A meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of syndesmotic injury treated with metal screw, dynamic fixation, and bioabsorbable screw

Primary Ankle Fracture Dislocation Is Not a Negative Prognostic Factor for the Surgical Treatment of Syndesmotic Injury-A Retrospective Analysis of 246 Patients

Background/Objectives: Acute ankle sprains are common injuries that significantly affect both sports and daily activities. Syndesmotic injuries, a specific type of ligamentous damage, can occur as a part of a sprain or alongside fractures, affecting approximately 20% of ankle fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate negative prognostic factors influencing surgical outcomes in tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries associated with ankle fractures. Methods: Data from 246 patients were analyzed to examine the impact of initial ankle dislocation, fracture type, and fixation method on postoperative complications and reoperation rates. Ankle joint fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using an anatomically contoured plate designed for optimal tibia and fibula fixation. Four methods of syndesmosis fixation were recorded: one three-cortical screw, one four-cortical screw, two screws (either both four-cortex screws or one three-cortex and one four-cortex screw), or one endobutton. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: Key findings reveal no significant association between initial dislocation and the necessity for reoperation (p = 0.613). However, smoking combined with dislocation significantly increases reoperation rates (35% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.026). Fixation type influenced outcomes, with single four-cortex screws linked to pain but fewer infections. Infection was the most common complication (33.3%), predominantly after fixation with a single three-cortex screw. Men had higher rates of fixation destabilization and infections, while women experienced pain persisting beyond six months postoperatively Conclusions: Patient-specific factors influence syndesmotic injury outcomes. Smoking, gender, and fixation type impact complications, emphasizing the need for tailored surgical approaches to enhance recovery and minimize reoperation risks. Future research should aim to corroborate these findings in larger, multicentric cohorts to refine surgical strategies for syndesmotic injury management.

Management of Juvenile Osteochondral Fractures Utilising Absorbable PLGA Implants

The incidence of articular injury, particularly osteochondral fractures (OCFs), has seen a cinnotable increase in recent years. Regardless of their location, fragments can be overlooked by plain radiographs, which might lead to osteoarthritis in the long run. Diagnostic imaging has a pivotal role in the assessment and classification of the fracture severity, as well as the presence of any associated dislocations. These fractures require surgical intervention for the restoration of joint function and the reduction of long-term complications. This paper aims to present the surgical correction and post-operative treatment of osteochondral fractures with absorbable implants in four children. The following affected areas are discussed: lateral condyle of the femur, patella and radial head. Utilising absorbable implants for the management of OCFs provides numerous advantages, including the elimination of the need for re-anaesthesia and reoperation, reduction of complications and facilitation of early rehabilitation. This approach also minimises the period of hospitalisation and proves effective in pediatric OCF treatment.

Comparison of Suture Button and Syndesmotic Screw for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

The syndesmotic screw (SS) and suture button (SB) fixation methods are both widely used for the reduction of ankle syndesmotic injury, with varying outcomes.

Purpose

To review recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the outcomes between SS and SB fixation for ankle syndesmotic injury.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant RCTs published between 1966 and 2021 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing SS and SB fixation for ankle syndesmotic injury. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Primary outcomes included complications, malreduction, and unplanned reoperation, and secondary outcomes were the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS), and EuroQol-5 Domain (EQ-5D) score. The mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Random- or fixed-effects model was applied according to heterogeneity.

Results

Of 389 studies, 8 RCTs involving 512 patients were included. Overall, 257 patients received SS fixation and 255 patients received SB fixation. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in malreduction (RR, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.07) or EQ-5D (MD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03). However, the SB group showed significant advantages over the SS group in complications (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.66), unplanned reoperation (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.89), AOFAS score (MD, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.77 to 4.31), and OMAS (MD, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.54 to 7.48). The risk of bias of the included studies was acceptable.

Conclusion

The results showed that there were no significant differences between the SS and SB groups in malreduction and EQ-5D scores. However, the SB group had significantly better local irritation rates, unplanned reoperation rates, AOFAS scores, and OMASs.

Management of Syndesmosis Injury: A Narrative Review

The syndesmosis is an important fibrous joint that plays a crucial role in normal ankle weight-bearing and movements. Syndesmosis injuries include disruption of one or more of the ligaments comprising the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and are commonly associated with ankle fractures. The treatment of grade 1 syndesmosis injury should be conservative, such as immobilization for one to three weeks followed by gradual return to activity. For the treatment of grade 2 syndesmosis injury, if it was stable enough, the patients still could be managed with conservative therapies. But majority of them strongly favor surgical treatment. For the treatment of grade 3 syndesmosis injury, it should treat with surgical reconstruction. If syndesmosis injury is associated with ankle fractures, surgical reduction, fixation, and reconstruction are usually required. Common surgical treatment methods include syndesmosis screws, composed of either metallic or bioabsorbable material; fibula intramedullary nails; and dynamic button-suture fixation, TightRope or ZipTight. Each method has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered while determining which treatment will provide the best outcomes depending on the patient's needs. Continued exploration of new materials, devices, and methods for surgical fixation is necessary for advancement in this field.