iTotal CR implant can achieve excellent results with 93% of patients being satisfied or very satisfied at mid-term follow-up of five years. Prospective, randomized, and patient-blinded trials comparing off-the-shelf (OTS) TKAs with CIM implants are necessary to evaluate whether these implants are superior or not.

No significant clinical differences between native or reduced posterior tibial slope in kinematically aligned total knee replacement with posterior cruciate-retaining

Aims & objectives

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, conventional alignment techniques may lead to postoperative dissatisfaction in up to 20% of cases. Kinematic alignment (KA) has emerged as a new philosophy to restore the native joint line and achieve more natural kinematics. Preserving the posterior tibial slope (PTS) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is crucial to maintaining the pre-arthritic joint line and improving knee kinematics. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of postoperative PTS changes and their impact on functional outcomes and range of motion.

Materials & methods

A retrospective single-center study was conducted on patients who underwent KA-TKA with PCL preservation. The preoperative and postoperative PTS were measured on lateral knee radiographs using the tibial proximal anatomic axis method. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected pre- and postoperatively up to a two-year follow-up.

Results

Of the 95 included patients, 62.1% achieved an anatomically similar PTS (within 3° from the preoperative value), while 37.9% experienced noticeable PTS changes. However, no significant associations existed between PTS changes and compromised PROMs (WOMAC, 22.2 and 23.1; FJS, 66.6 and 67.3), ROM (118.5° and 119.4°), or patient satisfaction. No postoperative complications requiring reoperation or component revisions were observed.

Conclusion

Preserving or modifying the native PTS during KA-TKA could be confidently undertaken without compromising functional outcomes or patient satisfaction.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a popular treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Advances in understanding knee biomechanics have led to the development of medial pivot (MP) prostheses, which aim to replicate natural knee kinematics. While short- and mid-term studies have shown favorable outcomes for MP-TKA, long-term follow-up studies are limited. This systematic review aims to analyze the available evidence on long-term outcomes of MP-TKA, including survivorship, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for English language studies reporting long-term outcomes of primary MP-TKA. Nine studies with an average follow-up of 12.4 years were included. Data on survivorship, complications, and PROMs were collected and analyzed. The overall survivorship of MP-TKA was 98.2% at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. Aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were the most common reasons for revision, with a revision rate of 0.4% for each. The overall complication rate was 6.6%, with secondary anterior knee pain and PJI being the most frequent complications. The reoperation rate was 3.1%, primarily due to PJI and knee instability. PROMs significantly improved postoperatively. MP-TKA demonstrates favorable long-term outcomes with high survivorship, low complication rates, and enhanced PROMs. The procedure provides reliable management for end-stage osteoarthritis, offering patients improved knee function and pain relief. Further research with standardized reporting and larger sample sizes is needed to validate and compare these findings to other implant designs.

Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Bearing Designs and the Role of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament

The role of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery continues to be a source of debate among the adult reconstruction community. In native knee flexion, the PCL is comprised of an anterolateral and posteromedial bundle that work together to limit posterior tibial translation and allow adequate femoral rollback for deep flexion. In the arthritic knee, the PCL can often become dysfunctional and attenuated, which led to the development of posterior stabilized (PS) TKA bearing options. PS TKAs implement a cam-post construct to functionally replace a resected PCL. While PS designs may facilitate balancing knees with significant deformity, they are associated with complications such as postfracture, increased wear, and patellar clunk/crepitus. In recent years, newer designs have been popularized with greater degrees of congruency and incorporation of medial and lateral pivoting to better recreate native knee kinematics. The American Joint Registry has confirmed the recent predilection for ultra-congruent and cruciate-retaining TKA inserts over PS TKAs during the last decade. Studies have failed to identify an overall clinical superiority between the cruciate substituting and sacrificing designs. The literature has also failed to identify clinical consequences from PCL resection with modern, more conforming TKA designs. In this article, we review modern PCL sacrificing designs and discuss the impact of each on the kinematics after TKA. We also will delineate the role of the PCL in modern TKA in the hopes to better understand the recent surge in sacrificing but not substituting knee implants.

