Early loss of angular kyphosis correction in patients with thoracolumbar vertebral burst (A3-A4) fractures who underwent percutaneous pedicle screws fixation

Short-segment percutaneous fusion versus open posterior fusion with screw in the fractured vertebra for thoracolumbar junction burst vertebral fracture treatment

Objectives

The treatment options for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures remain a topic of controversy. Short-segment percutaneous fixation (SSPF) and short-segment open fixation including the fractured level (SSOFIFL) are both viable procedures for managing these fractures. At present, there is a lack of evidence in the literature demonstrating the absolute superiority of one treatment over the other. This study aimed to compare these two surgical strategies with a focus on radiological and clinical outcomes.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective case-control multicenter analysis involved patients with A3 and A4 vertebral fractures at the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) who underwent surgical treatment with either SSPF or SSOFIFL in the participating centers. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale (VAS) both pre- and postoperatively. Radiological outcomes included kyphotic deformity (KD), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), segmental kyphosis, and sagittal alignment parameters.

Results

A total of 156 patients were enrolled in the study, with 81 patients in Group A (SSPF) and 75 patients in Group B (SSOFIFL). Group B demonstrated better correction of KD (Group B: 3.4 ± 2.7° vs. Group A: 8.3 ± 3.2°, P = 0.003), AVBH, and sagittal alignment. A minor loss of correction was observed in Group B with respect to Group A (0.9 ± 1.7° vs 4.3° ± 2.1°, P = 0.043). Blood losses were lower in Group A (78 ± 15 min vs. 118 ± 23 min, P = 0.021) as well as during surgery (121.3 ± 34 mL vs. 210.2 ± 52 mL, P = 0.031), but the post-operative hemoglobin levels were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

SSOFIFL appears to show a major amount of KD correction and prevent loss of correction. This technique should be the preferred choice whenever possible. However, SSPF can be considered a valid alternative for damage control in polytrauma patients and fractures with low KD.

Usefulness of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Lower Lumbar Burst (A3-A4) Fractures: Comparative Study with Thoracolumbar Junction Fractures

Background

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) without fusion has been recently recommended in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches and to restore range of motion. However, those studies report on the thoracolumbar junction, and there is no report on lower lumbar fracture.

Purpose

To assess effectiveness of PPSF without fusion for treating lower lumbar burst (A3 and A4) fractures.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 50 patients with AO type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fracture underwent PPSF. Patients were divided into a thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) group (T11-L2) and lower lumbar (LL) group (L3-5). The following items were measured and compared between the two groups. Vertebral height and consolidation, retropulsed fragment, sagittal curve and fixation failure were assessed with certain interval regularly.

Results

The average height at pre- and post-reduction were 56.2% (36.2-74.3), 95.3% (84.2-98.3) in TLJ group and 65.7% (45.7-86.2), 91% (73.1-100) in LL group. The average canal area occupancy rate at pre- and post-reduction were 46.1% (37.4%-67.5%), 38.1% (31.3%-40.8%) in TLJ group and 40.4% (15.0-65.7), 19.3% (9.4-26.6) in LL group. Consolidation was completed within 12 months after surgery in both groups. There was no significant difference between two groups in clinical and radiographic parameters except cobb angle loss.

Conclusion

Patients with lower lumbar fracture can be effectively managed with PPSF without fusion. PPSF following the implant removal can restore the movement of the lower lumbar spine, which is essential for daily life.

Efficacy of a novel percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and vertebral reconstruction versus the traditional open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of single-level thoracolumbar fracture without neurologic deficit

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a novel percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and vertebral reconstruction (PPSR) vs. that of open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 153 patients who underwent PPSR and 176 patients who received OPSF. Periprocedural characteristics, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation duration was 93.843 ± 20.611 in PPSR group and 109.432 ± 11.903 in OPSF group; blood loss was 131.118 ± 23.673 in PPSR group and 442.163 ± 149.701 in OPSF group, incision length was 7.280 ± 1.289 in PPSR group and 14.527 ± 2.893 in OPSF group, postoperative stay was 8.732 ± 1.864 in PPSR group and 15.102 ± 2.117 in OPSF group, and total hospitalization costs were 59027.196 ± 8687.447 in PPSR group and 73144.432 ± 11747.567 in OPSF group. These results indicated that these parameters were significantly lower in PPSR compared with those in OPSF group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of complications between the two groups. The radiographic parameters including height of the anterior vertebra, Cobb angle, and vertebral wedge angle were better in PPSR group than in OPSF group. Recovery rate of AVH was 0.449 ± 0.079 in PPSR group and 0.279 ± 0.088 in OPSF group. Analysis of clinical results revealed that during postoperative period, the VAS and ODI scores in PPSR group were lower than those in OPSF group.