Comparison between gaits after a medial pivot and posterior stabilized primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most performed orthopedic procedures worldwide. While excellent efficacy has been reported, about 20% of patients are not satisfied with the result. A potential cause is the problematic reproduction of knee kinematics. This systematic review examines gait analysis studies in primary medial pivot (MP) and posterior stabilized (PS) TKAs to investigate the differences between the two prosthesis designs.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were analyzed, and eligible articles were evaluated in terms of the levels of evidence. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed by using the MINORS scoring. This review was registered in PROSPERO.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. Gait analysis was performed in 197 MP TKA and 192 PS TKA patients. PS TKA cases showed (P < 0.05) a significantly higher peak of knee flexion angle during the swing phase, greater knee flexion angle at toe-off, an increased knee adduction angle, higher knee flexion and extension moment, increased anterior femoral roll during knee flexion and anterior translation on medial and lateral condyle during knee flexion compared to MP TKA. MP TKA showed statistically significant (P < 0.05) higher knee rotational moment and greater tibiofemoral external rotation motion during knee flexion than PS TKA. No statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) was reported regarding gait spatial-temporal parameters. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Comparison in terms of Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score (mean stiffness) showed that MP TKA yielded significantly better results than PS TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review revealed significant kinematic and kinetic differences between MP and PS TKA at all gait analysis phases. Furthermore, the considerable difference between TKA design and the kinematics of healthy knee were highlighted in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: Mid-term results

This study aims to evaluate the mid-term results of patients who underwent medial pivot total knee arthroplasty at a single center. A total of 304 knees of 236 patients (40 males, 196 females; mean operation age and standard deviation : 66,64 ±7,09 years; range, 45 to 82 years) treated with medial pivot total knee prosthesis in our center between January 2010 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The American Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and especially flexion angles were recorded during pre- and postoperative follow-up. Of the operated knees, 71.2% were unilateral and 28.8% were bilateral. The mean follow-up was 79.30±14.76 months. The postoperative results with the Functional Score, Knee Score, Oxford Score, Total Knee Society Score, and flexion angles were significantly higher compared to baseline (p<0.01). All postoperative scores were significantly lower inpatients aged ≥65years, compared to those aged <65 years (p<0.01). In patients who underwent resection of anterior and posterior the cruciate ligaments, only the mean flexion angles were found to increase (p<0.01). Our study results suggest that medial pivot knee prostheses are reliable in the mid-term and provide favorable results in terms of function and patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence: Level IV retrospective study.

Custom total knee arthroplasty combined with personalised alignment grants 94% patient satisfaction at minimum follow-up of 2 years

PURPOSE

The purpose was to report detailed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction rates for computed tomography (CT)-based custom TKA at minimum follow-up of 2 years. The hypothesis was that custom TKA combined with 'personalised alignment' would yield equivalent or better PROMs compared to values reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses on off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA.

METHODS

Of an initial cohort of 150 custom TKAs, four died (unrelated to surgery), one required a revision, and five refused participation, leaving 140 patients for analysis. Patients completed pre- and post-operative PROMs (Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster osteoarthritis index (WOMAC)) as well as overall level of satisfaction. Proportions that attained a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were calculated for OKS and FJS. Clinical findings were compared to the average scores reported for PROMs in recent systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses on OTS TKA. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the clinical findings as means, standard deviations (SD) and ranges, or numbers and percentages.

RESULTS

At mean follow-up 33.5 ± 4.5 months, 94% (135/143) were either satisfied or very satisfied. Proportions that achieved PASS were 89% for OKS (120/135), and 85% for FJS (118/139). Median OKS, WOMAC and KOOS Symptoms and Pain scores were all within the 4th quartile of medians reported in systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

At a minimum follow-up of two years following custom TKA combined with 'personalised alignment', 94% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied, and the PASS criteria were achieved in 89% for OKS and 85% for FJS, all of which compare favourably to published outcomes of OTS TKA. Direct comparisons to the literature may not be appropriate, however, considering the heterogeneity of patient demographics and alignment techniques. Randomised controlled trials with sufficient statistical power are needed to corroborate these findings and generalise them to unselected TKA patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective cohort study.

Mid-Flexion, Anteroposterior Stability of Total Knee Replacement Implanted with Kinematic Alignment: A Randomized, Quantitative Radiographic Laxity Study with Posterior-Stabilized and Medial-Stabilized Implants

UPDATE

This article was updated on January 4, 2023, because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 16, in Figure 5, the x-axis that had read "P<0.0086" now reads "KSS Pain (p=0.02)," and the value for the MS group that had read "48.9" now reads "48.8."This article was updated on January 6, 2022, because of a previous error. On page 13, in the section entitled "Results," the sentence that had read "However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the MS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008)." now reads "However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the PS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008)."

BACKGROUND

Stability in mid-flexion is important for satisfactory clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to compare the anteroposterior stability of knees that had been treated with a posterior-stabilized (PS) device or a medial-stabilized (MS) device. We hypothesized that mid-flexion laxity would be greater in the PS group and that clinical outcome scores would be better for the group with lower laxity.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who had been randomly selected from a larger randomized, prospective, blinded clinical trial underwent primary TKA with either a PS implant (n = 30) or an MS implant (n = 33). Range of motion, the Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were collected, and anteroposterior laxity with the knee in 45° and 90° of flexion was evaluated with stress radiographs.

RESULTS

In 45° of flexion, the MS group demonstrated significantly less total anteroposterior displacement than the PS group (mean, 3.6 versus 16.5 mm; p ≤ 0.0001). In 90° of flexion, the total anteroposterior displacement was not significantly different for the 2 groups when both male and female patients were included (mean, 3.9 versus 5.9; p = 0.07). However, when only the subset of female subjects was considered, the MS group demonstrated significantly less anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion than the PS group (2.3 versus 5.4 mm; p = 0.008). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of preoperative age, body mass index, sex distribution, FJS, KSS, or range of motion, and they also did not differ in terms of postoperative FJS or range of motion. However, all 33 patients in the MS group returned to sports as indicated in question 12 of the FJS, compared with 19 subjects in the PS group (p = 0.0001). The postoperative KSS Pain, Pain/Motion, and Function scores were all significantly higher in the MS group than the PS; specifically, the mean KSS Pain score was 48.8 in the MS group, compared with 44.8 in the PS group (p = 0.02); the mean KSS Pain/Motion score was 98.4 in the MS group, compared with 89.5 in the PS group (p < 0.0001); and the mean KSS Function score was 95.5 in the MS group, compared with 85.7 in the PS group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-flexion laxity was greater in patients with PS implants than in those with MS implants, and laxity in 90° was greater in the subset of female patients in the PS group. The decreased laxity observed in the MS group correlated with higher KSS Pain, Pain/Motion, and Function scores as well as with a higher rate of return to sports activities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Medial pivot-based total knee arthroplasty achieves better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Stability in the sagittal plane, particularly regarding anterior cruciate ligament compensation, and postoperative functionality and satisfaction remain issues in total knee arthroplasty. Therefore, this prospective study compared the clinical outcomes between medial-pivot-based and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty based on anterior translation and clinical scores.

METHODS

To assess outcomes of total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis, the anterior translation distance of the tibia relative to the femur was measured at 30 and 60° of flexion using a KS measure Arthrometer at 6 months postoperatively. The 2011 Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analogue scale for pain, and range of motion were assessed at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The correlations among each score, anterior translation distance, range of motion, and visual analogue scale score for pain were investigated.

RESULTS

The medial-pivot and posterior-stabilised groups comprised 70 and 51 patients, respectively. The medial-pivot group exhibited a significantly shorter anterior translation distance at 60° flexion than the posterior-stabilised group. Furthermore, the medial-pivot group achieved significantly better outcomes regarding the visual analogue scale for pain, 2011 Knee Society Score, and Forgotten Joint Score than the posterior-stabilised group. A significant negative correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score of the 2011 Knee Society Score, whereas a significant positive correlation was found between the anterior translation distance and flexion angle, and between the extension angle and score of the Forgotten Joint Score or 2011 Knee Society Score. Significant negative correlations were also found between the pain visual analogue scale and both the 2011 Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score.

CONCLUSION

In total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, the medial-pivot group displayed a shorter anterior translation distance than the posterior-stabilised group at 6 months postoperatively. The visual analogue scale score for pain was also significantly lower in the medial-pivot group than that in the posterior-stabilised group at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Because a correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score, medial-pivot-based total knee arthroplasty was considered to significantly improve postoperative function compared to posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

No Significant Differences in Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes between PCL Retained or Sacrificed Kinematic Aligned Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty in Varus Knee