Conclusions

Collectively, these results indicated that PPSR more effectively restored the height of anterior vertebra and alleviated local kyphosis compared with OPSF. Moreover, the VAS and ODI scores in PPSR group were better than those of OPSF group.

Porous titanium microsphere kyphoplasty for augmentation treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: Technical report and case series

Background

Vertebral augmentation procedures (VAPs) are used in cases of persistent and unresponsive pain in patients with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Although VAPs are considered a safe procedure providing quick pain relief and improved physical function, some postoperative complications can occur, for example, bone cement leakage. The material used in this procedure is almost exclusively polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), which appears to lack biological activity and osteointegration capabilities. In this study, we introduce a new filling system consisting of cannulas preloaded with titanium microspheres, which stabilizes and consolidates the structure of the vertebral body in treating VCFs after the performance of the kyphoplasty procedure.

Methods

We report a retrospective case series of six patients affected by osteoporotic vertebral fractures with worsening back pain, neurologic impairment, and failed conservative treatment who underwent the VAP at our institute, for which the SPHEROPLAST [MT ORTHO s.r.l., Aci Sant'Antonio (CT), Italy] system was used.

Results

The patients had failed an average conservative trial of 3.9 weeks before they presented to us with neurodeficit. There were two men and four women with a mean age of 74.5 years. The average hospital stay was 2 days. There were no reported perioperative complications related to cement injection, such as intraoperative hypoxia, hypotension, pulmonary embolization, myocardial infarction, neurovascular or viscera injury, or death. The VAS score significantly decreased from a mean preoperative of 7.5 (range 6-19) to 3.8 (range 3-5) immediately after surgery and 1.8 (range 1-3).

Conclusion

We report the first clinical results in a series of six patients treated for VCF using the microsphere system after analyzing the clinical results produced by, and the complications that arose from, this new device. In patients with VCF, the VAP using titanium microspheres appears to be a feasible and safe procedure with a low risk of material leakage.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Symptomatic Bone Cement Displacement following Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Single Center Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic bone cement displacement (BCD) is a rare complication following percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) interventions for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). This study aimed to investigate the incidence and the outcomes of symptomatic BCD comprehensively and identify its risk factors.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients treated with PKP for OVCF between January 2012 and December 2020 were extracted. Patients who developed BCD following PKP during follow-up were divided into the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. Patients who did not develop BCD were assigned to the control group. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to compare the three clinical groups' features to assess the independent risk factors for the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups.

RESULTS

A total of 896 patients were enrolled. Twenty-one patients (2.3%) were identified as having symptomatic BCD following PKP for OVCF, and 35 (3.9%) developed asymptomatic BCD. Compared with the control group, the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups had a higher incidence of anterior leakage, intravertebral vacuum cleft (IVC) signs, and a lower cement distribution score. The symptomatic group had a lower relative cross-sectional area (rCSA) of the paraspinal muscle (PSM), higher PSM fatty degeneration, and higher kyphotic angle (at the last follow-up) than the asymptomatic and control groups. For outcomes, the symptomatic group had a higher VAS/ODI score and a higher incidence of new vertebral fractures compared with the asymptomatic and control groups. Anterior leakage (OR: 1.737, 95% CI: 1.215-3.300), the IVC sign (OR: 3.361, 95% CI: 1.605-13.036), the cement distribution score (OR: 0.476, 95% CI: 0.225-0.904), PSM rCSA (OR: 0.953, 95% CI: 0.917-0.992), and PSM fatty degeneration (OR: 1.061, 95% CI: 1.005-1.119) were identified as independent risk factors for the symptomatic group. Anterior leakage (OR: 1.839, 95% CI: 1.206-2.803), the IVC sign (OR: 2.936, 95% CI: 1.174-9.018), and cement distribution score (OR: 0.632, 95% CI: 0.295-0.858) were independent risk factors for the asymptomatic group.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of symptomatic BCD is 2.3% in patients treated with PKP. Anterior leakage, the IVC sign, and the distribution score were independent risk factors for BCD, and paraspinal muscle degeneration was a specific risk factor for symptomatic BCD. Symptomatic BCD can lead to poor outcomes.

Posterior Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Fixation Versus Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for Thoraco-Lumbar Spinal Metastases Palliative Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Surgical palliative treatment of spinal metastases (SM) could influence the quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients, since the spine represents the most common site of secondary bony localization. Traditional open posterior instrumented fusion (OPIF) and Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) became the main surgical treatment alternatives for SM, but in Literature there is no evidence that describes the absolute superiority of one treatment over the other.

Materials and Methods

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on PPSF versus OPIF in patients with SM, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The outcomes of interest were: complications, blood loss, infections, mortality, pain and also the Quality of Life (QoL).