In the last decades, several surgical techniques, such as medial pivot (MP) philosophy and kinematic alignment (KA), have been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve patients’ outcomes. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional results of PCL preservation or sacrifice in KA MP-TKA. A consecutive series of 147 patients older than 60, with a minimum follow-up of two years, were treated with TKA for severe primary knee osteoarthritis (OA) at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology between 1 January 2019, and 1 July 2020. After excluding those not meeting the inclusion criteria, 64 patients were included in the study analysis. Regarding radiographic outcomes, no statistically significant difference was observed between patients with preserved or sacrificed PCL (p > 0.05). A slight improvement in Knee Society Score (KSS), knee and function score, and FJS was observed for the PCL-preserved group, although this superiority tendency was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). PCL-preserved MA MP-TKA reported a statistically significant result in only two questions on the FJS questionnaire (p < 0.05). A slight, non-statistically significant improvement in active ROM was found in the PCL-sacrificed group (p > 0.05). No interventions or revisions were reported in this case series for all treated patients at the final follow-up. No significant differences were described in clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes in preserved or sacrificed PCL KA MP-TKA. Although not significant, a slight trend toward better clinical outcomes was reported in PCL-preserved KA MP-TKA.

In vivo kinematic comparison of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the kinematics of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty by comparing weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending and to evaluate the effect of the weight-bearing state on the kinematics.

METHODS

The kinematics of 19 knees were investigated under fluoroscopy during squatting (weight-bearing) and active-assisted knee bending (non-weight-bearing) using two- to three-dimensional registration technique. Accordingly, range of motion, anteroposterior translation for the medial and lateral low contact points, axial rotation of the femoral component relative to the tibial component and kinematic pathway were evaluated.

FINDINGS

There was no difference in range of motion between the two states. The medial anteroposterior translation showed no significant movement with no anterior translation in both the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing from 0° to 90° of flexion. Regarding the lateral anteroposterior translation, a posterior translation was observed during weight-bearing, whereas a slight anterior translation from 0° to 30° of flexion and subsequent posterior translation were found in the non-weight-bearing. Femoral external rotation was observed in the weight-bearing, whereas femoral internal rotation was seen from 0° to 30° of flexion and subsequent femoral external rotation was observed in the non-weight-bearing. The kinematic pathway showed medial pivot motion and subsequent bicondylar rollback in the weight-bearing, whereas only medial pivot motion was observed in the non-weight-bearing.

INTERPRETATION

The medial anteroposterior translation of the femur during deep knee bending showed no anterior motion in the two states. The lateral anteroposterior translation and femoral rotation were different in the mid-flexion range between the two states.

Custom TKA combined with personalised coronal alignment yield improvements that exceed KSS substantial clinical benefits

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report Knee Society Scores (KSS) at 12-month follow-up in a series of 266 knees that received custom TKA. The hypothesis was that custom TKA combined with personalised alignment would yield improvements greater than substantial clinical benefits (SCB) of KSS Knee and Function.

METHODS

From a consecutive series of 905 patients (918 knees) that received primary TKAs, 261 (29%) patients (266 knees) received computed tomography (CT)-based posterior-stabilised cemented custom TKA. Knees were aligned aiming to preserve or restore constitutional alignment within predetermined limits of 85°-95° for femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA), and 175°-183° for hip knee ankle (HKA) angle. The KSS Knee and Function were collected preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, to determine if patients achieved SCB. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations between KSS scores (Knee and Function) and patient demographics as well as pre- and postoperative radiographic alignments.

RESULTS

Of the initial cohort of 261 patients, 4 (1.8%) were reoperated for patellar resurfacing, 1 (0.4%) for lavage to treat infection, and 1 (0.4%) had arthroscopy to treat a stiff knee with < 90° range of motion. Complete clinical records were available for 227 patients (232 knees, 87%) that comprised 102 men (5 bilateral) and 125 women. At 12-month follow-up, mean improvements in KSS Knee and Function scores were, respectively, 61.0 ± 13.0 and 42.7 ± 16.7, which exceeded the SCB of KSS. Comparison of knees inside versus outside the target zone revealed no differences in KSS Knee (94.1 ± 9.1 versus 94.3 ± 9.0, n.s.) and Function (96.1 ± 9.2 versus 96.3 ± 8.9, n.s.). Multivariable analysis revealed worse KSS Knee in knees with preoperative FMA > 95° (β = - 6.21; p = 0.023), but no association between KSS Function and patient demographics or pre- and postoperative radiographic alignments.

CONCLUSIONS

Custom TKA combined with personalised alignment yielded improvements that exceeded substantial clinical benefits of KSS Knee and Function scores. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of custom TKA with 'personalised alignment' and encourage further investigations using comparative studies at longer follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

Restricted kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of radiographic and clinical data

Introduction

Kinematic alignment (KA) has increased in popularity in recent years, becoming a viable alternative to MA with encouraging short- and mid-term follow-up results. Recently, the concept of restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) has been developed to restore native knee kinematics better, avoiding failure of coronal alignment. This systematic review aims to examine whether rKA improves outcome scores (PROMs) compared with MA and to evaluate the radiographic analysis of the lower limb alignment and the causes of complications and reoperations with the rKA approach.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The following key terms were used: "restricted kinematic alignment, rKA, kinematic alignment, primary total knee arthroplasty, primary total knee replacement, TKA rKA, and TKR rKA." The initial screening identified 328 studies. Each eligible article was evaluated according to the inclusion criteria: studies with levels of evidence (LoE) 1 to 4, written in English, published through May 2022, and involving human subjects. Criteria from the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) were used to assess the methodological quality of the articles.

Results

Six clinical studies were included in this systematic review. The study was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A total of 574 knees were included. After excluding patients due to loss of follow-up or missing data, 475 knees were analyzed. The following rKA-related data were evaluated: patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs), radiographic analysis of the lower limb alignment, and causes of complications and reoperations.

Conclusions

The rKA is an improved concept for restoring native knee kinematics, avoiding excessive coronal varus/valgus alignment. It provides equivalent or slightly better PROMs than MA without increasing the risk of short-middle-term implant failure. Clinical studies with extended follow-up are needed to confirm this trend.

Comparison of the clinical and patient-reported outcomes between medial stabilized and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is effective in relieving pain and improving function in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Both medial stabilized total knee arthroplasty (MS-TKA) and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA) can achieve satisfactory clinical results, but comparisons between MS-TKA and PS-TKA have yielded contradictory conclusions. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the differences in clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) between MS-TKA and PS-TKA.

METHODS

In December 2020, systematic searches of the following databases were undertaken: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov. Studies with PROMs comparing MS-TKA to PS-TKA were included. Meta-analysis was conducted for range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KFS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

RESULTS

There were 17 studies included in this review, 13 studies used for quantitative analysis, and 4 studies used for qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis concluded that the WOMAC mean difference (MD) for MS-TKA was 1.55 higher than for PS-TKA (MD = -1.55; 95 %CI = -2.45 to -0.64, P = 0.0008); however, this difference was less than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) value of 15. Assessment using the OKS determined that the MD for PS-TKA was 0.58 higher than for MS-TKA (MD = 0.58; 95 %CI = 0.25 to 0.91, P = 0.0006); again, this MD was less than the MCID value of 5. There were no significant differences between MS-TKA and PS-TKA when assessed by ROM (P = 0.23), KSS (P = 0.13), KFS (P = 0.61), or FJS (P = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Derived from numerous sources, utilizing a multitude of validated functional and patient-reported outcome assessment tools, there was no clinically evident advantage of MS-TKA compared to PS-TKA.

REGISTRATION

The registration number on PROSPERO is CRD42021228555.

Comparison of Functional Outcomes, Femoral Rollback and Sagittal Stability of Anterior-Stabilized Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has improved leaps and bounds in terms of design to improve clinical outcomes and achieve better rehabilitation of the patients. Ultra-congruent inserts (UC) were designed to replace the need for posterior stabilized (PS) implants. The purpose of this review was to evaluate clinical outcomes, femoral rollback, functional scores, range of motion, sagittal laxity, complication rates, and isokinetic performance between UC and PS TKA among RCTs.

METHODS

Electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, opengrey, and Cochrane were searched from date of inception up to mid-April 2021, and meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. This study analyzed outcomes, femoral rollback, tibial sagittal laxity and isokinetic performance.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs identified 852 knees, of which 420 underwent UC TKAs and 432 underwent PS TKA. Compared to UC TKA, a significantly better sagittal stability (p = 0.17) and femoral rollback (p < 0.00001) in PS TKAs was noted, although no statistically significant difference was found in the assessment of the range of motion (p = 0.19) and functional scores. Both the groups had similar isokinetic performance with extensor torque (p = 0.97) and flexor torque (p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude with the current meta-analysis that there are no added benefits for UC over PS inserts and these inserts have a higher sagittal laxity and less femoral roll back in cruciate sacrificing UC knee. But since there are no long-term wear data, UC inserts with CS technique should be used cautiously and may be used only when the PCL cannot be balanced adequately. There is no evidence or only a few to support the superiority of the AS TKA in terms of clinical outcomes or isokinetic performance or femoral external rotation over PS TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Early migration of a medially stabilized total knee arthroplasty : a radiostereometric analysis study up to two years

Aims

Medial pivot (MP) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were designed to mimic native knee kinematics with their deep medial congruent fitting of the tibia to the femur almost like a ball-on-socket, and a flat lateral part. GMK Sphere is a novel MP implant. Our primary aim was to study the migration pattern of the tibial tray of this TKA.