Results

There were a total of 8 studies with 448 patients included in the meta-analyses. Postoperative complications were more frequent in OPIF (odds ratio of 0.48. 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.83; p= 0.01), PPFS was associated with blood loss (odds ratio -585.70. 95% IC, -848.28 to -323.13.69; p< 0.0001) and a mean hospital stay (odds ratio -3.77. 95% IC, -5.92 to -1.61; p= 0.0006) decrease. The rate of infections was minor in PPFS (odds ratio of 0.31. 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.81; p= 0.02) whereas the occurrence of reinterventions (0.76. 95% CI, 0.25 to 2.27; p= 0.62) and the mortality rate was similar in both groups (odds ratio of 0.79. 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.58; p= 0.51). Finally, we also evaluated pre and post-operative VAS and the meta-analysis suggested that both techniques have a similar effect on pain.

Discussion and Conclusion

The PPSF treatment is related with less complications, a lower rate of infections, a reduction in intraoperative blood loss and a shorter hospital stay compared to the OPIF treatment. However, further randomized clinical trials could confirm the results of this meta-analysis and provide a superior quality of scientific evidence.

[Short-term effectiveness of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with intravertebral allograft by different methods for thoracolumbar fractures]

Objective

To investigate the short-term effectiveness of percutaneous pedicle fixation combined with intravertebral allograft by different methods for thoracolumbar fractures.

Methods

The clinical data of 94 patients with single segment thoracolumbar fracture who underwent percutaneous pedicle fixation combined with intravertebral allograft by different methods between October 2018 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different methods of intravertebral allograft, they were divided into group A (bone grafting by Jack dilator, 40 cases) and group B (bone grafting by funnel, 54 cases). There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in the gender, age, body mass index, cause of injury, injured segment, Wolter index, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, injured vertebral height ratio, and Cobb angle. The operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, allograft volume, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. VAS score of low back pain was used to evaluate the remission of clinical symptoms before operation, at 3 days, 3 months, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The injured vertebral height ratio and Cobb angle were measured before operation, at 3 days, 3 months, and 12 months after operation.

Results

The operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, and allograft volume in group A were significantly higher than those in group B ( P<0.05). No complication occurred after operation, such as loosening or fracture of internal fixation. And bone grafting in the injured vertebrae healed at last follow-up. The VAS score, injured vertebral height ratio, and Cobb angle at each postoperative time point significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); compared with 3 days postoperatively, the VAS score improved further after 3 months, but the injured vertebral height ratio decreased and the Cobb angle increased, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS scores of low back pain between the two groups at each time point after operation ( P>0.05); the injured vertebrae height ratio in group A was significantly higher than that in group B, and the Cobb angle was significantly lower than that in group B, all showing significant differences ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

The intravertebral allograft via Jack dilator can restore the height and decrease the Cobb angle of the injured vertebrae, but accompanied with higher fluoroscopy frequency and longer operation time when compared with funnel bone grafting. For patients with single level thoracolumbar fractures, intravertebral allograft via Jack dilator is recommended.

Clinical effect of a novel transpedicular reducer for reduction and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures

BACKGROUND

Short-segment transpedicular screw fixation is a common method for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures (TBFs),but this technique has many problems. Therefore,the purpose of this article is to observe and evaluate the clinical efficacy of a novel transpedicular reducer that we designed for fractured vertebral body reduction and bone grafting in the treatment of TBFs.

METHODS

From July 2018 to November 2020, 70 cases of TBFs were included. Thirty-five patients were treated with the novel transpedicular reducer for reduction and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation (observation group), and 35 patients were treated with short-segment transpedicular screw fixation (control group). Before the operation, after reduction, and 3 days, 3 months,and 12 months after the operation, the two groups were assessed, and compared with respect to the anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebrae, the ratios of the anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebral body to the respective heights of the adjacent uninjured vertebral bodies (AVBHr and MVBHr, respectively), and the Cobb angle of the patients. We compared the pain VAS score and quality of life GQOL-74 score at the last follow-up. Finally,we evaluated the distribution of bone grafts and bone healing 12 months after the operation.

RESULTS

The anterior height, middle height, AVBHr, MVBHr, and Cobb angle of the injured vertebral body in the observation after reduction, and 3 days, 3 months and 12 months post-operatively were compared with those of the injured vertebral body before operation. All of these parameters were improved, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). These parameters in the observation group at the above time points were significantly better than thoes in the control group at the corresponding time points (p < 0.05). The VAS scores at the last follow-up were significantly better than those of the control group (p < 0.05), but the GQOL-74 score differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The observation group showed no obvious defects on CT at 12 months after the operation, and the bone healing was good.

CONCLUSION

The novel transpedicular reducer for reduction and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation for TBFs has good clinical efficacy.