Methods

A total of 31 patients were recruited to this single-group radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study and received a medial pivot GMK Sphere TKA. The distributions of male patients versus female patients and right versus left knees were 21:10 and 17:14, respectively. Mean BMI was 29 kg/m² (95% confidence interval (CI) 27 to 30) and mean age at surgery was 63 years (95% CI 61 to 66). Maximum total point motions (MTPMs), medial, proximal, and anterior translations and transversal, internal, and varus rotations were calculated at three, 12, and 24 months. Patient-reported outcome measure data were also retrieved.

Results

MTPMs at three, 12, and 24 months were 1.0 mm (95% CI 0.8 to 1.2), 1.3 mm (95% CI 0.9 to 1.7), and 1.4 mm (0.8 to 2.0), respectively. The Forgotten Joint Score was 79 (95% CI 39 to 95) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score obtained at two years was 94 (95% CI 81 to 100), 86 (95% CI 75 to 93), 94 (95% CI 88 to 100), 69 (95% CI 48 to 88), and 81 (95% CI59 to 100) for Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sport & Recreation, and Quality of Life, respectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found that the mean increase in MTPM was lower than 0.2 mm between 12 and 24 months and thus apparently stable. Yet the GMK Sphere had higher migration at one and two years than anticipated. Based on current RSA data, we therefore cannot conclude on the long-term performance of the implant, pending further assessment.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):737–744.

Is varus-valgus constraint a reliable option in complex primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review

PURPOSE

Knee instability is considered one of the most frequent cause of failure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In order to address intraoperative instability, varus-valgus constrained knee implants (VVC) are increasingly utilized in primary TKA. Despite an increased risk of mechanical failure, short to mid-term results seem to be encouraging, but long-term results are still lacking.

METHODS

A systematic review of prospective and retrospective studies that reported clinical outcomes of patients with VVC systems in primary TKAs between 1990 and 2020 was performed.

RESULTS

In all, 28 articles met our inclusion criteria. A total of 2798 VVC implants were used in primary TKA. The all-cause revision-free survivorship was 95.2% at a mean follow-up of 7 years. Infection and aseptic loosening were the most common reasons for reoperation with an incidence of 1.8% and 1.7%, respectively. Overall complication rate was 9.6%, the most common complications were knee stiffness and infection with an incidence of 2.8% and 2.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VVC implants in primary TKA are associated with improved functional outcomes and good mid-term survivorship, comparable to lower level of constraint implants. Non-modular stemless seem to be reliable implants at mid-term follow-up. However, given the lack data coming from long-term studies, VVC implants should be used cautiously in primary TKA.

Is non-operative management of acetabular fracture a viable option for older patients? A systematic review of the literature for indication, treatments, complications and outcome

There is no consensus about the best treatment for acetabular fracture in older patients. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature looking for indication, perioperative information and outcome of nonoperative management for acetabular fractures in elderly.A systematic review of literature was performed on different research database by using various combination of the keywords "acetabular fracture", "elderly patients", "60 years", "nonoperative", "nonsurgical" and "conservative treatment".Six articles met our inclusion criteria, 315 patients aged 60 or more treated nonoperatively for acetabular fracture were included in the analysis. The average age was 78.1 years, the average follow-up length was 48.7 months. The main criteria for indication of nonoperative management for acetabular fractures were, old age (75 years or more), two or more important medical comorbidities, and minimally or undisplaced fracture. The most frequent fracture pattern was anterior column in 25.3% of cases. Fall from standard height was the most frequent causative mechanism in 80% of patients. A conversion total hip arthroplasty was performed after 8.3% of cases. A 1-year mortality of 18% was reported, an overall mortality of 33.1% at last follow-up was reported.The management of acetabular fractur in elderly is a challenging problem and there is no consensus about the best treatment. Currently, multiple treatment options have been suggested, depending on fracture pattern and patients' general conditions. Although operatively treatment allow for an early recovery, there is not an high level of evidence about the superiority in terms or complications and mortality rate compared to nonoperative treatment.